You are viewing the NationofChange archives. For the latest news and actions, visit the new
Get Email Updates | Log In | Register

George Zornick
NationofChange / Op-Ed
Published: Thursday 2 February 2012
“Obama’s plan would allow homeowners to refinance at current rates, which are quite low.”

Obama’s Plan to Help Homeowners and Boost the Economy

President Obama detailed his administration’s new housing plan in Virginia today, a little over a week after announcing it in his State of the Union address. The crux of the plan is providing help to underwater homeowners—which, in turn, could also boost the economy.

The plan works like this: everyone who has a mortgage with a non-government sponsored enterprise (GSE), like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, is eligible to refinance under this plan if they meet the government’s criteria. (There are also features to further incentivize help for those with GSE loans—more on that later). Non-GSE homeowners must be current on their payments, meet a minimum credit score and be a single-family, owner-occupied home within FHA loan limits to get help under the new plan. (The idea is to target aid to families that aren’t already quite wealthy and are trying to stay in their current homes).

Crucially, however, it doesn’t matter if the homeowner is underwater on their mortgage (meaning they owe more than their home is worth). This is important because underwater homeowners typically can’t refinance, which creates a vicious economic cycle for the country: with high mortgage payments, people have less money to spend and so the economy suffers. But a suffering economy pushes home prices downward, meaning underwater homeowners are sunk even deeper.

Obama’s plan would allow homeowners to refinance at current rates, which are quite low. In the hypothetical distributed by the White House, say there’s a family with a $300,000 mortgage that they took out in 2005 at 6 percent. They’d have a balance of $272,000 with monthly payments of $1,800—but their home is only worth, say, $225,000. This means they’re underwater and can’t refinance at today’s lower rate. The administration plan would allow them to refinance at 4.25 percent, which would reduce their monthly payments by $460 per month. This extra money should help revive the economy—Matthew Yglesias wonders if perhaps this is a job-creation “game-changer.”

I spoke with Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, who said the plan got it “mostly right” but was bearish on the economic impact. He noted that even if 3 million to 4 million homeowners participated, and received $3,000 in annual benefits—both high-end estimates—that would be about $12 billion, or less than one-tenth of 1 percent of the country’s GDP.

Baker said in his view, the plan’s merit is helping people, not the economy. “The main thing is, Is it helping homeowners directly? Is it helping communities?” he said.

In any case, it would cost the government between $5 and $10 billion to implement—certainly an amount worth borrowing, if the plan provides the intended benefit. But the administration wants to pay for it instead by implementing a small fee on banks. This not only disables the inevitable Republican argument that the plan adds to the deficit but also would paint their opposition as an act of protection for Wall Street banks.

The initiative, as Greg Sargent notes, is an unabashed case for government involvement in fixing economic troubles, and contrasts well with Mitt Romney’s earlier statements that the housing market should be allowed to bottom out. (Though in recent weeks, as he heads to foreclosure-plagued Nevada for a primary, Romney has said he’s open to getting the government involved).

But there are other ways to get the government more deeply involved, and which the administration isn’t attempting. For people with GSE loans, the new plan simply adds incentives for write-downs and refinancing.

But it’s within the government’s power to simply engage in a mass write-down program, without worrying about “incentives” for banks—it’s just that Edward DeMarco, the current head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, has declined to do so. Many House Democrats want DeMarco to resign, and have urged Obama to use his recess appointment powers, as he did with Richard Cordray and the National Labor Relations Board nominees, to put someone in place who’s much less recalcitrant. The new “incentives” in this plan make it clear the administration has no interest in doing that.

Furthermore, the incentives might end up giving undue help to the banks. Under the new plan, the administration aims to triple the incentives for principal write-downs under the Home Affordable Mortgage Program (HAMP), from a range of six to twenty-one cents on the dollar to a range of eighteen to sixty-three cents.

If the average federal incentives handed out are closer to sixty-three cents, Baker notes, that’s pretty generous to banks—especially since they’re holding a lot of mortgages that are probably going to fail anyhow, and that they might not even fairly hold the papers too anyway. “We’re giving a lot to the bank” in that scenario, he noted.  

The plan must first pass Congress, and Republicans are—wait for it—skeptical. But if it does, despite its flaws, the plan will no doubt provide much-needed financial relief to a lot of homeowners.

This story originally appeared in The Nation.
Copyright © The Nation – distributed by Agence Global.

ABOUT George Zornick

George grew up in Buffalo, NY and holds a B.A. in English from the State University of New York at Buffalo. Prior to joining The Nation, George was Senior Reporter/Blogger for He worked as a researcher for Michael Moore's SiCKO and as an Associate Producer on "The Media Project" on the Independent Film Channel. His work has been published in The Los Angeles Times, Media Matters, and The Buffalo News.

I am really empress by read

I am really empress by read this comments. "Obama’s Plan to Help Homeowners and Boost the Economy "

I have already started reading some of your refinance rates related article. i found great post here.I will get back here. I just added your blog to my bookmark sites. thanks.

refinance rates

Thanks for post

What will this plan do for

What will this plan do for African Americans like my wife and I? Who have paid Wells Fargo 9.5% interest since 1986. We are victims of their greed and criminal action, We are not in danger of foreclousure,we would like to be compensative for this unfair interest. Where do we get help do we call 911? Robert Anderson And Family: Haltom City, Texas

Just like he was going to end

Just like he was going to end the wars as his first order of business
Just like he was going to close down Gitmo
Just like he was going to defend the constitution
Just like he was going to raise the minimum wage
Just like he wasn't going to be friendly with the bankers, then continues to hire them, hires Monstano's VP as FDA czar, etc, etc.

"Me, too, I'm skeptipal."

"Me, too, I'm skeptipal."

Comment with your Facebook account

Comment with your Disqus account

Top Stories

comments powered by Disqus

NationofChange works to educate, inform, and fight power with people, corruption with community.

If you would like to stay up to date with the best in independent, filter-free journalism, updates on upcoming events to attend, and more, enter your email below:

7 Compelling Reasons Why You Should Support NationofChange

Our readers often tell us why they’ve decided to step up and become supporters. Here are some of the top reasons people are giving.

1. You’re keeping independent journalism alive
The corporate owned media has proven that it can’t be trusted. In a media landscape wrought with spin and corruption, NationofChange stands in very scarce company.

2. You’re sticking it to the rich, powerful, and corrupt
When you have money in this country you can get away with damn near anything, and they do. NationofChange isn’t afraid to expose these criminals no matter how powerful they are.

3. Your donation is 100% tax-deductible
NationofChange is a 501(c)3 charity. People tend to assume that many other organizations are (most nonprofits are NOT) but it’s that 501(c)3 status is a bit more rare than you think.

Read the rest...