President Obama Empathizes with The Wall Street Occupation

Brian Walker
NationofChange / News Report
Published: Thursday 6 October 2011
After a period of silence, President Obama expressed an understanding and familiarity with the Occupy Wall Street movement.
Article image

In a press conference on Thursday President Obama described the Occupy Wall Street movement as something which “I think [the movement] expresses the frustrations that the American people feel that we had the biggest financial crisis since the great depression, huge collateral damage all across the country, all across main street. Yet, you're still seeing the same folks who acted irresponsibly trying to fight efforts to crack down on abusive practices that got us into this mess in the first place. I think people are frustrated. The protestors are giving voice to a more broad based frustration about how our financial system works.”

The president’s words came after weeks of silence on the movement, and to many without a direct statement of support, are not enough. While President Obama did not endorse occupy wall street directly, his expression of understanding shows that demonstrators are being heard from the high places.

During the conference the president expressed urgency in passing his $450 billion jobs plan, and supported a plan drafted by Democrats in the Senate to use a 5% surtax on millionaires to help fund it, saying “Our economy really needs a jolt right now,” Obama then ripped into the GOP, saying that he’d tried to work with them for two years and now it was time to bring the issue “to the American people so they know what is going on.” Suggesting a possible end to the President’s readiness to relent to the GOP’s demands.

Get Email Alerts from NationofChange
ABOUT Brian Walker

Brian Walker is a reporter and assistant editor for NationofChange.

FEATURE A

Connect with your friends

Find new content you might like and see what your friends are sharing!

Top Stories

51 comments on "President Obama Empathizes with The Wall Street Occupation"

mikellv7

October 17, 2011 6:48pm

10 for a dollar......Haven't seen that in our grocery stores only in our president!!!Talk is VERY Cheap INDEED. Everthing elese is out of Control !!!! Get ready for REAL HYPERINFLATION,COMING TO A CITY NEAR YOU!!!!

Dawn Willey

October 16, 2011 8:01am

Thank you so much for posting this. I had never heard of The Venus Project and after looking at the website I am VERY interested in learning more about. I was a strong supporter of Obama in the last election. The grass roots movement that was generated during his campaign, and the idea of radical change which is so clearly needed appealed to me. However, I am disappointed and left wondering where we go from here. The occupation movement is exciting to me too that people en masses across the Globe are rallying together. This is an interesting time to be alive!

Kirk Anderson

October 07, 2011 11:06am

Absolutely. He talks a good game sometimes, but his talk is cheap.

Jamie Clemons

October 07, 2011 1:22pm

He makes a good speech but then behind our back he keeps handing out money to the corporate puppet masters who are pulling his strings.

Lawrence Steinke

October 07, 2011 8:01am

Dennis is from Ohio I'm proud to say!

fuppeduck

October 06, 2011 11:00pm

In Europe, broadcast licenses require a tv or radio stations to donate equal air time to all registered candidates,at no cost as a condition of licensure. In the US, broadcast media can assuredly count on 100s of millions in ad revenue from a presidential election and even more from the lesser elections beyond that. Get the cash out of elections or we are doomed as a republic, and not only because with all the guns and ammo in general circulation in America, the doom won't end well.**This president is pwned** by his donors and an electoral system with rules that require huge amounts of cash to get in and win the game and all but sells the candidate's soul out from under them (assuming they had one to begin with) to whatever the donor wants. Its the root of the problem and anything less than radical restructure of the electoral process is closing the barn door after the horses have run off.

