House Republicans Censor Photo Showing Impacts of Mountain Top Removal, Calling it Child Porn

Matt Kasper
Climate Progress / News Report
Published: Thursday 7 June 2012
“Testifying in front of the House Natural Resources Commitee on the impact of coal mining, activist Maria Gunnoe intended to show a picture of a five year old child bathing in polluted water from mountaintop mining.”
Article image

At a House hearing last week, witnesses were intending to focus on coal mining. Instead, a photo of a five year old child is getting all the attention.

Testifying in front of the House Natural Resources Commitee on the impact of coal mining, activist Maria Gunnoe intended to show a picture of a five year old child bathing in polluted water from mountaintop mining. But House Republicans censored the image, calling it child pornography.

The photo was taken by photojournalist Katie Falkenberg, who wrote this caption about the image:

Erica and Rully must bathe their daughter, age 5, in contaminated water that is the color of tea. Their water has been tested and contains high levels of arsenic…. The coal company that mines the land around their home has never admitted to causing this problem, but they do supply the family with bottled water for drinking and cooking. Contaminated and colored water has occurred in other coalfield communities as well where mountaintop mining is practiced.

Members of the committee were not able to see the informative image, because Republican committee staff barred Gunnoe from displaying the picture during her testimony.

Gunnoe complied with the request, but after the hearing was escorted into an empty room by Capitol Police and was questioned for 45 minutes about the photo at the request of anunnamed GOP senior committee staffer to Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-CO). Gunnoe is a renowned activist against mountaintop coal mining, who has testified before the committee three other times.

Intimidation tactics against coal activists are nothing new, especially against Gunnoe. She hasfaced threats and intimidation directed at her and her family for her environmental justice work:

In return for her passionate activism, mine managers have singled out Gunnoe as an enemy of mine workers and their jobs. She has received threats on her life and her children are frequently harassed at school. Her daughter’s dog was shot dead, wanted posters featuring her photo have appeared in local stores, and she has had to take serious measures to protect her family and property.

It is not difficult to see why the Goldman Environmental Prize winner is seen as a threat. As Gunnoe pointed out in her testimony about the Spruce coal mines in West Virginia, mountaintop removal is an extraordinarily destructive process that the coal companies don’t want the public to know about:

  • Selenium discharges downstream from Spruce No 1 are already much higher than EPA standards according to recent water testing. The Spruce 1 permit will allow more selenium to be released into this stream. This is the making for life threatening levels of selenium.
  • The community of Blair has NO municipal drinking water available to them. The only water in these communities is the well water which in some cases has already been polluted. The community of Blair needs water infrastructure to supply their homes with healthy water before any area permits are even discussed.
  • From what we see on the ground the coal companies have already moved forward in preparing the permit area as if they had an approved permit.
  • The Spruce permit is in the Coal River watershed. Mountaintop removal is why American Rivers placed the Coal River on our America’s Most Endangered Rivers list this year – because the river is at a decision point – not because it’s the most polluted. We can save these precious headwater streams that also serve as drinking water to our communities but we must act now before it is too late.

21-peer reviewed study confirmed that people living near the mountaintop removal cites are 50 percent more likely to die of cancer and 42 percent more likely to be born with birth defects compared with other communities in the Appalachia region.  Local communities near such projects have a 70 percent increased risk for developing kidney disease, and there are 313 excess deaths every year from coal-mining pollution.

Sadly, these are not the issues being discussed after the hearing. Instead, we’re talking about why a powerful photograph was censored by a House Committee.

Capitol Police have not found Gunnoe guilty of any wrongdoing.



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange

Top Stories

12 comments on "House Republicans Censor Photo Showing Impacts of Mountain Top Removal, Calling it Child Porn"

lynn FOREMANL

June 19, 2012 12:00pm

what is obama doing to stop these travesties? what is he doing to stop montaintop mining? how much money are the gop getting to allow this destruction of our environment?

Btrwy

June 09, 2012 6:55am

What can anyone expect when the republicans are poisoned by the very things they promote. America will not be anywhere anyone wants to live if we let republicans continue on the path they are on. Maybe nazi rule would be worse but I honestly don't know.

Christopher Miller

June 08, 2012 6:33pm

It's only porn if the intent is to arouse. Sadly, not at all surprised the House found images of a 5-year-old bathing in polluted water sexually stimulating.

hugeone

June 07, 2012 10:53pm

I'm sure a child bathing is child porn to a at least half of a room full of congressmen. But bathing in arsenic- now there's some hard core child porn.
But seriously, betch they were just upset it wasn't a bathing boy.

michaelleckrone...

June 07, 2012 6:57pm

kill those who are killing us

Ronni85

June 07, 2012 4:25pm

The GOP will rot in Hell!!

Jeffrey Hill

June 07, 2012 3:55pm

Rethugs don't want their filthy rich mountaintop removal strip mining buddies publicly criticized and exposed as the heinous criminals that they are.

The pornographers are the mining company executives and boards of directors who prostitute the air and water quality for personal GREED, Selfishness, and the Almighty Dollar.

wildthang

June 07, 2012 3:43pm

Child porn is the character assassination charge du jour for destroying anyone with a grand slam... the real porn is the pollutants and pesticides infecting our fields and hillsides, poisoning the very planet we live on in a kind suicidal profit motive that leads to extinction. The real porn is wars of sexualized dominance and submission behavior due to our excessive sexual repression and thirst for torture and killing and blood sacrifices musch moe extensive than any Aztecs ever were.

dwdallam

June 07, 2012 3:07pm

This shows how perverted Republicans who censored the image really are.

When presented with a picture of a 5 year old bathing is polluted water, normal people feel compassion.

Obviously, Republicans who censored the image saw it as sexual.

That's the text book definition of perverted.

triumph181

June 07, 2012 2:38pm

Child pornography from the group that has more sexual dalliances than even the Catholic Church. Will they stop at nothing to elude the truth? The real pronography is the abscenities they have done to the mountains.

pitch1934

June 07, 2012 1:47pm

You know the repugnants are treading water when they cite that photo as child porn. There is absolutely nothing salacious or obscene about it. So, rather than face the truth, they trumped up (isn't it neat that the word TRUMP can be used to refer to a false thing) some carp charge about child porn. To think that the capitol police even gave th is charge the slightest credulity is troubling. I hope Ms. Gunnoe survives this charade unschathed.

Norman Allen

June 07, 2012 1:10pm

This is what GOP political hacks are doing to our society. Are any of you still delusional that they might change? It seems they are there to destroy the planet, distort facts and muddy the water to keep the cash flow to their benefactors. It is the party of the super rich vs. the 99%.