4 Ways Paul Ryan’s Budget Would Devastate the Poor
National media attention has focused on Rep. Paul Ryan’s (R-WI) drastic restructuring of the Medicare program, detailing the Vice Presidential candidate’s efforts to transform the current benefit guarantee into a “premium support” program for future enrollees.
But Romney/Ryan’s most devastating changes would impact programs that serve society’s most vulnerable citizens. American who rely on Medicaid, food stamps and Pell grants won’t be afforded the luxury of retaining their existing benefits, should Romney and Ryan implement their plans; these programs would experience immediate reductions if the Ryan budget becomes law (via CBPP):

1. CUTS FOOD STAMPS BY $133 BILLION: Ryan’s budget would send the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, or food stamps) back to the states as a block grant and cut the program by $134 billion. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, “an average of almost 10 million people would have to be cut from the program in the years from 2016 through 2022 to achieve the required savings.” If the cuts were to come from benefits, rather than kicking families out of the program, “All families of four — including the poorest — would see their benefits cut by about $90 a month in fiscal year 2016, or more than $1,100 on an annual basis.” Ryan continually claims that the food stamp program is “unsustainable,” even though the numbers show that’s simply not the case.
2. CUTS MEDICAID BY 1/3%: Ryan would treat Medicaid in the same way: transform the exiting matching-grant financing structure into a pre-determined block grant that will not keep up with actual health care spending and send it back to the states. This would shift some of the burden of Medicaid’s growing costs to the states, forcing them to — in the words of the CBO — make cutbacks that “involve reduced eligibility for Medicaid and CHIP, coverage of fewer services, lower payments to providers, or increased cost sharing by beneficiaries—all of which would reduce access to care.” The reductions to Medicaid kick in right away: between 2013 and 2022, the budget makes $1.4 trillion in cuts to Medicaid —a 34 percent reduction. As a result, states could reduce enrollment by more than 14 million people, or almost 20 percent—even if they are were able to slow the growth in health care costs substantially.
3. 30 MILLION AMERICANS WOULD LOSE HEALTH COVERAGE: Romney and Ryan would repeal the Affordable Care Act, including the subsidies for middle-class Americans to purchase coverage and the expansion of the Medicaid program for lower-income Americans. As a result, more than 30 million Americans would lose access to insurance. The popular regulations that prohibit insurers from denying coverage to people with pre-existing conditions and rescinding coverage would also be repealed.
4. CUTS PELL GRANTS FOR 1 MILLION STUDENTS: Ryan consistently claims that increases in financial aid are driving up the cost of higher education, even though evidence doesn’t back him up. The budget Ryan authored, according to an analysis by the Education Trust, would eliminate Pell Grants entirely for one million students. In 2011, 74 percent of Pell Grant recipients had family incomes of $30,000 or less. These cuts would come despite the fact that the price of a college degree has skyrocketed 1,120 percent over the last three decades.
CONNECT














8 comments on "4 Ways Paul Ryan’s Budget Would Devastate the Poor"
August 18, 2012 1:10pm
McCain flip-flopped on everything NOT TO WIN.......with a little help from "wink-wink you betcha"
RYAN is going to attack everything.....cutting foodstamps ?? Social Security? Healthcare?? Educatiion?? DID HE MISS ANYTHING ???
ANOTHER ELECTION THROWN - WHILE ATTEMPTING TO SHOW HOW MUCH THEY WANT TO "WIN????"
...WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO AMERICAN VALUES........RUNNING FOR OFFICE TO DESTROY OUR COUNTRY... General Benedict Arnold said what he is doing "WAS WHAT WAS BEST FOR THE COUNTRY?????
ISN'T THAT NOW WHAT THE REPUBLICANS ARE SAYING...history repeats itself ?.?.?.? He who forgets the past RELIVES IT.....the world is a circle - what goes around comes back around
take your pick they all seem to apply
. . . . When I say Social Security they have already raised the age requirements....shh don't tell anyone SECRET...????????
August 17, 2012 4:00pm
The long term plan for conservatives, is to deny a quality education for poor people...
Education in any form is not a priority.... Karl Rove said it best (paraphrasing), When people become educated, they tend to vote Democrat.
August 17, 2012 6:53pm
ARCH:
I think the Republicans figured that Americans don't need degrees to flip hamburgers for McDonald's, or stock shelves for WalMart, so why help young people get an education they can't use, and will only make them dissatisfied?
You gotta hand it to the Republicans. They know how to save money for the 1%. Why waste it on the 99%?
August 17, 2012 12:41pm
DEMAND
NO AUSTERITY
1% WALL STREET TRANSACTION TAX
http://Tarpley.net
August 17, 2012 11:51am
One difference between the federal and state budgets is that the federal government has the unlimited ability to print money (federal deficits only effect inflation, not a problem today but could be in the future if the economy ever recovers), the states actually need to balance their budgets.
So moving items you want to limit or kill to the state is a wining strategy for the politician at the expense of the constituents relying on the program.
August 17, 2012 11:35am
The merciless greed of the wealthy is no longer shocking to me.
Neither is the blatant service of it by the Republican party.
More shocking to me is how ineffectual the Dem party has become in countering it, and how complicit Obama has been with it.
Just remember that Wall Street funded Obama's 2008 campaign. Just remember that when the bankster CEOs paid bonuses totalling billions in 2009 to themselves and other bankster execs, with bail-out money, after millions lost their homes, jobs and futures, Obama went on TV to pay his respects to these "savvy businessmen" he said he knew. He even said he did not begrudge them their wealth. Also just remember that it was Obama who in 2009 and again in 2010 put Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid on the table.
August 17, 2012 7:01pm
Gee, and here I thought it was millions of middle-class progressives, and starry-eyed young people, who got Obama elected.
As for Social Security on the table, I refer you to the "guarantees" the VP recently made about Social Security and the President. I feel safer with my SS and Medicare in the hands of Obama than in the hands of Romney-Ryan, and for me that's the bottom line, though I know some seem to love their hatred of the President.
August 17, 2012 10:17am
Ryan consistently claims that increases in financial aid are driving up the cost of higher education, even though evidence doesn’t back him up-- false note medicaid expansion is being reject by most states Mo democrat gov for one
Ryan continually claims that the food stamp program is “unsustainable,” even though the numbers show that’s simply not the case. unfortunately ryan is correct