Indentured Servitude for Seniors: Social Security Garnished for Student Debts
The Social Security program…represents our commitment as a society to the belief that workers should not live in dread that a disability, death, or old age could leave them or their families destitute.
-- President Jimmy Carter, December 20, 1977.
[This law] assures the elderly that America will always keep the promises made in troubled times a half century ago…[The Social Security Amendments of 1983 are] a monument to the spirit of compassion and commitment that unites us as a people.
-- President Ronald Reagan, April 20, 1983.
So said Presidents Carter and Regan, but that was before 1996, when Congress voted to allow federal agencies to offset portions of Social Security payments to collect debts owed to those agencies. (31 U.S.C. §3716). Now we read of horror stories like this:
I’m a 68 year old grandma of 2 young grandchildren. I went to college to upgrade my employment status in 1998 or 1999. I finished in 2000 and at that time had a student loan balance of about 3500.00.
Could not find a job and had to request forbearance to carry me. Over the years I forgot about the loan, dealt with poor health, had brain surgery in 2006 and the collection agents decided to collect for the loan in 2008.
At no time during the 6-7 year gap did anyone remind me or let me know that I could make a minimum payment on the loan. Now that I am on Social Security (have been since I was 62), they have decided to garnishee my SS check to the tune of 15%.
I have not been employed since 2004 and have the two dependents . . . . I don’t dispute that I owed them the $3500.00 but am wondering why they let it build up to somewhere around $17,000/20,000 before they attempted to collect.
Her debt went from $3500 to over $17,000 in 10 years?! How could that be?
It seems that Congress has removed nearly every consumer protection from student loans, including not only standard bankruptcy protections, statutes of limitations, and truth in lending requirements, but protection from usury (excessive interest). Lenders can vary the interest rates, and some borrowers are reporting rates as high as 18-20%. At 20%, debt doubles in just 3-1/2 years; and in 7 years, it quadruples. Congress has also given lenders draconian collection powers to extort not just the original principal and interest on student loans but huge sums in penalties, fees, and collection costs.
The majority of these debts are being imposed on young people, who have a potential 40 years of gainful employment ahead of them to pay the debt off. But a sizeable chunk of U.S. student loan debt is held by senior citizens, many of whom are not only unemployed but unemployable. According to the New York Federal Reserve, two million U.S. seniors age 60 and over have student loan debt, on which they owe a collective $36.5 billion; and 11.2 percent of this debt is in default. Almost a third of all student loan debt is held by people aged 40 and over, and 4.2% is held by people over the age of 60. The total student debt is now over $1 trillion, more even than credit card debt. The sum is unsustainable and threatens to be the next debt tsunami.
Some of this debt is for loans taken out years earlier on their own schooling, and some is from co-signing student loans for children or grandchildren. But much of it has been incurred by middle-aged people going back to school in the hope of finding employment in a bad job market. What they have wound up with is something much worse: no job, an exponentially mounting debt that cannot be discharged in bankruptcy, and the prospect of old age without a social security check adequate to survive on.
Gone is the promise of earlier presidents of a “commitment to the belief that workers should not live in dread that a disability, death, or old age could leave them or their families destitute.” The plight of the indebted elderly is reminiscent of the Irish immigrants who came to America after a potato famine in the 19th century, who were looked upon in some places as actually lower than slaves. Plantation owners kept their slaves fed, clothed and cared for, because they were valuable property. The Irish were expendable, and they were on their own.2
It is obviously not a good time to raise interest rates on student debt, but they are set to double on July 1, 2012, to 6.8%. Many lawmakers in both parties agree that the current 3.4% rates should be extended for another year, but they can’t agree on how to find the $6 billion that this would cost. Republicans want to take the money from a health care fund that promotes preventive care; Democrats want to eliminate some tax benefits for small business owners.
Congress cannot agree on $6 billion to save the students, yet they managed to agree in a matter of days in September 2008 to come up with $700 billion to save the banks; and the Federal Reserve found many trillions more. Estimates are that tuition could be provided free to students for a mere $30 billion annually. The government has the power to find $30 billion -- or $300 billion or $3 trillion -- in the same place the Federal Reserve found it: it can simply issue the money.
Congress is empowered by the Constitution to “coin money” and “regulate the value thereof,” and no limit is set on the face amount of the coins it creates. It could issue a few one-billion dollar coins, deposit them in an account, and start writing checks.
