The Legacy of 9/11: An Institutionalization of Terror at Home and Abroad
Responding to terror perpetrated by 19 men with box-cutters a decade ago, the US government has now put hundreds of millions of innocent Americans into countless military, intelligence, and law enforcement databases without suspecting them of any crime. The National Security Agency eavesdrops on over 1.7 billion pieces of our email, phone, and other communications each day. And the government has spent trillions of dollars on often worthless “homeland” security bureaucrats and technologies—not to mention the additional trillions spent on the various declared and undeclared wars associated with the ongoing “war on terror.”
In the name of fighting terrorism, the government has institutionalized a massive response based on fear more than anything else. In the name of defending our freedoms, our government has fractured them as thoroughly as the WTC towers and Pentagon. In the name of enhancing security, it has damaged the authentic security and future of the nation.
Propagandistically “selling” the new security institutions and technologies to Americans has served the selfish interests of demagogic politicians, a conflict-loving mainstream media, and the wealthy contractors from the military-industrial-surveillance complex. But this has come at the expense of everyone else in the nation, now and in the future. Terrorists and criminals can easily evade most of these technologies; ordinary citizens won’t.
As carefully documented by Dana Priest and William Arkin in their new book, Top Secret America (based on the Washington Post series of the same name), no one—not even the government itself—has any real idea how much money’s being spent or who’s doing what in these new agencies; and worse, they are so secretive, duplicative, and inefficient that they simply don’t work.
As with the PATRIOT Act itself, mission creep and the rarity of actual terror events means that these new Keystone Cops are increasingly using these awesome new powers and technologies for petty crime (like ensuring that proceeds from neighborhood magazine subscription sales aren’t pocketed) or, worse yet, for active repression of peaceful dissenters, environmental and anti-war activists, animal rights and pro- and anti-abortion rights activists, Tea Party members and libertarians.
The FBI, CIA, the military’s new Northern Command, and the top-secret Joint Special Operational Command, in partnership with local police, corporations, and the 72 duplicative and ineffective “fusion centers,” use the powerful new technologies and surveillance authorities to secretly access our bank records, emails, airline and other travel information. Muslims, immigrants, African Americans, and other ethnic minorities are particular targets. Ironically, again, the military and law enforcement authorities supposedly protecting our freedoms and democracy are jeopardizing those rights and that democracy.
This new us-versus-them, jingoistic militarism has even crept into our politics (just look at debate over drones and troops at the border), TV shows (from 24 to NCIS: Naval Criminal Investigative Service), music (from Lee Greenwood’s “Proud to be an American” to Toby Keith’s “The Angry American”), and movies (from Captain America to Cowboys and Aliens). Our national character seems to have morphed into national caricature – an extreme, almost cartoon version of characteristics our nation possesses at its worst rather than its best: violence, racism, discrimination, arrogance, stupidity.
Respect for rights is indeed the only source of true security in our nation -- the most diverse in the world – especially in a world that contains both newly empowered diversity and diversified power.
President Obama has compounded the errors of Bush and Cheney by cynically continuing essentially the same flawed approaches. Most egregiously, he has dramatically escalated some of the most morally and legally indefensible and counterproductive techniques, including the global drone attacks now condemned even by Obama’s former Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair, and increased reliance upon extra-judicial killings or assassinations that completely sidestep fair trials and due process by targeting even US citizens.
These may produce some short-term “successes,” but they yield long-term catastrophe as revenge kicks in, those killed are quickly replaced, further offshoots of al Qaeda are created, both non-nuclear nations like Yemen and the Philippines and nuclear nations like Pakistan are destabilized, and, in short, the US creates more terrorists.
What Abraham Lincoln noted about the ironic vulnerability of our freedoms could just as readily be applied to our authentic national security: "America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
CONNECT















18 comments on "The Legacy of 9/11: An Institutionalization of Terror at Home and Abroad"
uizvtzj
bNkobr gxqyxkpcmeyj
4a6bVn , [url=http://yzzsdgqksdpb.com/]yzzsdgqksdpb[/url], [link=http://surbymbqkguv.com/]surbymbqkguv[/link], http://kyyrlofgkmdo.com/
lsWb9K difwiffmhcyl
Perfect answer! That rlealy gets to the heart of it!
September 11, 2011 7:43pm
These piranha agencies now have the taste of blood and lack of accountability in their mouths. Combine that with what they have to think is unlimited funding and secrecy, and how much actual, effective resistance from We the People do you think it will take for the brainwashed minions of the multiple intel agencies to take "extrajudicial executions" to any effective leaders? These people are salivating while waiting for the "Great Culling" and the chance to fill up those FEMA camps with victims - I mean "homegrown terrorists" and "useless eaters." This is a feeding frenzy, and those in power just keep chumming the water.
Ian
September 10, 2011 5:28pm
Yeah, you hit that on the head! It's why it happened and why it's now an unofficial National Holiday. It makes the whole event LEGITIMATE regardless the proof against the official account. A FALSE FLAG OPERATION. Our Government has engaged in these numerous times in the past and has gotten the populace to accept the story every time. Each time has enriched the wealthy at the expense of the masses and it's Never been questioned! Do some research people. 9/11 was a False Flag operation and it's put us one step away from being the modern day indentured servants that our forefathers escaped by fleeing Europe! Wake the F!@k UP!
May 02, 2012 2:42pm
I'm awake. Now what?
