You are viewing the NationofChange archives. For the latest news and actions, visit the new www.NationofChange.org.
Monday, December 22, 2014 / PROGRESSIVE JOURNALISM FOR POSITIVE ACTION
Get Email Updates | Log In | Register

Amber Ramanauskas and Bill Quigley
NationofChange / Op-Ed
Published: Tuesday 3 January 2012
“It turns out that almost none of the money that the general public thought was going to Haiti actually went directly to Haiti.”

Haiti: Seven Places Where the Earthquake Money Did and Did Not Go

Article image

Haiti, a close neighbor of the US with over nine million people, was devastated by earthquake on January 12, 2010.  Hundreds of thousands were killed and many more wounded. 

The UN estimated international donors gave Haiti over $1.6 billion in relief aid since the earthquake (about $155 per Haitian) and over $2 billion in recovery aid (about $173 per Haitian) over the last two years.

Yet Haiti looks like the earthquake happened two months ago, not two years. Over half a million people remain homeless in hundreds of informal camps, most of the tons of debris from destroyed buildings still lays where it fell, and cholera, a preventable disease, was introduced into the country and is now an epidemic killing thousands and sickening hundreds of thousands more.  

It turns out that almost none of the money that the general public thought was going to Haiti actually went directly to Haiti.  The international community chose to bypass the Haitian people, Haitian non-governmental organizations and the government of Haiti.  Funds were instead diverted to other governments, international NGOs, and private companies.   

Despite this near total lack of control of the money by Haitians, if history is an indication, it is quite likely that the failures will ultimately be blamed on the Haitians themselves in a “blame the victim” reaction.   

Haitians ask the same question as many around the world “Where did the money go?”

Here are seven places where the earthquake money did and did not go.

One.  The largest single recipient of US earthquake money was the US government.  The same holds true for donations by other countries.

Right after the earthquake, the US allocated $379 million in aid and sent in 5000 troops.  The Associated Press discovered that of the $379 million in initial US money promised for Haiti, most was not really money going directly, or in some cases even indirectly, to Haiti.  They documented in January 2010 that thirty three cents of each of these US dollars for Haiti was actually given directly back to the US to reimburse ourselves for sending in our military.  Forty two cents of each dollar went to private and public non-governmental organizations like Save the Children, the UN World Food Program and the Pan American Health Organization.  Hardly any went directly to Haitians or their government.

The overall $1.6 billion allocated for relief by the US was spent much the same way according to an August 2010 report by the US Congressional Research Office: $655 million was reimbursed to the Department of Defense; $220 million to Department of Health and Human Services to provide grants to individual US states to cover services for Haitian evacuees; $350 million to USAID disaster assistance; $150 million to the US Department of Agriculture for emergency food assistance; $15 million to the Department of Homeland Security for immigration fees, and so on.

International assistance followed the same pattern.  The UN Special Envoy for Haiti reported that of the $2.4 billion in humanitarian funding, 34 percent was provided back to the donor’s own civil and military entities for disaster response, 28 percent was given to UN agencies and non-governmental agencies (NGOs) for specific UN projects, 26 percent was given to private contractors and other NGOs, 6 percent was provided as in-kind services to recipients, 5 percent to the international and national Red Cross societies, 1 percent was provided to the government of Haiti, four tenths of one percent of the funds went to Haitian NGOs. 

Two.  Only 1 percent of the money went to the Haitian government. 

Less than a penny of each dollar of US aid went to the government of Haiti, according to the Associated Press.   The same is true with other international donors.  The Haitian government was completely bypassed in the relief effort by the US and the international community.   

Three.   Extremely little went to Haitian companies or Haitian non-governmental organizations. 

