Google Map Reveals Massive Geothermal Potential Nationwide, “Effectively an Unlimited Supply” Says Chu

Stephen Lacey
ThinkProgress / News Analysis
Published: Sunday 6 November 2011
“This map and corresponding study gives the geothermal industry another great tool for evaluating resources, particularly in areas on the East Coast where developers haven’t ventured.”
Article image

You’re looking at a whole lot of heat.

Southern Methodist University’s Geothermal Laboratory recently released a map that proves once again how much potential energy is locked beneath America. SMU’s resource map, which took years to develop with funding from Google.org, shows that there are enough technically recoverable resources throughout the U.S. to equal 10 times the amount of coal capacity in place today.

Other maps have shown similar data. Last year, SMU issued a map (also funded by Google) that showed massive geothermal potential under West Virginia, an area not typically seen as suitable for the technology. In 2007, MIT Researcher Jeff Tester analyzed deep “hot rock” resources, showing that the U.S has 100 GW of potential for Enhanced Geothermal Systems [EGS] — an emerging type of plant design in which a developer creates an artificial well by pumping water through deep rocks, rather than using direct steam from hot water reservoirs closer to the surface.

So big deal, right? Another map shows we have tons of resources. Why is this so different from the others?

Well, geothermal exploration can be a very risky business. It’s not uncommon for a developer to spend 3/5ths of capital on the exploration and drilling phase of a project. And if the resources aren’t there, that’s millions of dollars down the…bore hole.

This map and corresponding study gives the geothermal industry another great tool for evaluating resources, particularly in areas on the East Coast where developers haven’t ventured. SMU provides an explanation (and a good video of EGS starring Energy Secretary Steven Chu):

In this newest SMU estimate of resource potential, researchers used additional temperature data and in-depth geological analysis for the resulting heat flow maps to create the updated temperature-at-depth maps from 3.5 kilometers to 9.5 kilometers (11,500 to 31,000 feet).

This update revealed that some conditions in the eastern two-thirds of the U.S. are actually hotter than some areas in the western portion of the country, an area long-recognized for heat-producing tectonic activity. In determining the potential for geothermal production, the new SMU study considers the practical considerations of drilling, and limits the analysis to the heat available in the top 6.5 km (21,500 ft.) of crust for predicting megawatts of available power.

This approach incorporates a newly proposed international standard for estimating geothermal resource potential that considers added practical limitations of development, such as the inaccessibility of large urban areas and national parks. Known as the ‘technical potential’ value, it assumes producers tap only 14 percent of the ‘theoretical potential’ of stored geothermal heat in the U.S., using currently available technology.

In other words, this assessment, which shows we have enough recoverable resources to overtake our coal capacity ten times over, is pretty realistic.

Google.org funded this detailed piece of research as part of its suite of strategic investments in geothermal R&D and project deployment. But even with these resources and the high-profile backing from companies like Google, the pace of development in the geothermal industry will still be moderate.

That’s because developers in the sector are competing with oil and gas companies for drilling rigs and workers. Securing capital for projects from the still-tight financial markets has also been tough for companies. And in next-generation EGS, drilling technologies and power plant designs are still in pre-commercial phase. This isn’t an industry that can deploy projects very rapidly.

Even with some constraints, it’s clear that the Americans are blessed with an enormous amount of technically-exploitable resources under our feet. And no, it’s not coal, oil or natural gas.

Here’s a good video of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (and it beats the heck out of gas fracking):

Get Email Alerts from NationofChange
Author pic
ABOUT Stephen Lacey

Stephen Lacey is a reporter/blogger for Climate Progress, where he writes on clean energy policy, technologies, and finance. Before joining CP, he was an editor/producer with RenewableEnergyWorld.com. He received his B.A. in journalism from Franklin Pierce University.

FEATURE A

Connect with your friends

Find new content you might like and see what your friends are sharing!

