Herman Cain’s False Attack on Planned Parenthood

iWatch News / News Report
Published: Thursday 3 November 2011
“Presidential contender said founder of Planned Parenthood wanted to keep ‘black babies from being born’.”
Article image

Herman Cain has offered an alternate version of history in claiming that Planned Parenthood’s founder wanted to prevent “black babies from being born.” We find no support for that old claim. Cain also states that the organization built 75 percent of its clinics in black communities, but there’s no evidence that was true then. And today, only 9 percent of U.S. abortion clinics are in neighborhoods where half or more of residents are black, according to the most recent statistics.

The GOP presidential candidate made these comments back in March , telling an audience at the conservative Heritage Foundation that “[w]hen Margaret Sanger — check my history — started Planned Parenthood, the objective was to put these centers in primarily black communities so they could help kill black babies before they came into the world.” He called it “planned genocide.”

In an interview on “Face the Nation” on Oct. 30 , Cain did not back down from those allegations. Here’s his exchange with host Bob Schieffer:

Schieffer: "… you said that it was not Planned Parenthood, it was really planned genocide because you said Planned Parenthood was trying to put all these centers into the black communities because they wanted to kill black babies – "

Herman Cain: "Yes."

Scheiffer: " — before they were born. Do you still stand by that?"

Cain: "I still stand by that."

Schieffer: "Do you have any proof that that was the objective of Planned Parenthood?"

Cain: "If people go back and look at the history and look at Margaret Sanger’s own words, that’s exactly where that came from. Look up the history. So if you go back and look up the history — secondly, look at where most of them were built; 75 percent of those facilities were built in the black community — and Margaret Sanger’s own words, she didn’t use the word “genocide,” but she did talk about preventing the increasing number of poor blacks in this country by preventing black babies from being born."

Cain isn’t the first to believe that birth control advocate Margaret Sanger( 1879-1966) wanted to stop the birth of black babies. Just do an Internet search and see what happens. Sanger made more than her share of controversial comments. But the quote many point to as evidence that Sanger favored something akin to “genocide” of African Americans has been turned on its head.

Sanger, who was arrested several times in her efforts to bring birth control to women in the United States, set up her first clinic in Brooklyn in 1916. In the late 1930s, she sought to bring clinics to black women in the South, in an effort that was called the “Negro Project.” Sanger wrote in 1939 letters to colleague Clarence James Gamble that she believed the project needed a black physician and black minister to gain the trust of the community:

Sanger, 1939: The minister’s work is also important and he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.

Sanger says that a minister could debunk the notion, if it arose, that the clinics aimed to “exterminate the Negro population.” She didn’t say that she wanted to “exterminate” the black population. The  Margaret Sanger Papers Project  at New York University says that this quote has “gone viral on the Internet,” normally out of context, and it “doesn’t reflect the fact that Sanger recognized elements within the black community might mistakenly associate the Negro Project with racist sterilization campaigns in the Jim Crow south, unless clergy and other community leaders spread the word that the Project had a humanitarian aim.”

It goes on to characterize beliefs such as Cain’s as “extremist.” The project says: “No serious scholar and none of the dozens of black leaders who supported Sanger’s work have ever suggested that she tried to reduce the black population or set up black abortion mills, the implication in much of the extremist anti-choice material.”

We asked the Cain campaign for support for his claims, and we have not received a response. His comments already have been debunked by our fact-checking colleagues at the Washington Post , which today gave Cain four Pinocchios, and  Politifact, which gave him the “Pants on Fire” designation in March.

Sanger, as we mentioned, was a controversial figure. While she is heralded for her work in making birth control available, and legal, she was also tied to the eugenics movement, which believed the human species could be improved by controlling who reproduced and who didn’t. One essay from Sanger  shows she believed birth control advocates and eugenists were working toward a similar goal — “to assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit.” But she disagreed with some of the eugenists’ methods.

