Getting Guns Out of Our Heads
What do the following possibly have in common?
One, Woolrich, the venerable 182-year-old clothing company, recently brought out a new line of chinos with a second pocket that has been especially designed for carrying a concealed handgun. The clincher is that the pocket has been designed so that it wouldn’t destroy the “stylish look of the pants.”
Two, Levi Johnston, former fiancé of Bristol Palin and father of their child, not only has another baby on the way, but he plans to name her "Breeze Beretta" after his favorite Italian-made pistol.
Three, over the stringent objections of Tampa’s Mayor Bob Buckhorn, Florida Governor Rick Scott upheld the decision to ban water guns during the Republican National Convention, but not concealed handguns.
If you said that these three items have nothing in common, you’re wrong! Dead wrong!
Viewing each of them in isolation not only misses a key point, but a key pattern. Taken together, they show that controlling, if not eliminating altogether, handguns is more difficult than we ever imagined. Guns have insinuated themselves so deeply into our culture that they have literally taken over our minds. The outrage that I feel towards each of these “items” individually is dwarfed by the feelings I experience when I consider their combined effect and what they say about us as a culture.
In an earlier op-ed, “Confronting Shame-Based Politics: The Biggest Challenge of All,” The Huffington Post, April 24, 2012, I made the point that shame underlies most, if not virtually all, of our major political issues and societal problems. If in addition, fear, a deep sense of powerlessness, and a growing contempt for public institutions are combined with shame, then we have a potent mixture indeed that not only underlies, but perpetuates an out-of-control gun culture.
If we are to have any hope of breaking its stranglehold on our culture, then it is imperative that we understand shame. Shame is the deep unconscious belief that one is irredeemably bad to the very depths of one’s Being. Because the feelings it unleashes are so powerful, it is not surprising to learn that shame typically leads to intense anger and hostility in the form of violence towards others (homicide) or towards oneself (suicide), both of which are typically seen as responsible for making one feel worthless. Coupled with other intense feeling such as distrust and powerlessness, shame is so overwhelming that it makes gun control virtually impossible.
Nonetheless, the situation is neither hopeless nor impossible. However, this is true if and only if we can acknowledge the incredible power of shame, and honestly face up to it.
That’s why I believe that shame is the most challenging problem and social issue facing us. Indeed, Republicans and Democrats both use it but in different ways. For Republicans, just thinking about the possibility that the U.S. is no longer Number One is too shameful even to contemplate. For Democrats, having the poor bear the major brunt of tax cuts for the rich is a shame on us all.
To attack shame requires a four-fold strategy. One, we certainly need the best academic analyses that we can muster. At the same time, we need to understand that while absolutely necessary, the best analyses are not sufficient to move the great body of people. If anything, they turn people off because they don’t address the deep, unconscious feelings that are the basis of shame.
Two, while it is also necessary to understand the bigger, underlying, cultural patterns associated with guns, this too is insufficient for most people to make a lasting dent in overcoming shame.
Three, there need to be massive, ongoing educational campaigns like those that have been successfully waged against tobacco.
And, four, there need to be continuing PSA announcements spread over years by major celebrities on the linkage between guns and shame. Most of all, we need to talk about breaking the cycle of shame so that we can stop passing it on to our children and theirs as well.
The point is not that our most pressing problems do not require the best logical arguments and policies we can fashion. Of course they do! Rather, the point is, however essential, all the logic in the world is only a small part of the solution.
The great English wit and writer Jonathon Swift said it best of all: “You can’t reason a man out of what he was not reasoned into.”
To make serious headway against our most pressing problems, we need to combine the best programs of logic with a deep understanding of human emotions. Until we do, the assault on our minds will not only continue, but become worse.
CONNECT




6 comments on "Getting Guns Out of Our Heads"
June 15, 2012 2:20pm
A gun is a tool, nothing more nothing less.
Every tool can be used for good or for evil.
Anger comes from powerlessness, watching criminals and traitors in the government steal from those that work cannot create anything but anger.