Angel J. Perea

October 06, 2011 10:25pm

Keeping it honest: Remember the Movie: “Wall Street?” Isn’t Greed supposed to be NOT good?
So many news articles stating that American protesters have “no clear “agenda? It seems crystal clear to the middle class America that they are frustrated by the lack of concern that exists for the people in this country who need jobs and hope to support themselves and families.
Millions of unemployed people looking for work in this country are being ignored and slowly erased by mega-corporations including Big Oil, Banks, Computer Co., Drug Insurance Companies, whose only concern is for their obscene profits far exceed anyone’s understanding!
The beauty and treasured tradition of America allows people the freedom to unite and speak out to draw attention to these huge social injustices. It’s about time that Americans did and said, “we are mad as hell and we are not going take it any longer!”
For the record, “Greed is Not good”; it’s ugly, selfish, obscene and destructive for our society. After all, We are a still a democracy, not aristocracy! Just look around this great county!
" It's no surprise that the Romney campaign and his republicans buddies in the Congress are raising money from Wall Street by saying they want to CONTINUE THE CLASS WAR to repeal consumer protections sand allow Wall Street to write its own rules," KEEPING IT HONEST: Wall Street, a key contributor to Obama in 2008, seems to be switching allegiances.
" Hum.. I wonder why? Maybe the gang on Wall Street does not wish to alienate “their” representatives? Mr. Boehner, Cantor, McCarthy and Ryan and Senator McConnell and his 43 obstructionists in the senate that are provided their campaign funds! This is not aBanana Republic! After all, this same Wall Street Gang were the direct recipients of trillion dollar tax payer bailout with no conditions and used it some of it for bonuses!
According to Senator Bernie Sanders, it is now clear that the Republicans /hypocrites made pledges that they are for their “only” plan of continuing its Class War against the middle Class to protect their rich Millionaires on Wall street and Billions like the Gover Norquest, Russ Limbaugh, Rupert Murdock and others like the Koch Brothers that provide them their campaign funds! Their plan was never about creating American jobs for the unemployed middle class! LET'S PUBLICLY LIST THE NAME OF EVERY POLITICIAN AND WALL STREET GIVER SO AMERICAN CAN KNOW WHO IS ON "TAKE" AND SELLING MIDDLE AMERICA OUT!

American Bolshevik

October 06, 2011 10:08pm

We are frustrated, Mr. President. And one of the biggest sources of our frustration is YOU. But your being a weak, ineffectual, craven toady of Wall Street is one of the factors that gave birth to this movement, so, in a sense, I guess you can be counted as one of its "fathers".

Daniel Fratus

October 06, 2011 8:45pm

I totally agree with you. RIGHT ON!

Steward B. Clinton

October 06, 2011 8:28pm

PETITIONS ON WHITEHOUS.GOV NEEDING promised to get a White House response with 5,000 or more SIGNATURES by the 23rd of Oct. 2011, Occupy Wall Street already had over 8,000 (likely a reason for response already) but they seemed to have ignored all of those that were not theirs. Bad move. Most of them I signed while registered voiced the same issues. Make them all viral to get multiple responses and dominate the petition conversation.
1. https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#!/petition/reverse-scotus-ruling-citizens-united-v-fec-constitutional-amendment-supporting-hjres78/vWTGSMJX 3630 signatures needed
2. http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwwws.whitehouse.gov%2Fpeti... needs 3630 signatures needed
3. https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#!/petition/stop-death-penality-now-memory-troy-davis/jXgRx4bt NEEDS signatures needed
4. MOVE TO AMMEND – Best Citizens United vs FEC petition http://movetoamend.org/motion-to-amend
5. https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#!/petition/make-bribing-politicians-illegal/jkWvjLnr needs 2000 signatures needed
6. https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#!/petition/investigate-and-announce-national-economic-and-stability-reformation-act-nesara-american-people/V5k9mXhn
7. http://www.getmoneyout.com/
8. https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions/fb/petition/petition/reject-keysto...
9. https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#!/petition/help-families-avoid-foreclosure-stabilize-housing-market-and-boost-economy-adopt-principal-paydown/Yj4rq2l8
10. https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#!/petition/require-all-genetically-modified-foods-be-labeled-such/yZCBVVz0
11. https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#!/petition/enact-and-enforce-legislation-recognize-bullying-punishable-hate-crime/nlklS23v 3573 signatures needed

Lawrence Steinke

October 07, 2011 8:04am

Dennis is from Ohio I'm proud to say!

