How Little We Know about The Origins of 9/11
For a decade, the main questions about 9/11 have gone unanswered while the alleged perpetrators who survived the attacks have never been publicly cross-examined as to their methods and motives. It is not conspiratorial but rather obviously plausible to suggest that they have been kept out of sight because legal due process, constitutionally guaranteed to even the most heinous of criminals, might provide information that our government would find embarrassing.
We remain in ignorance as to what drove religious zealots formerly allied with the United States to turn against us, and what was the role of our ally, Saudi Arabia, the country of origin for most of the hijackers and their financing. Why in the aftermath of the attack did the United States embrace Pakistan, which was one of only three governments (Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates were the others) to diplomatically recognize the Taliban and which turned out to be harboring the fugitive Osama bin Laden? And why did we instead invade Iraq, a nation known to be engaged in a deadly war with bin Laden and his al-Qaida?
How little we know about the origins of the Sept. 11 attacks is laid out in the disclaimer on Page 146 of the official 9/11 presidential commission report. A box on that page states clearly that the conventional narrative of how those portentous events unfolded is based largely on the interrogation under torture of key witnesses who have never been permitted a single moment in a publicly observed court of law.
As the bipartisan commissioners ruefully conceded, their examination of the motives, financing and actions of the alleged 9/11 perpetrators had to “rely heavily on information from captured al Qaeda members” that the commissioners, despite having been granted the highest security clearance, were never allowed to seriously vet:
“We submitted questions for use in the interrogations but had no control over whether, when, or how questions of particular interest would be asked. Nor were we allowed to talk to the interrogators so that we could better judge the credibility of the detainees and clarify ambiguities in the reporting. We were told that our requests might disrupt the sensitive interrogation process.”
That sensitive interrogation process included the waterboarding of the key witnesses, led by alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who was scheduled to go on public, civilian trial in Manhattan last spring, until the Obama administration caved in to hysterical Republican-led pressure and called off the trial.
The fear of a public trial is apparently that it will be an occasion to humanize the presumed perpetrators of barbaric acts, but by that standard no alleged murderer should ever be tried in civilian court. The counterargument is that we as a society have, from the drafting of our Constitution, been committed to due process of law. But an even more compelling objection to the present secrecy flows not from the inalienable rights of the accused to justice but rather from the need to fully inform the public as to the dangers faced by our society.
Major policy developments, including two undeclared wars, were conducted in the name of defeating the perpetrators of 9/11 without the pubic being made aware of the relevant facts. Surely a public trial would have revealed, to the deep embarrassment of the Bush administration, that there was no connection between the 9/11 hijackers and the government of Iraq that the United States overthrew.
At the very least, such testimony would have shed light on the cozy relationship between the U.S. government and the key leaders of al-Qaida, particularly the American-educated Mohammed, recruited by the CIA to join the fight against the Soviets in Afghanistan. It certainly could also have proved embarrassing to former Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who, during the Bush administration, opposed public trials and managed last March to get President Barack Obama to reverse his pledge of civilian trials. Gates boasted in his 1996 memoir of his long history of working with Islamic fundamentalists in Afghanistan, dating to his days in the Carter administration. As his book publisher bragged at the time, Gates exposed “Carter’s never-before revealed covert support to Afghan mujahedeen—six months before the Soviets invaded.”
Of course 9/11 changed everything; nations were invaded, trillions of dollars were wasted, hundreds of thousands of civilian and military lives were lost, torture became acceptable and the public has come to tolerate a daily governmental assault on privacy as normal. But for all of the high drama and cost of the U.S. response, when it comes to understanding the forces behind the attack, we still do not know what we are talking about.
This article was originally posted on Truthdig.
CONNECT















23 comments on "How Little We Know about The Origins of 9/11"
mbvxvl
gIexEQ oqdiimdbitic
P8QTUf , [url=http://prtwgijhqpgv.com/]prtwgijhqpgv[/url], [link=http://lalifquqssud.com/]lalifquqssud[/link], http://ruqcpnmyekqo.com/
hVplcd bgmepqcdduul
Why does this have to be the ONLY reliable socrue? Oh well, gj!
September 09, 2011 12:25pm
Just watch the post 9/11 documentary movie "Why We Fight" to see how war benefits the defense industry. It starts out with President Eisenhower last state of the union address where he warns of the influence of the military industrial complex. It is available for free on YouTube: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9219858826421983682#
I don't trust our political leaders because I consider them lackeys for the corporations. They're pretty much all on the take and in the pockets of the corporations.
And I simply consider the "decider" the worst president we’ve ever had, at least in my lifetime. His deceit and ignorance cost this country mightily financially, in lives lost and relationships around the world.
