Article image
Robert Scheer
Truthdig / Truthdig Op-Ed
Published: Sunday 3 February 2013
The invisible hand of that primitive and pure free market so celebrated in the folklore of capitalism as the essence of efficiency and productivity has been replaced by the all too visible hand of the fixer.

It’s Good to Be a Goldman

Article image

Here’s a get-out-of-jail-free card, and while we’re at it, take this obscenely huge bonus for having wrecked the economy. As the inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program pointed out in a devastating report this week, “excessive” compensation was approved by the Treasury Department for the executives of the three companies that required the largest taxpayer bailouts to survive. 

In a stinging rebuke of Timothy Geithner’s Treasury Department, the report “found that once again, in 2012, Treasury failed to rein in excessive pay.” Whopping pay packages of $5 million or more were allowed by the Treasury Department for a quarter of the top executives at AIG, General Motors and Ally Financial, the former financial arm of GM.

But that’s nothing compared with the $21 million for last year’s work garnered by Lloyd Blankfein, CEO of Goldman Sachs, which is now free of TARP supervision. In addition to his paltry $2 million in salary, Blankfein received a $19 million bonus for his efforts. Not quite the $67.9 million bonus he got in 2007 before the market crash that his firm did so much to engineer, but times are still hard.

Goldman was the training ground for Robert Rubin and Henry Paulson, the two Treasury secretaries who did their best to grease the skids for Wall Street hustlers. It was Rubin under President Bill Clinton who pushed to get the law changed to allow investment banks like Goldman to become commercial banks, and it was Paulson under President George W. Bush who permitted Goldman to take advantage of that loophole and partake in the low interest Fed money available to the commercial banks. Throw in the AIG bailout that allowed the passage of billions of dollars to Goldman, and you get the picture.

What you may not know, and file this in the gallery of the terminally shameless, is the role of James A. Johnson, the longest serving director of Goldman Sachs and chairman of its compensation committee that awarded Blankfein his outrageous bonuses. Before being named a director at Goldman, Johnson served as the CEO of Fannie Mae when the once public-spirited federal housing agency joined forces with Countrywide CEO Angelo Mozilo and other mortgage scam artists in initiating the great housing bubble. 

Back in 1996, Johnson had named Mozilo to be chair of Fannie Mae’s National Advisory Council, and together they cooked up a deal in which Fannie Mae came to rely on Countrywide’s proprietary CLUES software for short-circuiting the mortgage qualification process. Thus was born the housing mortgage debacle that to this day has haunted the economy. 

Countrywide announced its “Strategic Agreement with Fannie Mae” in a press release that all but predicted the subsequent housing crisis: “The objective is to expand markets to accommodate more customers and streamline loan processing in order to reduce the upfront cost of homeownership. This entails increased acceptance of Countrywide’s proprietary CLUES underwriting technology, greater usage of short form appraisals, expansion of streamlined loan products, flow sales for expanded criteria loans, and guideline waivers.”

That history became inconvenient back in 2008, when Democratic candidate Barack Obama picked Johnson, a lifelong Democrat, to head the search for a vice presidential candidate. Turns out Johnson was one of the beneficiaries of the new streamlined loan processing system, being what was known inside Countrywide as a “friend of Angelo,” entitled to fast-track approval on loans. As a result, Obama had to drop him, but not so Goldman Sachs, where Johnson had landed as a director and remains today as the chairman of the firm’s compensation committee.

They do flock together, and so it makes perfect sense that Johnson would approve the enormous bonus for Blankfein. In the end, it doesn’t matter whether these folks are Democrats or Republicans, nor whether they are operating at the highest levels of government or banking—they take care of their own. It is the new model of crony capitalism that must have Adam Smith turning in his grave, for it has nothing to do with free-market performance.

The invisible hand of that primitive and pure free market so celebrated in the folklore of capitalism as the essence of efficiency and productivity has been replaced by the all too visible hand of the fixer, who can combine government power and corporate profits to game the system. Yes, visible. Just observe how easily folks such as Rubin, Paulson and Johnson move through the revolving door between corporate and government power undeterred by critical media notice. And now it is Geithner’s turn.

This article was originally posted on Truthdig.



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange
Author pic
ABOUT Robert Scheer
Robert Scheer, editor in chief of Truthdig, has built a reputation for strong social and political writing over his 30 years as a journalist. His columns appear in newspapers across the country, and his in-depth interviews have made headlines. He conducted the famous Playboy magazine interview in which Jimmy Carter confessed to the lust in his heart and he went on to do many interviews for the Los Angeles Times with Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and many other prominent political and cultural figures.

Top Stories

6 comments on "It’s Good to Be a Goldman"

Elsten

February 04, 2013 9:49am

well, here again is an article reiterating what has been said many times before.
The Banks and, the top eschelon in them, have been the cause of world wide recession. It wouldn't be so bad if those who make the outlandish monetary rewards, actually PAID TAXES commesurant to what they made. They are able to play the game from several angles.

If some poor guy steals a loaf of bread, because his family is starving. Or if an addicted drug or alcohol user is brought up for breaking the law they, are shuffled off to some FOR PROFIT jail, while the banker gets an ovation for having been a real entrepenour in his line of endeavour.

The Bible is full of tales about, the subject above, and the ones that flaunt those laws are not shuned by their friendfs neighbors and associates, or heaven forbid, they be punished for their missdeeds

Jeffrey Hill

February 03, 2013 11:47am

"Savvy businessmen" is what Obama and Holder call the Wall Street thieves.

Harvard Law School spews out more raw sewage than the Cambridge, Massachusetts wastewater treatment plant during torrential downpours caused by hurricanes coming up the east coast.

kofi123

February 03, 2013 11:32am

We have jails for everyone except the majority of the politicians. A congressmen like James Traficant can be jail be jailed because Israel doesn't like what he says. But any politician can assist in destroying our political system and he is rewarded.

Bill Clinton allowed Rubin to deregulate the banks into commercial banks and Clinton walks away with $100 million. After awhile Obama will do the same and then try to hand off to Hillary to do likewise.

The federal reserve, the Goldman Sach's, and our politicians have surrounded the American people in an orgy of greed, corruption, and malfeasance. When will we say enough? When will we have our Terir Square?

miz.behaves

February 03, 2013 10:37am

It should be plainly obvious to anyone who reads this story that the US Government and many state governments now exists as a tool for multinational corporations to transfer public assets to private hands while having their own spokespersons (politicians) talk as though they are going to "clean up" the mess or reform government.

The government does this by offering rather simplistic solutions to complex problems, knowing that various segments of the population will support these programs.

In essence, they take advantage of the public's good nature and desire to do good by telling them what they want to hear while not publicizing the costs versus the benefits and rigging the game so that these projects will benefit these corporations at the expense of the public. Building massive solar energy projects is one of these projects.

mycophile

February 03, 2013 2:02pm

virtually ALL of their "projects" are in that category. one should be particularly suspicious of the projects that one considers address to their pet causes. feeling grateful that "the government" found one's cause worthy of attention is a powerfully blinding bias.

Norman123

February 03, 2013 10:32am

AND SUCK AND SUCK AND SUCK!