The Myth of the ‘The Knowledge Economy’
Only 25 percent of all Americans go to college, and only 16 percent of those actually try to learn anything. Welcome a nation of helots.
"In the 21st century, the best anti-poverty program around is a first-class education," President Obama famously declared in his 2010 State of the Union address, just as millions of high-schoolers across the nation were going through the annual ritual of picking their preferred colleges and preparing the grand tour of the prospects, with parents in tow, gazing ashen faced at the prospective fees.
The image is of the toiling students springing from lecture room to well-paying jobs, demanding advanced skills in all the arts that can make America great again — outthinking and out knowing the Chinese, Japanese, Indians, South Koreans and Germans in the cutting-edge, cut-throat, high-tech economies of tomorrow.
Start with the raw material in this epic knowledge battle. As a dose of cold water over all this high-minded talk, it's worth looking at Josipa Roksa and Richard Arum's recently published "Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses." The two professors followed more than 2,300 undergraduates at 29 universities, selected to represent the range of America's 2000-plus four-year college institutions.
Among the authors' findings: 32 percent of the students who they followed in an average semester did not take any courses that assigned more than 40 pages of reading per week. Half did not take any courses in which more than 20 pages of writing were assigned throughout the entire term. Furthermore, 35 percent of the students sampled spent five hours or less a week studying alone. Typical students spent about 16 percent of their time on academic pursuits, and were "academically engaged," write the authors, less than 30 hours a week. After two years in college, 45 percent of students showed no significant gains in learning; after four years, 36 percent showed little change. And the students who did show improvement only logged very modest gains. Students spent 50 percent less time studying compared with students a few decades ago.
One of the study's authors, Richard Arum, says college governing boards — shoveling out colossal sums to their presidents, athletic coaches and senior administrative staff — demand that the focus be "student retention," also known as not kicking anyone out for not doing any measurable work. As Arum put it to Daily Finance, "Students are much more likely to drop out of school when they are not socially engaged, and colleges and universities increasingly view students as consumers and clients. Unfortunately, there is no guarantee that all students want to be exposed to a rigorous academic program."
In his one sensible sally Rick Santorum briefly struck out at ingrained snobbery about going to college, a piece of derision it didn't take him long to retract. It turns out only about 30 percent of Americans over the age of 25 have bachelor's degrees. Jack Metzgar had a useful piece recently on the Talking Union site with this and other useful facts.
The U.S. government's Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that in 2010 only 20 percent of jobs required a bachelor's degree, whereas 26 percent of jobs did not even require a high school diploma and another 43 percent required only a high school diploma or equivalent.
Please note that the latter 69 percent were therefore devoid of the one debt in America that's even more certain than taxes — student's loans.
At least if you're provably broke, the IRS will countenance an "offer in compromise." In fact, they recently made the process slightly easier. No such luck with student loans. The banks are in your pocket till the last dime of loan-plus-interest has been extorted.
Now for the next dose of cold water. The BLS reckons that by 2020 the overwhelming majority of jobs will still require only a high school diploma or less and that nearly three-fourths of "job openings due to growth and replacement needs" over the next 10 years will pay a median wage of less than $35,000 a year, with nearly 30 percent paying a median of about $20,000 a year (in 2010 dollars). In other words, millions of Americans are over-educated, servicing debt to the banks and boosting the bottom lines of Red Bull and the breweries.
The snobbery stems from the fact that America's endless, mostly arid debates about education are conducted by the roughly one-third who are college-educated and have OK jobs and a decent income. The "knowledge economy" in the U.S. now needs more than 6 million people with masters or doctoral degrees, with another 1.3 million needed by 2020. But this will still be less than 5 percent of the overall economy.
The BLS's three largest occupational categories by themselves accounted for more than one-third of the workforce in 2010 (49 million jobs), and they will make an outsized contribution to the new jobs projected for 2020.They are: office and administrative support occupations (median wage of $30,710); sales and related occupations ($24,370); food preparation and serving occupations ($18,770).
Other big areas of opportunity: childcare workers ($19,300); personal care aides ($19,640); home health aides ($20,560); janitors and cleaners ($22,210); teacher assistants ($23,220), non-construction laborers ($23,460), security guards ($23,920); and construction laborers ($29,280).
