Article image
Amy Goodman
NationofChange / Op-Ed
Published: Thursday 7 June 2012
“Scott Walker’s win signals less a loss for the unions than a loss for our democracy in this post-Citizens United era, when elections can be bought with the help of a few billionaires.”

It’s One Person, One Vote, Not 1 Percent, One Vote

Article image

The failed effort to recall Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker is widely seen as a crisis for the labor movement, and a pivotal moment in the 2012 U.S. presidential-election season. Walker launched a controversial effort to roll back the power of Wisconsin’s public employee unions, and the unions pushed back, aided by strong, grass-roots solidarity from many sectors. This week, the unions lost. Central to Walker’s win was a massive infusion of campaign cash, saturating the Badger state with months of political advertising. His win signals less a loss for the unions than a loss for our democracy in this post-Citizens United era, when elections can be bought with the help of a few billionaires.

In February 2011, the newly elected Walker, a former Milwaukee county executive, rolled out a plan to strip public employees of their collective-bargaining rights, a platform he had not run on.  The backlash was historic. Tens of thousands marched on the Wisconsin Capitol, eventually occupying it. Walker threatened to call out the National Guard. The numbers grew. Despite Walker’s strategy to “divide and conquer” the unions (a phrase he was overheard saying in a recorded conversation with a billionaire donor), the police and firefighters unions, whose bargaining rights he had strategically left intact, came out in support of the occupation. Across the world, the occupation of Tahrir Square in Egypt was in full swing, with signs in English and Arabic expressing solidarity with the workers of Wisconsin.

The demands for workers rights were powerful and sustained. The momentum surged toward a demand to recall Walker, along with a slew of his Republican allies in the Wisconsin Senate. Then laws tempered the movement’s power. The Wisconsin recall statute required that an elected official be in office for one year before a recall. Likewise, a loophole in the law allowed the target of the recall to raise unlimited individual donations, starting when the recall petitions are filed. Thus, Walker’s campaign started raising funds in November 2011. His opponent, Tom Barrett, the mayor of Milwaukee, was limited to individual donations of up to $10,000, and had less than one month to campaign after winning the Democratic Party primary May 8.

Coupled with the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, the Wisconsin loophole set the stage for grossly lopsided fundraising between Walker and Barrett, and an election battle that was the most expensive in Wisconsin’s history. According to the most recent state campaign-finance filings, Walker’s campaign raised over $30.5 million, more than seven times Barrett’s reported $3.9 million. After adding in super PAC spending, estimates put the recall-election spending at more than $63.5 million.

According to Forbes magazine, 14 billionaires made contributions to Walker, only one of whom lives in Wisconsin. Among the 13 out-of-state billionaires was Christy Walton, the widow of John T. Walton, son of Wal-Mart founder Sam Walton.

Nobel Prize-winning economist Joe Stiglitz writes about the Walton family in his new book, “The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future.” He notes, “The six heirs to the Wal-Mart empire command wealth of $69.7 billion, which is equivalent to the wealth of the entire bottom 30 percent of U.S. society.” That is almost 95 million people. Stiglitz told me: “We’ve moved from a democracy, which is supposed to be based on one person, one vote, to something much more akin to one dollar, one vote. When you have that kind of democracy, it’s not going to address the real needs of the 99 percent.”

The voters of Wisconsin did return control of the state Senate to the Democratic Party. The new majority will have the power to block the type of controversial legislation that made Walker famous. Meanwhile, three states over in Montana, the Democratic state attorney general, Steve Bullock, won his party’s nomination for governor to run for the seat held by term-limited Democrat Brian Schweitzer. Bullock, as attorney general, has taken on Citizens United by defending the state’s 100-year-old     corrupt-practices act, which prohibits the type of campaign donations allowed under Citizens United. The case is now before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Wisconsin’s recall is over, but the fight for democracy starts with one person, one vote, not 1 percent, one vote.

© 2011 Amy Goodman
Distributed by King Features Syndicate



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange
Author pic
ABOUT Amy Goodman

Amy Goodman is the host of "Democracy Now!," a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on more than 900 stations in North America. She is the author of "Breaking the Sound Barrier," recently released in paperback and now a New York Times best-seller.

Top Stories

5 comments on "It’s One Person, One Vote, Not 1 Percent, One Vote"

jeltez42

June 07, 2012 3:35pm

A rather novel concept, that one person, one vote thingy. The country did not start out that way. See the wealthy thought the only people smart enough to vote were white land owning males. But this clashed with the agrarian ideals that allowed "commoners" and non-titled immigratnt to buy land so lets throw in an electoral college as that will controll the "non-wealthy" vote. We will rig the Senate too by having senators appointed by the state governors. Again, it is too dangerous to allow the non-wealthy into government.

So we move forward to today. Don't have a spare tens of millions in your couch cushions, then you cannot run for anything. And if you work a blue collar or any other type of day job, good luck getting a year off to run. It's not like your wife and kids will go to work for you like they did in 1788.

We have a ruling class without the pomp and titles. We have our royals, and our barons, earls, and the tax monies going to fund their extravagance to go along with the growing peasant class. Are you sure the US "won" the Revolutionary war?

Norman Allen

June 07, 2012 1:13pm

America as we knew is vanished. It has become the country of the 1% at the expense of the 99%. The only savior is for the 99% to keep organizing and fight money with organized power of the PEOPLE.

jeltez42

June 07, 2012 3:42pm

Super concept Mr. Allen. But 99.9999% firmly believe they will be in the 1% someday soon so best not to make the 1% angry.

When life cannot get any worse, a majority of the 99% will rise up, the remainder will still be waiting for the winning lottery number to fall into their hands and will defend the 1%.

Norman Allen

June 08, 2012 8:00am

A well made point. Yes, the audacity of hope!

Sageman69

June 07, 2012 11:16am

It seems so obvious, one person, one vote. And common sense suggests that the Citizens United ruling by the Supreme Court flies in the face of democratic principles....but then we remember that it's about who has the money, the access and the power to buy elections, and we realize, sadly, that we no longer live in a democratic state. The longer this situation remains unchallenged and unchanged, the farther we slip into a democracy in name only. One that is "managed" by the power-elite, Wall Street, corporations, PACs and the media. Wake up, folks! We've become a corporate-fascist state unless we turn this thing around!