Record Ocean Temperatures Recorded Off New England Coast

Bob Berwyn
Climate Progress / News Report
Published: Sunday 23 September 2012
“The warm waters led to the earliest, most intense and longest-lasting plankton bloom on record, with implications for marine life, from the smallest creatures to the largest marine mammals like whales.”
Article image

Federal ocean scientists said this year’s sea surface temperatures along the northeast coast of the U.S. set all-time records, with as-yet unknown consequences for marine ecosystems.

Above-average temperatures were found in all parts of the ecosystem, from the ocean bottom to the sea surface and across the region, and the above average temperatures extended beyond the shelf break front to the Gulf Stream, according to an ecosystem advisory issued by NOAA’s Northeast Fisheries Science Center.

The warm waters led to the earliest, most intense and longest-lasting plankton bloom on record, with  implications for marine life, from the smallest creatures to the largest marine mammals like whales. Atlantic cod continued to shift northeastward from its historic distribution center.

“A pronounced warming event occurred on the Northeast Shelf this spring, and this will have a profound impact throughout the ecosystem,” said Kevin Friedland, a scientist in the NEFSC’s Ecosystem Assessment Program. “Changes in ocean temperatures and the timing of the spring plankton bloom could affect the biological clocks of many marine species, which spawn at specific times of the year based on environmental cues like water temperature.”

Friedland said the average sea surface temperature exceeded 51 degrees during the first half of 2012, topping the previous record high set in 1951.The average sea surface temperature the past three decades has ranged around 48 degrees.

Temperatures climbed even higher than that in some near-shore locations like Delaware Bay and Chesapeake Bay, where sea surface temperature readings were more than 6 degrees above historical average and more than 5 degrees above average at the seafloor.

In deeper offshore waters to the north, bottom waters were 2 degrees warmer in the eastern Gulf of Maine and more than 3.6 degrees warmer in the western Gulf of Maine.

This year’s record-high ocean temperatures are a spike in a long-term trend that is push many commercial fish farther north and east in a response to ecosystem warming.

A 2009 study of data from 1968 to 2007 found that about half of the 36 fish stocks studied in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean have been shifting northward over the past four decades, with some disappearing from US waters as they move farther offshore.

Friedland said that, although cod didn’t shift as much as other species like hake in the 2009 study, the effects of warming water on ocean currents and other ocean circulation patterns could change that.

“Cod distribution continues to be dynamic, with northerly shifts detected in the spring 2012 data, consistent with a response to ecosystem warming,” Friedland said. “The big question is whether or not these changes will continue, or are they a short-term anomaly?”

Mike Fogarty, who heads the Ecosystem Assessment Program, says the abundance of cod and other finfish is controlled by a complex set of factors, and that increasing temperatures in the ecosystem make it essential to monitor the distribution of many species, some of them migratory and others not.

“A complex combination of factors influence ocean conditions, and it isn’t always easy to understand the big picture when you are looking at one specific part of it at one specific point in time, “Fogarty said. “We now have information from a variety of sources collected over a long period of time on the ecosystem, and are continually adding more data to clarify specific details. The data clearly show a relationship between all of these factors.”

The 2012 spring plankton bloom, one of the longest duration and most intense in recent history, started at the earliest date recorded since the ocean color remote sensing data series began in 1998. In some locations, the spring bloom began in February, and was fully developed by March in all areas except Georges Bank, which had an average although variable spring bloom. The 2012 spring bloom in the Gulf of Maine began in early March, the earliest recorded bloom in that area.

“What this early start means for the Northeast Shelf ecosystem and its marine life is unknown,” Fogarty said. “What is known is that things are changing, and we need to continue monitoring and adapting to these changes.”

Plankton samples are collected six times a year in each of the four subareas of the Northeast Shelf: the Middle Atlantic Bight, Southern New England, Georges Bank, and the Gulf of Maine. EcoMon scientists also collect water samples and other oceanographic data about conditions during each season in each of the four areas to provide a long-term view of changing conditions on the Shelf.

Ecosystem advisories have been issued twice a year by the NEFSC’s Ecosystems Assessment Program since 2006 as a way to routinely summarize overall conditions in the region. The reports show the effects of changing coastal and ocean temperatures on fisheries from Cape Hatteras to the Canadian border. The advisories provide a snapshot of the ecosystem for the fishery management councils and also a broad range of stakeholders from fishermen to researchers.

The Spring 2012 Ecosystem Advisory with supporting information is available online. To access, click here.



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange
ABOUT Bob Berwyn

Bob Berwyn is the Editor of Summit County Citizens Voice. This piece was originally published at Summit Voice and was reprinted with permission.

Top Stories

14 comments on "Record Ocean Temperatures Recorded Off New England Coast"

anono

September 23, 2012 2:47pm

Look on the bright side. Those who survive the great tribulation ahead will have gained so much more insight and wisdom in applying the insight and wisdom of millenium past of balancing and maintaining eco-systems. Our Elder Brothers to the south have lived in that balance for thousands of years. They are the meek that shall inherit the New Earth after evil has devoured itself for its own sake and the New Vision of God rules in the hearts of Man. Rejoice, even as the storm clouds darken the sky, for the rains will bring New Life.

Errol J Lima

September 23, 2012 5:56pm

yes .. the warming will grow more plankton to produce oxygen on this 3rd dirt ball from SOL in the MW galaxy.. the devils PERMANENT prison home and those that worship its agenda.. LUKE 4.7.. and meanwhile as MALACHI 4 & REVELATION 16 unfold.. there are 2 options for the 'meek' before their REVELATION 20.12 encounter .. and they are.. LUKE 19.27 or MATTHEW 27.5.. to escape into the rest of the universe with all the 'worthy' ones ..REVELATION 21.7 .. because by now you should know all about JOHN 14.2

Factkneader

September 23, 2012 11:07pm

These religonuts obviously ignore the eight different passages in the New Testament where Jesus himself in bright red print says he will return IN THE FIRST CENTURY AD !! (Actually the zero century). Since this obviously didn't occur, why bother with the rest of the nonsense in this much over-credited collection of mythology, folk tales, propaganda and distorted history?

