Money in Politics: Where is the Outrage?
We might wish the uproar from the convention halls of both parties these busy weeks were the wholesome clamor of delegates deliberating serious visions of how we should be governed for the next four years. It rises instead from scripted TV spectacles — grown-ups doing somersaults of make-believe — that will once again distract the public’s attention from the death rattle of American democracy brought on by an overdose of campaign cash.
No serious proposal to take the money out of politics, or even reduce its tightening grip on the body politic, will emerge from Tampa or Charlotte, so the sounds of celebration and merriment are merely prelude to a funeral cortege for America as a shared experience. A radical minority of the super-rich has gained ascendency over politics, buying the policies, laws, tax breaks, subsidies, and rules that consolidate a permanent state of vast inequality by which they can further help themselves to America’s wealth and resources.
Their appetite for more is insatiable. As we write, Mitt Romney, after two fundraisers in which he raised nearly $10 million from the oil and gas industry, and having duly consulted with the Oklahoma billionaire energy executive who chairs the campaign’s energy advisory committee, has announced that if elected President, he will end a century of federal control over oil and gas drilling on public lands, leaving such matters to local officials more attuned to industry desires. Theodore Roosevelt, the first great advocate for public lands in the White House, would be rolling in his grave, if Dick Cheney hadn’t already dumped his bones in a Wyoming mining shaft during the first hours of the Bush-Halliburton administration.
We are nearing the culmination of a cunning and fanatical drive to dismantle the political institutions, the legal and statutory canons, and the intellectual and cultural frameworks that were slowly and painstakingly built over decades to protect everyday citizens from the excesses of private power. The “city on the hill” has become a fortress of privilege, guarded by a hired political class and safely separated from the economic pressures that are upending the household stability, family dynamics, social mobility, and civic life of everyday Americans.
Socrates said to understand a thing, you must first name it. As in Athens then, so in America now: The name for what’s happening to our political system is corruption — a deep, systemic corruption.
How did we get here?
Let’s begin with the judicial legerdemain of nine black-robed magicians on the Supreme Court back in the l880s breathing life into an artificial creation called “the corporation.” An entity with no body, soul, sense, or mortality was endowed with all the rights of a living, breathing “person” under the Constitution. Closer to our own time, the Supreme Court of 1976 in Buckley vs. Valeo gutted a fair elections law passed by a Congress that could no longer ignore the stench of Watergate. The Court ruled that wealthy individuals could spend unlimited amounts of their own fortunes to get themselves elected to office, and that anyone could pour dollars by the hundreds of thousands into the war chests of political action committees to pay for “issue ads,” clearly favoring one side in a political race, so long as a specific candidate or party was not named.
Money, the justices declared in another burst of invention, was simply a form of speech.
Then, just two years ago, the Roberts Court, in Citizens United vs. Federal Elections Commission, removed any lingering doubts that the marvelous “persons” that corporations had become could reach into their golden troughs to support their candidates and causes through such supposedly “educational” devices as a movie trashing Hillary Clinton.
Meaningful oversight of campaign expenditure, necessary if representative government is to have a fair chance against rapacious wealth, was swept away. Hail to a new era in which a modestly-financed candidate is at the mercy of nuclear strikes from television ads paid for by a rich or corporate-backed opponent with an “equal right” to “free speech.” As one hard pressed Connecticut Republican, lagging behind in a primary race against a billionaire opponent outspending him twelve to one, put it: “I’m fighting someone with a machine gun and I’ve got a pistol.” When the votes were counted, even the pistol turned out to be a peashooter.
A generation ago, the veteran Washington reporter Elizabeth Drew warned against the rising tide of campaign money that would flood over the gunwales of our ship of state and sink the entire vessel. Noah’s Flood was a mere drop in the bucket compared to the tidal wave that has fulfilled Drew’s prophecy. The re-election of every member of Congress today is now at the mercy of corporate barons and private princes who can make or destroy a candidacy by giving to those who vote “right,” or lavishing funds on opponents of those who don’t.
Writing the majority opinion for Citizens United, Justice Anthony Kennedy would have us believe corruption only happens if cash passes from one hand to another. But surely as he arrives at his chambers across from Capitol Hill every morning, he must inhale the fetid air rising from the cesspool that stretches from Congress to K Street — and know there’s something rotten, beyond the naked eye, in how Washington works.
Senator John McCain knows. Having been implicated in the Keating Five scandal during the savings and loan debacle 30 years ago, he repented and tried to clean up the game. To no avail. And now he describes our elections as nothing less than “an influence-peddling scheme in which both parties compete to stay in office by selling the country to the highest bidder.”