As Metzgar writes, as a society, "the best anti-poverty program around" cannot possibly be "'a first-class education' when more than two-thirds of our jobs require nothing like that."
So what is the best anti-poverty program? Higher wages for the jobs that are out there, currently yielding impossibly low annual incomes. The current American minimum wage ranges between $7.25 and $8.67 per hour. On a fairly regular basis, executives of Wal-Mart call for a rise in the minimum wage since, in the words of one Wal-Mart CEO, Lee Scott, "Our customers simply don't have the money to buy basic necessities between pay checks." The minimum wage in Ontario, Canada, is currently well over $10 per hour, while in France it now stands at nearly $13. Australia recently raised its minimum wage to over $16 per hour and nonetheless, it has an unemployment rate of just 5 percent.
Any Republican candidate seriously pledging to raise the minimum wage to $12 would gallop into the White House, unless — a solid chance — he wasn't shot dead by the commentarial or maybe by a Delta team acting on Obama's determination relayed to him by the bankers, that this pledge constituted a terrorist assault on America. As Ron Unz, publisher of The American Conservative recently wrote (calling for a big hike), "The minimum wage represents one of those political issues whose vast appeal to ordinary voters is matched by little, if any, interest among establishment political elites."
CONNECT













10 comments on "The Myth of the ‘The Knowledge Economy’"
March 25, 2012 10:56am
Like it or lump it, higher education trains the inventers. With todays level of technoligy out there we still need more. Only those with high education are going to be able to continue the refinements of existing technoligy, and, invent the new technoligy needed to make real progress in our societies. It is these people who will have to solve the existing human survival challenges on this planet.
March 24, 2012 9:24am
That's pretty hilarious about Wal-Mart calling for a higher minimum wage. They're right, of course, but isn't Wal-Mart notorious for paying skimpy wages itself?
I always thought the comparison was that Henry Ford paid his workers well so that they could afford to buy his cars: Wal-Mart pays its workers so little that they can't afford to shop anywhere but Wal-Mart. (I suppose they get some employee discount, but you can be sure Wal-Mart still makes a profit.)
March 23, 2012 7:35pm
What ever happened to on the job training? with tax incentives for the company that does so. Yes f the colleges for not pushing that idea and setting the working class down to low class with the Goverments help Throw all politicians out before its to late both parties must go Vote in new people that have average jobs
with common sense and watch thing turn around.
March 23, 2012 3:34pm
Having grown up poor and blue collar I am of a similar frame of mind. The whole system is meant to socially condition workers presumably to maintain the status quo. Remember when Teachers weren't members of a Union? and notice that Doctors still refuse to call the AMA a Union? This is the American caste system at work! If you were born blue collar it is very difficult to get out of that caste unless you impress the right people. BTW if your family is making less than 50,000 per year you are not middle class, you are on the edge of being officially poor and yet you still will find it difficult to be awarded grants to pay for a college education. IT is a rigged game. Might I recommend one of George Carlin's last performances when he rants about "it's a big club and you ain't in it".
March 23, 2012 3:00pm
President Bill Clinton informed us that Globalization would require the country to lower its standard of living so the 3rd world (China, India, Brazil, etc.) could raise theirs.
He wasn't talking about lowering his standard of living or that of his family.
Good jobs are going to be less and less a part of this country so get accustom to it because it's by design.
A college education won't be as necessary for most people except college administrators and college professors who depend upon paying customers to financially support them.
There's an old saying, "It's not what you know but who you know."
That's how the job game has worked and will increasingly continue to work as good-paying jobs get scarcer.
Merit Selection is an Orwellian lie.
The lottery is EQUAL OPPORTUNITY -- what personnel bigots, liars, and idiots engage in isn't.
March 23, 2012 2:12pm
Perhaps if schools did a better job teaching critical thinking, voters would not elect officials who continue to cut education spending.
We need a cultural reset...and that's not Romney or Ron Paul.
March 23, 2012 1:31pm
The school system from kinder garden to professor is nothing but a politically built money machine that is robbing the tax payers and the students blind. All education in the USA should be furnished free of charge by the Government . No exceptions except those who wish to opt out .Like every thing else the congress/ senate does ,always turns into a train wreck. Seems they believe their job is to wreck every institution in the USA . But when they decided to sell out their country to the big Corporations both foreign and domestic , they crossed the line form ignorant to criminal and I recommend immediate action and a lot of stretched necks.
