Protecting Political Insiders from Our First Amendment
Ah, it's almost August — time for another quadrennial flowering of America's glorious democratic process, otherwise known as the presidential nominating conventions!
This grand testimonial of our citizens' rights and liberties will begin with the Republicans in Tampa, Fla. Flags are being mounted, majestic music is arranged, uplifting speeches are being scripted — and, as has now become normal for these spectacles of democracy-in-action, heavily armed police repression of our cherished First Amendment rights is being ordered.
Of course, the delegates, candidates, lobbyists and billionaire funders inside the GOP's convention bunker will be perfectly free (as they should be) to gild the promises and lies that will frame their presidential campaign. They will not be bothered by the riot-geared police authorities deployed around Tampa. However, any citizens who come to practice the hallowed freedoms of public assembly and speech can expect to be welcomed by a thoroughly un-American, weeklong police state.
In May, at the behest of national Republican officials, Tampa's mayor and council passed a temporary ordinance to suspend our First Amendment and authorize a crackdown on protestors. Warning ominously that a few vandals might get out of control, the ordinance tries to force all citizen demonstrations into a few restricted parade routes and what amounts to "protest pens." Pre-emptive detainments, indiscriminate mass arrests and police infiltrations of peaceful protest groups can be expected. Ironically, that's the kind of autocratic excess that led to the American Revolution itself.
The city's top lawyer recently barked that "troublemakers ... will not be tolerated." But the real troublemakers are those inside the hall — and inside a police system that's being used to stomp on the very freedoms that America is supposed to embrace and encourage.
One of the juiciest ironies of Tampa's newly minted law to suppress protest at the upcoming Republican National Convention is that it bans the carrying of water pistols by protestors. However, thanks to Florida's nutty right-wing governor, anyone with a concealed-weapon permit is free to tote an actual bullet-firing pistol throughout the proceedings! Apparently, the authorities really do consider blood to be thicker than water.
Even nuttier is the fantasy of convention organizers that they can lock down the feisty and essential American spirit of political protest with a rash of ridiculous liberty-repressing laws. Among their ordinances is a directive that thousands of demonstrators squeeze their public expressions into short "parade routes" and out-of-the-way "viewing areas." This is as futile as King George III demanding 225 years ago that American revolutionaries march into battle by lining up in neat rows to be shot down by his Redcoats.
A spokesman for one protest group says flatly that its members will pick their own spots to assemble and have their say: "We (Americans) were born with the right to move freely from place to place and speak our minds," he rightly points out. Also, a poor people's coalition is setting up a "Romneyville" on private property in Tampa, providing what it calls "a kind of refuge" against the government's attempt to box in its protest of official policies that are increasing poverty all across America.
The opposite of courage is not cowardice, it's conformity. What makes America great are courageous folks like these who refuse to go along with authoritarians and elites who always demand that we surrender our most basic liberties to protect them from speech they don't want to hear. To keep up with this never-ending battle of rights versus wrong, go to the National Lawyers Guild's website at nlg.org.
CONNECT














14 comments on "Protecting Political Insiders from Our First Amendment"
July 26, 2012 8:17pm
At the DNC in Denver in 2008, it looked similar to this. The sidewalks were completely fenced to the roads. They kept protestors in pens and had expensive partys for "important" people. I saw bus loads of police in riot gear, who were not there to protect the people's rights.
The Republicans & Democrats, and their handlers, are the same.
July 25, 2012 4:24pm
St. Paul, MN had made it illegal for 2 or more people to walk togeher on a public street in downtown St Paul for the GOP convention in 2008. So let the hypocrits talk about protecting Citizens' rights.
The GOP for the most part is a party of liars. Where is our freedom to peacefully assemble? Our right to speak freely? And what of our unalienable rights of Life, Liberty, and be able to pursuit happiness? I guess the pigs are more equal that the horses, sheep, cows, and other barnyard animals.
July 25, 2012 4:17pm
Rmember the great odessey of Dorothy and Toto where-in she met manifestations of the American Peoples in the forms of the Lion , the Scarecrow and the Tin Man. The wicked witch of the west who was intent on destroying everything good in the world was wearing a bulletproof cape, but had an issue with water. The cancervatives are afraid of getting their make-up washed away and being exposed for the nothingness that they are.
July 25, 2012 4:09pm
I have a question: How/why aren't water pistols and/or water rifles and/or water assault guns covered by the 2nd Amendment? I don't believe there were specifications on the material the gun must be made out of to qualify for 2nd amendment protection. I do not remember the US Constitution putting requirements that the ammo has to contain lead. Well, even still, if you used municipal water, that would meet that qualification. The only problem I could see is the toxicity of the water.
Someone needs to call the NRA. The GOP's trying to take our guns. The GOP is infringing upon our rights to defend ourselves. HELP US NRA. We need and love our (water) guns.
July 25, 2012 4:04pm
In other words, leave the water pistols at home - bring the assault rifles?
Its a shame they are now the state of "SHOOT FIRST - ASK QUESTIONS LATER"
Good old GOP - still at it!
July 25, 2012 3:21pm
I'm far away geographically, but if some feisty citizen organizes a supersoaker batallion, I'll be right with you in spirit!
July 25, 2012 2:31pm
Why does this kind of display of power complete with Majestic music and suppression of protest remind me of Germany in the 1930's? hmmm
July 25, 2012 2:09pm
mayor is evil he should let the delegates get beaten up
July 26, 2012 9:02am
Mayor good. He stomp out aqua army! Heil!
July 25, 2012 1:47pm
Alas, I have some Republican relatives in the Tampa area and they'll probably be cheering every televised slam against the President from the mean mouths at the podium inside the convention center. If there are any protestors against the 1% and their lackeys inside the center, they must be imported from other places in the U.S., because the Solid South votes happily against their own interests nowadays because they can't abide a black man in the White House. (But hush, you can't say that out loud!)
They really banned water pistols in the gun-happy locale? Your good old "liberty-loving" GOP protecting the plutocrats against vicious water spurts from the restless plebes!
July 25, 2012 1:38pm
In Philadelphia, during the 2000 gop converntion, a Democratic Mayor, ed rendell, allowed the police, led by timoney, to stomp on free speech and the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. They went so far as to arrest an individual, 10 blocks from any demonstrations, for possessionof an instrument of crime. The instrument was a cell phone. How's that for "Let Freedom Ring"?
July 25, 2012 12:05pm
Flags will fly with bunting hung
"America, the Beautiful," will be sung
Cigars, champagne, balloons galore
As gilded feet stomp quaking floor
The orators with tongues like axes
Will "whet" the throng denouncing taxes
They'll tout our "freedoms" once again
With "Democracy" confined to pen
July 26, 2012 8:58am
Well said!! Poe would be proud!
July 25, 2012 11:17am
In case you have not noticed, Mr. Hightower, GOP are very "sensitive" people. The 99%ers water pistols are more powerful than their guns. That is how I see the legal ramification of the situation.