Kristine Osbakken

October 06, 2011 7:49pm

to Zagnut: How entrenched you are, and how you cannot see the handwriting on the wall. Died in the wool Dem, I bet.
He got in through Wall Street money; why did i expect more than Geithner, Summers et al?
Bernie Sanders, Dennis Kucinich understand and are speaking out. I'll vote for either. How about for Pres and VP?
2010 was all about Obama selling out. He had not one, but two Dem houses, and decided to turn Republican. WHAT did you want people to do?
The army is taking to the streets, and they do not support our current president.
To Maya:
Did he take the time when he decided to eliminate two American citizens with NO charges against them last week? Did he take the time when he decided it's OK to fund governments that hire child soldiers? To throw 30,000 more soldiers into Afghanistan? To keep Guantanamo open? ETC.
We can't create him; he is his own creation. How often have you seen him negotiate? How often capitulate?.
I don't feel 'most of us' react out of uninformed emotion. Many of us see what is blatantly wrong; there comes a time when you can't deny your gut. Should we wait it out while he perpetrates policies against the people? Like plenty of Germans waited it out with Hitler?
I have no problem declaring myself a detractor. I would bring in a leader with better qualities who WOULD work for us, AND defeat Obama at the same time.
I am not childish, selfish or short-sighted. I have children. I have grandchildren.
My hope is in a candidate like Bernie Sanders or Dennis Kucinich. I cannot hope in someone who has purposefully supported the ultra-wealthy when millions are suffering as I write? Is that what you call intelligent?
We cannot create Obama; we don't want him destroyed.
We do want new, effective leadership.
To AP News Guy:
And yes, Obama has and does support the oppressors on Wall Street. Have we seen him crack down on abusive practices? Who are his appointees but from the Street?
But aren't our public pension funds still buying in? Maybe you're an investor yourself. Where do you store your money that it doesn't support Wall Street? It even sounds like you're apologizing for the corrupt financial markets who caused the world to fall.
An inordinate 50% + of the U.S. budget goes to the military and wars, past and present.
Obama continues the public theft of the people's money that began in earnest 30 years ago, and that burgeoned astronomically under the darling of the right, George W. Bush, who initiated extravagant, deadly, devastating oil wars. Why can't anyone tea party speak to that travesty?
We, the people, finance the hugest of polluting companies, the oil oligarchies, the arms manufacturers, and you point out measly Solyndra, that failed because China undercut them. Where is your thinking?
The people's money is of, by and for them. But few speak up to demand that government fulfill its first and foremost obligation: the welfare of the people.
Why not try just that?
To Charlotte:
You begin by saying, "at least he is listening". OMG. Some of us are reduced to that, in free fall after believing in the guy who promised 'change'.

But you segue to hoping for someone in gov. who won't be bought. We have those people: Senator Bernie Sanders of VT, Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Indiana, former rep Russ Feingold of WI, others. Tune in on-line. Keep reading Nation of Change. You will find answers. We, the people, don't have to settle for the horror story we have, of one choice: right or more right.
As it stands, fascism is at the gate, and it's by and large the young, who have not lived through fascism, who are carrying the flag against it.
Read, and begin to speak and act. They can't do it alone.

zagnut

October 06, 2011 8:04pm

I'm not a Democrat, I'm an independent, so that makes two things you are wrong about. Sanders and Kucinich are not president and could never become president, so exactly how have you addressed my statement?

fuppeduck

October 06, 2011 7:17pm

In Europe, broadcast licenses require a tv or radio stations to donate equal air time to all registered candidates,at no cost as a condition of licensure. In the US, broadcast media can assuredly count on 100s of millions in ad revenue from a presidential election and even more from the lesser elections beyond that. Get the cash out of elections or we are doomed as a republic, and not only because with all the guns and ammo in general circulation in America, the doom won't end well.**This president is pwned** by his donors and an electoral system with rules that require huge amounts of cash to get in and win the game and all but sells the candidate's soul out from under them (assuming they had one to begin with) to whatever the donor wants. Its the root of the problem and anything less than radical restructure of the electoral process is closing the barn door after the horses have run off.

