Dave Lindorff
Published: Friday 26 October 2012
America is supposedly the “Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave,” as our unsingable national anthem puts it at its most unsingable point, but to tell the truth, it is no longer either of those things.

A Nation Armed to the Teeth but Living in Fear

Article image

A new study by researchers at the University of Illinois in Urbana, showing that young children who are fearful in childhood are likely to be conservative when they grow up got me to thinking.

It’s not just that a whole generation of kids who get regularly belted by their parents, who are warned that if they behave in a certain manner they’ll go to hell, or that their faces will freeze in some horrible contorted way, or that they will be thrown out of the house, are becoming Republicans. It’s that virtually the whole country is populated by adults who have been raised in a climate of fear by a media and a government that are hell-bent on scaring the shit out of everyone.

The result is that a nation that once, for better or worse, was full of people who could strike out for unknown regions to stake a claim on land when they didn’t even know how to farm (land admittedly belonging to native Americans who could understandably be expected to react with aggressive hostility to being expropriated), who could weather brutal winters with nothing to get them through but a musket and a store of root vegetables in the cellar, who could stand up to the mightiest military of its day and throw off a colonial yoke and boldly create a new country, now cowers in fear at the imagined threats of a landlocked group of uneducated and incredibly poor people living in a country that is a throwback to the 16th century.

America is supposedly the “Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave,” as our unsingable national anthem puts it at its most unsingable point, but to tell the truth, it is no longer either of those things. Don't believe me? Just try telling a cop who stops you for standing off the side of the road with your thumb out and says you are breaking the law against hitchhiking, that he is wrong and that the law does not in fact bar thumbing. For exercising your right of free speech, even if you were polite about it, he will in response threaten you with arrest. Argue (which is your right), and you’re likely to be slammed against his vehicle, cuffed, and dragged off to the slammer. Never mind that the cop is wrong about the law, and that your charges will be tossed out later. If you resist, or mouth off further during this arrest process, you might even be tased. In the end, you are busted, probably bruised, too, and you’ll be detained for a couple of hours until your family can come spring you by paying an extortionate bail.

In an environment like this, you're not free, and the cop is certainly anything but brave. And that is the situation we're in today in the U.S.

When the Twin Towers in New York City were attacked and struck by two planes and collapsed, I agree it was a horrible shock, but at no point was the survival of the United States, or even of the American people, threatened. Even if you throw in the attack by a third plane on the Pentagon, which collapsed a section of the world’s biggest building, the US wasn’t facing any existential risk. But the reaction of the American public to this attack on 9-11-2001, encouraged mightily by the US government, was to hunker down, beg for police-state laws, and to stop all normal activity. (In fact, any serious damage to the US following those attacks was caused by the reaction of government, business and the people of the US to the event, not by the events themselves.)

In my town, the local school board cancelled all school trips for the rest of the 2001-2 school year, claiming, with the full support of most of the parents in the school district, that there was a risk that terrorists might attack school buses!

This is not rational behavior. It is irrational fear.

The same fear that has led to public support for bi-partisan funding of the most bloated, grotesquely over-armed military in the history of the world. That porkbarrel military is not any good at fighting wars, as the defeat in Iraq, and the looming defeat in Afghanistan by forces armed with AK-47 rifles and home-made mines has proved, and it’s not any good at fighting terrorism, as the spreading of fundamentalist Muslim terror groups across the Middle East and northern Africa demonstrate, but it creates a warm feeling of comfort for terrified Americans to see those huge nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, bristling with heavily armed fighter bombers on their decks, plowing through the ocean, just as it makes people comfortable to see US troops, puffed out with body armor so that they look like pro-football players on a gridiron, standing at the ready at some far off desert outpost.

They’re “keeping us safe,” people think, even as they rush out to buy guns in record numbers.

The depths to which this nation has sunk in this miasma of mindless fear became apparent when President Obama, at both the first abysmal debate and the third, opened his remarks by declaring that it was his primary duty as president “to keep Americans safe.”

Huh?

I thought the primary responsibility of the president of the United States was to defend the Constitution. In fact, here’s the presidential oath: 

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. 

Note that it doesn’t say anything in this oath of office about keeping Americans “safe.”

It’s our Constitution and our freedom that the president is supposed to be defending, not our safety!

Imagine President George Washington, or President Abraham Lincoln, saying that their “number one goal” was to “keep Americans safe”!

I was at a gathering of journalists last night -- the annual dinner of the Knight-Bagehot Fellowship program. Actually it was a gathering of journalists, bankers, public relations executives and media tycoons, all of the latter of whom help to fund this program at Columbia University designed to train journalists to report on financial and economic affairs. A former director, Pauline Tai, from Hong Kong, an old friend, was talking with me and said that she was amazed in her visits back to the US, at how afraid Americans have become.

