Rep. McCarthy: Pushing 300k Children Off Lunch Program to Protect Military Spending is Trimming the Fat

Ben Armbruster
Think Progress / News Analysis
Published: Tuesday 8 May 2012
“A further 23 million would be affected by the repeal of the Social Services Block Grant, which helps fund child care and disability assistance to low-income Americans.”
Article image

Yesterday, House Republicans moved legislation forward aimed at preventing any reductions in military spending, even if that means cutting much needed programs for the nation’s poorest. The House Armed Services Committee’s bill provides $554 billion for the Pentagon — $29 billion more than DOD had requested — while the GOP-led Budget Committee packaged six bills that would “slice $261 billion from food stamps, Medicaid, social services and other programs for struggling Americans.”

Last night on Fox News, House Majoriy Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) claimed that the Republicans were just trimming the fat from the budget and getting rid of wasteful spending:

VAN SUSTEREN: But these cuts — I mean, these cuts — I mean, some of the cuts, I mean, just — you know, there are — there’s money sitting in our government. There’s some fat that we can.. some of these cuts. I mean — the fat is incredible!

MCCARTHY: Then you would support what we’re doing. That’s we’re doing committee by committee!

Watch the clip:

So what do McCarthy and the GOP consider budget fat? The New York Times today offered some details:

The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the bill would push 1.8 million people off food stamps and could cost 280,000 children their school lunch subsidies and 300,000 children their health insurance coverage through the federal and state Children’s Health Insurance Program. Elimination of the social services block grant to state and local governments would hit child abuse prevention programs, Meals on Wheels and child care.

A further 23 million would be affected by the repeal of the Social Services Block Grant, which helps fund child care and disability assistance to low-income Americans.

In fact, eliminating the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans would more than provide the savings the Republicans are seeking, twice over.

But not only are House Republicans protecting “largely useless” weapons systems and programs by cutting needed social services, their motivation stems from trying to prevent military spending cuts of nearly $500 billion over ten years because of the Budget Control Act’s sequestration trigger. Luckily for the GOP, the Center for American Progress has found more than $500 billion in Pentagon cuts — i.e. the real budget fat — that could be implemented over the next decade while still maintaining our vast military superiority.

While GOP plan has no chance of passing the Democratic-controlled Senate, the AP noted yesterday that it is “likely just a sample of what’s in store next year from Republicans if Mitt Romney wins the White House and the GOP takes back the Senate.”



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange

Top Stories

17 comments on "Rep. McCarthy: Pushing 300k Children Off Lunch Program to Protect Military Spending is Trimming the Fat"

paradise

May 09, 2012 6:45pm

There are more sane, compassionate people in America than Republicans. Let's volunteer, donate and vote out those that are not sane or compassionate. Get involved now along with people you know!

AnnieMO

May 09, 2012 9:46am

They have no use for children once they are born.

Brian Glennie

May 09, 2012 8:08am

Have to keep the military and police happy, so they don't bite the hand that feeds them when the poor won't take the cuts no more.

Swimmer

May 09, 2012 4:58am

Money is what they represent, not voters. First question after announcing your running for congress is, "When do I become a millionaire"

Ronni85

May 08, 2012 4:00pm

The GOP is ANTI WE, the PEOPLE AMERICANS. Their ONLY consideration are the moneyed interests in this country, WE are just the trash waiting to be discarded in the landfills!

thouzel

May 08, 2012 2:32pm

Why do we keep electing these short sighted people to represent us? Do we really want a country that favors only the 'haves' while the rest of us have less and less?
Get out and vote folks! It doesn't have to be this way.

mike morell

May 08, 2012 1:35pm

Ask the ultra rich to carve their teeth with wooden rather than solid gold toothpicks, and help the nation, and have the Repubs scream Socialism! Class warfare!

peacerose

May 08, 2012 12:23pm

If this isn't proof that the Republican party has gone stark-staring mad, I don't know what is. This is insanity at the highest levels, and a vivid glimpse of what's to come if Romney is elected next November.