Sanger, “Birth Control and Racial Betterment,” Feb. 1919: We who advocate Birth Control, on the other hand, lay all our emphasis upon stopping not only the reproduction of the unfit but upon stopping all reproduction when there is not economic means of providing proper care for those who are born in health. The eugenist also believes that a woman should bear as many healthy children as possible as a duty to the state. …

We maintain that a woman possessing an adequate knowledge of her reproductive functions is the best judge of the time and conditions under which her child should be brought into the world. We further maintain that it is her right, regardless of all other considerations, to determine whether she shall bear children or not, and how many children she shall bear if she chooses to become a mother.

She goes on to talk about the financial benefits of birth control, saying that it “will make a better race,” because a family can better care for a smaller number of children.

Sanger’s early 20th century clinics later grew into what is now Planned Parenthood, and the group is aware that its founder had some views that it doesn’t agree with today. In response to the controversy over Sanger, Veronica Byrd, director of African American media at Planned Parenthood, issued a statement saying:

Byrd: Planned Parenthood has a long history of condemning racism and opposes discrimination in all forms. Margaret Sanger worked for social and racial justice at a time when segregation was the law of the land. She was invited by African American leaders to help provide health care to women in the African American community and her work was praised by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. For all her positive work, Margaret Sanger made statements some 80 years ago that were wrong then and are wrong now. Those statements have no bearing on the high quality health care Planned Parenthood provides today.

In 1966, Planned Parenthood awarded Martin Luther King Jr. one of its Margaret Sanger Awards, and he praised her in his acceptance speech, delivered by his wife, Coretta Scott King,  saying: “At the turn of the century she went into the slums and set up a birth control clinic, and for this deed she went to jail because she was violating an unjust law. Yet the years have justified her actions.”

75 Percent of Clinics in Black Neighborhoods?

Cain also claimed that “75 percent of [clinics] were built in the black community.” But we found no evidence that that was true in Sanger’s time, and it’s not true today.

Sanger’s first clinic, opened in 1916, was in Brooklyn in a neighborhood called Brownsville, which was 80 percent to 85 percent Jewish in 1910 and 1920, according to author Wendell E. Pritchett’s “ Brownsville, Brooklyn: Blacks, Jews & the Changing Face of the Ghetto .” Cathy Moran Hajo writes that the neighborhood was “populated largely by Italians and Eastern European Jews” in “ Birth Control on Main Street: Organizing Clinics in the United States, 1916-1939 .” She says that Sanger didn’t choose to open her first clinic in Harlem, where infant and mother mortality rates were similar to those of Brownsville.

In fact, early birth control clinics didn’t welcome black women with open arms, Hajo writes: “In the 1920s and early 1930s, African Americans had far more limited access to birth control than did white women. Not only did many clinics discriminate against black women, but the regions with the largest black populations had fewer clinics.”

Sanger opened a clinic in Harlem in 1930, and, as mentioned, the “Negro Project” began in the late 1930s.

That doesn’t support Cain’s implication that Sanger’s “objective was to put these centers in primarily black communities,” or that “75 percent” of clinics were in such neighborhoods. It should also be noted that these early clinics were focused on providing birth control, and Sanger herself warned of the dangers of abortion. “While there are cases where even the law recognizes an abortion as justifiable if recommended by a physician, I assert that the hundreds of thousands of abortions performed in America each year are a disgrace to civilization,” she  wrote in her 1920 book “ Woman and the New Race .”

Cain’s claim also isn’t true today. Tait Sye, a spokeswoman for Planned Parenthood, told us in an email that “73% of Planned Parenthood health centers are located in rural or medically underserved areas.” Not all of those would be predominately black communities.

Also, the Guttmacher Institute  reported this year  that 9 percent of abortion clinics in the U.S. are in neighborhoods in which 50 percent or more of the residents are black. That’s according to the group’s “census of all known abortion providers.”

FEATURE A

Connect with your friends

Find new content you might like and see what your friends are sharing!

Top Stories

28 comments on "Herman Cain’s False Attack on Planned Parenthood"

pitch1934

November 06, 2011 6:47pm

THE MAN IS A FREAKING DOPE? HOW DID HE EVER GET WHERE HE IS?

oldhat

November 08, 2011 7:09pm

from actual history -- suggest you take an American history class

Teako

November 05, 2011 3:53pm

"Anne in K.C." is a perfect example of what Gsary has asserted to be true. Thank you for making this easy Anne.

