Shannon Hayes
YES! Magazine / Op-Ed
Published: Wednesday 11 July 2012
“As a homeschooling mom, I occasionally envy non-homeschooling parents who have the luxury of blaming outside influences for their children’s shortcomings.”

The Audacity of Acting Out: What Our Kids Can Teach Us

Article image

Saoirse and Ula are three years apart. Saoirse, 8, is unusually tall, slender, well-spoken, and comes across to grown-ups as particularly well-behaved and extraordinarily poised.

Ula isn’t any of those things. At 5, she’s about a foot shorter than her sister, demonstrates an ability to move exceptionally heavy objects for a child of her proportions, has a wandering eye, wears glasses, and acts on impulse. I have been mulling over how I am supposed to help her work with that last attribute.

A few days ago, Ula and her best friend Katharine were having a tea party in the living room. Saoirse, who can’t help but be admired, adored, and obeyed by all younger children (except her sister), interrupted the tea party with a sing-song announcement: “It’s puzzle hour, kids!  Now we’re all going to put puzzles together!” She proceeded to open up a series of jigsaw puzzles and push aside the tea party. Ula didn’t warm to the idea. She began pitching cardboard puzzle pieces at her sister. Katharine joined her.

Saoirse stormed off in frustration, seeking adult intervention. Bob and I didn’t yell at anyone. We just helped Saoirse find a quiet space where she could have some alone time free from non-compliant five-year-olds.

Later on, after Katharine went home and we were sitting quietly together with Ula, Bob opened the conversation, suggesting that throwing puzzle pieces at her sister wasn’t an appropriate response to the situation, no matter how bossy her sister was being.

He looked to me for back-up commentary. I avoided his eyes and tried not to laugh. “That’s right, Daddy,” I tried to muster. I covered my mouth so Ula wouldn’t see it twitch. But Daddy saw it. And he couldn’t control it either. We both burst into laughter. Ula patiently waited for her scolding to resume. 

We tried a second time with a few weak platitudes, like “throwing things is never appropriate.” Trouble was, Bob and I both agreed that it would be very hard for either of us to resist hurling puzzle pieces in a similar situation. And Ula knew it. “Look,” Bob finally said. “We’re not really angry with you; but you need to find different ways to express your frustration, ok?” Ula agreed.

So yesterday, Ula and her friend Katharine were playing with a kitchen set out on the porch at the farm. They had a bowl of water for soup stock. Saoirse entered to join the fun, and proceeded to direct the girls as to what they could and could not do with the water.

Ignoring her, Ula picked up a spoon and sipped her broth, then picked up the bowl and had a more satisfying drink. Saoirse proceeded to reprimand her. Ula quietly obliged and put the spoon down. She disappeared for a few moments. Saoirse and Katharine thought nothing of it and resumed play. Without a word, Ula returned to the porch a few minutes later and joined the fun.

But three hours later, Saoirse pushed her digital camera in front of my face. “Look!”  She exclaimed.

Apparently, Ula had obeyed Bob’s suggestion that she find a different way to express her frustration. This time, she drew upon her artistic sensibilities. She’d taken her sister’s camera, deleted some of the images, then used the freed-up space to photograph her naked hiney. The image she’d captured was a close up of her personal vertical smile. Saoirse was only half- heartedly trying to rat out her sister. Mostly, all she could do was laugh and recount exactly how she’d managed to incite the crime.

As a homeschooling mom, I occasionally envy non-homeschooling parents who have the luxury of blaming outside influences for their children’s shortcomings. Bad behavior or academic failure can conveniently be the fault of the school bus, other school children, negligent teachers, misspent school resources, misguided school boards, or pinched school budgets. Bob and I have none of those excuses. If our children don’t learn successfully or behave badly, the blame falls squarely on our shoulders.

Thus, Ula’s behavior falls back on Bob and me. And I am of two minds about how to address it. I suppose I should play the part of “good mom” and have a serious talk with her about appropriate and inappropriate ways of dealing with frustration. I should explain just what I learned in school: it is not appropriate to act out.

But I can’t quite bring myself to do this. Deep down, I feel one of the biggest problems with our culture is that we don’t act out. We’ve been so conditioned to “behave appropriately” that many of us have lost the instinct to identify and point out absurdity when it transpires before our eyes.

