Pakistan to ‘Punish’ Families Who Reject Ineffective and Dangerous Polio Vaccine

Anthony Gucciardi
Natural Society / News Analysis
Published: Thursday 29 March 2012
“World Health Organization states that Pakistan, despite the large percentage of prescribed vaccination, had the highest number of polio cases in a decade.”
Article image

Despite powerful mainstream evidence showing that 78% of polio cases in Pakistan are among those vaccinated with the polio vaccine, and even the fact that the polio vaccine is now the leading cause of polio paralysis, Pakistan is now moving to slam parents of non-vaccinated children with fees and school bans. The country has been battling the disease, which has been running rampant among those vaccinated against the condition for quite some time, even prompting potential travel restrictions until the epidemic is dealt with.

While attributing the spread and outbreak to unvaccinated children, and demonizing their parents for making such an ‘irresponsible’ choice, mainstream public statistics have shown that even those who have been administered polio drops on several occasions were still developing the disease. According to the National Institute of Health, whose polio action group compiled the data in the report, 107 polio-affected children out of the 136 total patients had been given the polio drops under a prescribed schedule — doctor approved.

What’s more, World Health Organization states that Pakistan — despite the large percentage of prescribed vaccination — had the highest number of polio cases in a decade. But perhaps most shocking of them all is a report by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) that shows it is possible that these children are developing polio from the vaccine itself. The report states:

From 1980 through 1999, there were 162 confirmed cases of paralytic polio cases reported. Of the 162 cases, eight cases were acquired outside the United States and imported. The last imported case caused by wild poliovirus into the United States was reported in 1993. The remaining 154 cases were vaccine-associated paralytic polio (VAPP) caused by live oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV)… there is no clinical difference between paralytic polio caused by wild poliovirus, OPV, or VDPV.

It should be no surprise, then, that vaccine-associated paralytic polio has emerged as the pre-dominant form of the disease since 1980 according to peer-reviewed research. Amazingly, this is no new discovery. The issues surrounding vaccine-induced polio paralysis was so serious that the US actually moved to the inactivated poliovirus vaccine (known as IPV) in 2000 following the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended altogether eliminating the live-virus oral polio vaccine (OPV) — the same vaccine that is still widely used throughout the third world despite the serious known associated risks.

Meanwhile, the government officials will now be financially assaulting families who decide to avoid these ineffective and dangerous vaccinations. Unsurprisingly, public trust for the shots is at “its lowest ebb”, according to Hussain A. Gezari, the WHO’s envoy on global polio eradication. Previous attempts by government to financially ‘punish’ parents who do not subject their children to the government-mandated vaccinations have been made in Australia, where the nation suggested stripping parents of non-vaccination children from tax benefits.



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange
Author pic
ABOUT Anthony Gucciardi

Anthony is an accomplished investigative journalist whose articles have appeared on top news sites and have been read by millions worldwide. A health activist and researcher, Anthony’s goal is informing the public as to how they can use natural methods to revolutionize their health, as well as exploring the behind the scenes activity of the pharmaceutical industry and the FDA.

Top Stories

7 comments on "Pakistan to ‘Punish’ Families Who Reject Ineffective and Dangerous Polio Vaccine"

Factkneader

March 30, 2012 12:28am

As is too often the case, journalists such as Gucciardi have virtually no background in or knowledge of real science and foist upon an equally naive public a slop bucket of pseudo-scientific blather. If Mr. G had actually read and understood the abstract of the "peer - reviewed research" that he linked to, he would have encountered this statement:

The risk of VAPP (vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis ) has remained exceedingly low but stable since the mid-1960s, with approximately 1 case occurring per 2.5 million doses of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) distributed during 1980-1989. (Division of Immunization, National Center for Prevention Services, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia)

One case per 2.5 million !! Doesn't sound like high risk to me! Certainly not nearly the risk that I and my peers experienced before the blessing of an EXTREMELY EFFECTIVE VACCINE was presented to a desperate nation in the '50s. So 107 children who received OPV contracted the disease. How malnourished and/or immune impaired were these children and how many THOUSAND children would have become paralyzed without the vaccine?

This is of course a not-too- subtile attack by the All Natural gang on the use of vaccines. Next we'll doubtlessly be treated to an article on how vaccination causes autism!

Please NoC , accept no more of this hurtful nonsense from the Natural Society!

vbekiaris

March 29, 2012 10:05pm

there isn't really a story here. Pakistan and other countries should stop using live oral vaccines an start using inactivated vaccines by injection. The scientific proof against live oral polio is compelling. As Daveh92104 said, the real question is why Pakistan is still using live oral vaccines.

mediai

March 29, 2012 5:33pm

This is extremely poor journalism. I would check this man's credentials, his sources, his reasoning.I am not sure I would trust any articles in Nation of Change if this is the kind of pseudo-scientific drivel and obviously questionable reporting they post.Having and writng opinions is one thing; distorting facts is another - and it is clear that facts are distorted here.

bogglesthemind

March 29, 2012 4:41pm

Something is very strange here. If the vaccine does not work and instead results in an opposite outcome, why in hell would the Pakistani government want to continue using it? Let alone punish people for not using it. Is it a 'brother-in-law thing? Meaning someones brother-in-law is making huge bucks off the vaccine. Or is it like what we do here, in the U.S., keep making the same mistakes and expecting a different result?

This story needs more information... this is not journalism.

bogglesthemind

March 29, 2012 4:42pm

O0ps

Joyce James

March 29, 2012 4:32pm

Yes - I agree - as a Rotarian that is committed to eliminating POlio as an endemic disease from the face of the earth we must continue to vaccinate until the virus has become extinct. ( it doesn't live long outside human host). The focus should be using on the safer oral vaccine. India is now polio free for 12 months - a major milestone leaving only Pakistan, Afghanistan and Nigeria as countires where it is endemic. If we don't eliminate it completely, it will resurge - with horrible results for victims .

DaveH92014

March 29, 2012 2:58pm

This article misses the most important point. The article seems to purport that the Pakistan government should stop punishing parents for not vaccinating their children. That is the wrong point. Polio has terrible effects on those who contract it. I am old enough to remember before there was a vaccination to prevent polio and I recall the devastation it caused to many young people in my town. So not vaccinating should not be a preferred option. The real story here should focus on the fact that, as stated in the article, no polio cases were contracted in the U.S. since year 2000 and the U.S. in that time period has been using inactivated polio vaccine. So the real discussion should be about why other countries are using live polio vaccine and the U.S. is successfully using only inactivated vaccine. I know nothing about the answer to that, but it should be the question addressed by any investigative journalism.