Privatization Madness: Now Private Companies are Collecting Our Taxes
I went into my local township building Monday to settle up my local income tax bill. I had filed for an extension of my federal and state taxes back in April (call it my "Romney extension), because of my father’s unexpected death a few weeks before the tax filing date and the need to deal with his funeral and with arranging for care for my widowed mother, who has Alzheimer’s, had taken up all my time.
I paid my local tax bill on time though, because at 1 percent of income it is a relatively small amount and was easy to get out of the way. I just made a rough estimate and dropped a check with the one-page form in the mail, figuring I’d settle the amount due after my federal taxes were completed. So, after finally getting my federal and state taxes done, I went to the town hall to settle up. It turned out I’d overpaid my local taxes by $165.
Ordinarily if I’ve overpaid my local tax, for example by paying too much in the four required estimated tax payments, the township simply applies the overpayment to my next tax year’s estimated payment. Not so this year. I was told that the collection of taxes by all the townships in Montgomery County had been privatized -- taken over by a private accountancy firm called Berkheimer Tax Administrator, a company expressly created to bid for outsourced collection operations of local towns, school districts and counties, for a fee.
The immediate problem for me resulting from this astonishing privatization of a fundamental local government activity -- the collection of taxes -- was that the local township office said they could not credit my overpayment as before. “Berkheimer is in charge of the money,” a township official told me, “and they will send you a check for the overpayment.”
“But that means I will be late in filing the first two quarterly estimated payments for 2012,” I said, adding, “but I’m really not late, because they already have my money!”
“You’ll have to call Berkheimer,” she told me. “We can’t do anything about it.”
After calling Berkheimer (and waiting through 15 minutes of listening to god-awful Muzak), I finally got a tele-clerk, who told me that there was nothing she could do. I would be issued a check for the overpayment, and would be charged a late fee for my late quarterly payments. She said I could write and explain about my father’s death and see if they could “do anything,” but she didn’t sound optimistic. I’m not either, and I sure don’t want to go through any more of those 15-minute Muzak experiences (which seem calculated to deter callers)!
I learned that for taking over the role of collecting my taxes for my local town, Berkheimer gets paid 1.39 percent of whatever taxes it collects. That’s a pretty cushy deal, given that nearly all of the local taxes collected ($6.4 million a year, in the case of my town), are automatically withheld by employers and then paid over to the taxing authority -- in this case Berkheimer. Talk about a cushy arrangement: $13,900 for every $1 million in taxes mailed in by employers! Even where it comes to self-employed taxpayers like me, it’s not a hard job. Send me a tax bill once a quarter, and book the check when I send back the payment coupon and a check. (Except that Berkheimer can’t even do that right: they’ve been sending out estimated tax forms in envelopes that say nothing about local tax documents, and that just have Berkheimer in the return address, leading most people, like me, to toss them out as junk mail solicitation letters from some accountancy firm trolling for clients.)
This tax privatization business is sure nice work if you can get it. And Berkheimer got it because the professional association of CPAs in the state lobbied the Pennsylvania state legislature heavily in 2009 to get a law passed mandating (got that? mandating!) that all townships in each county in the state get together and hire one organization to collect all their taxes. My county, Montgomery County PA, which opposed the bill, hired Berkheimer. So did a lot of other counties. The company, created expressly to capitalize on the new law, has 17 offices dotted around the state according to their website, to collect the taxes for hundreds of towns, school districts and other local entities.
How much are they getting paid in total for all this “work”? That would be hard to ascertain. The company is private, and is not subject to any sunshine laws. Think about that a minute! Local taxation has always been one of the bright spots of open government...until now. You could go into the registrar’s office and find out what someone’s house was taxed, or find out exactly what taxes were being paid by a local company. Since no government agency is monitoring Berkheimer’s activities or those of other similar privatizers of the tax collection business, though, doing that kind of research now is almost an impossible task. It's a crime wave waiting to happen. A reporter or auditor trying to dig up this information would have to go to each taxing authority to find out how much their residents and local businesses owed in taxes each year, and then find out how much of a percentage cut Berkheimer was getting in that county for collecting all that money (the local jurisdictions got together in each county as an adhoc committee to negotiate a deal with the company, but good luck locating anyone from that committee who’d be able to tell what the terms were.) I lucked out: The chair of the committee in my county was the township manager for Montgomeryville, PA, and he gave me the 1.39% figure.
Now the proponents of privatization always argue that it is a more efficient way of doing things than having “overpaid” public employees do that job, so I wondered: is this privatization of a basic function of local government saving money? I called the tax collection office at my town and asked Ed Shay, the head of that office. “Well, they’re laying off two people this year,” he said. “One of them is me. I’m gone at the end of December.” That’s two employees, and possibly a third after the transition is completed sometime next year.