Here's an example: I delivered a keynote presentation at an organic farming conference this past winter. Before I took the podium, the state secretary of agriculture gave the opening address. In it, he stood before an auditorium packed with organic farmers and told them that if they wanted to have success with their conference that day, and with their businesses in the future, then the first thing they needed to learn was that they should never speak ill of or publicly criticize the conventional food system.

Here was absurdity. A perfect justification for acting out. Not one person did. Instead, when he finished, he was given a round of applause. I regret that I didn’t have the gumption to take the podium and directly call attention to the balderdash we had just been fed. I was too polite. After all, I was raised to not act out. My skills at calling attention to absurdity are above average, but nowhere near as honed as I’d like them to be.

Ula demonstrates what developmental specialists would probably identify as typical impulse control issues of a five-year-old. I can’t help but consider it a gift. Maybe throwing cardboard puzzle pieces or mooning a camera are considered inappropriate responses in an adult world. But I think they were relatively reasonable choices for a five-year-old. Ula is learning to identify absurdity. Saoirse is learning to negotiate her power as a result. As the parent, I choose to step back and let them play it out, and I accept full accountability for this choice.

Shannon Hayes wrote this article for YES! Magazine, a national, nonprofit media organization that fuses powerful ideas with practical actions. Shannon is the author of Radical Homemakers: Reclaiming Domesticity from a Consumer Culture, The Grassfed Gourmet and The Farmer and the Grill. She is the host of Grassfedcooking.com and RadicalHomemakers.com. Hayes works with her family on Sap Bush Hollow Farm in Upstate New York.



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange

Top Stories

14 comments on "The Audacity of Acting Out: What Our Kids Can Teach Us "

Lark

July 11, 2012 4:58pm

Dwallum makes a very important point- who cares about a five year old who acts like a healthy five year old when an obviously crooked, bought off State official threatens farmers? Since I actually farm, I got that quicker than you web addict stay at home mommies.

The article sucks because it yammers on about somebodies kids, losing the important point. Kids are all a pain in the but, I was glad to send mine off to school! They come home as young adults. Who understand that "traditional food" is poisoning us, as well as creating ecological disasters. Round up resistant weeds are encroaching towards my land; I wouldn't use that toxic soup but now that monsanto has created a monster we farmers have to deal with it. And some crooked crony of somebody's is telling farmers not to discuss?

Big Ag will send thugs out to break legs and you blindly rant about an ill placed, too long anecdote by another child worshipping woman who gave up on life and reproduced instead.

You obviously deserve toxic food.

Ambular

July 11, 2012 5:31pm

At least us 'web addict stay at home mommies' don't state in one breath that they have children, then in the next that reproducing means giving up on life. Or tell people they deserve to be poisoned because they missed the point of an internet article. Because, you know, saying stuff like that would REALLY make us look stupid, hypocritical, and just generally like rather vile excuses for human beings.

pintobeans

July 11, 2012 4:33pm

Thanks for writing this delightful true-life allegorical story about the social norms discouraging nice people from making a disconcerting splash to try to change others' bad behavior. I'm with DWDALLUM--I can't imagine what is up with these other commenters. Your daughters sound perfectly normal-- bossy, controlling big sister, and feisty little sister letting her know she can't be controlled. As for your parenting choices, I'm just going to assume that anyone who writes as well as you do is surely demonstrating to the family how to respectfully, powerfully, without insults or violence, convey, "If you won't play in a way so all of us are happy, get the *#%& outta here!"

Lark

July 11, 2012 5:01pm

So what about the State Komissar threatening organic farmers? Doesn't that worry you?

dwdallam

July 11, 2012 2:33pm

Wow, the ignorance of these comments is disillusioning. You people miss the entire point of the article in order to involve yourselves in arm chair parenting. No wonder nothing gets done in the USA politically--people can't even understand a simple analogy.

I mean here we have a state agency telling people not only to abstain from exercising freedom of speech, but also that if they do, they will be penalized.

And the most important issue you get out of the analogy is critical parenting comments.

Fucking retards, and I mean that in the most pejorative sense.

Lark

July 11, 2012 5:05pm

Good for you Dwallum! Fucking retards is correct, although I was thinking along Irresponsible bubble dwelling illiterates who have no reading comprehension or critical thinking skills left...

Nah. Fucking Retards is concise and addresses the stupidity just fine.