September 09, 2011 12:11pm
I am not a tremendous conspiracy believer. I do believe that Al Qaida is responsible for the attack. I also believe that the Bush Administration in their profound stupidity missed all the cues that were out there and were partially to blame for not raising the indicated emergency alerts for airports. I do a lot of electronic media work and remember in alerts during the Clinton Admin. needing my videotapes x-rayed because of these airport alerts--none here with all the red flags before 9/11. ALSO I have never read any investigative follow-up re the SELLING SHORT OF THE TOP RE-INSURERS During THE MONTH PRECEDING THE ATTACK. The top two or three huge re-insurers(The giant institutions that actually insure the big insurance companies) in Europe. The executives of the re-insurers had no idea why their company's values were plummeting in the period before 9/11. Who the hell has ever written in depth about this phenom? Who has traced the short selling--who knew enough re. the impending attack to make a mint off of short-selling these companies??
September 09, 2011 6:55am
pipe line to Caspian Sea, South China Sea oil, Afghanistan produces 90% of heroin now, before 80%, so Conniving Idiots Agency wants to keep their cut,too
September 09, 2011 1:00am
Anyone with basic sense can connect the dots. Our government used these people to draw in, humiliate, and defeat the Soviets, as the satanic infidel, in Afghanistan then discarded them as we became the satanic infidel.
September 08, 2011 8:38pm
When you consider that the Bush and bin Laden families have been in business together for decades, so much so that George W.Bush allowed all bin Laden family members in the US on 911 to leave the country within 24 hours of the event despite the fact that all commercial flights were grounded at the time; when you consider the lovey-dovey relationship between the Bushes and the Saudi royal family even to the point of holding hands and kissing each other (the men, I mean), I begin to see a lot of reasons the government wants to maintain secrecy.
September 08, 2011 7:23pm
I have concluded that after seeing the changes to men as they assume the Office of the President that when they get there they discover that the people, and we probably all know who they are, who really run the place tell them how it's going to be and that is that. We have no republic. We elect puppets to send to Washington and they obey their global coporate masters. Dick Cheney recently commented that he wished Ms Clinton had been elected because she would have been easier for "us" to work with. The "us" to whom he refers is the shadow government of which I am sure he is still part.
The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.
-Benjamin Disraeli, English statesman, 1844
September 08, 2011 6:40pm
I accepted the general theory that Osama Bin Laden was infuriated at the Americans maintaining a military base in Saudi Arabia. At least that is what he said he was feeling. Of course, once the Russians were driven out of Afghanistan, he needed a new cause to motivate his Wahhabi inspired fanatic followers. From a religious point of view, the Saudi government was immoral and perhaps Bin Laden blamed the Americans for corrupting it.
The national government is now in possession of information that may clarify what the Al Qaida motivations were. People need to know this information so that they won’t spend more taxpayer money chasing Bogey men. I am referring to the trove of information that was taken from Bin Laden's house on the night that he was killed. The government is even more likely to hold this information back if it contains things that might embarrass various agencies. The press and all open media should mount an effort to declassify as much of it as possible. The public really needs to know the facts so that unwarranted fears are not further manipulated to someone's political and financial advantage.
It is abundantly clear that the war in Iraq was a Republican plot to bring back the cold war Reagan era militarism to the advantage of oil companies and military contractors. The documents put on line by the Project for the New American Century showed that the plot was being hatched two years before Bush was elected. Rumsfield even said that Iraq's oil would pay for the war without any taxpayer cash on the line. These people were babbling idiots and only because the public had been scared so much by the 9/11 attacks did it allowed them to go ahead with their scheme. I bet Bin Laden was delighted.
The underlying thinking of Republican strategists in planning the Afghanistan war has not yet been revealed. I suspect that it has everything to do with the fact that Afghanistan is surrounded by five nuclear powers and that the country is home to trillions of dollars of mineral wealth. I think US leaders allied themselves with Pakistan, because it was the easiest player to co-opt with money.
The war on terrorism and 9/11 are just smoke screens that keep the public confused and focused on the wrong things. It is unfortunate that the American public has to pay so much to maintain these mythologies, but many great civilizations have had their temples and priests who did little except to shield the real power holders from scrutiny.
September 09, 2011 4:41am
Osama Bin Laden did not have anything to do with 911. He denied this and the FBI stated that they, through their investigation, could not find any involvement by him.
September 08, 2011 4:37pm
Let's not beat around the bush. (no pun intended) We know that elements within our government were heavily involved in the planning, execution and cover-up of 9/11. I'm not even going to argue this point, because with all the evidence out there for anyone to see, if you don't know that by now, I'm not wasting my time.The question now is just what in the hell are you going to do about it? It's for sure we can't just let them get away with it. We can't keep portending things are normal. We can't have psychopathic mass-murders running our country. So what are you going to do? How soon are you going to do it? The answers are do whatever you can. If you can write, write. If you can draw - draw. If you can speak, speak. Just don't remain silent. And keep doing this until we have put the people responsible for 9/11 where they belong.
September 08, 2011 3:09pm
Back in my youth, folks use to say the FBI, CIA etc were watching, keeping files. America made that a joke, paranoid druggies.