FeelinGroovy

October 06, 2011 6:40pm

Well stated, and I agree 100%. He could have put people to work repairing and upgrading the infrastructure. I voted for Obama, but I will not be voting for him again. I will vote my conscience for the this time. And, yes, it might be the Green Party.

zagnut

October 06, 2011 4:57pm

Why do some people who claim to understand the Federal Reserve's role in this persist in believing that Bernanke and Geithner were "Obama's choices?"

Who would that person be who you would have replace Obama, and how exactly would he make things better? Neither Obama nor your fantasy quarterback can be a firebrand without an army. In 2010 we had the opportunity to give him one, and stayed home from the poles instead. Quit complaining that he cannot achieve the impossible. Just another bad meme that works against your own best interest.

Kristine Osbakken

October 06, 2011 6:09pm

How entrenched you are, and how you cannot see the handwriting on the wall. Died in the wool Dem, I bet.
He got in through Wall Street money; but i expected more than Geithner, Summers et al.
Bernie Sanders, Dennis Kucinich understand and are speaking out. I'll vote for either. How about Pres and VP?
2010 was all about Obama selling out. He had not one, but two Dem houses, and decided to turn Republican. WHAT did you want people to do?
The army is taking to the streets, and they do not support our current president.

Will Murray

October 14, 2011 10:13pm

"Bernie Sanders, Dennis Kucinich understand and are speaking out. I'll vote for either. How about Pres and VP?"

There are NOT running in 2012!

"2010 was all about Obama selling out."

LOL...no, it was all about Americans wanting an immediate fix to literally the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression (which took the better part of 10 years & the start of a World War to end completely), which was completely & totally unrealistic, period.

Voting for the GOP now or in 2010 is just voting for more of their same, old, failed nonsensical policies. Too many people are too stupid for their own good...ugh...

zagnut

October 06, 2011 9:01pm

I'm not a Democrat, I'm an independent, so that makes two things you are wrong about. Sanders and Kucinich are not president and could never become president, so exactly how have you addressed my statements?

zagnut

October 06, 2011 8:59pm

Deleted post

Sky Wind

October 06, 2011 4:04pm

Central Banks are trying to enslave the world. The monetary system is obsolete, what can we all do about this? In this new age of social networking we have a better chance today of making change, where are the mass forums to discuss these issues?

Kristine Osbakken

October 06, 2011 6:11pm

Turning to the streets. And I just participated in a nation-wide call-in with bernie Sanders. It can only get bigger.

Bradford Nelson Bray

October 06, 2011 3:47pm

Here's the deal. Obama had a very small window, but a window nonetheless, to really give hurting America a jobs program, universal health care and housing program not unlike FDR in 1934 and following. He blew it!

He had a 10 million vote MANDATE to fix this broken country. He blew it. What we have gotten, as important as it is for those who have benefited, is too small, too piecemeal. Way too small in fact. Obama, it seems , was more concerned about his image as a "reconciler" across the political divide and ended up being hoodwinked. So we got a healthcare law that will enrich the insurance companies all the more and continue to see unabated soaring cost in premiums (mine went up 20% this year!).

Millions are still losing their homes with the worse of that crisis yet to come (though NO ONE is talking about that!). And we are still tax funding a 2 Billion dollar bill EACH WEEK on the war machine (and very few are talking about that fubar either!).

So, all in all, I rate Obama (I voted for him) as a near failure. Something close to a miracle will have to occur to get his base back (including myself) and REALLY help those who are twisting in the winds of Corporate Hell. I am not holding my breath, sorry to say. I will be voting Green Party this next time. The Democrats look and sound too much like the Money Baron Repugs. Disgusting.

Ap_News_Guy

October 06, 2011 2:56pm

You might like to comment on the President’s comments found in this article by the AP News wire:

"It expresses the frustrations that the American people feel that we had the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression, huge collateral damage all throughout the country, all across Main Street,” the president said.

“And yet you’re still seeing some of the same folks who acted irresponsibly trying to fight efforts to crack down on abusive practices that got us into this problem in the first place.”

Yes, you might like to comment on this, but Yahoo has taken away it's message boxes for people to comment on their articles. Your voice has been taken out of the social, global news by the idea bandits at Yahoo.