For the ultimate absurdity of money’s role, we must look to another group of happy billionaires, the corporate owners of the television stations which reap handsome profits for selling the public’s airwaves to undisclosed buyers (also known as campaign contributors) who pollute the political atmosphere with millions of dollars spent on toxic ads designed to keep voters angry, dumb, or both. Every proposal is shot down or undermined that would make it a duty for those stations to devote free air time for public purposes in order to earn the licenses that they treat as permits to get rich. In one of the great perversions of the Constitution foisted on its subjects by their overlords, the public airwaves where free speech should reign have become private enclosures to which access must be bought. Free? It’s about as free as Tiffany pearls.
Money rules. And in the foul air democracy chokes and gasps, the middle class falls behind, and the poor sink from sight as political donations determine the course and speech of policies that could make the difference in the lives of ordinary people struggling in a dog-eat-dog world.
The Devil must grin at such a sorry state of affairs and at the wicked catch-22 at its core. To fight the power of private money, it is first necessary to get elected. To get elected it is necessary to raise astronomical amounts of private money from people who expect obedience in return. “That’s some catch,” says Yossarian to Doc Daneeka, and Doc agrees: “It’s the best there is.”
Where is the outrage at this corruption? Partly smoothed away with the violence, banality, and tawdry fare served up by a corporate media with every regard for the public’s thirst for distractions and none for its need to know. Sacrificed to the ethos of entertainment, political news — instead of getting us as close as possible to the verifiable truth — has been reduced to a pablum of so-called objective analysis which gives equal time to polemicists spouting their party’s talking points.
As ProPublica recently reported: “Someone who gives up to $2,500 to the campaign of President Barack Obama or challenger Mitt Romney will have his or her name, address and profession listed on the FEC website for all to see. But that same person can give $1 million or more to a social welfare group that buys ads supporting or attacking those same candidates and stay anonymous.” But when is the last time you heard one of the millionaire anchors of the Sunday talk shows aggressively pursue a beltway poobah demanding to learn about the perfidious sources of the secret money that is poisoning our politics?
At our combined ages we’ve seen it all; hope no longer springs eternal. We know the odds against reversing the hardening grip of the monied interests are disheartening. Those interests are playing to win the ferocious class war they launched 40 years ago with a strategy devised by the corporate lawyer Lewis Powell (later a Supreme Court justice) and a call to arms from the Wall Street wheeler-dealer William Simon, who had been Richard Nixon’s treasury secretary. Simon argued that “funds generated by business” would have to “rush by multimillions” into conservative causes in order to uproot the institutions and the “heretical” morality of the New Deal. He called for an “alliance” between right-wing ideologues and “men of action in the capitalist world” to mount a “veritable crusade” against everything brought forth by the long struggle for a progressive America. Business Week noted at the time “that some people will obviously have to do with less… It will be a bitter pill for many Americans to swallow the idea of doing with less so that big business can have more.”
This was not meant to be. America was not intended to be a winner-take-all country. Our system of checks and balances — read The Federalist Papers — was to keep an equilibrium in how power works and for whom. Because of the vast sums of money buying up our politics, those checks and balances are fast disappearing and time is against us.
We are losing ground, but that’s the time when, more than ever, we need to glance back at the progressive crusades of a century ago to take note of what has been forgotten, or rather what braying blowhards like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck have been distorting or attempting to flush down the memory hole. Robbing a nation of its historical memory is the most devastating of all larcenies because it opens the door to far worse crimes.
We have been here before. The two of us have collaborated in studying the example of the populists and progressives who over a century ago took on the financial and political corruptors. They faced heavy odds, too — a Supreme Court that exalted wealth as practically a sacred right, the distortion by intellectual and religious leaders of the theory of evolution to “prove” that the richest were the fittest to rule, the crony capitalism of businessmen and politicians.
With government in the grip of such exploiters, child labor was a fact of life, men and women were paid pittances for long hours of work and left unprotected from industrial diseases and accidents, and workers too old to be useful to employers any longer were abandoned to starvation or the poorhouse. No model laws existed to protect them.
But these pioneers of progressivism were tough citizens, their political courage fueled by moral conviction. They sensed, as the Kansas editor William Allen White wrote, that their country had fallen into the hands of self-seekers, their civilization needed recasting, and a new relationship must be forged between haves and have-nots. When the two major parties failed them they gave full throat to their discontent by fighting from outside, and when Theodore Roosevelt’s breakaway Progressive Party held its organizing convention in l912 — exactly one hundred years ago — they shook the rafters with “The Battle Hymn of the Republic.” Oh, for such defiance today!