Then, strange as it seems, there were files, provocateurs, set-ups, etc. It wasn’t imagined, it is real.
I concur from the onset the officially accepted/professed ‘storyline’ has major holes & contradictions. However, it isn’t separate from what is our American experience is today.
The controlled disparity of wealth distribution, the consolidation of markets and power by the 2%ers, the raping of the environment by corporate shills. The 2%ers have been at this long game even before 9/11, I doubt this was not part of their game plan too. And ‘We, the people’ still viciously fight each other over BS.
It’s not the economy stupid! It’s our Nation, our substance as a people that is being devalued& destroyed with our inaction as concurrence.
Our only hope, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, Our Declaration of Independence. These abstract ideals that are eroded everyday because we meekly do nothing but complain.
Guess this civility & Politically Correctness in being quite, thoughtful & peaceful works. 9/11 was the goat; we, the people are the sheep in this slaughter.
However, having been to war for my country, Viet Nam, I know how We, the people really are, underneath. A violent, dangerous, vengeful people. Our weakness is focusing that at the true villains, the 2%ers & their minions.
When their blood in fact flows, that’s when this story’s and all the other stories facts will see the light, and we the people can deal with our deserved shame & the needless shame we bequeath our children.
Not just the shame of torture, but of our negligence in actualizing our responsibility & obligation as Americans to each other as a people.
I pray it makes us stronger or at least human again.
September 08, 2011 2:38pm
Now is a great time to connect some dots. No conspiracy theories, just publicly available information.
Start with the website "The Project for a New American Century", click on "Publications /Reports", pull up document "REBUILDING
AMERICA’S DEFENSES" and search for "Pearl Harbor". Read enough to get a complete idea of the context, how in order to attack Iraq and other Middle East countries, we would need an event like Pearl harbor. We got it.
Next, go to the site "http:-slash slash - rememberbuilding7.org/10/", click on "Architects & Engineers: Solving the Mystery of WTC 7" Listen to how it is unlikely WTC7 collapsed with out explosive demolition, and by extension, perhaps WTC 1 & 2.
When I first read "rebuilding America's Defenses" several years ago the document was signed by Rumsfeld, Scooter Libby, Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, Paul Wolfowitz, Willian Krystal. Since then the Rumsfeld, Cheney and Bush's names have been removed.
September 09, 2011 2:27pm
Yes, I saw as signatory Rumsfeld, Libby, Cheney, Jeb Bush, Wolfowitz, and Willian Krystal when I read and spread that document to all I knew or communicated with at the time in early 2000. (I was SO outraged that GWB was even able to run for president) The server offering that and other documents became inactive since then and I haven't seen the info since so didn't know until now that those names have been removed.
I'm only surprised that it took them so long, and I thank you for pointing it out.
September 08, 2011 1:07pm
Interesting that we could try the perps that remained alive in Nuremberg, but these Muslims like KSM are just too dangerous to even allow in the country much less offer to have them tried in a civilian court. I guess our sensibilities as a political body have become too delicate for that. Or it might be that thew "war" paradigm as a response to international terrorism requires less restraint and less accountability than the law enforcement model would have and thus made craven decisions like invading Iraq, or just the "bush doctrine" easier to sell to a fear stoked populace. Sad to see the Obama administration take the baton on this policy and run with it. I think we are tough enough and our courts reliable arbiters of the facts that a murdering douche like KSM could be brought to this country and shown how civilized people administer justice. But by now, he knows that we are hardly better than the murdering douches that sat in the dock at Nuremberg and that could make any attempt to try him a referendum on our conduct post 9/11. It might also give us a better understanding of bush's relationship with his "friends" in Saudi Arabia and I suspect that may be a large part of why a trial cannot happen in this country.
September 08, 2011 1:02pm
THE BILLION DOLLAR QUESTIONS OF THE CENTURY: DID WE DO THIS TO OURSELVES & PASSED OFF BLAME TO OSAMA BIN LADEN/AL QAEDA? AND WHY WAS IT SO EASY FOR PRESIDENT OBAMA & NOT BUSH/CHENEY TO FIND OSAMA IN PAKISTAN, KILL HIM & DUMP HIS BODY INTO THE SEA?
September 08, 2011 11:07am
Much more needs to be done in terms of understanding the "why" behind 9.11.
September 08, 2011 10:46am
If we scratch the surface of 911 event officially sanctioned reports, we will find nothing but unproven assertions of the DICK/Bush orchestrated "truths".... If we do not get to the reality of the event, we will be mired in perpetual warfare till the end of time, throwing money at the defense contractors and making enemies around the world, leading to internal implosion due to unsustainable costs... One should point out to the "leaders" again "IT IS THE ECONOMICS STUPID", not the military that secures hegemony in world affairs....
September 09, 2011 1:04am
Our vengeful, testosterone laced leaders don't care about the American people, only their own corrupt, self serving egos.