The frustration of conservatives expressed by the Tea Party’s non-violent, law abiding protests is that the “same folks who acted irresponsibly” towards efforts to crack down on abusive financial practices was the government itself and expressly Mr. Obama over the last three years.

The unwillingness of Congress to limit spending over the last half a century to the tune of 16 trillion dollars was the key factor in America not being able to take a 100 billion dollar hit in the financial markets. Mr. Obama’s spending above, beyond and escaping the utmost imaginations of our national debt ceiling has continued the downward economic cycle. To top that off he has expanded American war efforts in three countries, given billions away to foreign countries and financed irresponsible companies like Solyndra.

But remember, your observations are not welcome on Yahoo.

Will Murray

October 14, 2011 10:08pm

"in America not being able to take a 100 billion dollar hit in the financial markets."

LOL...that's not what happened in 2008, and, if you don'ty know that, I feel sory for you my friend.

"Mr. Obama’s spending above, beyond and escaping the utmost imaginations of our national debt ceiling has continued the downward economic cycle. To top that off he has expanded American war efforts in three countries, given billions away to foreign countries and financed irresponsible companies like Solyndra."

Wow, the entire debt ceiling issue this past summer was a completely phony issue that was pushed almost exclusively by the Tea Party. Obama has helped to bring the USA's involvement in Iraq to a close, which McCain certainly didn't want to do. The entire Solyndra nonsense is nothing but a red herring. That company's application started under the GWB Administration, and the money that was given to that one company was around 1% of the total amount of money spent in that federal program to promote more sustainable energy development. If around 99% of your own investment portfolio performed well, you wouldn't be complaining my friend.

Blaming the federal debt on Obama (when it was almost exclusively accumulated under GOP management) is simply ridiculous!

Kristine Osbakken

October 06, 2011 6:37pm

And yes, Obama has and does support the oppressors on Wall Street. Have we seen him crack down on abusive practices? Who are his appointees but from the Street?
But aren't our public pension funds still buying in? Maybe you're an investor yourself. Where do you store your money that it doesn't support Wall Street? It even sounds like you're apologizing for the corrupt financial markets who caused the world to fall.
An inordinate 50% + of the U.S. budget goes to the military and wars, past and present.
Obama continues the public theft of the people's money that began in earnest 30 years ago, and that burgeoned astronomically under the darling of the right, George W. Bush, who initiated extravagant, deadly, devastating oil wars. Why can't anyone tea party speak to that travesty?
We, the people, finance the hugest of polluting companies, the oil oligarchies, the arms manufacturers, and you point out measly Solyndra, that failed because China undercut them. Where is your thinking?
The people's money is of, by and for them. But few speak up to demand that government fulfill its first and foremost obligation: the welfare of the people.
Why not try just that?

I'm sorry to say I cannot agree that Mt. Obamas comments mean anything. This isnt happening In Egypt or Libya - it's happening in the country THAT HE'S PRESIDENT OF-and the putative leader. And he can only "comment" that he understands our frustration-and it's the 'same people' who are still causing it? Excuse me Mr. Obama-YOU are one of 'those people!' You were elected to effectuate the changes that would help RESOLVE these issues and problems. Instead, you've given away every bargaining chip and compromised us to WHERE WE ARE NOW. But once again, you seem to think you're a bystander. YOU ARE A HUGE PART OF THE PROBLEM! Stop 'commenting' - grow some and start LEADING. Like you were hired to do.

Kx Russell's picture
Kx Russell

October 06, 2011 2:16pm

Yip.

Ohsotired

October 06, 2011 1:55pm

Good call Maya. It is all to easy to be an armchair quarterback and find fault with whatever is said or done...and then again, as we both know, it is impossible to please everyone. I too, appreciate his reserve.

I believe that the culture of disrespect that has been cultivated by the opposition has made it extremely difficult to get the things done that need doing. Especially without the support of the people. Too many times, and I'm guilty myself, we've said...'why doesn't he do something?'

