Paradise Lost: The Sinking Middle Class
Deep down we know there's no paradise on earth, but as the children of immigrants who came to this country believing it was a land of milk and honey, we are stalwart. For generations now, it's the middle class that has sustained the dream of "America, the Beautiful" – with a dash of liberty and justice for all. But now the very foundations on which that dream has rested are crumbling. Consider the facts in this recent editorial in the New York Times:
[The] numbers on the loss of personal wealth [since 2007-2008] are staggering and say a lot about why the economic recovery has been so sluggish — and why the government will need to do a lot more to turn things around.
According to a new survey from the Federal Reserve, the median American family’s net worth dropped by nearly 40 percent from 2007 to 2010 — from $126,400 to $77,300 — wiping out 18 years’ worth of accumulated wealth. The crash in house prices accounted for most of that loss. Median family income, which was already edging down in the years before the recession, continued to decline, dropping from $49,600 in 2007 to $45,800 in 2010, about where it was in the mid-1990s.
The middle class was hit the hardest…
The recession "would have been much deeper and the weak recovery much weaker", we are told, but for past government support (for example, payroll tax cuts and extended jobless benefits). Of course, Republicans in Congress opposed these measures. Give the socialist Obama an inch, you see, and he will turn this country into a Marxist dictatorship.
The Times editorial calls for "…more support, including federal spending on education and public-works projects to create jobs, targeted tax credits for hiring, programs to deliver mortgage relief that supports house prices…as well as a renewed commitment to financial regulation to ensure that the system doesn’t melt down again." However, "The Republicans — for reasons of ideology and self-serving election-year politics — are determined to block all of these necessary programs."
In case you haven't heard: Freedom isn't free. Just ask the rich Republicans who seem to think it's fair that millionaires and billionaires get big tax breaks not available to middle class working families. After all, "earned income" is for losers; winners have "capital gains" to keep them warm.
And so what if losers pay a higher rate of tax than winners. Somebody has to pay for all that freedom they…uh, I mean we…enjoy.
There are no two ways about it. When the middle class is in decline, the storied "American way of life" is imperiled. Neither a republic worthy of the name nor a robust market economy can exist without a strong and vibrant middle class. That's not bleeding heart schmaltz; it's a fact that only block-headed fools dare to dispute.
In its latest report, the Federal Reserve published a bleak analysis showing – guess what? – the the impact of the Great Recession hit the middle class the hardest. The 60 percent of American families in the middle of the middle had a larger decline in wealth and income on a percentage basis than the very wealthy or the very poor.
The reasons are fairly obvious. The most important asset for the average middle-class household is, well, the house it's holding (or trying to hold onto), an asset which is worth a frightful fraction of what the owners paid for it in the bank-driven Bubble Era before the Big Meltdown in 2008. The median value of home equity plunged from $110,000 in 2007 to $75,000 in 2010. While the stock market has staged a comeback of sorts, housing prices have barely budged.
Meanwhile, median family income has plummeted. The crash of housing prices accounts for three-quarters of the loss, but it's also clear from this mass of data that the crisis of the middle class cannot be explained in terms of a single cause or fixed with bobby pins and band-aids.
The rot has eaten deeply into the political system as well. We will see the effects of this decay on display in the 2012 election. Casino tycoon and multibillionaire Sheldon Adelson says the money he's prepared to pour into Mitt Romney's bid for the presidency is "limitless". Here's the scenario Steve Bertoni writing in Forbes magazine lays out:
Thanks to the Citizens United decision, there are no curbs on how much Adelson could give the pro-Romney Super PAC, Restoring Our Future. Given that he’s one of the 15 richest people in the world, the Sands chairman could personally bankroll the equivalent of entire presidential campaign–say, $1 billion or so–and not even notice. (The $10 million donation he just made to Romney is equivalent to $40 for an American family with a net worth of $100,000.)
What we are experiencing in this country is an unsustainable state: the rich get everything they want, and they want everything. It's as though the plutocrats have a death wish. Tragically, they alone are in a position to move the machinery of government toward necessary reforms, but they persist in doing the opposite. If the inequality and injustice of the New Derivative Economy does not provoke a popular uprising, the combination of fundamental structural imbalances and corrupt politics will eventually bring the whole degenerate system crashing down.
No mass consumption society can prosper if its middle-class citizens lack the means to consume and the confidence to invest. And no republic can flourish or long survive when the people's elected representatives get in bed with billionaires and bankers, rig elections, sell votes, polarize society for personal gain, and place partisan interests above the public interest.
CONNECT














12 comments on "Paradise Lost: The Sinking Middle Class"
June 26, 2012 1:16pm
Jobs, Jobs, Jobs! And I don't mean jobs created abroad to manufacture products sold and consumed here in the U.S.. My question to all of you; What is it going to take, specifically, to create the necessary jobs to recover from the actions of both parties? How does increasing taxes on the 1% do anything more than make the 99% feel better? Seems to me that having decent paying jobs in the private sector would be better than higher taxes so the government can create jobs. What's the answer?
June 26, 2012 10:17am
Jobs, Jobs, Jobs! And I don't mean jobs created abroad to manufacture products sold and consumed here in the U.S.. My question to all of you; What is it going to take, specifically, to create the necessary jobs to recover from the actions of both parties? How does increasing taxes on the 1% do anything more than make the 99% feel better? Seems to me that having decent paying jobs in the private sector would be better than higher taxes so the government can create jobs. What's the answer?
June 26, 2012 10:14am
Jobs, Jobs, Jobs! And I don't mean jobs created abroad to manufacture products sold and consumed here in the U.S.. My question to all of you; What is it going to take, specifically, to create the necessary jobs to recover from the actions of both parties? How does increasing taxes on the 1% do anything more than make the 99% feel better? Seems to me that having decent paying jobs in the private sector would be better than higher taxes so the government can create jobs. What's the answer?