They murder our countrymen in their liars war, they tax to the limit of survival then wonder why people are pissed off. Bastille day will be a new USA holiday if the working class ever get organized.
July 02, 2012 3:48pm
But no other tool offers the distance and impersonal aspect of using it to kill as does a gun. Have you every really read the complete history of Bastille Day and the rivers of blood that came from the guillotine as heads were lopped off of both the innocent and the guilty? How blood rage went on for days and days on end, where no one could trust their neighbor. I suggest you read the reality of Bastille Days, realitybites, before you encourage anyone into it. If it should happen here as it did in France, you would be no safer than anyone else. And the outcome of Bastille days, don't forget, was Napoleon, who carried on one of the bloodiest, longest wars in European history until Hitler.
June 15, 2012 1:44pm
Interesting, but sad point of view. Shame has absolutely nothing to do with why I own multiple firearms, hand and long guns. Not really sure where this author gets this kind of rubbish, but the anti-gun bias is pretty transparent. The 'psyche', as one comment refers, of the American people (rather broad generalization) has been influenced in a devastating manner by guns? Ha! I think not. The guns that I own, have owned and new ones I acquire have no affect on my 'psyche'. Fortunately, the majority seems to 'get it' when it comes to gun ownership in the US. As citizens we are entitled to bear arms and the defenders of this right, the NRA, the GOA, the JPFO, really understand why, especially the Jews for Preservation of Firearms Ownership. You ought to check out their website sometime, you might learn to shuck the pseudo-intelligentsia talking points.
July 02, 2012 4:02pm
I have owned hand guns. I went hunting with my father from an early age. However, it is the angry attitude of gun owners that bothers me when people ask why should anyone need an AK47? Why, indeed. And why are so many guns not locked up and out of reach of children? Hardly a month goes by that I don't see a story in our state and others of a child getting a rifle or hand gun out to show friends or just to look at and ending up dead. Also, many of the guns used in crime are guns that have been stolen out of private homes because they were not locked away. There are responsibilities that go along with gun ownership that far too many gun owners fail to shoulder. That is one reason there is a bias against guns.
I also see no reason why there are not background checks on guns sold at gun shows and by private parties. Would you like to live next to someone who owns guns and has a serious mental history? I sure wouldn't. Anyone who wants to buy a gun should have a background check done, no matter where or who they buy it from. Even George Washington wouldn't have wanted mentally ill people with guns around!
Growing up in an area where hunting was common place there was no 'bias' against guns. But today, the variety of guns and the number of guns in public hands is not like it was then, and gun safety is not promoted like it was then. The bias against guns came about because so many innocent children and people were being killed-not with screwdrivers or knives, but guns.
May 31, 2012 8:38pm
Interesting point of view and I certainly agree about the devastating influence guns have on society and the psyche of the American people. I would argue, however, that "shame" is relative to cognitive realization and understanding. In point of fact, I would contend a great deal of our continuing fascination with firearms symbolizes a "lack of shame" on the part of large segments of our citizenry. Far to many Americans have an attitude of "we're Americans...what the hell do WE have to be ashamed about." Until and if that paradigm changes we will continue regressing into a violence permeated culture, glamorized by many forms of mass media. I grew up watching a slew of Western's on TV. Virtually every episode of whatever show it happened to be, ended with the situation being "resolved" by someone or multiple someone's being shot and usually killed. We possess more guns and export more guns than any country on Earth. "Shame" will not be the salve for the itchy "trigger finger."
May 22, 2012 12:29pm
For the time being, on each main subject, we are facing a touch attack fro fascism disguised in the dress of "libertarians".
Our members should hold guns for their own safety and, if preferred, "we" shall provide you the needed protection.
We can't ignore such attacks but we have to find a way to show how pernicious they are. And we should do so without being negative (without insisting too much) but with positive points.
The problem is how to deal with such matters while providing something the people can rely on.
geebee090@gmail.com