March 23, 2012 1:25pm
What's your point, man? Do you have one? What an incredibly selective and disjoint collection of citations! Yes, if you just count numbers of jobs then you get the impression that there is no knowledge economy. But don't forget, many of those sales and food service jobs are part-time, transitional jobs and are not jobs people settle into for a career. If you want to see thoughtful analysis of our future workforce needs, go to the Georgetown Center on Education and the Workforce website (http://cew.georgetown.edu/).Is Cockburn really saying that we should focus on the crappy part-time jobs and ignore the fact that we can't seem to produce enough STEM degrees to fill the really good jobs we are creating? The facts are clear. There is a knowledge economy. It produces high quality jobs in a broad range of fields. Some of those fields are math and science focused, and our K-12 system isn't producing enough students interested and capable of pursuing STEM majors.The only accurate thing in this article is the observation that the economy isn't producing enough high-paying, career-oriented jobs for everyone. That's a problem we need to deal with. But not going to college guarantees a worker WONT get one of those higher-paying jobs.
March 23, 2012 11:55am
I grew up blue collar. I held a 3.8 GPA throughout the two years of college I regretfully finished...and I spent countless hours studying alone. I received no financial aid because I came from "middle class" - in my area, that's about 40,000-65,000/y for my parents combined income. That's basically nothing, but I'm sure you're aware of that. The government expected my parents to contribute 1/3rd of their total income to my college education, which is also complete absurdity. The fact of the matter is, college is for the rich and the extremely poor. It perpetuates the CASTE system we have in this country, quite easily. The poor people, receiving free rides and in many cases only going BECAUSE it's free will have VERY LITTLE impact in the future of our economy...they will invent nothing great...will contribute nothing spectacular. The middle class, similar to my situation - if they actually finish college with a masters or bachelors or doctorate - will end up having a SECOND MORTGAGE essentially, and will destroy their financial future and only obtain a job paying less than or equal to a skilled trade through a union shop - which doesn't require you to pay anything to train, by the way. Your payment to your "teachers" is practical experience in the working world.
"College" is a joke, unless you are quite advanced in mathematics and sciences and go for engineering or medical fields. Most students who leave our public school systems are simply incapable of achieving those ends. Private school kids are - you guessed it - from the high class...almost exclusively. If you or anyone else hasn't noticed the pattern, wake up. It's called class warfare. They push most of us down, and keep lifting their own children up. This has been going on for CENTURIES.
I was a philosophy major - I still read philosophy - and I'm actually rather certain I'm still learning as much as I was in college, outside of it. I don't need to pay money to obtain a degree in the "arts." That's truly for rich children, not for blue collar kids. I don't need a degree to write, think for myself, rationalize or ascertain the meaning of Heidegger's works.
Because of all of these foolish individuals going to college expecting they are going to end up making more than if they chose a real trade, or got a "real" job, the cost of college has increased so much that someone like myself, who actually has an intellect, and a desire to learn, simply can not afford to.
So fuck the college system, fuck overpaid professors, fuck overpaid board members and most of all, fuck sports, exercise centers, lazy teenagers who just want to party for four years and everything else that increases the cost of an accredited degree outside of what it actually requires - LEARNING. All of the above made it IMPOSSIBLE for me to seriously consider obtaining said degree, and I will never forgive the high class for designing the system in such a way.
If you ask me for my honest opinion, the reason college is pushed by the government is because they KNOW it is overpriced, they KNOW most people will have to take large federally subsidized loans out and they KNOW that those students will be paying billions and billions in interest in the course of the next few generations.
April 22, 2012 1:30pm
you couldnt be more accurate. I am 77 years old, and in my day, the only people who went to college were those who were going ino the Professions such as engineering, medical, law, education which professions required one to obtain a professional license to practice and thus further education was required. Then there was the Classic Liberal Arts Education which taught people who wanted to became really "educate" ie thinkers such as yourself
Thats all history now Now we have the Education Racket as you so well described. I hope you can get a scholarship to attend a really good Liberal Arts Education if there are any left in the US