From the fighters of that era came a renewal of the social contract first set forth in the preamble of the Constitution — the moral and political notion of “We, the People.” Equitable access to public resources was its core, so that when the aristocrat De Tocqueville came here from France in the l830s he marveled at the egalitarian spirit he found in the new country. Public institutions, laws and regulation, as well as the ideas, norms, and beliefs embedded in the American mythos pointed to a future of prosperity open to all. That ideal survived the fires of the civil war and then the hard, cold cruelties of the industrial era and the First Gilded Age because people believed in and fought for it. They neither scorned nor worshipped wealth but were determined it would not rule.
It was on these foundations that the New Deal built the structure now under attack, with the support of a Depression-stricken nation which realized that we were all in it together — as we were in the war against fascism that followed.
But in the succeeding fat years the nation forgot something — the words of the great progressive senator Robert LaFollette from Wisconsin: “Democracy is a life and demands constant struggle.” Constant struggle. No victory can be taken for granted, no vigilance relaxed. Like the Bourbon kings of France, the lords of unrestrained, amoral capitalism never forgot anything. They learned from their defeat how to organize new strategies and messages, furnish the money to back them, and recapture control of the nation’s life. And in the absence of genuine, fight-to-the-finish resistance, they are winning big-time.
Think of where we are now. One party is scary and the other is scared. The Tea Party, the religious right, and a host of billionaires dominate the Republican Party. Secret money fills its coffers. And in the primaries this year almost every Republican inclined to compromise to make government work went down before radical and well-funded opponents with a fundamental “anti-government” mindset.
Yet even now President Obama says he is sure the Republicans will be willing to negotiate if he is re-elected. Sure, and the wolves will sit down with the lamb.
Nor is that all. In Wisconsin, salvo after salvo of campaign cash for union-busting Governor Scott Walker defeated the effort to recall him. In Pennsylvania a hardline judge has given his approval to a voter ID law specifically targeted to making it harder for low-income would-be voters to register. And such laws are proliferating like runaway cancer cells in state after state. The Tea Party and right-wing Christians furnish the shock troops of these assaults, but those who could be counted on for sturdy defense are not immune to the grinding pressures of nonstop fundraising. Democratic incumbents and challengers, in national and state canvasses likewise garner corporate contributions — including President Obama, whose fundraising advantage is about to be overtaken by Mitt Romney and the Deep Pockets to whom he is beholden. And at both conventions, the prime time show is merely window-dressing; the real action occurs at countless private invitation-only parties where CEOs, lobbyists, trade associations and donors literally cash in their chips. Writing in the New York Times, for example, Nicholas Confessore reports how The American Petroleum Institute will entertain with a concert and panels, all the while promoting an agenda that includes approval of the Keystone XL pipeline, opposition to new transparency rules for American energy companies operating abroad, and the expansion of oil production on those public lands Mitt Romney is preparing to turn over to them.
Does this money really matter? Do owls and bats fly by night? Needed reforms are dead on arrival on the floor of Senate and House. Banking regulations with teeth? Mortgage relief? Non-starters when the banks’ lobbyists virtually own Washington and the President of the United States tells Wall Street financiers he is all that stands between them and the pitchforks of an angry mob. Action on global warming? Not while the fossil fuel industries and corporate-back climate deniers have their powerful say in the matter. Cutting bloated military expenditures? Uh-uh, when it means facing a barrage of scare stories about weakening our defenses against terrorism. Spend money on modernizing our rail system or creating more public transportation in our auto-choked city streets? What heavy artillery the auto, gasoline and highway construction lobbies would rain down on any such proposal.
All of which would make a Progressive Rip Van Winkle shake his head in disbelief and grind his teeth in fury. “Where is the passion we shared for driving money from politics?” he would ask. Where indeed? Not on the floor of either of these conventions. You are unlikely to hear the name of Theodore Roosevelt praised by Republicans or of Franklin Delano Roosevelt by the Democrats, except in perfunctory terms (It was FDR, after all, who said he feared government by money as much as government by the mob.)
Each party will sing the obligatory hosannas to the middle class, give the silent treatment to the working poor, and bellow forth the platitudes of America’s “spirit of enterprise and innovation” that will restore our robust economy and world leadership. If the stagnant recovery and sufferings of the unemployed and underemployed get any mention, it will be to blame them on the other party. As for taking on the predatory rich, forget it.
