Fox News Laments Federal Government’s Role in Hurricane Relief: ‘FEMA Has an Ability to Print Money!’

Igor Volsky
Think Progress / News Report
Published: Thursday 1 November 2012
On Thursday, the hosts of Fox & Friends argued that Americans affected by the hurricane could turn to private insurers for help and suggested that hurricane relief could be left to the states.
Article image

While governors across the country have praised the federal government’s rapid response to Hurricane Sandy, Fox News sought to remind viewers of the evils of Washington, criticizing the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for “printing money” and relying on China to fund relief for victims of the storm.

On Thursday, the hosts of Fox & Friends argued that Americans affected by the hurricane could turn to private insurers for help and suggested that hurricane relief could be left to the states:

GRETCHEN CARLSON (HOST): There is an argument about federal versus state. I mean, some people have said the states should be in charge of some of this relief money, so you don’t have to go and request to the federal. I mean, I understand why you have to go before Congress, because otherwise you could have a situation where you’re giving out money willy nilly.

PETER JOHNSON (GUEST HOST): In essence, FEMA has an ability to print money. And as we were talking about before, Steve, who in the end will be paying for our flood damage in the short-term? Who will be putting up the dollars? Will China? Will we be becoming more indebted to China as a result of our floods on our coast?

STEVE DOOCY (HOST): That’s right. It’s never free money. You know, Congress can say okay, we’re going to come up with the dough and here is the thing, FEMA has this gigantic program with over a trillion dollars worth of property insured, but they only got $3 billion in the bank. That’s crazy. But because we’ve got such a gigantic deficit right now, Peter, you’re exactly right. If the Congress says okay, let’s put more money in the ’till for FEMA, that money is probably going to be borrowed from China.

Watch it:

FEMA estimates it has enough funds for disaster aid, but it’s unclear if the agency’s federal flood insurance program will be able to provide for the flood damage caused by the storm (private insurers typically don’t cover flooding.) FEMA owes $18 billion to the Treasury Department from Hurricane Katrina, but may have immediate access to $3.8 billion. Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-PA) also plans to introduce legislation “to provide $12 billion in new emergency assistance funds.”

But Fox News is arguing that the federal government is overplaying its hand and should leave recovery to the states, local governments, and private entities. FEMA director Craig Fugate has indeed embraced a “whole community approach to emergency management nationally,” recognizing that “all aspects of a community (volunteer, faith, and community-based organizations, the private sector, and the public, including survivors themselves) – not just the government – to effectively prepare for, protect against, respond to, recover from, and mitigate against any disaster.” And while all parties play an important role in relief, only the federal government can coordinate and organize disaster relief that spans across state lines and inflicts billions of dollars in damage.



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange

Top Stories

12 comments on "Fox News Laments Federal Government’s Role in Hurricane Relief: ‘FEMA Has an Ability to Print Money!’"

enuf

November 01, 2012 8:42pm

Caution TROLL on this site

The Dog
Lunenburg, MA
November 01, 2012 3:07pm

Interesting how Romney got his tail caught threatening to eliminate FEMA, and along comes Sandy, and all-of-a-sudden he loves FEMA. FLIP FLOP No.?

Micheal Cwynar

November 01, 2012 2:13pm

Struggle needs to struggle harder with the difference between fears and facts.

Kathy Cooper

November 01, 2012 11:40am

Obama cannot cut anything. Spending starts in the House, moves to the senate then goes to POTUS for signature or veto.

It was nice your friends belonged to a church, many people do not.

strugglingtomakeit

November 01, 2012 1:08pm

Kathy,

Obama has completely ignored the Constitution, and the Congress, and taken things into his own hands...which is illegal. He has even stated that he would do so.

Maybe you need to pay a little more attention to what he is doing.
If re-elected, he will take more things into his own hands, till there is no use for a Congress. He has overstepped his authority too many times.

strugglingtomakeit

November 01, 2012 10:17am

You know what REALLY works? The community! The people in the community who come together and use their own resources, and their own labor to rebuild their community. It is called charity.

I have an elderly, disabled friend. She lost her home in my town, and moved back to a very old home they owned in Atlanta. She still did not have the money to pay the last 4 months of mortgage on that home. Her elderly husband, in the meantime, had a massive heart attack. Their CHURCH came in ..paid the rest of their mortgage. Cleaned up the very old home, replaced carpets, painted, repaired, gave them food, and have been helping them stay afloat ever since.

Now THAT is how it is supposed to be! Charity starts at home! That is what the founding fathers expected it to be done. The powers of the federal government were limited to protecting the citizens of the USA. Now you might say that FEMA comes under that. I don't know how you think. But I consider protecting this land...means...protecting our borders..so that evil does not illegally come over the border...like Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Qaeda and other enemies of the USA, have been doing for YEARS now...even before Obama. But politics continues to get in the way.

Norman123

November 01, 2012 10:18am

Any condition from which the 1% does not make money is going to be criticized by the media of the 1%. To them, government should be used to force people to pay for the lifestyle of the 1%. Privatization/Austerity has become synonymous with more opportunities for the 1% to skin the 99%. Disorganized masses (busted unions, mistrust of anyone bordering paranoia in our society makes this possible) are no match for well funded, well organized and coordinated force of the 1%. Organize, organize, organize....

strugglingtomakeit

November 01, 2012 1:10pm

Norman,

Most of the 1% are Democrats.

The Dog
Lunenburg, MA
November 01, 2012 3:03pm

The Dog -

You are absolutely wrong. The 1% is not all Democrats. The greater percentage of this class are Republicans - you know the ones with all the money that they are obsessed with hoarding.
For your information, President Obama taught US Constitutional Law at Harvard. I think he knows a good bit about it

Ron in NM

November 01, 2012 2:23pm

Hey, STRUGGLING, here's another of your pretensions. How about giving us your sources for the startling revelation that most of the 1% are Democrats.

Is that why so much of the 1% is behind Romney's bid for the presidency?

If most are Democrats, why aren't they shoveling billions into Obama's attempt to get re-elected? The statistics show that smaller contributions are flowing to Obama, but much BIGGER money is behind the SuperPacs that are funding Romney's attacks on the President. If your wild assertions were true, Obama TV ads would be dominating the airwaves, when the exact opposite is what I see on my TV.

I think you just make up things in your mind, then proclaim you have this secret source of the TRUTH, which you won't divulge to any skeptic of your claims. "Do your own research, you lazy co-dependents!" But people don't really want to waste their time substantiating your wild charges...they're just telling you," hey, you say this, and it's pretty outrageous, so where's your proof?"

But you offer nothing, just insult your questioner. Who's impressing whom with your nonsense?

strugglingtomakeit

November 01, 2012 10:07am

Maybe you are not aware...in case you get all upset about this article...that Obama was cutting FEMA by about $900,000,000.

It's politics people! Politics stink! Politics is corrupt!

Get over it!

Or CHANGE it!

Warren D Nicholson

November 01, 2012 5:47pm

Are you mitt? Because you sure do make up a lot of lies,