Top Stories

16 comments on "Google Map Reveals Massive Geothermal Potential Nationwide, “Effectively an Unlimited Supply” Says Chu"

rss0246

November 08, 2011 9:42pm

Adrienne - I agree everyone should do whatever they can to lessen the demand they make on the grid by individual actions like conservation, insulation and installing/using wind, solar, household geothermal, etc. BUT we still need to find a clean, domestic BASELOAD energy source to light and heat our cities, charge our cars and power up the national electric grid. The utilities (and their bankers) will not invest millions to drill clusters of deep wells at their new and existing power plants -- unless and until the government forgoes a few fighter planes and uses the money to build a couple of big HDR/EGS plants that safely and cleanly feed power to major U.S. cities for all the world to see... : ]

Corey Watson

November 07, 2011 6:38pm

The best place for Solar is rooftops.

AdrienneB

November 07, 2011 3:12pm

RSS0246 - We are waiting for the Koch brothers to buy up all the rights to it so they can then charge us an obscene amount for it. Read: our politicians, while claiming to "look for solutions" aren't the least bit interested in any that don't come backed with big money. Big money that can get bigger by taking advantage of such. Geothermal's been around for some time; folks who can should insist on putting it into their houses. It would pay for itself in a few years. It does. But the only involvement our government would have in it would be screw it all up for us. This is something the 99% should just start using for themselves wherever and howver they can. If you research how it's installed, you'll see that it's actually feasible for many; I just wish my yard wasn't on the side of a hill - with nearly solid rock 1/2 an inch down. I'd have installed it years ago.

rss0246

November 08, 2011 9:59pm

Hi Adrienne - I agree everyone should do what they can to lessen the demand they make on the grid by conservation, insulation and installing / using wind, solar, backyard geothermal, etc... BUT, we still need to find a huge, safe, clean, domestic base load energy source to light our cities, heat our offices, power our factories, charge our cars, produce hydrogen fuel and charge the grid -- forever.

The utilities (and their bankers) are risk averse and won't invest money to drill deep well clusters alongside their new and existing power plants -- until the government first forgoes a few fighter planes and builds one or two big hot dry rock geothermal plants that successfully supply electric power to some major U.S. cities, for all the world to see... : ]

Steve Newcomb

November 07, 2011 2:27pm

Beverly Smith says:
> By asking me to sign on-- you have COMPLETELY ERASED MY VERY IMPORTANT MESSAGE ABOUT FRACKING!!! Why would you respond to my message by asking me to sign on, and the actually DELETE MY MESSAGE????

I had the same unfortunately experience. And there's more: the Nation of Change website seems to prefer that I use my facebook etc. account. Appalling, since Facebook, Twitter, etc. look like good ways to help corporations track what individuals are doing, with no accountability, through what amounts to a one-way mirror. I say: "Nuts to that!"

Beverly, Nation of Change clearly has a bug in the login-after-you've-already-written-your-response page; it does indeed forget the note you've just written. So, the thing to do is *not* to login at the login screen after you've written your response. First, cut your note from the page on which you wrote it, then paste it into a text editor (you should do that anyway so you have a record of what you actually wrote!). Then log into Nation of Change, copy it to your clipboard from your text editor, paste it onto the Nation of Change web page, and post. Troublesome, but it works.

Matt R

November 07, 2011 1:35pm

Just so you know, this is not fracking. The two technologies are very different from each other. Fracking = bad and dangerous way to generate gas. Deep well Geothermal = good and safe (well until the first major man-made earthquake or volcano, but that's a ridiculous long shot) way to generate clean electricity directly

Rodger Garrett

November 07, 2011 11:42am

Think maybe Big Petro sees this as a competitive threat that would cut into profits? No!

JustSomeGuy

November 07, 2011 7:33am

Iceland already does this... I don't know if we could reach their level of involvement, but on the other hand it's probably worth a shot.