Jonathan Bleemer, Finance Director for Upper Dublin, says that the township, which also opposed the new state law, estimates that prior to this mandated privatization, it had been paying about $125,000 a year for the staff that collects the annual $6.4 million in town income tax receipts. At 1.39%, Berkheimer will be doing the same job for just shy of $90,000. That $35,000 difference might seem like a small savings, at least, but as Bleemer points out, the township has been very aggressive about pursuing delinquent taxpayers. “Will Berkheimer be as effective at that part of the job?” he asks. “We don’t know. They still only get the same 1.39% for collecting from delinquent taxpayers, which is not very good compensation since it’s a harder job, but it’s what we’re stuck with by the state law.” (Remember, if the diligent “overpaid” public tax department workers chased down and collected just one corporate delinquent taxpayer’s bill of $35,000 in a year, they’d have broken even with Berkheimer.)
He also agreed that he had heard a lot of reports from residents about poor service from Berkheimer. Big surprise that. Who is Berkheimer's customer? Not the taxpayers. It’s the townships that hire them who are their customers. Why should they be nice to the taxpayers?
As the soon-to-be-furloughed tax director Shay added, “It’s always better if your tax collector is closer to the people paying the taxes.” He explained that this proximity makes it easier to catch cheating, and also easier to help taxpayers when there are problems (like mine). Just one example: figuring out one’s local tax bill can be complicated -- for example, someone who works in nearby Philadelphia, and pays a 4% tax to that city, can have that payment deducted from the local bill, thus wiping out any local tax completely, but this can be hard for a number-challenged resident. The friendly tax staff at the township were always happy to do the work right in front of you at the counter -- for free. Berkheimer isn’t even located near the township, and offers only a website to work with.
So what’s ahead? Republican legislatures are mandating privatized tax collection for local taxing authorities. We already have privatized prisons, privatized schools, privatized highways, and privatized police. Will things move upwards now to the state and federal level? How long before the Berkheimer-type companies are collecting our state taxes? And with some Republicans pushing for an end to the IRS, how long before some Berkheimer clone gets the gig for collecting our federal taxes?
By then, I would suspect that when you call the company with a complaint about your taxes, you’ll get someone with a strong Indian accent calling him or herself Richard or Marilyn answering from a phone center in Bangalore.
CONNECT













6 comments on "Privatization Madness: Now Private Companies are Collecting Our Taxes"
October 21, 2012 10:44am
The Constitution provides for a means of making money through numismatics, not too complicated (e.g. Bernard von Nothaus). Look at what the Old Guard has done to this. Hear of an audit for the Fed? Anyhow, the Constitution provides statutes and regulations that not one person understands, or so it seems. Check out Larkin Rose, for what it is worth (Theft by Deception). Within the guidelines of the same, there is a provision past statehood, for a voluntary tax for the nation.
I know, ecologically, the nation-state is what is being thrown into the volcano with the princess, but don't you think our election process should be fixed to provide for law and ecology, the idea of a paper trail since all computers do is copy, serially and parallel, as easy to edit as this comment?
Oh, oops, I mean evolution instead of law and ecology, that fertile notion for learning, but now, a four letter word. Strange. Too many dark attractors, basins for chaotic generation. Bateson's psychology might be a different place to get a wash, if you get my drift? (There is a dirty stream where way too many are washing... Just what makes this stream dirty and have you been made 'whole' in it, yet, or unfortunately?) Too much.
Where is Indira Singh, William Binney?
Lew:
http://libertycrier.com/finance/lew-rockwell-explains-how-the-federal-re...
Life has become the target instead of the object.
October 21, 2012 8:45am
Hmmm
Taxation or in this tax collection without representation and complete transparancy is TYRANNY!!!!! There were 3 main reasons why the revolution took place; Tariffs, taxs and control of the currency. And sadly today the common man has no more say or control over any of these than when the crown was ripping of the Colonists. Private bankers control the money, private companies control the voting and tax collecting, and the Congress answers only to the 1% regarding trade and tariffs. In short the American people are right back where they were in 1770!!!!!!!
October 21, 2012 5:39am
Welcome to the brave new world of capitalist ideology that has total faith that anything done by private industry will always be done more cheaply and efficiently (notice I did not write "effectively") than by government. I lived in a suburb of Pittsburgh in the early 2000's. At that time, the suburb had already privatized its tax collection, but it was at least to a local company with local people providing a reasonable level of service and responsiveness.
