You are viewing the NationofChange archives. For the latest news and actions, visit the new www.NationofChange.org.
Wednesday, November 26, 2014 / PROGRESSIVE JOURNALISM FOR POSITIVE ACTION
Get Email Updates | Log In | Register

Article image
Ruth Marcus
NationofChange / Op-Ed
Published: Wednesday 14 September 2011
The key for Obama may be to convince these voters that he is serious about deficit reduction

A Cloudy Forecast For 2012

Article image

The word clouds tell the story — and illustrate the challenges ahead for both sides.

“TRYING,” says the cloud illustrating swing voters’ assessment of President Obama. And then, ominously: “liberal” and “ineffective.”

“STUBBORN,” says the cloud illustrating these voters’ view of congressional Republicans. Followed by “conservative,” “selfish,” “greedy” and — the one unabashedly positive phrase among the top 10 — “trying.”

The images are generated from a fascinating new poll by the centrist Democratic group Third Way. The clouds depict the assessment of what the poll terms “persuadable switchers” — voters in a dozen battleground states who backed Obama in 2008, voted for Republicans in 2010 and describe themselves as up for grabs in 2012.

The Third Way poll, conducted by Stefan Hankin of Lincoln Park Strategies, examined two groups: the “switchers” and the “droppers,” who voted for Obama in 2008 and stayed home in 2010. The “droppers,” it found, are not the president’s problem. Nearly three-fourths say they will definitely or probably vote to reelect Obama.

The switchers represent a bigger headache. Less than a third said they would definitely or probably vote again for the president. A full quarter said they are irretrievably gone.

In all, six in 10 switchers are persuadable, prompting the question: What would it take to do the trick?

It won’t be easy. As the word cloud depicts, these voters continue to like Obama. They think he’s smart and sincere. They give him credit for trying. But the next two words encapsulate their twin doubts: that he is too liberal for their tastes and not effective enough for the country’s needs.

The first word may be easier to knock down than the second. These persuadable switchers describe themselves as significantly more conservative than Obama and his party. Strangely, they see Obama as slightly more liberal than his congressional counterparts. Even stranger, given that they voted for Obama, they see themselves as closer on the ideological spectrum to congressional Republicans than to the president.

The key for Obama may be to convince these voters that he is serious about deficit reduction. They care about the issue — more, as they perceive it, than do the president or congressional Republicans. Yet their preferred approach dovetails nicely with Obama’s. More than two-thirds would be willing to accept tax increases as part of a deficit-reduction plan.

The harder task for Obama will be to dispel the aura of ineffectiveness. This presents a twofold challenge: first, to show he can get something done in the face of a Republican-controlled House that isn’t inclined to hand him any such victory; and second, to demonstrate his effectiveness in the relatively short time remaining. If the ultimate measure is the economy — and more than half the persuadable switchers put it at the top of their list — that will be extraordinarily difficult. Even if Congress were to magically pass Obama’s plan swiftly and in full, the jobs turnaround is apt to be slow and far from assured.

Of course, Republicans aren’t about to be so compliant, but their word cloud helps explain the GOP’s new tone of seeming conciliation. When swing voters who backed you in 2010 come up with words such as “selfish,” “greedy” and “irresponsible” less than a year later, you’ve got a serious problem with the brand.

The political trick for Republicans is to puff up Obama’s “ineffective liberal” portrait while diminishing their image as the intransigent party. Their smartest move would be to quickly co-opt a piece of Obama’s jobs plan — tax cuts and a slice of trade deals, anyone? This jujitsu would dissipate the stubbornness rap without letting the president crow that Republicans acceded to his demand to “pass this bill.” Let Obama look like Mr. All-or-Nothing.

Yet much as he might prefer to, Obama won’t be running against congressional Republicans. This is why Mitt Romney’s approach to Obama — casting him as a nice guy in over his head — could be so potent. Where Texas Gov. Rick Perry can be cutting about Obama, Romney takes more of the “poor schnook” stance. He’s not telling swing voters they were wrong to give Obama a shot — just that the president tried and failed.

“If you think the country needs a turnaround, that’s what I do,” Romney said at the Tea Party debate.

Romney still has some explaining to do about why his private-sector turnarounds so often involved cutting jobs, not creating them. But he is emerging as a formidable candidate against an incumbent for whom trying, however hard, may not be enough.

© , Washington Post Writers Group


Author pic
ABOUT Ruth Marcus

Ruth Marcus is a columnist and editorial writer for The Post, specializing in American politics and domestic policy. Marcus has been with The Post since 1984. She joined the national staff in 1986, covering campaign finance, the Justice Department, the Supreme Court and the White House. From 1999 through 2002, she served as deputy national editor, supervising reporters who covered money and politics, Congress, the Supreme Court, and other national issues. She joined the editorial board in 2003 and began writing a regular column in 2006. A graduate of Yale College and Harvard Law School, she was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize for Commentary in 2007. She lives in Maryland with her husband, Jon Leibowitx, their two daughters, and the world’s cutest dog.

Obama can lose 9 states (NV,

Obama can lose 9 states (NV, CO, NM, IA, IN, OH, VA, NC & NH) that he won in 2008 & still win in 2012, and he's not going to lose anywhere near that number of states in 2012. Barring any unforeseen, major disaster of Biblical proportions, Obama will win easily in 2012.
http://www.270towin.com

Obama could turn it all

Obama could turn it all around all by himself by simply working to save the environment. He could implement the 10 Environment ideas right here: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/environment-ten-things-obama-m... He'd also steal a lot of Republicans and Independents from the protest vote, improve the economy as well as the environment, create good green jobs, and coast easily to a second term.

Comment with your Facebook account



Comment with your Disqus account

Top Stories

comments powered by Disqus

NationofChange works to educate, inform, and fight power with people, corruption with community.

If you would like to stay up to date with the best in independent, filter-free journalism, updates on upcoming events to attend, and more, enter your email below:

7 Compelling Reasons Why You Should Support NationofChange

Our readers often tell us why they’ve decided to step up and become supporters. Here are some of the top reasons people are giving.

1. You’re keeping independent journalism alive
The corporate owned media has proven that it can’t be trusted. In a media landscape wrought with spin and corruption, NationofChange stands in very scarce company.

2. You’re sticking it to the rich, powerful, and corrupt
When you have money in this country you can get away with damn near anything, and they do. NationofChange isn’t afraid to expose these criminals no matter how powerful they are.

3. Your donation is 100% tax-deductible
NationofChange is a 501(c)3 charity. People tend to assume that many other organizations are (most nonprofits are NOT) but it’s that 501(c)3 status is a bit more rare than you think.

Read the rest...