Isaiah J. Poole
Published: Wednesday 12 September 2012
“Incomes for the middle fifth of American households—the heart of the middle class—would have been an average of $19,000 higher per year by 2007 if the share of growth claimed by the richest households had not grown so much over the past 30 years.”

A ‘Lost Decade’ for the Middle Class Caused by Conservative Policies

Article image

The latest edition of the Economic Policy Institute's "State of Working America" report, out today, documents in sharp detail what has been for the middle-class economy a "lost decade" in which working people have fallen behind. But what's more disheartening is its prediction that without radical change "nearly two decades likely will pass before American incomes regain lost ground and return to their 2000 levels."

The report makes clear what has been robbed from low- and middle-income people as a result of conservative policies that have their roots in the early 1980s, as the country turned from balanced growth policies in which labor and capital profited more or less in tandem to government policies that advantaged corporations and the wealthy at the expense of workers.

As a result of these policies, the report notes, "the business cycle preceding the recession [of 2008-2009] was already shaping up as a lost decade for American

incomes," with median household incomes falling 6 percent during that period. But when the Great Recession hit, median income of working-age families fell another 7.1 percent between 2007 and 2010.

"This is an underappreciated economic calamity," the report says.

These key slides from the report help tell the story:

From State of Working America Upload by Isaiah J. Poole

The report notes that this calamity is not caused by a lack of overall economic growth. National income, the report notes, has grown enough to substantially improve the fortunes for all. As the data reveal, however, it is the top 5 percent, the top 1 percent, and fractions of the top 1 percent that have received almost all the benefits of the economy’s growth.

"Incomes for the middle fifth of American households—the heart of the middle class—would have been an average of $19,000 higher per year by 2007 if the share of growth claimed by the richest households had not grown so much over the past 30 years. Likewise, wealth for the typical American family would have been $62,000 higher in 2010 had the growth in wealth over these same years not been overwhelmingly claimed by families at the very top," according to the report.

This is not the result of forces beyond the control of policy makers. "Policy decisions made over the last several decades have caused this explosive rise in inequality. These decisions include: lowering individual and corporate tax rates; deregulating industries; failing to maintain the value of the minimum wage; failing to protect the right of workers to obtain collective bargaining; and failing to prevent asset bubbles."

This lays the blame at the feet of conservative ideology that has not only guided Republican administrations but has limited, and sometimes influenced, the actions of Democratic administrations. It is no surprise that during this presidential election campaign conservatives are blaming the Obama administration for failing to reverse these trends.

It was president Ronald Reagan and the conservatives who placed him in the vanguard of their movement who laid the foundation of the middle-class lost decade, and George W. Bush who embellished the modern structure built on that foundation with tax cuts, deregulation and an attack on unions. Their policies have been an unmitigated disaster for working people, and the conservative response to this failure, as Paul Krugman so eloquently pointed out Monday, has been, "First, obstruct any and all efforts to strengthen the economy, then exploit the economy’s weakness for political gain. If this strategy sounds cynical, that’s because it is. Yet it’s the G.O.P.’s best chance for victory in November."

Breaking the back of that strategy with hard facts and and a solid critique of what has really happened to the middle-class economy the past 30 years is critical, and that is why this year's release of "The State of Working America" is so important.



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange

Top Stories

12 comments on "A ‘Lost Decade’ for the Middle Class Caused by Conservative Policies"

Richard Townsend

September 13, 2012 7:14am

Republican economic policies have not made for a better life for many American citizens but Democrats have done virtually nothing to slow their move to the extreme Right over the past 20 + years. The Neo Liberals that took over the Democrat Party in the 1980s have a lot more in common with the Republican Right than the Progressive wing of the party that has been in a state of suspended animation over the same 20 + year period. Labor continues to be decimated by the Right as the current Obama administration has all but ignored their pleas for assistance. Rich Trumpka, president of the largest labor union, continues to throw good money after bad supporting Obama's bid for re-election with the precious few Dollars that the union has available due to a shrinking membership that only accounts for 7% of the private work force today. A surprisingly patriotic move on the Union's part considering that the Obama Administration did nothing to help them in their efforts to enact the "Employee Free Choice Act"—better known as the Card Check bill, last year. Many independent union members have called for Trumpka to break free from any political relationships and do what most politically active groups are doing now, form a PAC and use their money to fund those who offer real political support in the halls of Congress. Considering all the money that is flooding into these campaigns now, an open donation to either side from Labor Unions without a guarantee of any specific action plan is like sealing a multi-million Dollar business deal with a handshake as the sole form of legal protection ! No doubt the union’s fund would most likely be dwarfed by some of these donations from various Billionaires but at least their money wouldn’t be going into a bottomless pit doing nothing to advance their cause !

