CONNECT
Published: Sunday 12 August 2012
There are trillions of dollars of car loans, mortgages, and other debts, in the United States, tied to the Libor.
The Fed, Ben Bernanke, and the Rotten Libor
The case of the rigged Libor turns out to be the scandal that just keeps on giving. It reveals a great deal about the behavior of the Federal Reserve Board and central banks more generally.
Last month, Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke gave testimony before Congress in which he said that he had become aware of evidence that banks in England were rigging the Libor in the fall of 2008. According to Bernanke, he called this to the attention of Mervyn King, the head of the Bank of England. Apparently Mervyn King did nothing, since the rigging continued, but Bernanke told Congress there was nothing more that he could do.
The implications of Bernanke’s claim are incredible. There are trillions of dollars of car loans, mortgages, and other debts, in the United States, tied to the Libor. There are also huge derivative contracts whose value depends on the Libor at a moment in time. People were winning or losing on these deals not based on the market, but rather on the rigged Libor rate being set by the big banks.
Bernanke certainly had an obligation as Fed chair to expose and stop this rigging, which was interfering with the proper working of U.S. and world financial markets. But hey, Mervyn King didn’t want to take any action, what could Bernanke possibly do?
It is truly incredible that Bernanke would make such a statement to Congress and the public. There was nothing he could do about the rigging?
Suppose that he told the head of the Bank of England that he had no choice but to stop the rigging. Bernanke could have said that if King doesn’t immediately take the necessary steps to end the rigging then he would hold a press conference in which he would publicly display the evidence of the rigging and report King’s failure to take action.
Is it conceivable that this threat would have left King unmoved? Would King continue to tolerate the rigging even if could cost him his job and leave him open to public humiliation for failing to carry through his responsibilities to the people of the United Kingdom? That seems unlikely.
Of course such a threat would have been rude. It would have required Bernanke to tell a fellow central bank head that he was failing in his job and that Bernanke was prepared to ruin his career in order to force him to act responsibly. Apparently Bernanke never even considered this course of action.
This should make everyone very angry. Whatever personal relationship Bernanke has with Mervyn King and other central bank heads should be subordinate to his responsibility to ensure the integrity of U.S. financial markets. If the latter requires that he be rude to the head of the Bank of England, then there is no question that his job requires that he be rude to Mervyn King. But that is not the way things get done in the central bankers’ club.
It is not just the Libor scandal that shows the bad effects of central banker clubbiness. Bernanke has recently committed the Fed to a policy of targeting a 2.0 percent inflation rate. The basis for this targeting is seen as the congressional mandate for the Fed to pursue a policy of promoting price stability. Of course that is only half of the Fed’s mandate; the other half is to pursue a policy of promoting full employment.
No prior Fed chair has seen the commitment to price stability as implying a specific inflation target, so Bernanke has taken a big leap in picking this 2.0 percent inflation target. This is a big deal because it could mean that the Fed would neglect the other half of its mandate, the commitment to maintain full employment (as it is arguably doing now) in the interest of hitting its 2.0 percent inflation target.
Why would Bernanke pick this 2.0 percent inflation target? After all, there is little evidence that moderate rates of inflation in a 3.0-4.0 percent range cause any major harm to the economy. There are hundreds of examples, including in the United States, where economies have maintained strong growth over prolonged periods with rates of inflation that exceeded 2.0 percent.
Of course the 2.0 percent inflation target came from Bernanke’s friends at other central banks. Mervyn King has announced a 2.0 percent inflation target for the Bank of England. The European Central Bank (ECB) is legally committed to a 2.0 percent inflation target.
This legal commitment to 2.0 percent inflation meant that when housing bubbles were growing to ever more dangerous levels in Spain, Ireland, and elsewhere in the eurozone, the ECB just looked the other way. Rather than taking any steps to prevent the collapse that has devastated the eurozone’s economy, the ECB said: “what does this have to do with us?”
Bernanke apparently wants the Fed to have the same attitude. If tens of millions have their lives ruined by unemployment and/or the loss of their home, Bernanke will still be able to pat himself on the back because the Fed reached its 2.0 percent inflation target. That’s the way things work at the central bankers’ club.
Get Email Alerts from NationofChange
ABOUT Dean Baker
Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C. He previously worked as a senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute and an assistant professor at Bucknell University. He is the author of several books, including Plunder & Blunder: The Rise and Fall of the Bubble Economy, The Conservative Nanny State: How the Wealthy Use the Government to Stay Rich and Get Richer and The United States Since 1980. He was the editor of Getting Prices Right: The Debate Over the Consumer Price Index, which was a winner of a Choice Book Award as one of the outstanding academic books of the year. He appears frequently on TV and radio programs, including CNN, CBS News, PBS NewsHour, and National Public Radio. His blog, Beat the Press, features commentary on economic reporting. He received his B.A. from Swarthmore College and his Ph.D. in economics from the University of Michigan.
Top Stories
By Richard (RJ) Eskow
4 comments on "The Fed, Ben Bernanke, and the Rotten Libor"
August 12, 2012 8:37pm
Make that ethnicity not nationality...my bad.
August 12, 2012 8:36pm
It doesn't matter who the government figure- heads are. The people who control the money...ie..THE FED control the wealth and therefore the country. Look up the nationalities of the past several decades of FED chairmen...interesting huh?
August 12, 2012 3:47pm
We need first to throw out our entire government, reform the electon laws, and the laws governing the bahavior of the politicians, We then need to reform just who can run for office. Right now, presently there are few restrictions, We need educated, experienced patriot statesmen to run, not the typical whore politician hack
Then, we need to nationalize the Federal Reserve and put it under the control of a newly formed agancy, like the Supreme Court, Its members would have to be approved by Congress, A central bank is needed, but not like the one we have Its sole purpose should be to lend to the government for projects whose economic return would be off the loan such as was done the Railroads, Hoover Damn, etc,
Wars need to be funded by the currant people who want them in the form of War Bonds only, No loans for war
August 12, 2012 12:44pm
I have total respect for Dean Baker as an economist. He was one of a handfull that accurately predicted the housing speculation bubble bursting and the catatsrophic results. However, I don't understand why he hasn't grasped the all powerfull influence wielded by the banking fraternity over the world's national economies. Mr. Baker keeps on writing articles that skirt the fundamental issue of the banking system's inate corruption and ponsi schematics based on the fractional reserve system and monopoly control over the issuance of money. Libor was allowed to be fixed for two reasons, profits and balance sheet optics and the proping up of sovereign debts by the supporting of the bond market, primarily the U.S. dollar as the world's reserve currency. All this is in the best interests of the bank owners, the real persons of interest, not the Dimons/Diamonds of the banking world. It's like Mr. Baker can't escape his economist training enough to call a spade a spade.
These are some of the reasons the bankers are allowed to continue their crimminal actions without prosecutions as they hold the all the economies in the palm of their collective hands at the behest of the banks actual owners.
Who would dare move against them in a meaningfull way?
When a depression finally takes hold that will be the time to end the bankers strangle hold over the nations of this world, their militaries and their peoples.
Not only do the bankers control what your car and mortgage payment will be, they also have within their power the abilty to control wether or not you even have a job, to earn money that the bankers have ultimate control over as they create all of it, so that you can pay the bankers principal and interest on the credit they gave you, all created out of thin air...imagine if you could create money out of thin air and charge interest on that money, why you'd have the alchemist's dream of being able to turn air into gold for your own profit. It's high time this ultimate power was restored to the peoples of this world for their own profit, instead of for the profits of the few that have usurped the all powerful control of creating money and controling credit; given to them by either corrupt, stupid or both by governmental representatives of the peoples..