Bill McKibben’s Speech at Occupy Wall Street
Today, Tar Sands Action organizer Bill McKibben spoke at Occupy Wall Street in New York City and made the connection between the demonstrations there and the ongoing fight against the Keystone XL pipeline. Below is a video and transcript of the speech. Many thanks to our friends at Treehugger for providing the video.
Here is the text of Bill’s speech:
Today in the New York Times there was a story that made it completely clear why we have to be here. They uncovered the fact that the company building that tar sands pipeline was allowed to choose another company to conduct the environmental impact statement, and the company that they chose was a company was a company that did lots and lots of work for them. So, in other words, the whole thing was rigged top to bottom and that’s why the environmental impact statement said that this pipeline would cause no trouble, unlike the scientists who said if we build this pipeline it’s “game over” for the climate. We can’t let this pipeline get built.
On November 6, one year before the election, we’re going to be in DC with a huge circle of people around the White House and they’re going to be carrying signs with quotations from Barack Obama from the 2008 campaign. He said, “It’s time to end the tyranny of oil.” He said, “I will have the most transparent government in history.” We have to go to DC to find out where they have locked that guy up. We have to free Obama, because there is some sort of stunt double there now. So on November 6, I hope we can move, just for a day, Occupy Wall Street down to the White House and get them in the fight against corporate power.
The reason that it’s so great that we’re occupying Wall Street is because Wall Street has been occupying the atmosphere. That’s why we can never do anything about global warming. Exxon gets in the way. Goldman Sachs gets in the way. The whole fossil fuel industry gets in the way. The sky does not belong to Exxon. They cannot keep using it as a sewer into which to dump their carbon. If they do, we’ve got no future and nobody else on this planet has a future.
I spend a lot of time in countries around the world organizing demonstrations and rallies in solidarity. In the last three years at 350.org, we’ve had 15,000 rallies in every country except North Korea. Everywhere around the world, poor people and black people and brown people and Asian people and young people are standing up. Most of those places, don’t produce that much carbon. They need us to act with them and for them, because the problem is 20 blocks south of here. That’s where the Empire lives and we’ve got to figure out how to tame it and make it work for this planet or not work at all.
Thank you guys very much.
CONNECT













13 comments on "Bill McKibben’s Speech at Occupy Wall Street"
vF6gZc , [url=http://fekgbukdulat.com/]fekgbukdulat[/url], [link=http://pmqwgrlgoikk.com/]pmqwgrlgoikk[/link], http://bwaldcyanknb.com/
F34dQD gfnvwctvwyia
A really good awnesr, full of rationality!
October 16, 2011 2:47am
What baffles me with the environment is how environmental organizations are just denying the worst global warming problem that exist: Animal Agribusiness. According to the United Nations, a shift to a plant based diet would do more than trying to replace pollution from industry and all the vehicles in the world combined. It is the elephant in the room that is still not addressed and that makes me mad. Methane is 10 times worse for the atmosphere than carbon. But they just keep staying in denial of the best way to prevent GW.
October 10, 2011 7:51am
The reason for the pipeline is to get sand tar from Canada to the refineries in the Gulf Region and ship them where? If this is designed or campaigned to be an alternative to buying fossil fuel from the hostile middle east. Why the need to ship the crude out to sea. Will that only help the on going oil speculators with the artificial price of the refined crude? Just build a few refineries up in North Dakota and truck the refined oil to states in the USA. Or build a smaller pipeline to that state? Less environmental impact and quite possibly keep that newly refined petroleum here and easily transported back to Canada.
Cant really cuz it takes way too long to build another refinery, aswell , it doesnt make sense to build another. ... Even when richard branson wanted to build one, he was approached by many in the environment who begged him not to... And after , looking at the facts, he realized it wasnt a good idea. As far as our oil going to china and others, ... Would u rather the worlds superpower( yea sadly) gave their money to hostile oil nations? .... But i do agree, double hull vessuls should be mandatory in canadian waters.
October 10, 2011 1:20am
america's police state has long been here, just ask a poor person. we have more children shot in our dysfunctional schools than cops shot so called serving/protecting. generally its poor kids being shot, as the well off, are in private schools.
Canada- trying to reduce your foreign hostile oil dependancy, and create your needed jobs. .... It sucks that the impact assessment was not above board, ... But if u think your economy sucks now... Just imagine where you'll be when you cant get ANY oil from hostile nations anymore!! .... You'll come crying to us.... And then we'll say.... Sorry, its going to china. ... Ever wonder why we have practically no crisis here?
Yea... Because we have a better system. Some facts hurt. Best of luck to your cause though. From a country with so much wealth, you sure don't eqitably spread it arond your country. ... But thats ok. Keep chanting USA., and maybe youll forget.
..
Your right. ... Its not like cars are going away tomorrow
Canada- trying to reduce your foreign hostile oil dependancy, and create your needed jobs. .... It sucks that the impact assessment was not above board, ... But if u think your economy sucks now... Just imagine where you'll be when you cant get ANY oil from hostile nations anymore!! .... You'll come crying to us.... And then we'll say.... Sorry, its going to china. ... Ever wonder why we have practically no crisis here?
Yea... Because we have a better system. Some facts hurt. Best of luck to your cause though. From a country with so much wealth, you sure don't eqitably spread it arond your country. ... But thats ok. Keep chanting USA., and maybe youll forget.
..
October 09, 2011 1:13pm
Beautiful article!
October 09, 2011 12:50pm
In Canada, it is perfectly legitimate to have environmental audits payed for and hired by companies seeking development. In Canada, when the police kill citizens they are suspended with pay while the same police department investigates itself. In British Columbia there have been over 260 deaths in police custody. Zero charges laid. Canada; kinder,gentler,and corrupt.
No its not perfectly acceptable... Except when your arguing your case in the US.