yellowdogdemo

September 12, 2012 10:07pm

Teachers, fire fighters, police, all workers certainly do have a right to strike. I, as a teacher went on strike in '75. Our district offered us $50 PER YEAR raise. Meanwhile, the school secretaries were getting a 15% raise and to pay for it, we were going to get increased class sizes. This is the US. Everybody has a right to action if their working conditions are lousy and they aren't able to do their jobs because administrators are sitting around drawing big salaries and perks.

luxartisan

September 12, 2012 6:32pm

Actually...at this point...the biggest thing harming people in US now are the US elite and their "purchased" government lackeys who use their American citizenship as a polite calling card when convenient, not as a measure of pride.

Michael S. Smith

September 12, 2012 3:41pm

Conservative want to make it that most people do not get ahead and realy make it and keep most of the wealth concentraited with a small grooup of people

DHFabian

September 12, 2012 2:02pm

Treading water is better than drowning. If nothing else, maybe this generation will finally start to figure out that poverty is not a mere "lifestyle choice." Good workers lose their jobs, and can even become unemployable. Strong motivation is not enough to get you a job when there aren't enough jobs for all who need one. You can spend decades "working hard and playing by the rules," only to have everything pulled out from beneath you. When we got rid of the social safety net, what we actually did was chopped the rungs off of the proverbial ladder out of poverty. We virtually ended upward class mobility, and now we just have to live with the consequences.

Albert Kapustar

September 12, 2012 1:19pm

There is no arguing at least for the sane that conservative politics has destroyed the middle class over the last 30 plus years.Unfortunately the Democratic parties turn to the right lead by Raoul emmanuel,Clinton and Obama who all adopted Republican policies have helped doom America.Clinton made 2 free trade agreements and created a NLRB that sided with business weakening unions.Obama added 2 more trade agereements and has been less then warm to unions.Naturally the Republicans were all for these 4 trade agreements,the only thing they supported Democrats on.
Although many stupid Democrats liked clinton and Obama,until we get rid of the DLC and go back to progressive Democrats or real liberals as i call them this country is going nowhere except down with Republicans and DLC pro business Democrats.

Mattie

September 12, 2012 12:21pm

I'm glad some people still remember the Reagan response to Patco. The thing that got me was the rise of so-called "Reagan democrats," even after Reagan's response to the Air Traffic controller strike. That whole drama made very clear his feelings about unions and the working class (that was if you hadn't been following the arc of is his career as a supporter of McCarthyism and shill for business interests in California). The republican party he helped engineer was no friend of workers, yet rode the backs of the white working class to victory time and again, now we're all screwed.

Jeffrey Hill

September 12, 2012 12:13pm

Support Sanity -- Reject Every Republican for Elected Public Office!!

Michael S. Smith

September 12, 2012 3:44pm

Yes and all DINOs as well

MikeSchwab

September 12, 2012 10:41am

Decade? How about Generation? Since the Patco (Air Traffic Controllers) strike and firing by Reagan about 1983 or so.

Mrs Bee

September 15, 2012 9:33am

I've been saying for the past 20 years that Reagan's administration was the start of trouble for the middle class. Breaking the air traffic controllers' union set a very bad precedent for both government & business. I believe history will view him not as a great president as do the Republicans who invoke him almost as a god, but as a failure, maybe not to the level of Buchannon but a failure nonetheless.

Michael S. Smith

September 12, 2012 3:44pm

You are right about when it may have started howeve the ATCs should never have gone on strike becasue they put the public at risk Government workers Teachers Police Fire fighters should not be alowed to strike becaue they harm the people by doing so