The Center for Economic and Policy Research, the absolute best source for accurate information on this issue, analyzed all the 1490 contracts awarded by the US government after the January 2010 earthquake until April 2011 and found only 23 contracts went to Haitian companies.  Overall the US had awarded $194 million to contractors, $4.8 million to the 23 Haitian companies, about 2.5 percent of the total.  On the other hand, contractors from the Washington DC area received $76 million or 39.4 percent of the total.  As noted above, the UN documented that only four tenths of one percent of international aid went to Haitian NGOs.

In fact Haitians had a hard time even getting into international aid meetings.  Refugees International reported that locals were having a hard time even getting access to the international aid operational meetings inside the UN compound.  “Haitian groups are either unaware of the meetings, do not have proper photo-ID passes for entry, or do not have the staff capacity to spend long hours at the compound.”  Others reported that most of these international aid coordination meetings were not even being translated into Creole, the language of the majority of the people of Haiti! 

Four.  A large percentage of the money went to international aid agencies, and big well connected non-governmental organizations (NGOs). 

The American Red Cross received over $486 million in donations for Haiti.  It says two-thirds of the money has been contracted to relief and recovery efforts, though specific details are difficult to come by.  The CEO of American Red Cross has a salary of over $500,000 per year.

Look at the $8.6 million joint contract between the US Agency for International Development (USAID) with the private company CHF for debris removal in Port au Prince.  CHF is politically well-connected international development company with annual budget of over $200 million whose CEO was paid $451,813 in 2009.  CHF’s connection to Republicans and Democrats is illustrated by its board secretary, Lauri Fitz-Pegado, a partner with the Livingston Group LLC.  The Livingston Group is headed by the former Republican Speaker-designate for the 106th Congress, Bob Livingston, doing lobbying and government relations.  Ms. Fitz-Pegado, who apparently works the other side of the aisle, was appointed by President Clinton to serve in the Department of Commerce and served as a member of the foreign policy expert advisor team on the Obama for President Campaign.  CHF “works in Haiti out of two spacious mansions in Port au Prince and maintains a fleet of brand new vehicles” according to Rolling Stone.

Rolling Stone, in an excellent article by Janet Reitman, reported on another earthquake contract, a $1.5 million contract to the NY based consulting firm Dalberg Global Development Advisors.  The article found Dalberg’s team “had never lived overseas, didn’t have any disaster experience or background in urban planning… never carried out any program activities on the ground…” and only one of them spoke French.  USAID reviewed their work and found that “it became clear that these people may not have even gotten out of their SUVs.”

Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton announced a fundraising venture for Haiti on January 16, 2010.  As of October 2011, the fund had received $54 million in donations.  It has partnered with several Haitian and international organizations.  Though most of its work appears to be admirable, it has donated $2 million to the construction of a Haitian $29 million for-profit luxury hotel. 

“The NGOs still have something to respond to about their accountability, because there is a lot of cash out there,” according to Nigel Fisher, the UN’s chief humanitarian officer in Haiti.  “What about the $1.5 to $2 billion that the Red Cross and NGOs got from ordinary people, and matched by governments?  What’s happened to that?  And that’s where it’s very difficult to trace those funds.”

Five.  Some money went to for profit companies whose business is disasters. 

Less than a month after the quake hit, the US Ambassador Kenneth Merten sent a cable titled “THE GOLD RUSH IS ON” as part of his situation report to Washington.  In this February 1, 2010 document, made public by The Nation, Haiti Liberte and Wikileaks, Ambassador Merten reported the President of Haiti met with former General Wesley Clark for a sales presentation for  a Miami-based company that builds foam core houses.

Capitalizing on the disaster, Lewis Lucke, a high ranking USAID relief coordinator, met twice in his USAID capacity with the Haitian Prime Minister immediately after the quake.  He then quit the agency and was hired for $30,000 a month by a Florida corporation Ashbritt (known already for its big no bid Katrina grants) and a prosperous Haitian partner to lobby for disaster contracts.  Locke said “it became clear to us that if it was handled correctly the earthquake represented as much an opportunity as it did a calamity…”  Ashbritt and its Haitian partner were soon granted a $10 million no bid contract.  Lucke said he was instrumental in securing another $10 million contract from the World Bank and another smaller one from CHF International before their relationship ended.