Our advice: Learn something from the emptiness of what you see and hear — and if it doesn’t make you mad as hell and ready to fight back against the Money Power, we are all in real trouble.
CONNECT













27 comments on "Money in Politics: Where is the Outrage?"
September 05, 2012 1:35pm
Frighteningly awesome article and great discussion. Since this is all about the almighty dollar, that has to be the course of action for our revolution. If we vote with our wallets, they are going to PAY ATTENTION! What would such a movement look like? First look around your life and see all the stuff. Sure it's cool to be able to provide TV's, and phones and all those things that make up our modern-day obsession with acquiring things. Is it all necessity? I'm just suggesting an inventory and then trace it back to the corporation it came from. The point being that we support the very corps we claim to have aversion to. We have been hypnotized by the TV's and Twinkies and Marts of this system, but you can break free to a large extent by seeking out and supporting small, sutainably-run local business
September 04, 2012 12:46pm
Really? Corporations are simply a group of people that have invested together as shareholders and have a joint interest in their corporation growing in sales and earnings. And this corporation also represents their employees who also have an interest in their employer doing well also. Yet Moyer wants to silence these people from representing their interests in politics. But - amazingly Moyer and you other liberals are all for Unions -- which is a organization that represents a group of people with like interests - giving billions of dollars across this country to bribe politicians - who are their bosses essentially in government election situations-- but you think that is just swell. These unions may also represent the employees of a corporation but the shareholders of the corporation are not suppose to use their assets to also promote their best interests?
Obama is a typical hypocrite who only wants his point of view expressed or heard -- corporations can run all the ads they want but finally people will weigh the situation and vote for what they think is best for themselves and the country or their state or city.
THis is America -- all groups should have the right to express their point of view -- and to explain their position -- any group of two people or groups of thousands -- either as rligious groups, unions, corporate shareholders or simply political opinion--
Unions use their money to hire their own bosses -- which has led to the bankruptcy of cities and shortly states and finally our federal government--
What Moyer would like is to have Unions alone being able to spend their money to give their opinion. Many rich people have invested millions in campaigns and still lost-- as long as corporations are just explaining their position and not bribing politicians directly-- it is absurd that you would oppose the free dissemination of opinions and ideas.
But then you are the party of Lenin--
September 09, 2012 3:28pm
ATLAS:
I just went back to this discussion and saw your nonsense again.
Giving corporations the right to make anonymous unregulated donations to dummy organizations that support one candidate is NOT the expression of a point of view. Were you born yesterday or what? Our broadcast industry is now unregulated, thanks to Republicans during the Reagan administration, and most people get their news and opinions from TV, and advertising on TV costs a lot of money, so it stands to REASON (!) that the candidates who have the rich corporations backing them will be able to saturate the public airways with their messages.
"Weigh the situation and vote for what they think is best..." is a lot of nonsense, and you know it. Big lies, repeated over and over, eventually becomes the truth in many people's eyes. Corporations have no right to impose their "bottom-line" preferences before an election. Let them do so as individuals. Individuals are persons, fictitious organizations are not.
You talk about unions. You also know that unions are only a shadow of what they once were. Most unionized jobs have been shipped overseas, and you must know that too.
Well, your post was just a lot of nonsense, and you end it by insinuating that someone who cares about their fellow citizen is a Communist. How retro and low-brow!
September 05, 2012 7:05pm
The Republicans are Win at any co$t, even if it's the loss of the American Dream or ideal of freedom, liberty to achieve through your own merit, even the right to VOTE without an ID. I believe that we need to LIMIT the LIFE of corporations and TAX them according to their International, National, to Inter-State to State, Net Profits and AGE. Without WE THE PEOPLE that purchase or buy their corporate goods, they never would have grown to the mega corporations of today. Once they reach their agreed upon AGE, they divest and the shareholders get their due. The employee's can elect to start up another corporate venture. A Challenge to invigerate people.
.
The other issue I have is ingenuity and new ideas usually spurred on by companies that are built by the original inventors. Watch the movie TUCKER again, and you'll understand the scope of corrupt politicians involvement in keeping the established corporate status quo the same. It wasn't about FAIR competition. How many new products or companies exist today? How many patents are being bought up by AGED corporations and never used? How many AGED corporation sell a product at xxx value that isn't worth it and many times is WORTHLESS. Without strict regulations that CONGRESS and our federal agencies are THERE to do - we loose. When we loose these protections, WE THE PEOPLE become their built-in commodities that are their WIN/WIN - in every industry.