Let's think about this...he has zero support for any initiative from the GOP and even has trouble marshalling his own party. Why? Let's just say that big money and lack of vocal support by the people can build a fairly impenetrable wall. Without pressuring our local representatives we cannot build the kind of support he needs.

Keep the movement going!

Kristine Osbakken

October 06, 2011 6:40pm

Sounds like you're coming from an armchair yourself.

Annebonnie

October 06, 2011 1:45pm

The Federal Reserve and the entire system is why this has happened. Agree with Maya above - I have not agreed with most of his choices to give in to the thugs that want to destroy us and that he has waited almost too long. However, destroying him or anyone else will not accomplish anything. At least he is listening. Maybe he did wait too long to make this statement but he has at least paid attention and considered what is happening. Saying that we need a new leader and that he did it all wrong is unproductive and who would that new leader be. We DO, however need someone who cannot be bought under any circumstances. That is the real issue here - what leader will take a position and not be swayed by the dollar going in his/her pocket. If our entire system of government is being bought like they are now then we are doomed. I pray that is not the case.

Kristine Osbakken

October 06, 2011 6:52pm

You begin by saying, "at least he is listening". OMG. Some of us are reduced to that, in free fall after believing in the guy who promised 'change'.

But you segue to hoping for someone in gov. who won't be bought. We have those people: Senator Bernie Sanders of VT, Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Indiana, former rep Russ Feingold of WI, others. Tune in on-line. Keep reading Nation of Change. You will find answers. We, the people, don't have to settle for the horror story we have, of one choice: right or more right.
As it stands, fascism is at the gate, and it's by and large the young, who have not lived through fascism, who are carrying the flag against it.
Read, and begin to speak and act. They can't do it alone.

Kx Russell's picture
Kx Russell

October 06, 2011 2:21pm

THis is probably why the people who support Kucinich & Paul support them. They are not in the pockets of any lobbyists or corporate interests. Ron Paul takes no PAC money. This is why in 2008 during the Presidential debates you couldn't hear them. They were shut down. At least now RP has a better shot. He & Kucinich met this week on TV with Nader & agreed on many points of handling this situation.

Todd Hathaway

October 06, 2011 1:25pm

Check out http://occupyearth.tv - party in D.C. on October 28th @ 7 p.m., 5425 39TH ST NW, Washington, DC 20015. Email occupyearth2012@gmail.com for more information.

The true problem is that we're still using an obsolete economy, one that uses money and is a contradiction to the term "economy," and also that most people can't seem to wake up and understand that the very institution of government is also entirely obsolete. Should the majority educate themselves on the proposals and concepts of The Venus Project ( www.thevenusproject.com ), we would be a much happier people. Indeeed, a resource-based economy is the only logical solution, and it is very difficult to think otherwise once you know what it is.

Anthony A. Capo...

October 06, 2011 1:10pm

President Obama is not the problem. The problem is that our elected officials are being bought/controlled by Big business who in a sense are truly running our government. What has to be done is that a clean sweep of our present government must be undertaken now, and a replacement government must be put in place. The only thing that stands in the way of that happening, is that there are no people out there who cannot be tempted by money, etc. Meanwhile, I'm hoping that if there's truly a "Second Coming", then let it take place now!

Dave Brillig

October 06, 2011 1:22pm

Obama got over a million dollars from Goldman Sachs for his 2008 campaign.

Obama got over a million dollars from Goldman Sachs for his 2008 campaign.

Obama got over a million dollars from Goldman Sachs for his 2008 campaign.

Will Murray

October 14, 2011 9:56pm

...and the GOP got over a million Dollars from Goldman in 2010.

BTW, Obama got only $44,750 from Goldman in 2008...you're lying! Mitt Romney gets consistently more from Goldman than anyone else since 2008.

http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/toprecips.php?id=d000000085&type=P&sort=...

Maya Bohnhoff

October 06, 2011 12:50pm

Before "we" bring anything down, we need to build something up. It's also too simplistic to blame all our problems on one person and think that somehow just swapping one president for another will solve them.