Six.  A fair amount of the pledged money has never been actually put up. 

The international community decided it was not going to allow the Haiti government to direct the relief and recovery funds and insisted that two institutions be set up to approve plans and spending for the reconstruction funds going to Haiti.  The first was the Interim Haiti Recovery Commission (IHRC) and the second is the Haiti Reconstruction Fund (HRF).  

In March 2010, UN countries pledged $5.3 billion over two years and a total of $9.9 billion over three years in a conference March 2010.  The money was to be deposited with the World Bank and distributed by the IHRC.  The IHRC was co-chaired by Bill Clinton and the Haitian Prime Minister.   By July 2010, Bill Clinton reported only 10 percent of the pledges had been given to the IHRC.

Seven.  A lot of the money which was put up has not yet been spent. 

Nearly two years after the quake, less than 1 percent of the $412 million in US funds specifically allocated for infrastructure reconstruction activities in Haiti had been spent by USAID and the US State Department and only 12 percent has even been obligated according to a November 2011 report by the US Government Accountability Office (GAO).

The performance of the two international commissions, the IHRC and the HRF has also been poor.  The Miami Herald noted that as of July 2011, the $3.2 billion in projects approved by the IHRC only five had been completed for a total of $84 million.  The Interim Haiti Recovery Commission (IHRC), which was severely criticized by Haitians and others from its beginning, has been effectively suspended since its mandate ended at the end of October 2011.  The Haiti Reconstruction Fund was set up to work in tandem with the IHRC, so while its partner is suspended, it is not clear how it can move forward.

What to do

The effort so far has not been based a respectful partnership between Haitians and the international community.   The actions of the donor countries and the NGOs and international agencies have not been transparent so that Haitians or others can track the money and see how it has been spent.  Without transparency and a respectful partnership the Haitian people cannot hold anyone accountable for what has happened in their country.  That has to change.

The UN Special Envoy to Haiti suggests the generous instincts of people around the world must be channeled by international actors and institutions in a way that assists in the creation of a “robust public sector and a healthy private sector.”  Instead of giving the money to intermediaries, funds should be directed as much as possible to Haitian public and private institutions.  A “Haiti First” policy could strengthen public systems, promote accountability, and create jobs and build skills among the Haitian people. 

Respect, transparency and accountability are the building blocks for human rights.  Haitians deserve to know where the money has gone, what the plans are for the money still left, and to be partners in the decision-making for what is to come. 

After all, these are the people who will be solving the problems when the post-earthquake relief money is gone.



uueglr

uueglr

Very true! Makes a canhge to

Very true! Makes a canhge to see someone spell it out like that. :)

This is nothing more than

This is nothing more than disaster capitalism described best in Klein's Shock Doctrine.

TJAMIR makes an excellent

TJAMIR makes an excellent point. When I read this article, I thought - ok, so a lot of money probably WAS wasted, a lot has not yet been awarded or allocated, and these are HUGE problems. But most of the international NGOs like Doctors Without Borders and Oxfam, just to name a few, have done AMAZING, EFFECTIVE work in Haiti and they account for how they spent the money not to mention Oxfam at least does everything it possibly can to work WITH communities to determine how to spend the money. I know this because I used to work for them - very recently - on disaster relief among other things. The government was not capable of managing and allocating this money effectively, let alone much of the aid dollars probably would have been lost to corruption if the Haitian government had been the major recipient of aid money. Some of these international organizations were the ONLY ones on the ground with the CAPACITY to deliver rapid, life-saving assistance, and that is a FACT. Thousands of lives were saved by these organizations through medical care and the quick construction of potable water treatment and sanitation facilities. Yes the Haiti reconstruction has been largely determined by outsiders and that is awful, but this article assumes that money going to groups who are not Haitian is in and of itself a travesty, which it is not. It was absolutely necessary given the context.