But wouldn’t that be inflationary? No. The Fed’s own figures show that the money supply (M3) has shrunk by $3 trillion since 2008. That sum could be added back into the economy without inflating prices. Gas and food are going up today, but the whole range of prices must be considered in order to determine whether price inflation is occurring. Housing and wages are significantly larger components of the price structure than commodities, and they remain severely depressed.
There is another way the government could find needed funds without raising taxes, slashing services, or going further into debt: Congress could re-finance the federal debt through the Federal Reserve, interest-free. Canada did this from 1939 to 1974, keeping its national debt low and sustainable while funding massive programs including seaways, roadways, pensions, and national health care. The national debt shot up only when the government switched from borrowing from its own central bank to borrowing from private lenders at interest. The rationale was that borrowing bank-created money from the government’s own central bank inflated the money supply, while borrowing existing funds from private banks did not. But even the Federal Reserve acknowledges that private banks create the money they lend on their books, just as central banks do.
U.S. taxpayers now pay nearly half a trillion dollars annually to finance our federal debt. The cumulative figure comes to $8.2 trillion paid in interest just in the last 24 years. By financing the debt itself rather than paying interest to private parties, the government could divert what it would have paid in interest into tuition, jobs, infrastructure and social services, allowing us to keep the social contract while at the same time stimulating the economy.
For students, at the very least the bankruptcy option needs to be reinstated, usury laws restored, predatory practices eliminated, and the cost of education brought back down to earth. One possibility for relieving the burden on students would be to give them interest-free loans. The government of New Zealand now offers 0% loans to New Zealand students, with repayment to be made from their income after they graduate. For the past twenty years, the Australian government has also successfully funded students by giving out what are in effect interest-free loans. The loans in the Australian Higher Education Loan Program (or HELP) do not bear interest, but the government gets back more than it lends, because the principal is indexed to the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which goes up every year.
Predatory lenders are keeping us in debt peonage through misguided economics and bank-captured legislators. We have people who desperately want to work, to the point of going back to school to try to improve their chances; and we have mountains of work that needs to be done. The only thing keeping them apart is that artificial constraint called “money”, which we have allowed to be created by banks and let out at interest when it could have been created by public institutions for public purposes, either by direct issuance or through publicly owned banks. We just need to recognize our oppressors and throw off their yoke, and the good times can roll again.
CONNECT














15 comments on "Indentured Servitude for Seniors: Social Security Garnished for Student Debts"
May 14, 2012 4:27pm
Something interesting. The VA considers a pension eligibility as over 65 or disabled. At 65 you are considered disabled for continued work. Of course the VA and the DOE are separate departments but there is a precedent for the definition. A full discharge at social security could be argued for without the opposition of those who say I paid mine and you pay yours.
I owe more now, 8 years after my last degree and if I pay as required I'll owe $125000 (double what I owe now) when the government pays off the bank after 25 years.
The banks have the flexibility to take what we can afford because the guaranteed principal grow and grows.
May 14, 2012 10:15am
I'm 70-I owe over $40,000 in stafford loans. My marriage broke up when I was almost 60-I went to a community college-trades so I wouldn't have debt. I was awarded a scholarship for books. I ended up earning a BA with a GPA of 3.99. I went to university honors and took extra classes to position myself on the advice of counselors and professors. I paid off Sallie Mae last week. At one job interview, I was told if I was so smart why was I looking for a job in New Mexico. I have dystrophy so I don't type fast. I wish that I could have landed a job at Walmart or McDonalds. I didn't have any local references and was new to the city. Then when I took classes for the Pell Grant to keep from being homeless, I was too educated to work at such places. I did internships to get experience-and I had to pay fees for the internships, basically paying to work. The only work I could get was being a substitute teacher, I can't work now.
May 14, 2012 12:21am
Many would like to see student loan forgiveness instituted, my favorite, a "debt jubilee". If that's out of the question, how about interest forgiveness, which in some cases has more than doubled the cost of those original loans? Let's give borrowers a chance to make good, leave lenders with their piece, and reduce the overall percentage of loan defaults by writing off that interest. It would be a start. With out a doubt, borrowers should have the option for bankruptcy. Looking into the future, free state colleges, as we had at one time. The responsibility of years of a downward spiraling economy, high unemployment levels, rising interest rates, and outrageous medical costs should not be placed on the shoulders of people who took out students loans with the ideal of contributing to society and caring for their families. In good conscious, we can't leave seniors to live out the rest of their lives buried under impossible surmounting debt or in death knowing their ruin has become is their legacy?