Things such as tax collection are only the tip of the privatization iceberg. I've just finished chapter 5 of Matt Taibbi's book Griftopia. Matt exposes that many public infrastructure projects and assets are being secretly privatized, compromising long term public revenue in order for government officials to cover shortfalls in their budgets. Based on Taibbi's investigations, it appears that in many cases even the officials of the departments or agencies responsible for the government assets don't know about it until it is a done deal or else they are handed a contract at the last minute and ordered by higher ups to sign without having the terms explained to them. Often, the amount negotiated to obtain the one time funding is just a small fraction of the total value of the cash flow from the government project or asset that the privatizer purchases. Government officials are selling off chunks of public assets at pennies on the dollar, often to foreign interests (including Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds) fronted by the same glorious financial institutions that brought us the 2008-09 economic meltdown and the Great Recession.
One interesting case in point, also from Pennsylvania just like the tax privatization, is that the revenue stream from the PA Turnpike tolls was almost secretly sold off in 2009 to a consortium of Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds fronted by Morgan Stanley. Having driven the PA Turnpike many times and knowing how difficult maintaining it is, I can just imagine what the conditions would become when a privatizer gets to both increase tolls and reduce spending on maintenance in order to increase profitability. The deal was eventually killed, but it is probably sitting quietly on someone’s agenda, waiting for an opening to be proposed again.
Morgan Stanley was also apparently heavily involved in representing undisclosed investors for the purchase of the rights to 75 years of parking meter revenue in Chicago. Initially, the purchaser appeared to be US investors, but shortly after the deal was completed, the initial investors sold out their interests to a fund heavily invested in by Middle Eastern countries. Among the things the privatizers did first were: raise the parking fees; extend the hours and days people have to pay for parking; and demand that any community organizations or people wanting to hold street fairs or other community events on the public right of way reimburse the new owner of the parking meters for the lost meter revenue during the event. According to Taibbi's book, if that last policy hasn't changed, it means elimination of any neighborhood or community street activities in the areas where the meters are privatized. Even worse, Taibbi reports that people who have independently analyzed the parking meter privatization deal calculate that the price the City of Chicago received was close to $1 billion too low at a minimum, and that was before the new owner of the parking meters raised the fees.
(NOTE: If you are from Chicago, please feel free to correct any errors of fact that I've made, especially if you were not one of the people who negotiated the parking meter sell out. I am recapping from information I've read in Taibbi's book, Griftoppia. I'm willing to risk relying on his statements as being factual, because every time I've researched the statements and positions he has presented in his other writings, my research showed that he had his facts correct.)
BTW - Mayor Daley's conclusion on this deal was that local and state governments should privatize everything they can think of.
Other cities are going ahead with similar parking meter privatization deals, often just as secretly as Chicago apparently did. Governments are also doing these kinds of deals for highways, airports, parking garages, and other assets. Pretty much anything for which there is even the remotest potential to charge a use fee to create a revenue stream. (The city where I now live did a privatized parking garage which has become generally viewed as a lose-lose-win situation. Lose for the taxpayers, lose for the city, win for the privatized developer & operator.) It seems that most of the investors in these privatization deals are Middle Eastern and Asian sovereign wealth funds using money that we provided through job outsourcing and importing (in the case of Asian countries) or higher, speculator driven oil prices (in the case of Middle Eastern countries). All are fronted by the investment arms of companies like JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and others. Most, if not all, are using secrecy, shell front companies, and nominee investors to hide the true identity of the actual buyers. At least when Japanese investors caused the American public to think we might have had a lot to worry about in the 1970s and 1980s as they were buying numerous properties that were highly visible symbols of corporate America, they were up front about it and didn’t try as hard to hide the fact that the buyers were Japanese. Now, thanks to collusion between government officials and investment bankers, we as consumers and members of the tax paying public may never find out who really owns the country. The one thing we will know is that it isn’t us.
October 20, 2012 1:24pm
"We know now that Government by organized money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob."---FDR, October 31, 1936
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
October 20, 2012 10:16am
Here's another way to look at it. The city decided to take in 1.39% less in taxes to save, maybe, $35,000. I will even wager that soon these private collection companies will be setting tax rates.
Privatization of public infrastructure and public services has been a nightmare. Examples: Public parking and toll roads. Rates have skyrocketed because the companies cannot "make" a profit. Private prisons only make money when they are full. Privatized public schools are not able to make a profit without major inflows of public money.
It has long been proven that prices go up with every hand that touches a product. It has long been proven that quality of service goes down when you put more layers between management and the customer. As we have seen over the past 30 years, government pays much more than it needs to for contracted goods and services, taxpayers pay more and make due with less.
October 20, 2012 8:50am
Good reporting! Thanks!