We remarked on how bizarre that was. America is far and away the most powerful nation in the world, favored in so many ways with abundant resources, with a diverse culture and population, and yet its people cower in fear -- fear of the outside world and, sadly, even fear of each other. People in Hong Kong aren’t afraid. People in Taiwan and China aren’t afraid, and yet objectively they all live in much more vulnerable places -- Hong Kong right next to a totalitarian government that could snuff out its civil liberties overnight, Taiwan under the threat of Chinese missiles just across a narrow strait -- missiles that were test fired into adjacent shipping lanes during a crisis in 1995. And China itself a kind of pressure cooker of public frustration and anger held at bay by a sclerotic Communist Party elite that doesn’t really know how to change and reform without losing its grip in an uncontrolled explosion.

The same can be said of much of the rest of the world, from what I have seen in my own travels. Look at Greece. It is seeing its economy destroyed and pillaged by the greedy demands of banks in northern Europe and by the governments of the more powerful economies in the European Union, yet far from cowering in fear, its people are fighting back in massive public demonstrations.

Americans, worried about their own country’s economic future, go out and buy more and bigger guns and huddle in their homes in fear of the future. And then they vote for politicians who tell them they should be afraid --whether of terrorists, "death panels" in Obamacare, a bankrupt Social Security program, the budget deficit, regulations, or a black president -- and who, to public applause, hand ever more power over to an intrusive and increasingly violent domestic police/army.

The worst thing about all this fear and fear-mongering is that it has turned the US into a nation of conspiracy theorists, so ready to believe the most far-fetched plots and schemes by the rich and powerful that we Americans are unable to see the real challenge facing not just us, but the entire world: the threat of catastrophic climate change. And that is a very real threat that cannot be avoided by cowering in a basement or by electing some tough-talking chief executive, or by buying guns. It can only be tackled by taking bold united action as a people to change the whole basis of the socio-economic system from one premised on encouraging wasteful consumption to one based upon utility and on bettering the lot of all as efficiently as possible -- and doing this not just as a nation, but in collaboration with the rest of the world.

It is time for Americans to reject the fear-mongering, and to take responsibility for our own society and government. We don’t need a leader who will “keep us safe.” We need a leader who will denounce fear, who will declare that the freedoms that are enshrined in the Constitution’s Bill of Rights are the foundation of this nation, and that we will rely on them, not police and armies, to move the country forward to face the real challenges of the future.



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange
ABOUT Dave Lindorff

Dave Lindorff is an investigative reporter, a columnist for CounterPunch, and a contributor to Businessweek, The Nation, Extra! and Salon.com. He received a Project Censored award in 2004. Dave is also a founding member of the online newspaper ThisCantBeHappening! at www.thiscantbehappening.net

Top Stories

9 comments on "A Nation Armed to the Teeth but Living in Fear"

Ogblofeld

October 27, 2012 2:22pm

Solid article except for the unnecessary dig at conspiracy "theorists". The very act of creating this irrational fear spoken about in the article, which makes the masses easier to control, is a conspiracy in itself. They make us look to them to protect us, which allows them to commit horrible atrocities without fear of repercussions to indulge their addictions to power, greed, and legacy.

Nearly every major event is a conspiracy, whether the illicit meeting takes place in a board room, a bunker, a staff meeting, a think tank, or PR firm.

rageoninaz

October 27, 2012 8:55am

Amen.

larronm

October 26, 2012 12:34pm

Having read Mr. Lindorff's piece and the comments which follow, I have come to a single conclusion; Ya'all need to go back and read the piece again. You did not get it. It is you that Mr. Lindorff is referring to. Fear is the strongest human emotion. Every despot and dictator in history understood that. Every violent criminal gets it. The Mafia propered with it. It can be used to sell many goods and services. Take Life Insurance for instance. It has an intrinsic value but is often sold through the use of fear. Why do we "need" a military as large and powerful as we now have? To protect us against whom or what? We have 12 monster, supersized aircraft carriers which carry 80 supersonic fighter bombers plus AWAC support and controlers plus other powerful weapons. They travel with several other vessels in a task force more powerful than the entire navy of the 1920's era. No other country in the world has any. Exactly who are we to be affraid of? And with all this military might we are unable to stop a few terrorists with rifles and homemade bombs.
Mr. Lindorff is correct. So is Mr. Eskow who's article appears today as well. Clear your minds, relax and read these again. Then see if you can locate your backbone. It's there somewhere.