Anne in K.C.

November 05, 2011 11:57am

Anybody who believes that Sanger was a humanitarian interested in the betterment of anyone but the wealthy and/or white upper class is a fool waiting to be escorted to whatever form of extermination has been established to take the place of Hitler's overworked furnaces. The odd/sad thing is that those who have been convinced that Sanger was a saint interested in saving them are the very same as those she sought to exterminate. The most effective means of destroying a group or class of people is to convince them that you are their friend. Sanger did that very well. People are still giving her credibility long after she has gone on to meet her reward (or her punishment) from God. The devil is a chameleon with the ability to disguise the evil it is comprised of and there were few more adept at such than Sanger. She was very efficient at what she did and even after death she manages to appear as a hero when she should be viewed as what she was: a snake.

joeboosauce

November 04, 2011 8:12am

So, you are talking about conservatives who had that view. Now, did all your friends go to work for Planned Parenthood?

Teako

November 05, 2011 4:05pm

@Anne - A "report" is not proof of anything. A conviction would have some real fsctusl basis. You are very guilty of making it all up. It sounds a whole lot like your own personal conspiracy theory and quite probably the only theory you can make yourself believe.

Did you not notice that only 9% of the clinc were in these neighborhoods and not the 75% our idiot Mr. Cain asserts. That would be a falsehood. It's not the only one.

Anne in K.C.

November 05, 2011 12:12pm

Who says Cain's attack on Planned Parenthood is false? You should look into the reports about the Planned Parenthood in Overland Park, Kansas who concealed the rape of children to protect their best source of income: abortion. They had a lot of help perpetrating their hoax in the person of Kathleen Sebelius, former governor of Kansas, a corrupt person if ever there was one, who is responsible for the deaths of millions of innocent babies. She was a mercenary just like her benefactor Dr. Mengele aka George Tiller. She made it clear that no one was going to touch her friend Tiller by legally appropriate means. So she signed her friend's death warrant even while she blamed someone else for his death. She prevented adjudication in court so the people's justice prevailed.

chvietvet

November 04, 2011 3:18am

I clearly remember arguing with people during the 1960s, who justified the need for Family Planning by stating that "Negroes miltiply like rabbits" and have to be stopped before they account for a large enough percentage of the voters to start having influence on what Congress does. If you argue that racism is not at the root of "Family Planning," then you are just plain wrong. It was fully unexpected that birth control and abortion would become so popular with rich white people. The people I was arguing with were anti-civil rights conservatives, who fully expected that Family Planning would reduce the number of poor people in the population, especially non-whites.

joeboosauce

November 04, 2011 8:15am

So, you are talking about conservatives who had that view. Now, did all these people go to work for Planned Parenthood?

Yesca_Again

November 03, 2011 9:30pm

I'm waiting for Cain's favorite line when his crap explodes in his face, "End of story!"

He's the boss man, we underlings better know our place, or he'll make sure we're put there, maybe even with a $35,000 check & Oh Yeah! A Confidentiality Agreement or is that Settlement Agreement? He mixes them up…has difficulty with understanding those words, and everything else he ‘knows’ but not what he believes, sometimes.

Is he a white sleeper? Sorry forgot he’s color blind most times. Admit it he is one consistant fellow.

Teako

November 05, 2011 3:58pm

Don't look now, but you have been "Anned". Apparently she has gotten a check of her own from Herman.

Anne in K.C.

November 05, 2011 12:06pm

I'm waiting for your favorite line: MORE LIES presented as truth.

Norman Allen

November 03, 2011 6:25pm

Want to fix this country? Elect someone like Cain who will bring about the worst possible programs and government that will collapse the economy, will get the republicans totally out of the political stream forever. From the ashes will rise the Sphinx of change that will be most likely the voice of the 99.5%. Otherwise, the Tweedledum and Tweedledee will keep us in a boiling pot until we all turn into soup. Do not underestimate the master politicos protecting the .00005%. They can play the nation various groups like violin to get their agenda served, no matter what the human, social, economic costs to the 99%!