Do you blame the President for not jumping on the OWS bandwagon immediately? I don't. I'm pleased that he's a leader who actually takes the time to assess things before he weighs in or, worse, ACTS on them. The last thing we need in the White House is a leader who reacts the way most of us seem to—out of raw, uninformed emotion. We can say stupid things, even commit stupid acts and scuff our feet and apologize after the fact.

Our president shouldn't.

As much as I disagree with some of the compromises he's made, I understand why he made them. He thought the "other side" was negotiating in good faith, when they weren't. He gave them the benefit of the doubt, IMO, too long.

I don't want him out, but I would like him to recognize that the agenda of his detractors—for whatever reasons—is not to bring in better policies, or work for us—the American people—or even to simply have another chance to do better. Their goal is simply to defeat Obama. That's not a worthy goal. It's a childish, selfish and short-sighted one.

I hope this is a return of the purposeful, intelligent man we elected.

Put your efforts into creating something, not destroying someone.

Kristine Osbakken

October 06, 2011 7:17pm

Did he take the time when he decided to eliminate two American citizens with NO charges against them last week? Did he take the time when he decided it's OK to fund governments that hire child soldiers? To throw 30,000 more soldiers into Afghanistan? To keep Guantanamo open? ETC.
We can't create him; he is his own creation. How often have you seen him negotiate? How often capitulate?.
I don't feel 'most of us' react out of uninformed emotion. Many of us see what is blatantly wrong; there comes a time when you can't deny your gut. Should we wait it out when he perpetrates policies against the people? Like plenty of Germans waited it out with Hitler?
I have no problem declaring myself a detractor. I would bring in a leader with better qualities who WOULD work for us, AND defeat Obama at the same time.
I am not childish, selfish or short-sighted. I have children. I have grandchildren.
My hope is in a candidate like Bernie Sanders or Dennis Kucinich. I cannot hope in someone who has purposefully supported the ultra-wealthy. Is that intelligence when millions are suffering as I write? Is that intelligent?
We cannot create Obama; we don't want him destroyed.
We do want new, effective leadership.

Will Murray

October 14, 2011 9:53pm

"To throw 30,000 more soldiers into Afghanistan?"

Yes, he did take the time.

"To keep Guantanamo open?"

LOL...he signed an executive order to end the Gitmo torture prison on his first day in office, and then Congress proceeded to undermine him on it. That's NOT his fault at all.

"Should we wait it out when he perpetrates policies against the people? Like plenty of Germans waited it out with Hitler?"

That's sheer crazy talk.

"My hope is in a candidate like Bernie Sanders or Dennis Kucinich"

...and they are NOT running for President of the USA in 2012...Obama is & we need to re-elect him...and we will!

Pikewich

October 06, 2011 12:29pm

Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice, shame on me.

Only during the election cycle does this man tell us what we want to hear.

Kx Russell's picture
Kx Russell

October 06, 2011 2:17pm

Yip.

Dave Brillig

October 06, 2011 1:23pm

INDEED.

Dan

October 06, 2011 12:19pm

We need a new leader. Starting from the top, that would be, um, Obama. He appointed Geithner, instituted the Bush-Obama Tax Plan for Rick Folk, etc. Now he's acting all "bystanderish" about the Wall Street events. Get him out of there! I don't want him there.

Thomas McKee

October 06, 2011 1:13pm

How moronic!

Chris Steeg

October 06, 2011 12:01pm

I say we start higher up the pyramid and we bring down the Federal Reserve Banking System! THAT'S what got us into this mess in the beginning!

Kristine Osbakken

October 06, 2011 7:18pm

Sounds good! Look to Bernie Sanders!

Kx Russell's picture
Kx Russell

October 06, 2011 2:18pm

+1

Dave Brillig

October 06, 2011 1:33pm

You're one of the few who understand this.

Low interest rates encourage people to make bad investment decisions.

Not only low income folk buying a house, but big business people buying and selling crazy investments they don't understand and can't afford, leveraging their companies 30 to 1, etc.

If we want to understand how everybody including the gov't spent so much money and got so far in debt, look at the interest rates which have been near zero since 2001.

End the Fed, and we'll end the boom & bust business cycle that put us here.