Come on America, let's think out of the box!
May 13, 2012 9:08pm
Can Ellen or someone post an answer as to how the student loan debt breaks down. Much of this is from the banks and is then guaranteed by the government. How much is actually sourced out by the government? Who is reaping the interest that congress is desperate to have to replace, as if they had it in the first place? How bound are we to the guarantee to the banks who have ruined our economy? What is the bottom line to the US and given that debt is money, how many times over has the guaranteed amount been redeemed prior to collection? The press would have us believe that the government lends it and collects it and we are deadbeats who avoid paying. What is the real truth. If I google anything all I get are pages of come ons for new loans. this is a much different set of dialogues than the ones generated on Truthout in response to the same article, but the questions I ask are necessary to fram the debate, both here and elsewhere.
May 14, 2012 1:34am
I can tell you how it works, because I just had a big argument with a CSR with NELNET about it in April. I finally got a "total & permanent disability discharge" after 6 years - 3 years more than they were supposed to take for it, because they don't have actual guidelines about what they want from the doctors and send it back over and over for unexplained things, or for a signature that is now more than 60 days old (because they took their time before advising it needed more something!). They also rarely bothered to let me know they wanted or needed something, and I wouldn't have known most of the time if I hadn't called about it. Then it sat for a year, nothing going on at all, until NELNET bought it and asked for some income data, then put on its website the loan was forgiven, but when I called, the CSR said it was a mistake, I still needed to send in income data for the first 6 months of my disability eligibility period. Why didn't you ask for that when you asked for the other income statement 6 months ago? Just didn't. Now they had everything, and finally I got a letter discharging the loan in 2014. Oops. Two weeks later, I got a letter correcting the date to 2011. The letter came with a 1099 tax form. It looked very wrong.
I called and asked how it had gone to $75,450 from about $55k when interest was supposed to be waived from eligibility date on. And I wanted to know what portion of that $75.4k was interest, because this discharge is taxable as income, with interest maybe exempt in some/most/all situations, hurray Congress.
What he told me was that it was all principal, which is not possible, of course. How did that happen? I paid $500/mo. for 5 or 6 years before the consolidation, and then again for a few years before starting on various deferments and forbearances, then finally applied for the discharge. That's what they paid for the loan, he said, so it's all principal. I told him I didn't think it changed to all principal just because they paid that amount for the loan - principal and interest.
Wait, how much did it show as principal back in Oct. 2003, when I "consolidated" my student loans to a hideous 8.75% rate from 9.25% - although rates were down around 3-4% at the time. Hurray Congress, again, it had a bizarre weighted formula for a floor on consolidation loan interest, punishing those of us who went to school when rates were high.
Nonetheless, he said that back a decade ago, my loans were around$57,450, and today they were showing as $75,442. So that means about $18,000 of the current balance was interest since I refinanced (consolidated). He insisted it was all what they had paid so it was all principal! And when I consolidated, they had added the interest from the 2 or 3 separate loans to the principal of the new single loan, which then accrued its own interest, and when it was sold, that interest was added to the principal.
No separating it out as far as they were concerned, taxes and 1099 forms be damned. Wouldn't give me his last name, or extension ID, or let me speak to a supervisor or manager either. The official line from the US Dept. of Education, as told to a senator inquiring about it on my behalf, was that they don't break out interest, it's reported as student loan debt forgiven, and reported to credit bureaus as discharged/closed. End of story.
So this is transparency in government? They call themselves servicers for US Dept. of Education, but the NELNET guy said they bought the loans. How does that work? And since when does interest turn into principal just because somebody new bought the loan? That's why everybody's loans are so high - they keep getting the interest capitalized when loans are consolidated or sold/transferred, starting over with a higher principal balance, then adding more interest on the higher amount, with whatever interest rate applies at the time. Is that buried in the loan fine print somewhere? This is not right!