.
When you talk about Bribing or even campaign contributions - I agree it's broke on BOTH Sides. So let's WE THE PEOPLE pay for strict - set auditable campaigns (population, median income) that limits the number to participate by occupation, net worth to better represent WE THE PEOPLE. We also limit terms. We do away with PARTY Systems. We do away with Lobbyists for Profit Corporations and their Subsidies. Let's also ensure EQUAL LAW for all, so if they steal - they are prosecuted & go to jail & the bigger the theft the MORE jail time. We must stop the corruption and the mindset that anything is 'ok' if ... we WIN, if we show a Profit, if we Protect our company, or because the other fellow is doing it. All must be held responsible for corrupting the system and NOT closing loop holes that allow it to continue.
.
In regards to your Union comments, the root of this issue is your city, your county, your States Planning Commission. Everyone thinks or wants growth, but what happens when you originally planned for growth that didn't happen and you are now stuck with paying out (higher than norm) retirement fees to those that worked for them (most teacher's, policeman are lower than norm... paid fireman are most times higher than norm). Top this off with more Management & Administrative levels and you've got a recipe for negative cash flow. Why because you cannot support both the Retirement base & the Working base when the economy or growth takes a nose dive. Especially if you've given TAX breaks to Corps to MOVE to your area, but did not diversify these industry sectors . So if one fails, it hits you harder. Did you also know there 2 books: 1) the budget book ...always reporting not enough revenue and 2) the Composite Annual Financial Reports for each City, County, State ..investments in SAID corporations. So which one is reporting the loss?
.
We must hold these Corporations & Unions up with strict standards and guidelines for ethical behavior that everyone signs off on. Where doing a good job - results in bonuses, doing a bad job - results in firing, if no improvement. We must also limit nepotism or ethnicity in local government hiring: limit it to 2-3 family members/relatives, and a comparitive representation of your populations country of origin.
.
Its not always black or white, red or blue. We must come together to fix what's broken and close the Loop holes for good!
September 04, 2012 2:48pm
No one is against corporations making a profit, nor their individual owners and sharholders retaining their right to speak or vote. What we are seeing, however, is the flooding of our political discourse with millions upon millions of dollars that the Supreme Court has ruled is "speech", based on OUR 1st Amendment rights being awarded to legal constructs, or corporations.
Are you aware that 80% of all the money in the coffers of the superpacse so far in this election is attributed to 0.000063% of Americans - if you do the math that equates to 196 people. With "free speech" like that, the overwhelming majority of Americans' voices will be rendered mute by virtue of our average incomes.
We're not against corporations making a profit, we're against our rights being hijacked to override our democratic process and our right of self-determination.
September 04, 2012 12:36pm
RIGHT ON Bill Moyers! You must keep beating the drum and waking the dazed and confused among us to action against that pathology in our body politic. Yours is a voice of reason and inspiration. You have our undying gratitude.
September 04, 2012 9:34am
Yes, we too are outraged over this and we are fighting back - at our ballot box. We have on our ballot a referendum 1A - see ReclaimOurRights - that tells our representatives to propose, support and ratify an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that establishes that the inalienable rights our Constitution was written to protect are reserved for human being only - and not to legal constructs such as corporations; and that MONEY is NOT SPEECH. Won't you please go to our site and donate to help us succeed? We are part of a nationwide movement to lay the groundwork to achieve this, and your support will help us purchase signs and materials needed to get the word out. We are doing OUR part, and would appreciate it if you would help us by donating, and by posting our link to your social media. Thank you so much for helping those of us in the trenches move forward to Reclaim OUR Rights! Please Donate here or at http://ReclaimOurRights.nationbuilder.com/donate
September 02, 2012 8:08am
I think electing Obama will give us a fighting chance without rebellion, or the last chance to avoid it. If that does not work then rebellion it must be. All of these comments show the frustration we all feel. Were we complacent? Sure doesn't help to have a supreme court on the wrong side. Will Obama make the right choice for supreme court nominations?