After all, the land under "Old Faithful" in one of our national parks has been pushed upwards about a foot recently in an area long overdue for a caldera explosion. Maybe we can take some of the pressure off and use it to get some nearly free power for a while until it does.

I'm game! What do you have to lose? Some pipe? I think we could afford that since others seem willing to plow through the entire midwest with a pipeline for Canadian shale oil, ignoring any threat to aquifers and farming in the most productive food growing region on earth!

Hey... it could happen, but in the meantime I think I would still like to put solar roofing tiles on every house built from now on and retrofit the others when new roofs are needed with subsidies that would otherwise go to the most profitable industries on earth (you know... the oil companies!).

Old Faithful might become Old Power Producing Faithful, and take an inch or two off that land rise I mentioned before. That caldera is still going to explode someday though!

Norman Allen

November 06, 2011 10:56pm

Instead of drilling deep for oil, why pipeline industries don't start their own alternative geothermal energy companies by drilling wells into magma level, press water through pipes and get super steam at the other end running jet electric gigawatts turbines, dwarfing anything we have now. One well per major city should be adequate to meet all the power needs. No pollution, no poison, no global warming, just pure hot steam and cold titanium engines. New jobs, new independence, new pride in America. Will the oil elite let it happen?

Smallbear

November 10, 2011 6:01pm

Reply to Norman Allen:

You don't even need to drill for magma. Ground heat increases with depth, no matter where you are. Simple heat pumps makes for a much simpler, cheaper, and safer system.

enuf

November 06, 2011 5:56pm

Beats the pants off bird killing wind farms and desert eco system destroying solar farms.

Corey Watson

November 07, 2011 6:38pm

The best place for Solar is rooftops.

Beverly Smith

November 06, 2011 1:04pm

By asking me to sign on-- you have COMPLETELY ERASED MY VERY IMPORTANT MESSAGE ABOUT FRACKING!!! Why would you respond to my message by asking me to sign on, and the actually DELETE MY MESSAGE????

Bah Humbug!!
Beverly Smith

Matt R

November 07, 2011 1:35pm

Just so you know, this is not fracking. The two technologies are very different from each other. Fracking = bad and dangerous way to generate gas. Deep well Geothermal = good and safe (well until the first major man-made earthquake or volcano, but that's a ridiculous long shot) way to generate clean electricity directly

rss0246

November 06, 2011 1:10pm

Beverly... I can relate. They did it to me too! (But I fooled 'em because I used the Windows CTRL-C function to put the whole message in memory before I ventured off to their sign up... )

Please take the time to write again about fracking... : ]

rss0246

November 07, 2011 8:23am

I attended Stewart Udall's "Hot Dry Rock Geothermal" conference at Los Alamos in December, 1991. Learned of the Lab's 1970's patents on HDR. Saw their small, beautiful Fenton Hill HDR demo electric plant (built years earlier) humming away in smooth, clean operation. All of us standing there felt like we were at Kitty Hawk in 1903 -- and we all KNEW we were looking at the future of the world.

TWENTY YEARS wasted since then in the U.S. without a dime of govt. spending on our greenest and greatest domestic energy resource... HDR.

A complete disgrace. What in God's name are we waiting for ??

Secretary Chu and the feds must construct two or three commercial sized HDR plants in the eastern U.S. immediately, and lease them to the utilities to operate (just as Eisenhower did with Navy atomic reactor technology in the 'fifties). This will prove the technology and finally ween Wall Street and the American power industry off filthy fossil fuels and dangerous nuclear power.

Think of the turnaround that HDR (now sometimes called "EGS") would make for America! Think of an electric (and hydrogen) based society, using a clean, domestic and endless energy -- and producing no greenhouse gases or other environmental harm to do it. Think of no more dollars shoveled out to OPEC. Think of tens of thousands of U.S. jobs quickly created by an all-out crash program to convert the existing national electric grid to 24/7/365 geothermal.

It CAN happen, boys and girls. It's entirely up to you... : ]