How the “Job Creators” REALLY Spend Their Money
In his "Gospel of Wealth," Andrew Carnegie argued that average Americans should welcome the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few, because the "superior wisdom, experience, and ability" of the rich would ensure benefits for all of us. More recently, Edward Conard, the author of "Unintended Consequences: Why Everything You've Been Told About the Economy Is Wrong, said: "As a society, we're not offering our talented few large enough rewards. We're underpaying our 'risk takers.'"
Does wealthy America have a point, that giving them all the money will ensure it's disbursed properly, and that it will create jobs and stimulate small business investment while ultimately benefiting society? Big business CEOs certainly think so, claiming in a letter to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner that an increase in the capital gains tax would reduce investment "when we need capital formation here in America to create jobs and expand our economy."
They don't cite evidence for their claims, because the evidence proves them wrong. Here are the facts:
1. The Very Rich Don't Like Making Risky Investments
Marketwatch estimates that over 90% of the assets owned by millionaires are held in a combination of low-risk investments (bonds and cash), the stock market, and real estate. According to economist Richard Wolff, about half of the assets of the richest 1% are held in unincorporated business equity (personal business accounts). The Wall Street Journal notes that over three-quarters of individuals worth over $20 million are invested in hedge funds.
Angel investing (capital provided by affluent individuals for business start-ups) accounted for less than 1% of the investable assets of high net worth individuals in North America in 2011.
The Mendelsohn Affluent Survey confirmed that the very rich spend less than two percent of their money on new business startups. The last thing most of them want, apparently, is the risky business of hiring people for new innovation.
2. The Very Rich Don't Like Taking On Risky Jobs
CEOs, upper management, and financial professionals made up about 60 percent of the richest 1% of Americans in 2005. Only 3 percent were entrepreneurs. A recent study found that less than 1 percent of all entrepreneurs came from very rich or very poor backgrounds.
In fact, the very rich may not care about U.S. jobs in any form. Surveys reveal that 60 percent of investors worth $25 million or more are investing up to a third of their total assets overseas. Back home, the extra wealth created by the Bush tax cuts led to "worst track record" for jobs in recorded history. The true American job creator, as venture capitalist Nick Hanauer would agree, is the middle-class consumer.
3. The Very Rich Corporations Don't Like Spending On America
How do corporations spend their money? To a good extent, they don't. According to Moody's, cash holdings for U.S. non-financial firms rose 3 percent to $1.24 trillion in 2011. The corporate cash-to-assets ratio nearly tripled between 1980 and 2010. It has been estimated that the corporate stash of cash reserves held in America could employ 3.5 million more people for five years at an annual salary of $40,000.
The top holders of cash, including Apple and Google and Intel and Coca Cola and Chevron, are spending their money on stock buybacks (which increase stock option prices), dividends to investors, and subsidiary acquisitions. According to Bloomberg, share repurchasing is at one of its highest levels in 25 years.
Apple claims to have added 500,000 jobs to the economy, but that includes app-building tech enthusiasts and Fedex drivers delivering iPhones. The company actually has 47,000 U.S. employees, about one-tenth of General Motors' workforce in the 1990s.
The biggest investment by corporations is overseas, where they keep 57 percent of their cash and fill their factories with low-wage workers. Commerce Department figures show that U.S. companies cut their work forces by 2.9 million from 2000 to 2009 while increasing overseas employment by 2.4 million. They also tap into a "brain drain" of foreign entrepreneurs, scientists, and medical professionals rather than supporting education in America.
One last way corporations see fit to spend their money: executive bonuses. Especially at the banks, where the extra stipends are often paid for with zero interest loans from the Federal Reserve.
The richest individuals and corporations are really good at building up fortunes. They're even better at building up their "job creator" myth.
CONNECT














14 comments on "How the “Job Creators” REALLY Spend Their Money"
May 29, 2012 9:13pm
"superior wisdom, experience, and ability of the rich", my foot! When will people realize that most of the things in this world depend on chance..? How can the rich be risk takers when they get trillions in bail out. Where is the risk? If they succeed they get money and if they fail they get money, they get money anyway.
May 29, 2012 7:03pm
A former role of government was to collect taxes and redistribute the wealth created by the nation as a whole to prevent the current situation of accumulation at the top. Unfortunately the Repubs were taken control of by the corps and elected, ushering in the age of globalization marked by "free trade agreements" which had little to do with free trade and much to do about the rights and privileges that would be afforded to corps over local law. Now the Dems are also "owned" by this class of managerial turds seeking more on all fronts. Therefore the birth of Occupy as the only way forward as a counter balance if it can garner enough support from the people to counter the vastly out of kilter economic and political teeter totter. If not our children and grandchildren will be facing a very ugly world in which to try and carve out a life.