I am equally appalled by the

I am equally appalled by the misinformation contained in this article. Bill made it appear as if the money allocated for Haiti went to US and other international agencies...and stayed there! I've been to Haiti last year and it is quite obvious that there are lots of activity going on to help Haitians, from relief/feeding effort to water supplies, road construction, debris clean up, etc., funded primarily by these monies. Of course a lot of the contracts to get these effort off the ground were channeled through international, not Haitian government or NGOs, for a reason. Either they do not have the capacity to deliver (remember, they were massively impacted by the earthquake), or expertise is not available locally, or it was done to make sure most of the money gets spent for the intended purpose rather than get funneled into the pockets of corrupt local officials and NGOs (many of which are fly-by-night operators out to make a quick buck). Yes, a lot of the US government money went to USAID, but it was used by the agency to fund their massive operations and projects in Haiti...not to line up their pockets. The same is true with money going to the International Red Cross, UN relief agencies, etc. (By the way, I think the mention of CEO's salaries is irrelevant in this discussion, except perhaps to insinuate something sinister was going on). Is the system perfect? Of course not. There are still lots to learn and areas for improvement, including getting more local Haitians participate in the process. But is this a better way than just doling out money directly to the Haitian government and thousands of local NGOs, as was done in the past? Yes, I believe it is a better approach.

Tjamir, have you yourself

Tjamir, have you yourself volunteered in Haiti? Have you seen what is going on there with these NGO's such as Red cross? Well I have! I have been there many times since the earthquake and I can tell you that not only is the allocation of the monies NOT perfect, but it is SINISTER, your words. The CEO's of these organizations do not need to, for any reason at all, make close to a half a million dollars. If you read the article it states " a $1.5 million contract went to the NY based consulting firm Dalberg Global Development Advisors. The article found Dalberg’s team “had never lived overseas, didn’t have any disaster experience or background in urban planning… never carried out any program activities on the ground…” and only one of them spoke French". This is appalling. Not to mention, since you and many people probably don't know because they or you have never researched it, or gotten the information because they or you have tried to volunteer is the Red Cross is one of THE WORST OFFENDERS!
I am a trauma RN in the US, I speak creole, and prior to being an RN I was a Paramedic for 15 years. I have also been part of disaster teams and have helped rescue and provide medical care for people during Hurricane Andrew, Oklahoma City bombings, 9/11, Hurricane Katrina and Rita, and Haiti earthquake, so I am quite experienced in disaster relief and all the aspects that need to be covered during a disaster either natural or man caused.
When I volunteered for Haiti, with the Red Cross, I committed for 2 weeks to start out. Not only was I required to pay my own airfare, but their "fee" for the two weeks was $1500! I was housed in a tent, and provided two meals a day. If the RED CROSS was doing what it was supposed be doing with the money donated to them, why do their volunteers have to pay? I can see covering the cost of food, but it does not, and should not cost $1500 plus airfare for me to risk my life and provide my time away from my family to volunteer with one of the largest organizations in the world! It is also not necessary for the Red Cross to buy Hummers and Range Rovers to transport their medical teams on streets that are no wider than our typical one lane in the US. Their paid admin team does not need to stay in a hotel and eat steak and lobster, while us paying volunteers slept in tents and ate rice and chicken! It is not necessary for them to take over a hospital, yet only run it from 9am to 5pm, leaving the Haitian nurses to run things until the morning with no access to the medications or emergency supplies. It is certainly not necessary for this "non-profit" organization to start construction on a hotel in Port au Prince that they state is for their volunteers, but no doubt will continue to charge their volunteers for volunteering! All that money that was donated to the Red Cross via cell phone pledges may not have all been allocated as yet, but who knows why? Who knows if it is just another rumor to make themselves look good? Either way, the Red Cross isn't foot'n the bill for anything, their admins get paid VERY WELL and have great perks (free travel, free lodging, free meals, etc) and it is their volunteers, who are doing the work and saving the lives, that are paying for the Hummers, the Land Rovers, the expensive dinners, the fancy hotels, etc... I can list a whole lot more with this "non-profit" and many others. I will NEVER donate another penny to this joke of an organization, nor will I EVER help them again. There are legitimate non-profits out there, JPHRO for one, that does good, that doesn't cheat their volunteers, or the Haitian people. So I can tell you, your guesses are way off the mark, you should do more research, or go there and see what is really going on...and don't even get me started on the UN! Another BS organization that has no business being in Haiti, they have only caused problem after problem...and they need to get the hell out of there!