woetopoe

October 26, 2012 5:52pm

LARRONM, I have to concur with your analysis. Fear has been known since time immemorial to be a prime motivator. After Hitler's failed Beer Hall Putsch of 1923 he instructed his henchmen to use "fear and intimidation" in lieu of "reasoning" to convince the groups they were sent out to speak to. FDR, our greatest President made perhaps his most famous statement when he declared that "we have nothing to fear but fear itself." Fear compels people to do things that they would not ordinarily do. Like vote for "fear mongers" who use erroneous propaganda to keep an electorate cowering. We have the power to blow the world up a couple of hundred times over. Perhaps a re-examination of our policies, particularly in places where we have no business being, would ultimately prove more fruitful than saying Boo!...every night on the evening news.

JoyfulC

October 26, 2012 12:11pm

Call me cynical, but I think all this income inequality *IS* the way some are dealing with climate change. When we talk about climate change, we talk about the climate changing in ways that can't sustain the earth's population at present. But what if it was enough that an elite few could survive, if the others died or were killed off? If that were the case, and if I were the elite, things I'd be doing would include increasing wealth inequality as fast as I could, to be sure that most would not be able to compete with me for essential resources. And I'd be whipping up divisiveness and hatred so that the masses would turn on and eliminate each other, while I stood safely to one side. As long as these things will work—as long as we allow them to work—there will always be those working toward creating more inequality for survive as climate change worsens, rather than solutions to stop and roll back climate change.

Michael Mann

October 26, 2012 11:27am

In 1951, General Douglas MacArthur said, “I am concerned for the security of our great nation, not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within (…) It is part of the general pattern of misguided policy that our country is now geared to an arms economy which was bred in an artificially induced psychosis of war hysteria and nurtured upon an incessant propaganda of fear.”

Mr. Lindorff appears to be unaware of just who is running the shop in America, who’s managing its elections, controlling its economy and media, and instigating its wars. He seems to have missed asking the question, “Who stands to benefit from all of this?” And like many journalists in the West’s media, he relegates citizens groomed by what they read in mainline newspapers and hear from news anchors as “conspiracy theorists” and people given to “wasteful consumption.”

Lindorff seems to be oblivious to the fact that people have been conditioned to believe that a “conspiracy theory” is anything that challenges the government’s explanation of something when, by the very definition of the expression, the government’s version of an event is as much a conspiracy theory as the theories that challenge it. The fact that more Americans are waking up to the reality that their government lied to them about 9/11 and are aware that their “representatives” have used the events of that day to launch unending illegal and immoral wars, along with freedom-destroying legislation (like the Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act, and the NDAA), and that Americans feel powerless to do anything about any of this, should explain some of the fear to Mr. Lindorff.

Lindorff compares us to a time when our government represented the interests of its citizens and both the representatives and those they represented fought for the same things. That is no longer the case today, and has not been for over a century. Many Americans have awakened to this somber reality and simply don’t know what they can do to change it; hence the fear.

Issyco

October 26, 2012 12:01pm

I agree. However, there is always something we can do. Instead of going out after work or with friends and talking about zilch, we need to start talking about where we want our country to be headed and what we can do to affect those changes. We could start innocently enough by trying to get our gov't to balance the budget. We could also insist that GMOs are labeled so that people know what they are buying and eating. Or, better yet, we could outlaw GMOs like they have in Russia and getting ready to in India. There are so many issues out there, but we need to tackle those that affect our health and that of our children and grandchildren first. I think our gov't has grasped that we will not go to war anymore and that the Pentagon's budget will have to be slashed. If we do continue warmongering, I think most Americans will refuse to serve and the rest of us will support them in that decision! Then what will our government do? Listen to us for a change perhaps?

Warren D Nicholson

October 28, 2012 5:56pm

Have you noticed that balance the budget talk only happens when there is a democrat in office? No one worried about a balanced buget during the Regan years or Bush one/two. The way we balance the national buget is to cut taxes on the rich and cut programs for seniors, poor workers, veterans and young people so they all fear hunger and lost of homes.

Norman123

October 26, 2012 10:03am

When one steals a lot from everyone, one cannot live in peace and absence of fear because the loot is subject to questioning by those looted. Hence reliance on force instead of trust... The 1% has armed itself to the teeth, parking over $30 trillions in offshore accounts. That is not going to stop those thrown into the streets (OWS) or imprisoned in open society (J. Assange & Co.) and the armies of under-/unemployed with no prospect for a decent life. The solution: bring the $30 trillions back to the country to develop it and create security for the elites. No amount of arms will protect the looters in the long run like the love of their people.