May 29, 2012 9:45pm
bladtheimpailer's point that both the Dems and the Repubs represent the plutocrats is not yet sufficiently widely understood - but is the only political fact worth knowing. The propaganda system works overtime to differentiate these defective products, and the majority is still buying.
The other night my local #OWAS meeting degenerated into a debate over LOTE, with some arguing that Obama isn't perfect but we have to vote for him. True enough that the "birth of OWS" pointed the way out, but when OWS no longer provides a sanctuary from such discussions that feed the central political lie that there is any difference in outcome from voting for one of the two money parties, it no longer points in any useful direction and its once-hopeful potential dies.
OWS has failed to develop an electoral strategy that the only effective vote in our system is a vote against, not a vote for anyone. A vote against incumbents who fail to deliver on the single central issue of destroying the two parties by getting the money on which they thrive out of politics is the only effective vote.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Reversing-Citizens-United-by-Larry-Kach...
May 29, 2012 6:24pm
trickle down is just that - a trickle
May 29, 2012 2:35pm
If you aint got a buck, you can't spend a buck. If the "job creators" don't have enough money on hand to start thousands of new businesses in this country, they never will. Why should they when they can have business in low wage countries and still make beaucoup bucks.
May 29, 2012 2:06pm
Conservatives are just that -- Conservative, Cautious, Tight-Fisted, Cheap, Selfish, GREEDY.
Conservative only want to bet on a sure thing -- that's why they truly hate the Free Market and love Socialism/Corporate Welfare/Taxpayer-Insured Investments with Guaranteed Returns/Subsidized Risk.
(Thet give lip service to Free Market Capitalism, but they're just talking out of their rear ends.)
May 29, 2012 1:42pm
Trickle Down is when tax cuts to the rich will rain jobs and money on the 99%. Wish someone told us when/where the next Great Giveaway will take place? Bush’s Tax Cuts have handed trillions to the ultra rich and corporations so far. Their coffers are bursting. Rumors run our neighborhood billionaire will be handing out $1000-bills and jobs to all folks. Just curios, where’s the jobs? Where’s the dough? Can someone reveal the secret?
May 29, 2012 1:19pm
//The biggest investment by corporations is overseas, //
yea, need to understand what outFORCING is.
Why?
Why does it cost more to make things here then they can be purchased for?
May 29, 2012 1:12pm
All these nifty excuses to be liberal with other peoples money.
If Government stimulus, endless regulations and high taxes was actually a viable solution we would not say FORMER soviet union, in fact no county would ever go bankrupt if the government could tax and spend their way to prosperity.
May 30, 2012 12:13pm
You're just wrong. You're completely wrong. Saying it might convince the dummies that watch Fox "News" but it won't convince the rest of us that know better. The article is right.
May 29, 2012 1:58pm
If Government stimulus, endless regulations and high taxes was actually detrimental to the economy at large, the fifties would have been one of the worst depressions in the history of history. They were in fact the most robust period of growth in our history, BY FAR!. And what did we get for all that horrific government confiscation and redistribution of funds; An inter-state highway system; a space program that landed men on the moon; a K-12 (and beyond) education system that was second to absolutely no one; A GI bill that fundamentally transformed this nation in higher education; a building boom that went on for four decades; and we did all of those things while going about the business of the cold war that cost us untold billions for weaponry that could never be used and delivery systems that sit idle (thankfully) to this day. So far, I'm yet to see anything that would approach those accomplishments coming from the 1% in this country. In fact, it would seem the 1% are completely ungrateful for the government funded research that was the spur to a large portion of their millions; DNA mapping; the internet; electronic miniturization; and soson...... So I guess your right; We cannot tax and spend our way to prosperity....... except when we can.
May 29, 2012 1:03pm
Rich Nau: I agree that a tax on wealth may be a way to keep enough money circulating within the system to boost the economy.
May 29, 2012 12:04pm
It may be time to switch from taxing income to taxing wealth (assets), wealth transfer, sales, use and behaviors intended to be discouraged or adding to social burden.
May 29, 2012 9:55pm
It would seem easy enough to craft a tax on the hoarded trillions that would provide irresistable incentive to invest that money so as to create US jobs in accordance with the lie exposed in this article. But as easy to sell as such a tax would be, it will never happen as long as those hoarded trillions are used to buy politicians who would never bite the hand that feeds them by enacting such sensible policy.