Article image
Robert Scheer
Truthdig / Truthdig Op-Ed
Published: Saturday 6 July 2013
The fact that Edward Snowden was essential to raising this issue and enabling debate establishes his bonafides as a much-needed whistle-blower.

America’s New Cold War: Why the Allies Side With Snowden

Article image

There is a depressing statistical comparison that should shame all of us who voted twice for Barack Obama’s ascent to the White House. Our man, a former constitutional law professor who pledged to reverse the Bush administration’s abuses of national security concerns, has charged seven government whistle-blowers, including Edward J. Snowden, with violating the Espionage Act. That’s more than double the combined three charged with leaking classified information by all previous presidents, George W. Bush included.

The defense of his unprecedented prosecution of those who dare tell us the truth is that we live in particularly dangerous times, an obviously absurd notion given the civil wars, foreign threats and other sources of mayhem periodically experienced by most of the world’s nations. At its best, the “metadata” aggregation, including the logs of all email traffic and telephone calls, is a paranoid assault on our right to personal space enshrined in the Fourth Amendment. At worst it is an out of control grab for worldwide power over the new information age. 

As a New York Times account Sunday suggests, “A close reading of Mr. Snowden’s documents shows the extent to which the eavesdropping agency now has two new roles: It is a data cruncher, with an appetite to sweep up, and hold for years, a staggering variety of information. And it is an intelligence force armed with cyberweapons, assigned not just to monitor foreign computers but also, if necessary, to attack.”

A surveillance power run amok? The latest disclosures from Snowden’s leaks published in the German magazine Der Spiegel on Sunday turn out to have nothing to do with national security and everything to do with a compulsive and unseemly snooping not only into the lives of ordinary citizens throughout the world but also into the diplomatic correspondence, including trade and other negotiating strategies, of some of our closest allies. 

How inconvenient to the outraged innocence of the National Security Agency and its private for-profit counterpart Booz Allen Hamilton to find the names of France, Italy, Japan and Mexico among the 38 embassies and missions bugged at will by our electronic spooks, along with the Washington and Brussels office of the European Union. The code-named Dropmire bugging of the encrypted fax machine at the EU and other invasions of the organization’s private data were, as The Guardian summarized Sunday the content of the leaked documents, “to gather inside knowledge of policy disagreements on global issues and other rifts between member states.”

Germany is one of those member states, prompting that nation’s justice minister to declare Sunday: “If the media reports are correct, this brings to memory actions among enemies during the Cold War. ... If it is true that EU representations in Brussels and Washington were indeed tapped by the American secret service, it can hardly be explained with the argument of fighting terrorism.”

This was a sentiment echoed by French President Francois Hollande on Monday: “We demand that this stop immediately. ... There’s enough evidence for us to ask for an explanation.” And French technology minister Fleur Pellerin was so impressed with the significance of the information leaked by Snowden that she entertained the idea of an international whistle-blower protection for individuals who leak information exposing what they believe is illegal activity. “There is no international statute that allows for the protection of these people if necessary,” Pellerin said Monday. “I think it is a good occasion to get into the subject, which is a gray area of international law.”

So was Snowden a “traitor,” as both California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein and former Vice President Dick Cheney have insisted, or a genuine whistle-blower, as some of our allies are beginning to grasp for letting folks around the world in on the dirty secrets of U.S. intelligence? Put another way, how could Feinstein, who heads the Senate Intelligence Committee, and Cheney, who used supposedly secret data on WMDs to lie us into the Iraq War, not have been in the know on the sordid details that Snowden shared with the rest of us? And if they thought such activities to be admirable, why were they unwilling to inform the public of the extent of the surveillance programs?

Nor can they claim to be horrified by the very act of leaking secret information, since both know well that is the norm in the Washington practice of governance. Just ask outed former CIA agent Valerie Plame. Or in a rare instance of a highly placed official possibly being held accountable, there is the example of Gen. James E. Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 2007 to 2011, who is reported to be the target of an investigation into the leak of classified information to The New York Times concerning U.S. cyberattacks on Iran’s nuclear program. 

Cartwright is being represented by former Obama White House counsel Gregory B. Craig, and you can rest assured that he will not be charged with violating the Espionage Act or called a traitor by the likes of Cheney and Feinstein. The information he is suspected of leaking made our government look good, or at least those in power will think so.

Our government is treating Snowden as the most dangerous global outlaw because the information he released does not make us look good. Quite the contrary, it has, for the first time, forced an international debate on the threat of routine government electronic surveillance to the very notion of individual freedom. Even President Obama, while vilifying Snowden and insisting that “The American people don’t have a Big Brother who is snooping into their business,” has suggested that we need to weigh the tradeoffs.

“When he says he wants to have a debate on this issue, he passed on every opportunity to have a debate about it,” Jennifer Hoelzer, a former aide to Oregon Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden (who attempted in vain to get such a discussion going), pointed out to The New York Times on Friday. “You had to wait until someone illegally disclosed it? That seems disingenuous.”

That someone was Snowden, and the fact that he was essential to raising this issue and enabling debate establishes his bonafides as a much-needed whistle-blower.