So there's the answer to your question of who is getting all the interest - the "servicers" or lenders who make the loans, the government just guarantees they won't be defaulted. The exception is the Direct Loans program, which is made through the government, but that is primarily for graduate school loans, and most undergraduate loans are made by private or quasi-public lenders (i.e., Arizona and some other states have their own program to make student loans.)
I think everybody should try and get whatever discharge/forgiveness they can, or make them take you to court and show the judge how they figured your balance. Maybe we should have a class action suit against it. Maybe Congress should make any discharge tax free, especially discharges for disability where you can't have worked much or at all for 5 or 6 years, since they refuse to break out interest paid on their 1099 tax forms to the IRS.
Mindy M.
P.S. I will be 62 in June. I wrote and posted a piece about this some years ago, on my now-defunct mindymac.com website (still showing on Wayback Machine site!), looking at the possibility of being an old bag lady on social security paying my nondischargeable student loans, with the balance going up no matter how much I paid on it. Funny how close it was to the reality I have been living. (BofA foreclosed just before Xmas. One step closer to bag ladydom. Fighting it Pro Se. But that's another story.)
May 13, 2012 5:55pm
The only growth in the US and European markets have been debt. The annual global GDP averages between $50-65 trillion, yet the banks play in the hundreds of trillions...all mfg, all on paper. At the beginning of the financial crisis in 2008, the FED gave all the global major banks $16 trillion each, this came out a couple of weeks ago on Bloomberg. Since then, they have been feeding them trillions more, all on the backs of the American citizens. TARP made up less than 2% of the money actually given the big banks, and they continue to receive hundreds of billions in interest free (borrowed) money.
Meanwhile, they cannot find a few billion to help our own people get a decent education that would actually grow our economy.
Revolution is coming because millions more Americans are being ruined financially, and it will get a lot worse very soon. This is why they passed NDAA and HR347 with such overwhelming support. Our economy is collapsing, they are using financial shell games to keep the illusion of action going and skim any remaining wealth out of this country.
Any economy is only as good as the credibility of it's nation. and our's is gone.
The collusion between government, FED and the TBTF banks is too deep, there is no chance of reform. The FED is carrying 68% of our debt now, because China, Russia and Japan are no longer buying our debt.....nor is anyone else. The FED gives (borrowed) cash at zero precent to the TBTF banks, and the banks buy up US treasuries to keep our debt current. Then, in true Enron tradition, they take the twice indebted treasury notes and list them as assets. That is why they are bigger; it is all debt.
This is why there have been no investigations, trials or convictions, the truth would accelerate the collapse that is coming. Here is the reason.
Over 33% of global GDP contributors have found electronic alternatives to the US dollar for international trade. Started with the Sucre in South America, technology has helped other nations to trade with each other using their own currencies leaving the US dollar out. Electronic currency translates the value between nations, it saves time and money. It is also a result of the growing worldwide resentment and distrust of the US. It is growing rapidly, and soon we will be sitting on piles of paper currency that nobody wants. The ride is almost over.
May 13, 2012 1:20pm
It is time that we change our money system. We did not vote in the Federal Reserve. Since the private banking system owns our government and much of the major corporations that are outside our influence, we have entered into slavery. The interests created by the system is an unjust tax. We did not elect these people, why do we allow them to control us, our families, communities and our government.
Ellen Brown is educating us as to what has happened and what will continue to happen until we stand up against this evil in our culture. Let us dump this system and start all over again. The bankers are liars and thieves. Read Ellen's Book. Think for yourself and believe in yourself. These people owe no allegiance to our government or us. This is our country. It belongs to us. Take it back an inch at a time. Our enemy is here. You can make a difference just by showing up, learning as much as you can and fight them, not with guns and bullets but with faith, confidence in your fellow man and the determination that our government can be returned to the people. Today is a good day to start.
May 13, 2012 11:54am
My wife, divorced with 2 toddlers worked and attended college part-time earning her B.S. (Phi Beta Kappa) and then borrowed $17,000 to earn her Masters in social work. Not a lucrative profession. Dept. of Education failed to bill her for 7 years despite her notifying them of the problem. When she got the statement, after making repeated inquiries, the loan had ballooned to what today exceeds $36,000 and is projected to be $74,000 if she makes minimum payments. Direct Loans has a program where after 25 years of indigence, the loan may be forgiven. So by the time the loan is forgiven she will be age 95. The irony, at age 3, her father took is life due to "shell shock" as a result of combat service in WWII. Had anyone informed her before high school graduation, she would have received educational benefits from the Veterans Administration. She's age 60 now.
