Friday, September 19, 2014 / PROGRESSIVE JOURNALISM FOR POSITIVE ACTION
Get Email Updates | Log In | Register

Keystone Pipeline Goes Forward as Texas Court Ditchers

William Boardman
NationofChange / News Report
Published: Monday 31 December 2012
Over the weekend, apparently, Judge Sinz began to wonder if his court of limited jurisdiction actually had the authority to rule on the issues of property and land rights involved in blocking TransCanada from using its right of way for the pipeline.
Article image

Michael Bishop was ready for his day in court against TransCanada’s Keystone XL pipeline, which is under construction in East Texas and approaching his homestead.  The only trouble was the court wasn’t ready.

By the time TransCanada’s attorneys and Bishop, the former Marine representing himself, showed up at the Nacogdoches County Court on Dec. 19 to argue Bishop’s claim that TransCanada’s defrauded landowners like himself, which was enough to halt construction of the pipeline’s southern leg, Court at Law Judge Jack Sinz was already having second thoughts about his local court taking on a dispute with such large national, international, and global ramifications. 

Judge Sinz had already stopped construction once, having granted Bishop an emergency injunction on Dec. 7.  But Sinz then rescinded that order on Dec. 13 after TransCanada’s attorneys asked for a special hearing to which they present additional information. 

Apparently, over the weekend Judge Sinz began to wonder if his court of limited jurisdiction actually had the authority to rule on the issues of property and land rights involved in blocking TransCanada from using it as right of way for the pipeline.   

At the abbreviated hearing, Sinz invited both sides—TransCanada with its attorneys and Bishop representing himself—to write legal briefs addressing the question of whether the case should be heard by a higher court, which would be filed in early January.   

            No Court Action to Prevent Irreparable Harm

Although Bishop took no evidence to the hearing, Sinz took no action to prevent irreparable harm to Bishop’s property.  Sinz allowed TransCanada to continue its pipeline construction unimpeded, which Bishop initially brought his fear that the pipeline would cross his 20-acre property to the courts for their ruling of legality:

“They dumped gravel on my property today. They’ve got the pipe. They’re fixin’ to weld the pipe up. It’s about two miles down the road from me, three,” Bishop told StateImpact Texas.    

A crowd of supporters gathered at the courthouse supportin Bishop, a trained chemist and paramedic now enrolled in medical school.  He told the group:

“TransCanada may think they can keep delaying while their construction crews destroy my land, but they won’t shake me off so easily. I’ll continue fighting to win this case. And I’m suing the Texas Railroad Commission for letting TransCanada lie about what’s going through this pipe so they could use eminent domain to steal my land and my neighbors’ land.”    

Bishop is seeking a jury trial on the question of TransCanada defrauding landowners while one of his supporters held up a sign saying: “YOUR LAND HAS THE RIGHT TO A JURY” while another supporter’s sign read: “TRANSCAN IS AFRAID OF A TEXAS JURY.” 

On Dec. 19, the same day Bishop didn’t get his day in court, other Texans were being ignored by most of the members of the Sunset Commission, who was meeting in Austin to consider whether to dissolve the Texas Railroad Commission that regulates oil pipelines and facilitated TransCanada’s eminent domain process, when landowners weren’t quick enough to grant a right of way for the pipeline. 

The absent Sunset Commissioners missed hearing citizens criticize the railroad commission for taking money from the industries it regulates, abusing the eminent domain process (especially in relation to TransCanada’s tar sands pipeline) and their failure to take action against 98 percent of the violators of the laws the commission was supposed to enforce. 

Bishop has also filed suit against the rail road commission on some of these same issues, but his case has not yet been scheduled for hearing.  



Comment with your Facebook account



Comment with your Disqus account

Top Stories

comments powered by Disqus

NationofChange works to educate, inform, and fight power with people, corruption with community.

If you would like to stay up to date with the best in independent, filter-free journalism, updates on upcoming events to attend, and more, enter your email below:

7 Compelling Reasons Why You Should Support NationofChange

Our readers often tell us why they’ve decided to step up and become supporters. Here are some of the top reasons people are giving.

1. You’re keeping independent journalism alive
The corporate owned media has proven that it can’t be trusted. In a media landscape wrought with spin and corruption, NationofChange stands in very scarce company.

2. You’re sticking it to the rich, powerful, and corrupt
When you have money in this country you can get away with damn near anything, and they do. NationofChange isn’t afraid to expose these criminals no matter how powerful they are.

3. Your donation is 100% tax-deductible
NationofChange is a 501(c)3 charity. People tend to assume that many other organizations are (most nonprofits are NOT) but it’s that 501(c)3 status is a bit more rare than you think.

Read the rest...