Exclusive: Gingrich, The Christian Right
The Beltway media tells itself that Newt Gingrich can't possibly appeal to the GOP base, a group dominated by Christian conservatives, because of his history of cheating on his former wives.
The Washington Post's left of center policy blogger Ezra Klein says he likes Newt Gingrich, who he calls a "dreamy policy wonk" he'd love to get a beer with. But Klein concedes that Gingrich can't possibly win his party's nomination given the man's extramarital affairs. Although Klein's thinking is the consensus among the pundit class, the latest New York Times/CBS poll, which finds Gingrich leading the pack in Iowa, shows that white evangelicals overwhelmingly support the former Speaker of the House.
What gives?
The answer lies in a four-pronged strategy informed by a savvy understanding of the modern Christian right. First, Gingrich turned his marriage infidelities into a chance to embrace a religious transformation. Second, he made himself a spokesman for Christian-focused historical revisionism, a trend popular with evangelicals in particular. Third, he successfully harnessed the recent wave of anti-Muslim bigotry. And finally, he placed himself deep within the religious right movement by simply buying off key leaders.
Despite the easy narrative of political hypocrisy, the knee-jerk charge hurled in political debates, many evangelicals find stories of redemption far more compelling than those of picture perfect personal lives. The tale of personal crisis and redemption before God has propelled other Republican stalwarts. Think George Bush or Tom DeLay, hard partying alcoholics who became born again and were warmly embraced by Christian conservatives.
Gingrich publicly acknowledged his extramarital sin to then-Focus on the Family leader James Dobson in 2007. Dobson asked if the rumors were true, that Gingrich pursued the Clinton impeachment while carrying on with an affair with a young congressional aide (now Gingrich's third wife, Callista). "There's certainly times when I've fallen short of God's standards," he confessed during the on air interview. "Do you understand the word repentance?" barked Dobson. Gingrich, demurring from his know-it-all style, replied that he had begged "God to receive forgiveness and to receive mercy."
The thought of Gingrich kneeling down and asking for God's mercy might seem comical to political observers. After all, Gingrich is known for unapologetic political hits and jetting around in private planes, not humility. For evangelicals, however, a man asking to be absolved from his sins is perhaps the most humanizing story possible.
Mitt Romney, Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann, and Rick Santorum tout themselves and their families as the embodiment of wholesome Christian values. But deep inside, do GOP voters really want a flawless ideal? What sets Gingrich apart is his tale of falling into darkness and seeking the light of God, something that might actually make him more appealing to traditional Christian voters. As Richard Land, a powerful Southern Baptist, put it recently in an open-letter to Gingrich, "Evangelicals are a forgiving people, who having experienced redemption and forgiveness in their own spiritual lives, are most often willing to extend it to others who ask for it."
Gingrich has focused on his story of redemption in interviews with the Christian press. He told Christian Broadcasting Network's David Brody that he sought "not God’s understanding, but God’s forgiveness" as he explored his bid for the presidency.
It would be a mistake to attribute Gingrich's rise in the polls solely to his ability to turn his extramarital affair into an asset. Gingrich, once known for science fiction-influenced policy proposals, has weaved modern Christian conservative crusades into his political identity.
"It is a lie to teach American history as though this is a secular nation in which God did not reappear, again and again and again for every generation," said Gingrich to a recent meeting of far right pastors. Since Gingrich's heavily publicized mea culpa in 2007, he has set out to rebrand himself as a culture warrior against the "secular machine," as he calls it, that seeks to censor the Christian underpinnings of America's founding fathers. He has produced two movies and one book that argues that George Washington and Thomas Jefferson envisioned America as a Christian nation.
Gingrich attached himself to the Christian historical revisionist movement, led by crackpot historians like David Barton and popularized by radio blowhard Glenn Beck, shortly before the birth of the anti-Obama Tea Party. The Tea Party's interest in a far right conception of America's founding has made Gingrich's "Rediscovering God in America" series a hit among grassroots conservatives over the last three years.
