You are viewing the NationofChange archives. For the latest news and actions, visit the new
Get Email Updates | Log In | Register

Article image
Robert Scheer
NationofChange / Op-Ed
Published: Wednesday 17 August 2011
“Texas remains tied with Mississippi for the largest number of workers earning wages equal to or less than the federal minimum wage.”

The Biggest Little Hypocrite in Texas

Article image

It is unfathomable that yet another Texas blowhard governor has emerged as a front-runner for the GOP presidential nomination. The persistent appeal of the mythology of Texas as a model for the nation defies the lessons of logic and experience, and yet here we are with Rick Perry, a George W. Bush look-alike, as a prime contender to once again run our nation into the ground.

To begin with, Texas is not and never will be a model for the nation unless the other states discover similarly rich deposits of oil and natural gas that account for one-third of jobs and supply 40 percent of tax revenues within those states. If Texas energy receipts and jobs helped float Gov. Bush’s reputation, they have been nothing short of miraculous for Perry’s tenure. The price of oil rose from $25 a barrel when Lt. Gov. Perry replaced the newly elected President Bush to $147 in 2008 and has stayed at more than $80 a barrel since, to the dismay of anyone who has to buy gasoline.

In addition, thanks to breakthroughs in oil field technology that Perry had nothing to do with, there have been controversial new drilling techniques that have vastly expanded the exploitation of gas and oil reserves, producing many of the new jobs that the Texas governor claims. For a relatively ineffectual governor, in a state in which the part-time Legislature holds the power, to take credit for this job boom is as ludicrous as a Saudi prince bragging of his entrepreneurial skills as the source of royal wealth.

Unfortunately, the boom in the energy industry has not spread to those in the state stuck in less lucrative sectors of the economy. Texas remains tied with Mississippi for the largest number of workers earning wages equal to or less than the federal minimum wage. This is particularly true for the majority of nonwhite Texans, who account for a good portion of the state population increase that Perry brags about. It will be interesting to see how he handles the immigration issue in light of the fact that the manufacturing sector, particularly automobiles, is dependent on robust traffic of parts and workers across the border from Mexico.

It should be added that much of the non-energy job growth is in the public sector, which has been in part financed by the federal government that Perry lambastes. As the Austin American-Statesman newspaper points out: “… [A]lmost half of the state’s job growth the past two years was led by education, health care and government, the sectors of the economy that will now take a hit as federal stimulus money runs out and the state’s 8% cut in state spending translates into thousands of layoffs among state workers and teachers in the coming months.”

There is, however, something very important in the Texas experience that could serve as a model for the nation, and that is the state’s success in avoiding the worst effects of the housing crash. Texas has not suffered anything like the crushing foreclosure crisis that is the main source of joblessness in states from Florida to California. But Perry surely will not dwell on the reasons for Texas having escaped that fate, because his mantra of less government regulation doesn’t work in this instance. If lax environmental and zoning codes were the secret, neighboring Arizona and Nevada would not be the housing basket cases that they are. The difference for Texas is one that most free-market conservatives ignore: It was precisely the tight government regulation of the housing market that spared Texas a similar fate.

From the first days of statehood in 1845, Texas has maintained the strictest laws on home mortgages in the nation. The Texas constitution’s blanket ban on home equity loans, born of outrage over previous land grabs by banks, has been eased substantially over the years, but a firm commitment that the total amount in loans on a house not exceed 80 percent of appraised value, and other consumer-friendly restrictions on mortgage lenders, saved Texas from the home mortgage disaster visited upon many other states.

That put a crimp in the wild lending that fed the securitization of home mortgages that still proves to be so toxic to the nation’s economic recovery outside Texas. As a bit of irony, it was U.S. Sen. Phil Gramm, R-Texas, who pioneered the passage of federal legislation preventing government oversight of those mortgage-backed securities. Perhaps because Texas homeowners were better protected than those in the rest of the nation, the Texan Bush managed to be splendidly indifferent during his presidency to the dire consequence of the housing bubble. 

Indeed, how can Perry seek the presidency largely on the basis of his Texas governorship without conceding that it is his Texas predecessor, himself purely a product of Texas state government, who is far more responsible for the economic meltdown than the current president? 