WA
September 01, 2012 4:47pm
Good article, pointing out that the television ads WORK! Yes, on the TV-hypnotized American public the advertising has a devestating effect. Important here because the last defense against my line of reasoning that Los Angeles rules America is that TV ads have no effect. It does, and now, here in 2012 the Evil Entertainment Empire is not only billions richer, it is more powerful, as more people tune in because of the emotional, close elections. This gives their cheap theatre tricks more play, as they sway the public back and forth, achieving their first objective of "balancing the vote" for maximum excitement,maximum campaign spending, and maximum viewing. So, go with it Mr. Moyers, admit that politics and social values are persuasively presented in EVERYTHING the television presents, influencing the voters to predictable results. Luck is with us though, Los Angeles doesn't like Salt Lake City, TV hates Mormons, or anyone with a high moral standard, so the election will be swayed to The Solar Panel President, the environment of the world saved. I've picked up from his public statements and actions that Obama is concious of the power L.A. TV has, a point against him in Entertainment's book, but if Romney also catches on, where's the advantage? Republicans must have learned long ago that Big TV likes dumb sheep, 'cause that's their style!
September 01, 2012 4:24pm
While my sister-in-law was dying from cancer, I was thinking that the amount of money being spent on this election campaign, would go a long way to finding a cure for cancer. What a waste.
September 01, 2012 3:44pm
Everyone! Read the comment by 4directdemocracy! Check out the link.
And VOTE! Spread the word, get the majority of Americans behind this! You outnumber those rich bastards by millions to one, never mind how much money they spend on buying politicians! We, the people, will rise up and send them packing!
September 01, 2012 3:31pm
Romney works for Wall Street Obama works for The New World Order as led by the Monarhies of Europe and the Rothchilds. No matter who is elected, nothing will change. The dollar will be destroyed by Hyper-Inflation courtesy the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. We will have chaos and maybe some starvation thrown in as a New Dark Age emerges.
I am going to write in Jesse Venturaa for president He knows exactly what is going on and is a brave man. For Congress I am going to vote for the best 3rd Party Candidate, I am going to continue my crusade to Throw Them All Out Then moving to Wyoming, the all white, Armed Red Neck State as soon as the riots start here in the Great OC of Southern California, the nations foremost Illegal Alien State
September 01, 2012 2:53pm
Thank you Bill Moyers. It's all there. Except: where do we go from there. There's a one-word answer: Revolution. Things are totally blocked in America. To unblock them, a Second American Revolution is needed. A Revolution is not the rule of the mob. The word 'mob' stands for 'mobilization': mobilization of the people, the American people. The American democracy has been hijacked by the very rich. So, what we now have is an oligarchy, or, more precisely a plutocracy, using the democratic institutions and procedures to advance its interests and privileges. The truth must be faced: nothing short of a revolution will do...
September 01, 2012 4:40pm
Yes , this is what it has come to, another Revolution is desperately needed to defend the American Democracy from the greedy grips of the Plutocrats.
Government by Money or Government by Mobilization of " We the People "
Occupy Wall Street is just a drop in the empty bucket and it want begin to put out the Fire storms of Corruption, Greed, Lies and Deliberate Deceit that is being used to advance the destruction of our Democracy...
We the People must Get Up , Stand Up, Rise Up with Fired Up Voices and ready to Go To the Street in a combined effort to free the chains of Wall Street and the Hostages of the Plutocrats... These Hijackers Must be Stopped by any means Necessary !!! We Must Fight The Good Fight !!!
September 01, 2012 1:36pm
Very correct we do not have a Democracy, more a Corporatocracy. Some people think a third party is the answer...that will take decades.
Please take a look at Direct Democracy, bringing in We The People as the 4th check in our system of checks and balances. Voting on such issues as money in politics, transparency, corporate personhood, campaign finance reform will not come from the majority of our leaders but will come from the majority of our citizens. Please take a look at a 4 min film on the subject. http://ni4d.us The National Initiative for Democracy.
September 01, 2012 3:28pm
That's a great iniative! I'm not an American citizen but I keep a close watch on all that happens in America because it affects us all over the world.
So wake up Americans and vote for this, it might be your only chance to change the game!
September 01, 2012 1:00pm
greetings to all,
I have a dream which is that the special interest groups ,the Koch brothers and all those who seem to know that this electioncan be bought,now some 5.8 Millions are spend, can be stopped. I happen to believe that the constitution still has some value: all men are created equal,one men one vote, should govern,not the poket book of some. As a Vietman Vet I have have seen many a nation where folks would love to able to vote. I hope that every one pays attention to what the candidates and parties are telling,and not telling? Who can assure me that my one vote still has a chance to count? How can we make sure that ideas and values,not skin color determines the outcome? How can we get the supreme courts to reverse the free for all spending nonsence.