Promoting the series has also given Gingrich an opportunity to travel the country addressing large congregations. "We are in a period when we are surrounded by paganism, and paganism is on offense," Newt Gingrich warned at an event with militant Christian right leader Lou Engle and Mike Huckabee two years ago.
Such rhetoric is extreme, but does not come close to matching Gingrich's recent vitriol towards Muslims and Muslim Americans.
Earlier this year, Gingrich compared Muslims to the Nazis and Communists, saying he would have the "guts" to administer a loyalty oath to Muslims seeking jobs in his administration. Last year, he managed to insert himself into headlines by leading the charge against a planned Muslim community center a few blocks from Ground Zero. Supporters of the community center, Gingrich said, were "apologists for Sharia" who are "very hostile to our civilization."
Poll after poll has shown that evangelicals largely hold hostile views of Islam. Although Gingrich has made efforts to reach out to minorities in the past, particularly Latino voters, his new found demagoguery against Muslim Americans appears to be rooted in political expediency.
Taken together, Gingrich's unflinching attacks on Muslims, his vocal opposition to the separation of church and state, and his quest for personal redemption might seem like enough to earn the endorsement of Christian right power brokers in early primary states. But a look below the surface reveals a more simple reality.
In 2009, veteran Gingrich aide Rick Tyler set up a group ostensibly designed to unite religious conservatives with supply side right-wingers. Rather than training a new army of activists, as Tyler had promised, the new organization served as a conduit for Gingrich to buy off the Christian right.
The group funneled $200,000 to the virulently anti-gay American Family Association, $25,000 to the Iowa Faith and Freedom Coalition, as well as hundreds of thousands in "seed money" to an effort set up by Bob vander Plaats, a religious right huckster who controls a large grassroots network of Christian voters in Iowa. In last two months of the presidential primary, all three recipients of Gingrich money have lavished praise on the candidate to the press.
The primary is certainly not a lock yet with four weeks of tough campaigning before the first caucus. Although he still struggles in New Hampshire polls, Gingrich has an ace up his sleeve in the heavily evangelical states of Iowa, South Carolina, and Florida.
CONNECT















11 comments on "Exclusive: Gingrich, The Christian Right"
December 16, 2011 5:39am
Actually the "x-ian" principle is rather succinct: "WE aren't perfect, JUST FORGIVEN!" meaning that they can do anything nasty, filthy, disgusting and horrid that they choose, at any given moment, then say "I'm sorry" and it is gone, "washed away" in their terms, and they are free to go out and do it all again, because, as they say, they are not perfect..."
I personally find the "blood-drinking, etc." rather gross, as well as being some savage primitive thing they indulge in. How does one commune with a god by blood-drinking and symbolic cannibalism? The penchant for blood does seem to encompass the whole philosophy, and the Judeo-x-ian philosophy of life success IS based on genocide... read the nasty book, the first half is naught but a genocide game plan, and a blueprint for land theft! The mythical JAAAAYYYYsuuuussss guy said "GO AND SIN NO MORE!" He was ignored then, he is ignored now.
December 16, 2011 12:41am
Whenever a judaic / cristian / moslem " religion or the derivation of values thereof " article appears there are certain erroneous assumptions that that arise automatically. These assumptions are based upon various ancient concepts that have been erroneous for at least since 700 BCE. These thoughts are wired into the very core of society, of a religious concept of "THE DEITY", Self, singular and plural. When Nouriel Roubini { the economist } suggested about four years ago in discussion about the current economic plight that the problem was "systemic" I suspect even he was not aware of the profound truth that he was stating.
