Nine More Dirty, Aging Coal Plants Set to Close, Bringing Total U.S. Retirements to 106 Plants Since 2010
Today was a big milestone for people who care about public health and a livable climate. Two utilities announced the planned closure of nine coal plants in Illinois, Ohio, Pennsylvania and New Jersey, bringing total retirements (executed and planned) since January 2010 past the 100 mark to 106.
Today was a big milestone for people who care about public health and a livable climate. Two utilities announced the planned closure of nine coal plants in Illinois, Ohio, Pennsylvania and New Jersey, bringing total retirements (executed and planned) since January 2010 past the 100 mark to 106.
Two plants in Chicago owned by Midwest Generation, the Fisk Plant and the Crawford Plant, had been a key target for local activist groups. These two plants have been in operation since the early 1900′s and were last updated in the late 50′s and 60′s. Along with violating “grandfathered” (i.e. lax) air quality standards and causing hundreds of emergency room visits each year, the two plants represented the largest source of local greenhouse gas emissions in 2010.
Local and national activists groups, along with the Mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, put intense pressure on Midwest Generation to shut the plants down.
The second set of plant closures come from the wholesale power provider GenOn Energy, which said it will close 3,140 MW of aging plants in Ohio, Pennsylvania and New Jersey. All of the plants are coal, except for one that is oil-fired. GenOn said new air quality regulations would make it difficult for the company to keep the plants operating.
A confluence of factors is making it very difficult for owners of coal plants — particularly old coal plants — to compete. A combination of high domestic coal prices, low natural gas prices, new air quality regulations, coordinated activist pressure, and cost-competitive renewables are making coal an increasingly bad choice for many power plant operators. Along with the 106 announced closures, 166 new plants have been defeated since 2002.
So just how much of an impact have these factors had on coal closures? Bruce Nilles, director of Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal campaign sent along these numbers:
EXISTING COAL (ANNOUNCED/RETIRED SINCE JAN 1 2010)
- 106 coal plants, 319 units
- 42,895 MW (13% of fleet)
- 150 million MWh (8% of fleet)
- 162 million tons/year of CO2 (9% of fleet)
- 921,417 tons/year of SO2 (16% of fleet)
- Average age: 55 years old
- (For plants with available data – Data from Clean Air Task Force): 2,042 pre-mature deaths, 3,229 heart attacks and 33,053 asthma attacks prevented each year (about 15% of total health impacts from fleet). All together these plants retiring will save about $15.6 billion in health care costs.
So what’s going to happen to the lights when all that coal gets phased out? According to a group of forward-thinking power providers, there’s already enough unused combined cycle natural gas capacity installed to make up for over 100 GW of closures.
Of course, with questions about the life-cycle emissions of natural gas still unanswered, it remains to be seen how environmentally effective all that gas will be. But with record amounts of investment pouring into renewables and efficiency, and progressive utilities calling increasingly cost-competitive solar “the next big thing in the industry,” the forces are coming together to close the gap.
CONNECT














4 comments on "Nine More Dirty, Aging Coal Plants Set to Close, Bringing Total U.S. Retirements to 106 Plants Since 2010"
Hallo ik heb nog steeds plobremen met het uploaden van bestanden > 2mbyte ik krijg dan de melding Could not upload file! Error code: 7 ondanks dat ik bij UploadMaxFileSize 10 mbyte heb ingevuld. Enig idee?Alvast bedankt
March 02, 2012 9:15am
We need Tax Reform more than anything, in order to bring this great country back to Greatness. My new Motto is "Tax Em Like 1938".
March 01, 2012 2:48pm
no problem just become aminish
March 01, 2012 2:38pm
Coal should be cleaned up and burned as it is the single largest source of energy we have in America, and that can be done - but not to the new ridiculous EPA standards, but certainly to ones that would benefit all. If you understand that 'Global Warming' is a Scam to collect taxes and depress the American Economy, and thus eliminate the ridiculous consideration of CO2 as a pollutant (a good gas and required for plant life), sulfur and the heavy metals are what should be of concern - and they can be mostly removed.
America needs an interim strategy for energy as 'renewables' will not work anytime in the near future as a primary source of power. Wind, Solar and Tidal are not constant energy sources and cannot be depended on for energy. They all change and stop periodically and that will not work because we do not have any reasonable way to store power between' the intermittent peaks and ebbs. As a result, standard power plants need to be kept on line and what really happens is that they stop the renewables when they don't need their power because they are easier to shut down - I know this from talking to people working in the field.
A true measure of renewable's contribution needs to be the power sent into the grid - not potential capacity when the wind, sun or tide is producing at full peak -as this would expose the ridiculously low output we can get for the Billions of Dollars Spent.
America you have been scammed by a Government intent on implementing the Global Plan for Agenda21.