September 01, 2012 11:34am
Ron--I'm from just north of Chicago and in a situation similar to yours. Even though I try to be active as a progressive, I find that all too often I struggle with hopelessness. I console myself with belief in a bigger picture of social/cultural fluctuations and that homo sapiens isn't the most important species in that bigger picture. Almost daily now I struggle with political motivation (perhaps becoming toxic from sound bites of the political season) and wonder if I should just watch it unfold, too tired to do much else.
I think, however, Obama has given a possible clue to action by his statement that he is what stands between the moneyed class and the mob. It's the "mob" idea! I hate mobs as they always tend toward some form of anarchy but maybe it's time to take this risk--it's likely the only thing that frightens the capitalists anymore. And, at this time in our history, seeing so much of what is of value to a civilization be eroded and redefined as bad, perhaps it is time to take the risks inherent in mobs (or maybe "crowds" first). I'm still willing to show up with likeminded people, carrying a sign or whatever, to suggest I am mad as hell and won't take it anymore. I hope to see you there.
September 01, 2012 11:29am
What I appreciate most about this Moyers-authored article is the blunt criticism of the failure of the Obama-led Democratic Party to stand against the tide. What I dislike about the article is its perpetuation of the MYTH that we live in a democracy. We don't, neither literally as to form of government, nor figuratively as to electoral process. We will get nowhere until the 99% break the Repub-Dem stranglehold and revolt against a system built to protect the wealthy and elite from a tyranny of the masses, one increasingly corrupted to a system of tyranny by the wealthy and elite against the interests of the masses.
September 01, 2012 5:20pm
Well said I agree with you that our democracy is a MYTH
Barry Specter said it best in his book Madness at the Gates of the City:
"A philosophy of optimistic self-improvement merged with capitalist ideology of greed and perpetual growth, came to define American values".
George W. Bush in 2002: “American values are right and true for every person in every society”
I don't think so!
September 01, 2012 1:29pm
But GREG, just how is this stranglehold broken? The devil is in the details, as it's been said. Just ranting on the internet will accomplish little, if anything.
Okay, it's useless to argue about terms. We live in a republic that has a representative democracy. It's still supposed to be a democratic form of government, over which the voter has final say. The trouble is, few people vote these days, and many of those who do vote support an agenda (whether or not they realize it) that's not friendly to Americans who work for a living. And this voting public is easily manipulated by costly images and messages on TV, repeated over and over, with the result that fewer and fewer people vote with their mind, just their gut.
I sincerely wish we had a viable third or fourth party in our country. And I wish it was not a "winner takes all" electoral system...but that's what's in place, and we either find ways to change that, or we're just spitting into the wind.
So, like it or not, you either vote for the "lesser of the two evils" in this election, or you bow out and keep yelling invectives from the shadows. I have seen the Democratic party lose its "purity," over the years, and move too cozily to the right or the middle, and try to mollify the 1%. Some individual Democrats have gone to bed with the enemy. I'm not happy about that, but when I'm confronted with a choice ( a practical choice, not some airy-fairy dream of a perfect world) between a sullied and damaged workers' party or a party brazenly aligning itself with the 1%, I have little choice. I know, I know, it's not an ideal solution, not what I would wish for, but it's going to be down to the wire this November, and if you don't vote for the Prez, you're just empowering the Mitt. And that's the real bottom line.
I have sometimes voted Green Party, especially when their candidates were saying what Democrats once said, but this is too crucial an election, after the Supreme Court gave free rein to the 1% to buy their way to a taxless Utopia, to vote for someone just to make a statement.
When I was a young boy (and I'm now a retired senior), I remember that the Democratic party belonged to those who worked for a salary, and the Republican party was the party of "the Rich and Big Business." I haven't seen the primary goals of the Republicans change that much , even though the Democrats have lost some of their early commitment.
The only big difference I see in the Republicans is that they have persuaded evangelical Christians to mindlessly identify with them, and their commitment to the Rich and Big Business is even stronger than before.These are conclusions I can't avoid or ignore.
I saw the tremendous damage done to our country's economy, honor, and reputation, when the previous Republican conservative MBA (Bush) was president. I think it could be even worse under another conservative Republican MBA (Mitt). That's not a prospect I can soothe my conscience about, if I simply turn my back and pretend it's not my affair.
September 01, 2012 4:47pm
Ron in NM, I respect your view, and will not be wasting my vote, but I will keep "yelling invectives from the shadows" in hopes of the day I am but one of a majority chorus loud enough to shatter the walls behind which the oligarchs
wage a mercilessly greedy war on the rest of humanity.