Great article. The

Great article. The overwhelming majority of "non for profits" including those who sponsor cancer runs and cancer bracelets are scams.

The individual who wishes to

The individual who wishes to help by giving money after a natural disaster is going to get fleeced. I recommend that all help in the future be group-help: If your church has a large headquarters and can mount a large-scale effort on its own, that's the ticket. Make governments and politicians irrelevant.

Money donated to MEDICC goes

Money donated to MEDICC goes directly to buy supplies for the Cuban-trained Haitian medical people who have been working steadily in Haiti since the day of the quake, first on trauma and now on cholera.

bcbossarte's picture

And something left out of the

And something left out of the article. Much cheap labor is used in Haiti to manufacture clothing. The clothing corporations put pressure on our govt. officials to help squash a law going into effect that would have raised their minimum wage in Haiti. It is truly a sad, sick, greedy world. How much is enough?

Bill Clinton and other

Bill Clinton and other dignitaries recently opened a new industrial park (with clothing factories), while Haitians live in tent cities with mudslides and rape gangs.

iI forgot to mention the

iI forgot to mention the country I am in it is Ireland

All politicians are corrupt

All politicians are corrupt Just look at what our lot did robbed the people and with their friends robbed our banks all ligit within the law robbed us all and ran now we are very poor so just remember that when you vote for someone you are giving them a great living

Leave it to our government!

Leave it to our government! We think they screw WE, the People - the 99%. But they do it even worse to those that cannot defend themselves.
This government is a farce! Trouble is, its not just our government - they are all this bad. God help our world!

Sounds like the locals are

Sounds like the locals are still being punished for their slave revolt!

Absolutely appalling. Just

Absolutely appalling. Just when you think corruption on a grand scale can't get any worse--it gets worse.KarenVenice, CA

Absolutely appalling. Just

Absolutely appalling. Just when you think corruption on a grand scale can't get any worse--it gets worse.KarenVenice, CA

Comment with your Facebook account



Comment with your Disqus account

ABOUT Bill Quigley

Bill is legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights and a law professor at Loyola University New Orleans. You can reach him at Quigley77@gmail.com

Comment with your Facebook account



Comment with your Disqus account

Top Stories

comments powered by Disqus

NationofChange works to educate, inform, and fight power with people, corruption with community.

If you would like to stay up to date with the best in independent, filter-free journalism, updates on upcoming events to attend, and more, enter your email below:

7 Compelling Reasons Why You Should Support NationofChange

Our readers often tell us why they’ve decided to step up and become supporters. Here are some of the top reasons people are giving.

1. You’re keeping independent journalism alive
The corporate owned media has proven that it can’t be trusted. In a media landscape wrought with spin and corruption, NationofChange stands in very scarce company.

2. You’re sticking it to the rich, powerful, and corrupt
When you have money in this country you can get away with damn near anything, and they do. NationofChange isn’t afraid to expose these criminals no matter how powerful they are.

3. Your donation is 100% tax-deductible
NationofChange is a 501(c)3 charity. People tend to assume that many other organizations are (most nonprofits are NOT) but it’s that 501(c)3 status is a bit more rare than you think.

Read the rest...