River Rat

September 23, 2012 7:50pm

Huh? Are we on the same page here? We're talking climate change, not religion. Perhaps you could find a more receptive audience elsewhere.

ChetDude

September 23, 2012 1:00pm

Unfortunately the Duopoly-supported polluters of the fossil fool industry don't read this blog...

Both right-wings of the Corporate War Party are pushing more fossil fueled insanity during the current (s)Election cycle...

Ang Gree's picture
Ang Gree

September 23, 2012 12:13pm

typical Liberal Media! so, how do they measure these so-called temperatures? do they use Conservative thermometers? Liberal Scientist Elites always use their own government-approved instruments, but are they approved by noted Science Experts like Senator James Inhofe? huh? are they? ...I thought not!

Sunflowerbio

September 24, 2012 2:42pm

Todd Aiken is on the House Science Committee. He approved these thermometers along with the "legitimate" rape shutdown mechanism.

Factkneader

September 23, 2012 2:51pm

REPLY: the Inhofe thermometer for conservatives is best used rectally as it must be placed under the tongue!

RealityBites

September 23, 2012 12:58pm

The temp is rising due to the hot air expelled by all the republicans in DC drifting north like an enormous fart.

jeltez42

September 23, 2012 12:10pm

Since disasterous global warming theories have been around for at least 100 years, it would be a safe guess to make that back in 1951 people were thinking sea temps were going to keep going up and up. Yet they cooled, went up, cooled and went up again. It will get warmer and it will get colder. This is a given. What we cannot do is set the global thermostat on Goldielocks. This cyclical cooling/warming is NORMAL. A steady climate is not normal.

Like it or not, the climate and environmental systems on this planet are going to change. Those that can adapt will survive. Now ask yourself why there are so many migratory species on this planet. The short answer is to spread out the impact they have on ecosystems. We also have proof the the damage done by non-migratory species who occupy the same space over decades or hundreds of years. I am not all that worried about cod moving to cooler waters as their old habitat will get a rest from the strain they put on it. Mother Nature, or just plain old evoultion kills off species and creates new ones to take their place. The new species uses different types of resources and thus can keep a balance. This seemingly has worked well for billions of years. Now humans think they are smarter and more powerful than billions of years old systems. Maybe if humans can survive another 200,000 years.

We cannot and should not try and control the Earth's dynamic systems. All we should and can do is minimized our impact on them and use resources sparingly.

River Rat

September 23, 2012 8:09pm

Your problem, JELTEZ42, is that you choose to view the issue thru the bias of your personal wishes and not the scientific view.
It's been said many, many times before but in the hopes you can hear it this time ....
The amount of CO2 and the rate of change of CO2 has never, ever been witnessed at these levels. Not even close. If you study the CO2 rate of change is it off the charts -- way, way off the charts. Just like world population. We're adding people to the planet at numbers that make one stagger. And you'll likely admit that the world has never, ever seen numbers or rate of change like we have in the number of humans inhabiting the planet. Not even close. It's H-U-G-E. Well, it's the same for CO2. The rate of change is practically straight up --not a slow curve. As the scientists inspect ice core samples from thousands of years ... they find NOTHING like what we're experiencing now. Not even close. Not anywhere near close. We have ice caps melting like we've never had before, ocean salinity changing drastically, ocean temps changing fast, etc., etc. etc. If you put it all together it's not hard to figure out this is nothing like a "usual cyclic cycle". Not even close.

So, if it frightens you too much, then bury you're head in the sand -- many people have down thru the ages. Reality can be a harsh teacher and maybe it's too much for you. I can respect that. But, please, don't try to sell it as "normal". That won't pass muster any more than those who insisted the earth MUST be flat. Or that the Sun rotated around the Earth. Reality does't need to be convinced. It already IS. And most of us don't either. We can see the obvious. My take is that it's too late to do much about it -- but I'm not a fatalist so I figure I must try. I don't want to have to be embarrassed by my granddaughter when she demands to know: "What in the world were you thinking!!?? You had all those indicators and you did nothing? Were you completely daft?" She be right. And if I got it wrong and didn't grasp correctly what was happening -- I'll still be glad that I didn't turn my back on it and pretended it was no big deal.

ChetDude

September 23, 2012 12:56pm

And they were correct 100 years ago...

And now are becoming obvious to anyone but the willfully ignorant...

And the NOMINAL global temperature is increasing to a tipping point...

You ARE correct about powering down, minimizing our resource exploitation and try to repair some of the damage we've done.

mlane78212

September 23, 2012 9:38am

Maybe it's beyond our human capacity to envision our own oblivion. There may be some problems that we can't fix with prayer or science. If that is true, then I think what we are witnessing with climate change is that problem. It is arriving and we can't seem to get it. For all I know, it may be too late even if the whole world suddenly "gets it". But change doesn't happen fast where cultural and political policies are concerned. So, sorry to say, I am truly hopeless. Humans don't seem to solve big problems with major change until we are in a crisis. Our crises in the past have had solutions; it is a huge mistake to think that this crisis is like that. When it's too late in the natural world, it's...well, too late.

ChetDude

September 23, 2012 12:58pm

It's not only arriving but the execrable Ponzi-Scheme fossil fueled "economy" is bringing it closer every day...

And you are 100% correct, "When it's too late in the natural world, it's...well, too late."