Ambular

July 11, 2012 5:02pm

Fair enough, but I think the gist of the comments still applies if you address them to the analogy. There's something seriously out of whack if the question being asked is 'Should we (Ula) speak up for our rights, or let authority (Saoirse) trample all over them?' rather than, 'How did Saoirse ever get the idea that it's okay to do this in the first place, and why isn't she being corrected when she tries?'

Though I suppose you could say those are two different aspects of the same question.

Lark

July 11, 2012 5:08pm

Maybe the question is- Why does a highly placed state official threaten a specific type of farmer? The My Cute Kids story is superfluous and too much of the copy. But the writing isn't so lousy a literate person couldn't easily grasp the really important point.

Every body here did go to high school, right?

Blondie

July 11, 2012 2:04pm

A small warning for Ms Hayes: Even once I started my own family my bossy older sister kept telling me how she had to be involved (pregnancy/ newborn). I had to politely decline certain things but she wasnt used to that and became absolutely frustrated and furious. She told me she didn't want to have me in her life unless i changed my attitude. We haven't spoken since.

Blondie

July 11, 2012 1:53pm

What did you tell your youngest she was allowed to do to stop her older sister from interfering? Even more so, what did you tell your oldest to stop, if you did so at all....

Ambular

July 11, 2012 1:32pm

The older girl doesn't strike me as "particularly well-behaved and extraordinarily poised" by your description here. I'd say she is the one who deserves the reprimand for barging in and bossing her little sister and her friend around. How they play with their toys is none of her business. Doesn't she have any friends her own age she can play with?

Edited to add: re-reading this article, I'm actually quite indignant on Ula's behalf. You say, "We just helped Saoirse find a quiet space where she could have some alone time free from non-compliant five-year-olds," as though the five-year-olds were the ones who created the problem. But by your account, they were playing happily on their own until big sister crashed their party. Why should she expect their compliance? Why wasn't she told to leave them alone, that her interference was neither needed nor welcome?

jeltez42

July 11, 2012 10:38am

I feel very sorry for Ula. Why does she have to allow her older sister to boss her and her friends around? Is it that your oldest daugher is really the babysitter and you are just the household CEO who cannot be bothered with managing her children?

This story taught me a lot about the eldest Ms. Hayes. She has a favourite and is too lazy to discipline the real instigator of the trouble. In fact, mom re-enforces this behaviour by coming down on Ula as the bad daughter. I also find it very disturbing that mom seems to think that destroying big sis' pictures and replacing them with a moon picture is even mildly funny. This is totally unacceptable even if Ula had replaced the deleted pictures with a picture of a bible verse saying something fitting for the situation. Neither child should be taught it is okay to destroy someone else's property.

Please listen to your children Ms. Hayes. The oldest is a bully and tyrant-in-training. The youngest is suffering from your disfavour and her sister's bullying and has an attitude that she will not put up with being bullied. Ula strikes out at her bully because supposed adults in the family will not stick up for her.

Sad, very very sad. Maybe your daughters should spend a year or two in public schools as what they are learning from you will not serve them well into adulthood and will cause many problems if they decide to have a family. Bullying and striking back in destructive ways is not going to help either girl. It is even worse when parents defend the bully and punish the bullied.

Lark

July 11, 2012 5:22pm

Boy, do you have NO reading comprehension! The smaller kid did the right thing. She'll get into the Ivy League. I did.

The State Secretary of Ag threatening farmers was lost on you though. Its the most important point, but you're ready to settle for toxic and Genetically modified food while you spout about bronze age fairy tales from your mythology. Well not every body buys into that Xtian stuff. There are many religions, and non religious points of view. It's incredibly offensive of you to assume that your personal ego trip should be held up as a model for everyone else. How do you know the author isn't Bhuddist?

johnywhy

July 11, 2012 10:48am

I'm curious to know why you term Saoirse' behavior as "absurd" or "learning to negotiate her power". I don't see any absurdity or negotiating, only controlling, interfering behavior.

You say you support acting out against absurdity, and yet you repeatedly reprimanded Ula for objecting to her sister's inappropriate behavior. Not once did you reprimand Saoirse for it.

You say responsibity for your children's behavior lies squarely on your shoulders, yet then you take it off of your shoulders, saying you are stepping back and letting your kids play it out on their own.

Your title says we should learn from our kids' acting out, but you do not seem to have done so yourself .