Barack Obama “inherited a mess,” economist Nouriel Roubini—made famous by his 2005 prediction of the economic collapses, which Bush ignored—told The Wall Street Journal, adding, “We’re lucky that this Great Recession is not turning into another Great Depression.” In case his point was missed, Roubini reminded of the obvious: “We destroyed our fiscal sustainability before [President Obama] came to power. … We had guns and butter and low taxes. It doesn’t work, if you want guns and butter, you should have high taxes during wars.”

Bush, as Perry is doing, complained about big government in every area except lavish spending on the military-industrial complex, an important part of the Texas economy at more than $200 billion a year, double what it was a decade ago. But that’s all the hypocrisy we have time for in one column.

This article was originally posted on Truthdig.

Author pic
ABOUT Robert Scheer
Robert Scheer, editor in chief of Truthdig, has built a reputation for strong social and political writing over his 30 years as a journalist. His columns appear in newspapers across the country, and his in-depth interviews have made headlines. He conducted the famous Playboy magazine interview in which Jimmy Carter confessed to the lust in his heart and he went on to do many interviews for the Los Angeles Times with Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and many other prominent political and cultural figures.

Why is Perry having these

Why is Perry having these prayer meetings when he should praying for forgivness for all the innocent, mentally ill, and foreigners he has murdered. His favorite statement "If you don't like executions, guns, or you're gay, don't come to Texas". Gawd forbid what will happen to our nation if he were to become President.

Perry should be proud of his

Perry should be proud of his success in providing low paying jobs; and don't forget how polluted Texas is, one of the worst in the US; then again, don't forget how Texas has the highest percentage of high school dropouts in the nation. Let's face the music Perry, like you, Texas lacks brain power to solve anything, i.e., would the US be better off without this burden? Do us a favor and secede once more and give the US a chance.

"Indeed, how can Perry seek

"Indeed, how can Perry seek the presidency largely on the basis of his Texas governorship without conceding that ..."


Of puddin’-heads we’ve modern versions
Who mostly serve the GOP
Who cry we undergo conversions
So we can hear Rick Perry’s plea:
“Help us, dear God, our Lord and Savior
Don’t punish us for misbehavior;
For what Your congregations do,
By killing off apostate Jew
And Muslim’s, meant to do your bidding:
Who don’t see Jesus as Your Son,
As Paul has said, must be undone;
And when we’re finished with their ridding
And all know that our God is Great,
We’ll reunite the church and state.”

Please see more at

Who owns Murdoch? Start

Who owns Murdoch? Start there.
My Republican mother....has been since 1965 and the Civil Rights Act....said just nephews no longer have jobs in MS..... and are living off their parents now...... she said, I think we have to get those Republicans out of office.... LOL
She is 93 but she finally got it.

So that's what Warren Buffett

So that's what Warren Buffett was talking the other night on a latenight talk show: the housing bubble as the primary source of our current problems. Now it all makes sense to me. I doubt very many people understand all this, as I didn't. Thank you for the enlightenment!

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Bank

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Bank Deregulation bill was passed during the Clinton Administration and was passed by a majority of both parties. Both Parties took/take huge amounts of money from the financial community before, during, and after the deregulation bill. Check out some of Obama's MAJOR contributors. Many were bailed out by taxpayers. Hearing in 2004/05 concerning mortgage problems at Fannie Mac & Mae were stonewalled by Democrats in the House.

Ok - these are all good

Ok - these are all good facts. The nation today seems more interested in beliefs than facts. How do you turn these facts into something that will conform to the electorate's belief system that he is a joker? If he is the selection, how can you stop the Fox News machine from getting him elected?

Comment with your Facebook account

Comment with your Disqus account

Top Stories

comments powered by Disqus

NationofChange works to educate, inform, and fight power with people, corruption with community.

If you would like to stay up to date with the best in independent, filter-free journalism, updates on upcoming events to attend, and more, enter your email below:

7 Compelling Reasons Why You Should Support NationofChange

Our readers often tell us why they’ve decided to step up and become supporters. Here are some of the top reasons people are giving.

1. You’re keeping independent journalism alive
The corporate owned media has proven that it can’t be trusted. In a media landscape wrought with spin and corruption, NationofChange stands in very scarce company.

2. You’re sticking it to the rich, powerful, and corrupt
When you have money in this country you can get away with damn near anything, and they do. NationofChange isn’t afraid to expose these criminals no matter how powerful they are.

3. Your donation is 100% tax-deductible
NationofChange is a 501(c)3 charity. People tend to assume that many other organizations are (most nonprofits are NOT) but it’s that 501(c)3 status is a bit more rare than you think.

Read the rest...