September 10, 2011 3:01pm
Almost an entire population has been persuaded to deride any but the official and authorized (and _prima facie_ indefensible) explanation for the actual explosions, notwithstanding how very conveniently it or they all happened to complement a fascist political movement in this country. US people now "celebrate" 9/11 as though it were a holy day (crying, wailing, "learning," "feeling pain [in the most delicious way]"); indeed, for many US persons, that date lives on as one of the happiest of their lives. All of the hatred and stupidity that it legitimized continues now; and this weekend with all its attendant gnashing of teeth is the US' Christmas of a new "euangelion:' that of hatred, death, destruction, arrogance, and--ultimately--of collapse upon itself as it seeks to understand its own new and improved self-adulatory superlatives.
September 10, 2011 2:05pm
9/11 was an inside job and one only has to look at the lunatic and unconstitutional rules and reg.s that followed to understand what the most important reason for it was. Numerous people have commented over the years that the draconian Homeland Security was a symptom that the terrorists had won.
It is middle-class America that is being destroyed by the financial scams and liberty is being destroyed every time someone's person is violated by a TSA Agent.
September 12, 2011 3:59pm
I do hope you return to this to read my comment:
Do you really think that W would have had the "deer in the headlights" expression on his face when he was interrupted during reading a children's book to be informed of the second airplane striking the WTC? I think, had it been an "inside job," he would have shown us his sly, sneaky smile of self-satisfaction that we so often saw in later days. The plan to invade Iraq had been drawn up well in advance--the whole bunch readily admitted that (Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Rice and even Powell). When Iraq threatened to trade oil in Europe in Euros instead of dollars, they were all looking for a way to legitimize an invasion. In her book (The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism), Naomi Klein lays out the whole scheme so well. The Admistration were all desciples of the Chicago School of Economics (Milton Friedman and the University of Chicago's Economy Department). Klein shows how we backed the adoption of this corporatist agenda in other countries using turmoil, torture, shock, and fear with the overthrow of democratically elected South American presidents followed by the installation of brutal military dictators (the first being Chile with the overthrow of Allende and his replacement by Pinochet--Pinochet was tutored by Milton Friedman and Hayek and Chicago School economists had been trained in advance at Catholic universities in Chile and in Chicago). The CIA tutored and was complicit in the use of physical shock torture (as advocated from their research at McGill University in Montreal), and a host of other torture techniques we saw used at Abu Grahib--they imprisioned or "disappeared" anyone who was a threat to the total replacement of the populist economic system that had been thriving with Friedman-style free market economics without controls--industries were privitized and labor was crushed. In Great Britain, Margaret Thatcher was trying to install Chicago School Economics and was running at 25% popularity for her efforts and told Friedman that it would not likely be possible to convert the democratic Brits to his formula as had been done in South American countries. Just when she was about to give up, she facilitated the invasion of the Faulkland Islands (withdrew funding, complained verbally of the economic drain and did all but issue a formal invitation). Most Brits at the time had no clue what or where the Faulklands were. However, the loss of 400+ British military personnel and 600+ of the enemy brought a wave of patriotism to G.B. and the shock of being attacked confused and disoriented the populace enough that they then tolerated a draconian crushing of the largest union (coal workers) in the UK at the time. Thatcher's popularity soared and she then set about dismantling government owenership and privitizing as much as she could (power companies, banking, etc.). She proved that even a relatively minor threat can be used to appeal to a patriotic spirit (in this case, latent colonialism) and distract the public enough to go along with things they would otherwise never tolerate or allow. Had bin Laden had a clue that his actions would enable the Friedmaniacs in charge with just the absolutely perfect excuse to undo so much of the US Constitutional protections for liberty and enable the wholesale murder of innocent Iraqis to terrorize the population into accepting a restructuring of their economic system--Shock and Awe were clear Friedmanic bylines--and the privitizing of the US military and everything else associated with "rebuilding" Iraq (ongoing to this date), bin Laden would likely have had a radical course correction. I do not think he ever understood that he was an enabler, a necessary evil, to that bunch of wackos that had already successfully run a coup d'etate at home. In any event, read Klein and I think you will change your mind about 9/11 being an "inside job." The exact same thing happened in New Orleans with Katrina--it was the shock that distracted the public (too concerned with day-t0-day survival to notice) and allowed this bunch to privitaze public education and Friedmanize just about anything they could. It is still ongoing. I have no doubt that the internet is being monitored for dissenters to the Chicago School of Economics like myself. But make no mistake--this is the central issue of our times.
September 10, 2011 2:03pm
Naomi Klein's book (The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism) should be No. One on your reading list. It makes sense of all of this and tears off the web of deceit to expose the true, underlying evil we need to fear: Milton Friedman economics. The fact that Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Reagan and Thatcher were proponents of this economic design and that all resorted to torture, unconstitutional spying, mass murder and a false appeal to patriotism to do their dirty work becomes all too clear and exposes all too clearly that Friedmanism has come home to roost.
September 10, 2011 11:36am
Rick. I conclude that you are a fascist whose income flows from the military industrial complex. My family member fought in the America Revolution. He would roll over in his grave if he knew how what he fought for has been perverted. You sir, have and deserve my contempt.
September 10, 2011 11:33am
A nation of paranoia. Includes being afarid to travel to Mexico... FEAR. When I board a plane, why do I take off my shoes??? FEAR
September 10, 2011 11:33am
A nation of paranoia. Includes being afarid to travel to Mexico... FEAR. When I board a plane, why do I take off my shoes??? FEAR
September 10, 2011 10:43am
Bogus Chip. "Respect for rights is indeed the only source of true security in our nation..." What does this mean if you are attacked you demand respect?. Norman I take it you are also a Holocaust denier?
May 02, 2012 2:37pm
I think it means if your rights are respected in the first place you won't BE attacked.
September 10, 2011 10:38am
Concocted terrorism is a fantastic myth for the defense industry and war-based economy. We should find a way to stop this madness of killing all over the world which is leading to wasted resources and internal implosion of our society and continued destruction and killings. We must find alternative models based on peace for our and the world economy.