Financial Firm Fined for Misleading Investors on Magnetar Bets

Cora Currier
ProPublica / News Report
Published: Thursday 1 March 2012
Carina defaulted only 16 months after it was launched. Investors lost nearly $450 million.
Article image

State investigators in Massachusetts slapped the investment company State Street Global Advisors yesterday with a $5 million fine for failing to tell investors about the role of the hedge fund Magnetar in a risky collateralized debt obligation that collapsed in the housing market crisis.

In 2006, State Street and Deutsche Bank put together a $1.56 billion CDO deal, called Carina CDO Ltd. As we reported with This American Life and NPR, Magnetar was involved in the creation of at least $40 billion of CDOs, including Carina, while simultaneously taking positions that would allow it to profit if the CDOs failed.As we noted in our original story, sources involved in the negotiations said State Street managers were “highly skeptical” about dealing with Magnetar, raising concerns about the company’s “reputational risk.”

According to the settlement, a State Street executive also sent an email saying, “We are not comfortable with [Magnetar] shorting into the deal.”

Carina defaulted only 16 months after it was launched. Investors lost nearly $450 million. The Massachusetts settlement says Magnetar was closely involved in picking assets that went into the CDO — and “was able to reap a windfall” when it failed. (Here’s the settlement.)

Magnetar has never been charged with wrongdoing, and has always maintained that it did not have a strategy to bet against the housing market.

The settlement reached with Massachusetts faults State Street for not informing investors of Magnetar’s role in creating Carina and its bets against CDOs. “Investors were unaware of a potential conflict of interest between Magnetar and other Carina investors and thus were unable to make a fully informed investment decision,” the settlement states.

State Street will pay a $1.5 million fine and return $3.5 million to the state for fees, commissions and other revenue related to Carina.

State Street is being fined under a Massachusetts law regulating investment activity. In a statement, William Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, said his office “is actively investigating how banks misled buyers of securitized debt instruments backed by subprime mortgages.” The deals, he said, “allowed the mortgage crisis to continue and caused further harm to the U.S. economy.” The secretary’s office did not respond to requests for further comment on the settlement.

A spokesperson for State Street said that in accepting the settlement, the company “neither admits nor denies [Massachusetts’] findings or conclusions concerning information contained in the offering documents for the CDO.”

Massachusetts has gone after State Street before: In 2010, the company settled with Galvin’s office and the Securities and Exchange Commission for more than $300 millionover charges that the firm failed to disclose to investors the extent of their exposure to subprime investments.

J.P. Morgan settled with the SEC last year for $153 million over claims that the bank misled investors about Magnetar’s role in a CDO. The SEC is also reportedly considering charges against one former manager of a Japanese bank over his involvement with Magnetar CDOs — the first public evidence of possible charges against a bank executive related to the scandal.



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange

Top Stories

5 comments on "Financial Firm Fined for Misleading Investors on Magnetar Bets"

belleville

March 02, 2012 9:12am

We Need Tax Reform. "Tax Em Like 1938". This is my new motto.

PipeUp

March 01, 2012 4:12pm

They made sure their product would fail and then sold them as if they were sound.

Norman Allen's picture
Norman Allen

March 01, 2012 4:03pm

Steal $billions, get fined $5 million. That is a return of over 90%. Where else on earth you find a government like ours that plays Russian Roulette with people's livelihood like ours and let the criminals run with the loot?

anono

March 01, 2012 3:57pm

What they do is a criminal, but they fear no real consequences because they also own the the regulatory agencies and legal systems. Money talks; honor and integrity walks.

pitch1934

March 01, 2012 2:55pm

I cannot understand how it is not criminal to bet against your product. When you buy a car you get a warranty. They try to sell you an extended warranty, betting that their product won't fail. These companies were betting that their products would fail. They made those bets with the profits from selling the products. How is that not criminal?