Anne in K.C.

November 05, 2011 12:14pm

Can you dance as skillfully as you lie?

Teako

November 05, 2011 4:08pm

Herman Cain is equally adept at both lying and dancing. You probably couldinclude singing too. I would say he is a very good "song and dance" man.

joeboosauce

November 04, 2011 8:26am

I'm with you on that. There is no sane reason the Republicans should be a legitimate option. In most all countries, the Repubs would be considered far-right fringe extremists like the Klan. Except countries that are or veering towards religious fundamentalism. In a country like Canada, the Dems would be considered center to center-right. We have no real options in our elections. People need to wake the hell up and 2 terms of corporatist Bush and now corporatist Obama have not done that. We are seriously in a Orwellian trance. I think we need to have these far-right extremists push all their agendas before we see how failed our system is so that we actually change it. Democrats are really not that much better an option. A tad better but clearly not enough.

oldhat

November 03, 2011 1:31pm

plan parenthood founder was a frequent speaker at KKK meetings also her colleague Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as "scientific" and "humanitarian." so Cain is against the KKK and i see the white hooded ones are attacking him

Teako

November 05, 2011 3:56pm

I'm still waiting for the link to a credible source for this information. How long should I wait?

oldhat

November 06, 2011 2:42pm

start with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lothrop_Stoddard -- ask a 6 year old how to do searches

Anne in K.C.

November 05, 2011 12:05pm

Very true. For some strange reason no one wants to believe that. No one can think for themselves. Instead they line up like sheep headed to slaughter. I have to wonder if even at the moment their soul and blood pour from their body if they still cling to the beliefs which lead to their death. There are none so blind OR DEAD as those who will not see. I am not foolish enough to think anyone will believe me. Nothing I can do about that. I speak the truth... what anyone makes of it is their choice for better or worse.

mdfouru

November 03, 2011 6:32pm

One of Cain's best friends in college became a child sex trafficker, and introduced Herman to child sex tourism and cocaine fueled pedophilia parties. Later, he became an avid collector of child pornography and frequently sexually molested his nieces and nephews. In 1992, he paid them a large amount of cash, as well as coupons for free pizza, to keep quiet about it.

Gee, it's fun to throw around unsubstantiated allegations.

oldhat

November 04, 2011 3:49pm

i notice that it is popular with loony left i heared same story about bho but did not print -- my state is easily verifiable - but some are too lazy or too afraid

AdrienneB

November 03, 2011 12:28pm

Cain is truly a legend in his own mind. Typical Repug. Truth and facts do not apply.

Anne in K.C.

November 05, 2011 12:01pm

My guess is its been a while since you looked in the mirror?

Teako

November 05, 2011 3:54pm

Anne, I'm prety sure he is looking directly at you.

george r

November 03, 2011 12:24pm

Cain is using the same arguments that the John Birch Society use to do and still does. State a fact out of context. Make up a fact. Disseminate the idea to millions of people and hope they are to lazy to find the truth. This is why America is in such a mess. The Koch brothers and their agents are and have been the biggest threat to people around the world. True domestic terrorist.

Gary Williams
Kamloops, B.C.
November 03, 2011 12:15pm

For years now I've been trying to understand what it is about conservatives that compels them to say and do what they do, even when these things are so blatantly in violation of the known facts. And it occurred to me that just maybe, as children, they never realised or learned a lesson the rest of us now take for granted as adults.

And the lesson is.... If advocating for a particular point of view requires you must lie or tell half-truths to do so, that simple fact alone means there is little or nothing existing in the real world to use. That in turn means the particular POV isn't one they should be seen promoting in the first place, but instead they should be looking for a new and more easily defended POV.

But that of course would require they change their own POV on matters they've long held to be true. And "change", to a conservative, or "reform" to the rest of us, is something conservatives will fight tooth and nail to prevent, no matter how badly need those reforms may be.

Anne in K.C.

November 05, 2011 12:00pm

What makes conservatives speak half-truths? People dumb enough as you that would believe that. You have already decided that everything conservatives say is a lie so there is no sense trying to communicate with someone with a closed-mind such as yours.