I suggest a thorough, thoughtful and contemplative read of these three books:
"The Bible Unearthed" Israel Finkelstein & Neil Silberman
"How to Read the Bible" James Kugel
"The Mythic Past" Thomas L. Thompson
Today humanity is caught in a very literal death spiral. Recently the CEO of Goldman Sachs, probably to justify the larceny gnawing within his conscience, said he " was doing God's work." [ www.huffingtonpost.com ] Make no mistake about this, we are engulfed in a holy war. "Money" is only the vehicle to deliver absolute " Dominion " over all people and things. This dominion ism is in a partnership with the satanic. The specialty of "Apologetics" travels under the auspices of a specialty work "for god" which is little else than a smoke screen and a deception to keep the befuddled befuddled. Refer to Appendix 1: Apologetics and “Biblical Criticism Lite” - James Kugel a .pdf.
Dr. Jung foresaw this general crisis of this inward deficiency coming upon humanity many years ago and did not hold out much hope for a successful solution, in that the resolution resides at a not easily reached level of personal consciousness. Dr. Scott Peck in " The People of the Lie " addresses anomalies of this mystery space. Refer to Dr. David R. Hawkins, about “the box”.
Hasten to the truth for it alone can set you free.
May we all muster the courage to do so.
A fellow being
Tom
December 15, 2011 10:05pm
How can the "Christian Right" call themselves Christians? Love thy neighbor as thyself (but only if they're rich enough). Thou shall not kill (unless its invade Iraq, bomb Iran, or kill Muslims). Honor thy Father and thy Mother (but take away their Social Security and Medicare - they're old and don't count any more). Thou shall not hold any graven images (except worship the almighty dollars). And on, and on, and on!
December 15, 2011 6:53pm
"Such rhetoric is extreme, but does not come close to matching Gingrich's recent vitriol towards Muslims and Muslim Americans."
Could be his disdain for Muslims actually comes from his connection with the Fundamentalist Right who long ago joined forces with American Zionist that have exerted their will on many members of Congress for years. It explains our government's obscene loyalty to those Far Right leaders in the Israeli Government who are committed to setting the Middle East ablaze with the help of our money, soldiers, and tax dollars. Yet, the main stream religious groups in this country are being lumped with these maniacs as they refuse to voice opposition to their lethal doctrine while their leaders continue to cry about the loss of church membership. It's time for them to stand up to this far right element that preaches hate and revenge against any group that refuses to buy into their twisted psychopathic doctrine. Yet our government continues to wage war for these people using our tax dollars and children to eliminate a race of people from the planet. Shades of Hitler, and oh so many on the Right still ask “Why Do They Hate Us ?”.
December 15, 2011 5:57pm
There was one thing Jesus Christ hated; it wasn't the prostitute it wasn't the drunken sinner-- it was the hypocritical, religious leaders of his day, who held others to a standard that they themselves couldn't keep.
The thing that irks about Gingy isn't his infidelity; it's his seared-conscience hypocrisy. Naturally there's plenty of room for him with hypocrites of the religious right. They receive him as one of their own.
I can see Jesus shaking his head at all his "believers", like Dobson, who take the exact opposite positions Christ took; blessed are the war-makers; hate thy (muslim) neighbor; hold the rich in high regard; steal from the poor, widowed, orphan, and the sick; my kingdom is of this world and it's -your- country; man -can- serve two masters, God and Mammon; etc).
December 15, 2011 5:17pm
He can apologize as often as he wants to. It will mean nothing to me until he alters the offensive behavior. ANYONE can say "I'm sorry" merely because they got caught.
December 15, 2011 4:44pm
As far as Christian Right is concerned, you can lie, cheat, steal, maim and kill.
Hell, you can even start two illegal wars, starve the poor and give to the rich, all week long.
All you need to do is show up in church on sunday. Make sure you bring the wife and the kids as props and profusely repent. A large offering to a Mega Church will undoubtably bring forgiveness from the Lord!
Bush and Newt are two perfect examples. Two of the nastiest individuals who's dirty deeds have caused more harm to this nation than anybody else.
But they both declared Jesus as their Lord and Savior, and all was forgiven!
Stupid Clinton did it all wrong. Instead of trying to send the "blue dress" to the cleaners, he should have stood humbly in front of the Pastor, admitting he had "sex with that woman" and give the price of the dry cleaning to the church!
