Democracies Don’t Start Wars, but Fake Democracies Sure Do!
We’ve all heard it said by our teachers when we were in school, we’ve all heard it said by politicians, including presidents: “Democracies don’t start wars.”
And yet we have had the decades-long American war on Vietnam, the Reagan invasion of Grenada, the LBJ invasion of the Dominican Republic, the George H.W. Bush invasion of Panama, the G.W. Bush back-to-back invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, and now we have President Obama talking about launching an unprovoked war on Iran.
Is the much touted axiom wrong?
I don’t think so. I believe that in a democracy, where the will of the people is paramount, it would be very unlikely to have a country start a war. People generally don’t like war. They need to feel truly threatened or even under attack before they will accept the idea of their or anyone’s fathers, husbands, brothers and sons (and now mothers, wives, daughters and sisters) being marched off to face the horrors of war.
Clearly the reason we have seen the US starting so many wars is that the US is and has not for a very long time been anything approaching a democracy.
Democracy in the US is a purely formalistic thing. People get to vote once every two and four years to chose from a narrow list of pre-selected candidates approved by the real rulers of the country, who are the wealthy owners of the large business interests, many of which prosper when there’s a war on, and many more of which are happy to have periodic wars, or the threat of wars, to keep people in line and willing to tolerate the kind of abuse that is typically heaped on the average working person: financially starved school districts, starvation-level welfare grants, no public health system, rusting bridges, pot-holed roads, almost no public transit, and falling real wages, etc.
I think it’s largely true that real democracies do not start wars, but the endless string of wars big and small started by the US, particularly since the end of the Second World War, provide ample evidence that this country of ours has long since ceased to be democratic. In both domestic and foreign policy, the federal government does not reflect the true wishes of the broad public. If it did, as I wrote recently, polls suggest that we would have a much smaller military, we’d have a well-funded Social Security retirement program and Medicare for all, with better benefits, we’d have low-cost college education for all, we’d have clean air and water, we’d have serious action to combat global climate change, we’d have job programs to employ the jobless and policies to prevent the tax-subsidized shipping away of jobs to Mexico, China and elsewhere, we’d have a much more progressive tax structure with the rich paying much higher tax rates, we’d have bankers behind bars and breaking rocks. We’d also have legal marijuana, guaranteed paid vacations, solid protections for union organizing, unfettered abortion rights, and good schools for all our kids.
These are the things that the public has said it wants. It does not want wars, and by solid majorities, it has said it wants the military to be scaled back, and American troops brought home.
As founding father James Madison once said:
Of all the enemies to public liberty, war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded, because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few. In war, too, the discretionary power of the Executive is extended; its influence in dealing out offices, honors, and emoluments is multiplied; and all the means of seducing the minds are added to those of subduing the force of the people. The same malignant aspect in republicanism may be traced in the inequality of fortunes and the opportunities of fraud growing out of a state of war, and in the degeneracy of manners and of morals engendered by both. No nation could reserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.
Boy, did Madison nail it!
We have been having a state of continual warfare, and we in the US have seen all the above evils growing apace, to the point that the country today is barely recognizable as the one that was founded in 1776, or that came out of the Civil War in 1865, or that survived the Great Depression in the ‘30s. Our freedoms are vanishing, working people are being legally robbed by the rich, and our votes are a joke.
The answer clearly is that we have to stop the wars, stop the war-mongering, and slash the military down to a fraction of its current size or eliminate standing armies altogether. Then we can maybe get our democracy back, and have a hope of proving that the old axiom was right all along.
CONNECT













7 comments on "Democracies Don’t Start Wars, but Fake Democracies Sure Do!"
August 26, 2012 12:26pm
We need to switch to an online voting system where citizens can nominate anyone they choose to be the president, and then use the online system to add up the votes to see who the next president will be. Also, citizens should be able to use this online system to vote on big issues like war.
August 15, 2012 6:21pm
"The same malignant aspect in republicanism", i.e. CANCERVATISM.
August 15, 2012 3:14pm
So, let's just FIX DEMOCRACY!
Here's how: If we just hold 2 quick, back-to-back elections each time (the first, as usual, to hire the worker's pool of our Public SERVANTS from our districts, and the second where WE ALL appoint them DIRECTLY to their cabinet portfolio positions) then we eliminate their self-interested conflicts of loyalty-dividing political "parties," (which always only "party" at our direct expense, anyway,) forever!
;-)
August 15, 2012 2:53pm
Good article with many truths. It has become obvious that the western elites have set out on a path of world conquest for their own enrichment. The working class American people and those of it's allies are to be used to try to achieve this goal in the western military and security establishments. The people's voices are to be ignored or if need be silenced by the para military police forces under the control of the oligarch via treasonous supposed democratic governments. The pentagon calls this long in the planning imposed agenda "the long war."
To put a name to these elites one need only scan the headlines stochastically to reveal the actors. The military industrial complex immediately pops out followed by the globalist corporations and their dominant control of the worlds markets with their neo classical philosophy and "free trade" deals which amount to little more than the extortion of favourable legalities for their operations. The third player and the ultimate power behind the other two is the international financial fraternitiy's handful of owners who would own the whole world via basically their ponzi system of owning and creating all currencies and credit as debt. The last is the most onerous as it is a system which has out lived any purpose suitable to the perilous present world conditions. It arose with the rise of capitalism, and exists as a financial scam to fabulously enrich and empower those that own the system. These owners by either one or all, military, economic coercion, or financial manipulations,seek to bring the entire human existence and all planetary resources under their ownership and - or complete control. Who knows of their plans for the masses whether for good or evil or for their care of the planet, that is anyone's guess as they are not giving out agendas, and who could trust them if they did? Something about absolute power corrupting absolutely comes to mind.
It is long past the time for the ordinary peoples of this world to grow up and take responsibility for how life will proceed on this planet and leave the childish diversions of patriotism,war, senseless consumerism, banal entertainments, and red herring debates the elites would have us engage in to divert our attention from their proceedings.The perversion of true religious philosophy by sociopath clerics has become a prime tool for division by the sociopath elites. What quarrel would the masses of humanity, including our children, have with one another if our basic needs, desire for expression, and education where met. Only the sociopathic would seek to gain, which is where we stand today, in the world they've been allowed to create; all because good men were fooled and failed to understand their essence and oust them from society. Instead they rule us.
We have within us the collective ability to vet and elect persons of good character who would serve the people in an honest and forthright manner and be ever vigilante to those who would use and oppress the rest of society for their own gain; instead of the enhancement of the human condition and that of the planet we all depend on for sustenance. It's just that we have to start anew at the grass roots level and become involved.
August 15, 2012 1:02pm
Good piece, good points.
Only one quibble: the title and opening lines.
Which president said "Democracies don't start wars" ? I cannot recall ever hearing a teacher say this, nor reading it anywhere, in any textbook or anywhere else, before reading it today, here, in this piece.
August 15, 2012 9:40am
Man is this analysis ever on-point.
We already know that we'll be at war 4 more years no matter who is in the white house from 2012-2016.
So what specific steps can we start taking to make the situation more democratic for 2016?
August 15, 2012 11:24am
Vote for Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate for President and other Green candidates, then help the Green party organize for 2016.