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange
Author pic
ABOUT Robert Scheer
Robert Scheer, editor in chief of Truthdig, has built a reputation for strong social and political writing over his 30 years as a journalist. His columns appear in newspapers across the country, and his in-depth interviews have made headlines. He conducted the famous Playboy magazine interview in which Jimmy Carter confessed to the lust in his heart and he went on to do many interviews for the Los Angeles Times with Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and many other prominent political and cultural figures.

Top Stories

6 comments on "America’s New Cold War: Why the Allies Side With Snowden"

Raytech's picture
Raytech

July 08, 2013 7:20am

Guess they don't side with him that much! EU says U.S. trade talks should go ahead despite spying allegations. http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/07/02/uk-usa-security-trade-idUKBRE96...

Peter Tocci

July 06, 2013 1:29pm

Here are the main things Mr Scheer and most Americans don’t get.
• It is a gigantic ERROR to frame this outrage in terms of what governments are doing. It’s not government(s) per se doing the surveillance, though they are the mechanisms of it. This is part and parcel of the Illuminati’s Orwellian (George Orwell, “1984”) global fascist human-control system rapidly coming together, of which the US Gov’t is a tool.

• Wall Street (Illuminati handmaiden) types originally created the military/intelligence nexus with operatives in Government, shortly after the turn of the 20th century, to serve business interests (the bankers). They have not relinquished control. The system is in place, for one thing, to ‘enforce’ the legalized crime of private/central banking, the Illuminati’s death grip (usury) on peoples and ‘participating’ governments (all Western, now being spread in the ME), and the cause of all America’s wars.

• There is no terrorist threat of the kind publicized by the terrorist “warriors’ other than what the terrorist “warriors” themselves create. It is a protection racket. Western money has been poured into the Islamic world to lay the groundwork for the Islamofascist Drama. This is what the Elite do: Create chaos to which ‘solutions’ are applied that advance the Agenda. Oh, they can hurt us with their false-flag operations, like the recent Marathon bombing, but to give in is absolute slavery. Forget “tradeoffs.” That’s pure propaganda, because...

• “National Security” is one of the greatest covers for crime ever devised. It’s designed to fool those who’ve bought the brainwash of the system (most Americans), which the Elite own, lock, stock, and barrel. It’s just a great Drama of contrived threats that the “boyscouts” of the various national entities play out, often sincerely.

• Snowden has revealed nothing that anyone who’s done a modicum of conspiracy research doesn’t already know, though it seems he’s scratched a new surface. AND, the whole thing could be an operation, or insider power struggle (on the idea of the Plame scenario). But what do you think is meant by “New World Order” other than the Orwellian surveillance/police state?

• Truth is spoken by corporate insider and 9/11 whistleblower Richard Andrew Grove: “And it's worth mentioning that the NSA doesn't have a "secret relationship" with AT&T, GTE, and all of the other telephone companies, because they ARE the telephone companies. And there's a 1996 regulation wherein approximately $10 billion of U.S. Taxpayer money was used to modernize and upgrade the NSA's ability to monitor, process, and/or record each and every single telephone interaction that goes on anywhere in the country--to say the least." freewebs.com/abigsecret/Grove.html
The apparent separation between Government and the corporate monolith is a grand illusion. Another great Drama.

• Get it?

• We are being played (and having our wealth stolen as economic slaves) by our beliefs about the way things are.

• Get it?

pitch1934

July 06, 2013 12:28pm

Wasn't it John Dulles who aid "Gentlemen don't spy on each other."? Boy, was he wrong. Let's face it, all governments spy or try to. However, not all governments spy like crazy on their own citizens.

CASnyder

July 08, 2013 7:06pm

Gov'ts fear their own citizens more than any outside forces - most change comes from within. They want to keep their finger on the pulse of dissent via spying, in case they need to take out a key leader, which can range from character assasination to the real thing. Govt's aren't gentlemen.

Norman Allen's picture
Norman Allen

July 06, 2013 11:30am

We pay government to protect us through rational means (military:Army, Navy, Airforce; police, economic planning/regulation; open and honest communication with US, THE PEOPLE). We do not want a 1984 type of Big Bully stalking everybody in the world and everything we do. Government is OUR SERVANT, not our master as the officials seems to think. True, they are organized but that is because we authorized them. When a government steps its function, those abusing power should be brought to justice just like ordinary criminals. We must create an independent commission (not bipartisan but non-partisan representing all segments of the society, especially those who pay most of the taxes) to determine who committed crime then bring him/her to justice: and put them away. As for the structure of stalking, it should be dismantled. We spend enough on defense to stop anyone ever thinking attacking us. Sept. 11 needs to be reinvestigated to determine the who, how, why, of the incident. Unless we find how that event happened, we will be chasing ghosts at the expense of our long term viability. We cannot afford spending money on perpetual wars on all the world. We must create a saner world in cooperation with all the nations than what is being pursued now.

Theodore Ziolkowski

July 06, 2013 9:50am

THIS IS A COLD WAR WE CANNOT WIN, BECAUSE IT IS A WAR IN WHICH WE ARE ON THE WRONG SIDE. ONE CAN NOT SUPPORT AN IMMORAL ACTION AND LAWS AND THINK YOU CAN HAVE THE LORD SUPPORT YOUR WAR. REMEMBER TO ADD BRADLEY MANNING TO THE REASONS WE WILL LOOSE THIS COLD WAR.