June 19, 2012 2:14pm
Well, the lost paradise can be regained if all thinking people vote their conscience in the November election. We need a silent revolution. If the election turns out to bring in a whopping democratic majority (wiping out the tea party completely) in the House, and increase the democratic plurality in the Senate, besides reelcting Obama, then the congress and the president can work together in the first few months of 2013 to get the country going again with a bright economy. Contrary to all the warnings issued by the Republicans, all the fat cats will fall in line with the new economy. The 1% can still enjoy their wealth but cannot anymore keep on hoarding them at the expense of the majority. It is a cruel twist of circumstances that they have been able to do so so far. Remember in 1789 in Paris the housewives brought the "baker and his wife" to Paris from Versailles. This coming election is very crucial to defang the 1%.
June 18, 2012 8:42pm
We have always had a Progressive Tax Code. It's not until Reagan dropped the top marginal rate from 70% to 50%, and the Republican party saw how easy it was to manipulate the money market. In the 30's,40's, 50's, 60's, & 70's we had a top marginal rate over 90% for many of those years. To go along with a top marginal rate of 90% or more, it didn't come into effect until the earner made over $20,000,000. income. This is exactly what built this country to greatness, and is the only thing to bring it back to Greatness. We have to vote out of office all the Republicans in Congress, and keep a watchful eye on the Democrats. I advocate a simple solution to all the country's problems. "Tax em like 1938". In 1938 we had 33 Tax Brackets from 4% for income up to $64,000., all the way up to 79% for Only income over $79,000,000. Now this is "Fair and Balanced".
June 18, 2012 2:05pm
Globalization was intended to lower the standard of living of the US so the standard of living in the 3rd world (China, India, Brazil, etc.) could rise, a fact that President Bill Clinton made known to the country, so don't expect the middle class to make a comeback because it's not going to happen.
June 18, 2012 12:23pm
I certainly agree that the "middle class" has suffered over the past few years, but remember nearly all of those suffering are doing so at their own hand. Most bought beyond their financial means and sadly continue to do so even today. Everyone desires a better/higher standard of living, but we must faithfully remember three constants: 1. We cannot all be Upper level managers, CEO's or Attorney's. 2. Never spend more money than you earn. 3. No poor man ever gave anyone a job.
June 19, 2012 8:45am
Well, you certainly won't go down in history as "honest Abe." Millions of middle and lower class Americans are NOT suffering because of the doing's of "their own hand." The industrial base of America has been systematically wiped out by free trade agreements, perpetuated by both parties. Countless small businesses have been eradicated by your friendly, anti-neighborhood Wal-Mart. We all don't WANT to be upper level managers and insidiously rapacious CEO's and Attorney's. The "best and the brightest" in America have often turned out to be nothing more than thugs in Lear Jets. "Never spend more than you earn." Numerous individuals that prompted our economic malaise sure as hell didn't EARN the enormous sums of money they walked away with AFTER failing miserably at their respective companies. Golden Parachutes have been seen floating all over America. And "poor men" and women STILL spend money. Somebody receives that money for whatever product or service is being purchased, henceforth a "poor person" just created the means for someone to have a job. We can all have that "higher standard" of living when the pigs at the trough of avarice allow more of us to feed. And yes, far too many Americans have bought into the hype, exemplified by both religious and political operatives that being rich makes you somehow "superior" to those who are not and that being so brings you closer to God. What a load of bullshit!
June 18, 2012 8:13pm
ABE61, you're dead wrong on the third point. A flush middle class has and will continue to create 99% of the jobs... at the businesses where they spend their income. Not the poor, but in no way are they the 1%
"the reason we are stuck where we are is because the middle class lacks jobs and incomes–something that will get markedly worse if we continue to try to cut government spending and balance the budget" - John T. Harvey, Professor of Economics at Texas Christian in Forbes, The Real Job Creators: Consumers
"An ordinary middle-class consumer is far more of a job creator than I ever have been or ever will be." Nick Hanauer, billionaire Bloomberg, Raise Taxes on Rich to Reward True Job Creators
June 18, 2012 11:39am
A smiley vendor wants to take you to the cleaners to pay for his deeper tax cuts for the rich and corporations. Romney pays 14% rate on his earnings against over 30% for American workers and middle class. He’d like the 1% to pay two percent or even zero taxes. Where’s the math? When is he going to pay Bush’s $10 trillion red account? Only the naïve would buy a used car from Mr Romney.
June 18, 2012 9:48am
All too real, and all too telling about our current state of economic affairs. Yet the documentation is available, the history is clear, and unless we rise up and resist the Republican myths about tax cuts for the wealthy, trickle-down economics, the 'beauty' of markets that are not regulated, the need to cut back on social spending and education, etc., we shall surely enter very dark and dismal times. Spending by the middle class should be thought about critically, however. Our consumerism is part and parcel of our sickness, and is another aspect of our misguided efforts in seeking comfort and security at the expense of shrinking resources worldwide.
June 18, 2012 11:44am
Very well said. I particularly found your comment regarding "our consumerism" to be salient. Far, far too many Americans are chimerical in their beliefs that they too, somehow, someway, will join the gilded elite. The whole country has been subjected to a form of mass hypnotism that exalts wealth and material acquisitions whilst demeaning "public works" efforts designed for the common good. The 99% have a bona fide bone to pick with the 1% but in reality many would simply "love" to join them. Also, it should be pointed out that while the Republicans have morphed into a truly insidious form of vermin; the Democrats are guilty in many instances of "aiding and abetting" a criminal, when it comes to the country's continuing shift to the right despite all evidence that it will only lead to what the author describes as "unsustainable and inevitable collapse."