AMEN?
December 15, 2011 3:59pm
Thank you, The Nation.
Sincerely, we do appreciate you work. However, we are tired of just “reading” about the problems and waiting for Obama to wake up or get some balls (duh).
WE THE PEOPLE, ARE DYING OUT HERE!
We first lost our jobs, then our savings, and are now losing our homes.
We cannot feed our families and cannot keep them healthy and safe.
We have been hurt enough. Dialog, debate, discussion, compromise, education, peaceful protesting, and even voting, has NOT worked!
Wall Street, the 1%, the Tea Party, and corporate fat cats have become a gang of bullies.
Their unlimited cash buys votes, corrupts, and overpowers any positive initiative.
You can never appease a bully. A bully wants more, and more, and finally…everything.
You have to hurt a bully back…so badly, that he fears YOU!
C’mon Americans, OWS, the 99%, middle class, and forgotten people...it’s time to get mean dog fighting mad! Passivity is NOT working! Are we sheep? Are we going to let these bullies continue to hurt our families? Are we supposed to just lie down and die?
Hell no! (Not loud enough) HELL NO!
So, Fox News, Wall Street, fat cats, right wing nuts…we will take your advice to develop clear demands, strategies, and new battle tactics against your continuing class warfare.
Are we still obscure?
IT’S TIME THE BULLIES…WERE BULLIED BACK !
V
December 15, 2011 3:56pm
Lee, You hit a lot of important points here - but a factual correction might be in order re the 200K - reports are that Gingrich connected an anonymous donor with the Iowa judge recall effort, not that his ReAL provided the money directly as you state. Per the LA Times story you reference:
" "It wouldn’t have happened without Newt,” said David Lane, executive director of Iowa for Freedom, the organization that led the campaign. “Newt provided strategic advice and arranged the initial seed money, about $200,000, which is what got everything started.” The money came from an anonymous donor whose contribution was arranged by Gingrich, Lane said." (LA Times, March 3, 2011)
Also, I'd have to question your characterization that Gingrich "bought off" the Christian right. That suggests this is a new relationship. It is anything but. Gingrich did more than provide the seed money for the Iowa judge recall effort. He also provided strategic advice for the effort and that's consistent with Gingrich's extensive pattern of collaborating with the hard evangelical right, which goes back at least as far as 1985.
I think there may be points of divergence between Gingrich's agenda and that of the Christian right, but that remains to be seen.
In my opinion, your points on Gingrich's anti-Islam rhetoric and and his being a spokesperson for Christian nationalism a la Barton are very apt. I would note, however, that Gingrich's cultivation of David Barton goes back to the mid 1990s, at least, and Gingrich active role as a spokesperson for Barton's ouevre traces back nearly a decade.
Cheers,
Bruce Wilson
December 15, 2011 2:57pm
The agenda of the conservatives recognizes that opinions have both a "rating" position (the person's self-rating on a political left-center-right scale) and a "content" position (the actual content of his/her beliefs). The "rating" position always has "content" end-anchors. If the conservatives espouse highly radical positions, they change people's right-end anchors. So people who take themselves to be "moderate" or "middle-of-the-road" on their internal rating scale actually move themselves to the right in terms of their content positions.
So Mr. Gingrich and his colleagues/masters are crazy like a fox -- in repeatedly espousing their far-right positions (and thus moving them toward legitimacy) they are actually changing the minds of some people who are committed to seeing themselves in terms of where they are on a political left-right continuum.
December 15, 2011 2:24pm
Christians, like most free-will wielding Homo sapiens, need some dualistic framework, in which to give them a sense of perspective. Newty, and his fragile ego, are playing off those endless Christian vulnerabilities. A vilified enemy (anyone/everyone else and their free-will choices...especially Islam and Islamists...), is an outlet through which this pent-up vitriol, can flow. That does NOT, a good leader make! Predating upon the weak and impressionable Christian sheeple and their susceptibilities, is an exploitative way to attempt to become the "shepherd of the flock."