May 13, 2012 11:48am
To TMC2012 and anyone else who has trouble grasping this interest rate mess, let me try to make it simple. 1. The U.S. Treasury has no trouble borrowing money on 10 year notes at less than 2% interest. 2. When a bank lends money it is required to maintain an amount in it's reserve of a little more than 10%. That dosen't mean it lends out 10% of the money it has. It means that for ever dollar it has on reserve it can lend out $10.00. That's how banks create money. 3. Why should they pay you a lot of interest on your deposits if they don't have to to get you to deposit the money. 4. If depositors move their money to institutions or vehicles that pay higher interest, - say credit unions, for example - than the banks would have to compete for our deposits and they would pay higher interest rates. You see, we really do have the power, we just need to use it.
May 13, 2012 6:03pm
I agree with you about credit unions, and that moving our money from the big banks is power we still have and ought to use.
However, standard operating procedures for banks and government is to take $100 million and leverage it to $100 billion.....that is 1000:1, not 10:1. A few months ago, there was a deal proposed to save the Euro. One of the conditions was that the banks had to have 9 cents on deposit for every dollar they claimed as assets. The banks would have had to borrow the 9 cents. Deal didn't fly, and the debt levels are far too toxic to fix. In 1929, an investor could put $100 into a brokerage account, and buy $190 worth of stock; 9:1 leverage, and look at the banks that collapsed. Now, they are being kept afloat with outright collusion with the government and FED....
May 13, 2012 11:50am
There is just too much here for one comment. But 2 items stand out. First, That the Congress has allowed the student loan program to become an exempt loan program boarders on criminality. The only thing missing would be the strong-arm collectors. Congress must restore the reasonable safeguards of usuery and bankruptcy protections as well as "truth-in-lending" laws. Second, let us not loose sight of the value of U.S. government paper to the world's economy. This source of investment options is used by banks, investors and governments around the world as the safest investment available. To eliminate it would cause financial catastrophy on a global scale. The debt is not the problem. Debt size is only important as compared to other factors such as the ability to repay. Today, the U.S. debt service amounts to about 3% of GDP. How many folks do you know who's debt service requirements amount to only 3% of their annual income. In short, what is missing is the consummer. Even Mr. Reagan understood that the worlds ultimate consummer, with unlimited resources, is controlled out of the White House. If we grow the economy, the size of the debt becomes less important. As President Obama has said, It's just math."
May 13, 2012 11:07am
Does anyone understand why this is happening? My 93-year-old mother-in-law had $60,000 in her bank checking account for all of 2011. She figures she will just leave the money in the checking account since it's easily accessible to her should she need to go into an assisted living situation. For one whole year the bank gave her $28.00 in interest on the $60,000. And yet, the bank can add interest on a student loan at a rate of 20%! I realize that the banks own most those who should put protections in place, but does anyone have an answer to how can we stop this type of theft?
May 13, 2012 9:59am
It's time for seniors to work interdependently to protect themselves by creating trusts and putting their wealth into creating self sustaining eco villages that they share with others. In case of a medical emergency have your own staffed clinics on property instead of losing everything via hospital costs and insurance fraud.
Get the youth involved (those 18 million college grads that can't find jobs) and give them a future by inviting them to join you to do the heavy work, man the clinics, build and maintain buildings, grow food in organic gardens, etc. Elders can contribute wisdom, help mind kids, and work that suits their physical condition, younger folks can care for the very sick and help make the transition to the next life safer and more comfortable. With some cooperation and good communication we can build vibrant, vital communities and eliminate the exploitive middle men.
There are some web sites that can help guide the creation of community trust villages. Ours is www.the-communal-solution.us and another is www.ic.org for intentional communities.
Also, a debt jubilee is what is really in order and here is a great website about that. http://spiritofjubilee.com/crisis/us-student-loan-crisis-interview-with-...
May 14, 2012 9:45am
Ha! Try to get young kids to do physical labor. It's nigh on to impossible.
May 14, 2012 1:42am
Count me in on the ecovillages, cohousing, land trusts, etc. The ic.org website has a great directory of world-wide situations. Co-housing.org also has good resources and directory.