September 01, 2012 10:11am
There is no outrage. We are too involved in our own lives watching Sci Fi movies and the newest I Pods and lost in a plastic world. We realize that we can't compete with money because we can't provide properly for our families.
Short of what Alexander Hamilton suggested that a revolution is a good thing after a few years, maybe we are way over due.
Our government has ALLOWED these conditions to manifest in our society.
Do our people really want the highest office to be bought by money mongers?
Do we really accept a Supreme Court meant to do the best for the country to be now so politicized that it rules for money and not for our country?
Warren Buffet had I feel the right idea about evening up the playing field and have the elected officials get the same as they legislate for the rest of the country. Then and only then will we get true patriots running for office because the incentive to make it a career and make a lot of money , priority health insurance and a retirement with full pay as well as approve a wage increase, etc. will be taken away. Then you will see many of the present retire using the canned response...."to spend more time with their family."
Now if you are a Republican and vote for your own subjective reasons like Benedict Arnold, don't hide from the fact that they are after the sick, the poor, the week, the old to make them rich richer....
I would also review my Christian credentials, are they in line with the precepts of Jesus Christ?
We need to demand a change to happen or cause a financial revolution of our own and bring the money mongers to their knees.
Keep Mitt Romney from leading our country or I promiss you he has an ulterior motive that he is hiding and just waiting to win and spring it on you.
September 01, 2012 10:11am
There is no outrage. We are too involved in our own lives watching Sci Fi movies and the newest I Pods and lost in a plastic world. We realize that we can't compete with money because we can't provide properly for our families.
Short of what Alexander Hamilton suggested that a revolution is a good thing after a few years, maybe we are way over due.
Our government has ALLOWED these conditions to manifest in our society.
Do our people really want the highest office to be bought by money mongers?
Do we really accept a Supreme Court meant to do the best for the country to be now so politicized that it rules for money and not for our country?
Warren Buffet had I feel the right idea about evening up the playing field and have the elected officials get the same as they legislate for the rest of the country. Then and only then will we get true patriots running for office because the incentive to make it a career and make a lot of money , priority health insurance and a retirement with full pay as well as approve a wage increase, etc. will be taken away. Then you will see many of the present retire using the canned response...."to spend more time with their family."
Now if you are a Republican and vote for your own subjective reasons like Benedict Arnold, don't hide from the fact that they are after the sick, the poor, the week, the old to make them rich richer....
I would also review my Christian credentials, are they in line with the precepts of Jesus Christ?
We need to demand a change to happen or cause a financial revolution of our own and bring the money mongers to their knees.
Keep Mitt Romney from leading our country or I promiss you he has an ulterior motive that he is hiding and just waiting to win and spring it on you.
September 01, 2012 9:56am
Wow! Moyers is in top form with this essay. It makes any fair-minded progressive as "mad as hell" but if we decide we're "not going to take it anymore," what do we do?
Sure, I want to fight back against the Money Power, but how? How can I, a typical American senior, with a modest pension and Social Security, fight back against the Koch Brothers and free-spending Willard, who wants to do what his daddy couldn't?
We need someone to come up with a game plan that's realistic, but I don't see one on the horizon. All I can do is keep on keeping on, but I doubt that it will ever be enough. It's really disheartening to know that the birthplace of modern democracy has come to such a state. The conservatives have slowly and gradually, over many years, chipped away at the power of individual Americans, while enhancing the powers of those who control virtually everything in modern society.
September 01, 2012 10:24am
Ron,
I am also from NM. But to give you an example the voting age from 21 to 18 took only 3 months and a few days to become law because the country demanded it because we could send 18 year old's to Viet Nam but they didn't have a say in government. And that is what is needed here.... the people need to wake up and demand it by getting involved......form committee's, write our government officials.... local on up and threaten their positions. It is whether we want the status quo and leave it to the oligarch's or hold onto our Democratic life.
September 01, 2012 11:25am
DVILLE:
I see your point about the voting age change, but I don't think the ruling class, such as it was, felt threatened by the change of voting age.
Secondly, we had a draft back then, and so it affected all young males who didn't have cozy little reserve units they could hide in (those who never served in Vietnam), and that war was highly unpopular.
All I'm saying is that conditions are vastly different now, so the same tactics may not work. Also, this was before Fox News and Talk Radio became such media forces in our country. It's a different playing field out there these days. I've done my share of writing letters, sending emails, making calls, signing petitions, making the few contributions I could afford, but I don't feel it can counter the massive influence of Big Money in our public lives these days.