Riconui

May 08, 2012 12:22pm

I think it might just be as simple as this; poor people don't vote. They don't have very good lobbyists, or any lobbyist for that matter and they certainly don't have the available funds to stoke the re-election coffers of butt-smooching shills like McCarthy. (My mother was a McCarthy before marriage and this guy aint one of us). So who cares about the poor? So HAS to care about the poor? There's just no profit in it. Lockheed/Martin, Boeing, Raytheon et al., THEY have lobbyists and money to burn, (because they get it from us). Yes, Jesus is coming back and this time he's not going to be meek and mild and worried about the poor and the afflicted. He's going to be ready to kill and kick ass and get rich and screw the poor. Welcome to mitt world.

Gilbert T Schwob

May 08, 2012 12:03pm

Tax middle class, not Romney, not McCarthy.

Lori Norman

May 08, 2012 11:33am

lesson one in neoliberl economic theory 1. Moral and ethical concerns are of no consequence. See the myth of the chilian miracle.

shakingmyhead

May 08, 2012 10:11pm

Um, Ms. Norman, apparently you failed to read the article closely enough - nor do you appear to have been keeping up with who it actually is that's been decimating the middle class and crushing the poor underfoot like cockroaches. Please take note that the individuals responsible for putting forth this bill (in particular, the "gentleman" who made these elitist, heartless - and ignorant - statements above) are the GOP (also known as REPUBLICANS). They are most definitely NOT "neoliberl" [sic] - not by any stretch of the imagination. No, my dear, deluded lady, the Right-Wing GOP/Republicans and their Tea Party bretheren are so ultra, ultra conservative that they make the Puritans look like swingers. About as far from "liberal" as one can possibly get. But you did get one thing right: these wealthy, ultra-conservative, right-wing war-mongers have absolutely no morals or ethics, especially when it comes to their fellow man. But remember too, they don't consider anyone who isn't white, rich, and male to be in the same class as them - and if you happen to be female, elderly, disabled, a person of color, GLBT, or a child, well, as I've already pointed out, you're about as significant as a cockroach. They'll crush you under their shoes. No pity, no remorse. Just keep on walking. Oh, and if it messes up their shoe, why, they'll just buy another $5,000 pair. The defense contractors are paying them well enough to afford it.

River Rat

May 08, 2012 11:12am

Now for the BIG QUESTION. Will the American public reelect these jerks? As Pogo said: "We have met the enemy and he is us." We live in a democracy and it's up to us to set the stage. Here's hoping we can 'figure it out' in the next 6 months. If not we get to wait another few years for our 'training' to take full effect.

TinaMiz

May 08, 2012 11:06am

If they wanted to stop spending wasteful dollars perhaps they should have not spent 77 billion on the F-22 fighter jet, that was made to fight an enemy that does not yet exist and pilots are afraid to fly due to the safety issues! But lets take food and medical services from the poor they don't count anyway. I mean most of them are poor children and elderly folks. We are spending more on the military than anything else and these so called leaders are giving defense contracts to companies in which they've invested stock so to hell with American citizens that need help, because the leaders controlling the spending are making a killing and WE are paying the price!

I-AM-STRETCH

May 09, 2012 6:57am

Thank you TINAMIZ. This is exactly what my thought was. Do you know that the amount of money this country spends on "National security" in one day is enough to supply single payer health care to every non insured American for thirty days! This country better get its priorities straight again or we will be a nation of beggars in very short order.

Norman Allen

May 08, 2012 10:57am

Is he related to the infamous McCarthy of the witch hunt for communists among the thinking people of the US, who tried to label anyone who disagreed with him and his masters as communist or unpatriotic? If so, we should know it is in his genes to suck it to the poor and enrich the super rich further... A good characteristics for the lap-dogs of the super rich. If he is not related to that creature from the lagoon, then he must be aspiring to be one! How can a decent human spend money on the over-bloated military and let the working poor go hungry?

Theodore Ziolkowski

May 08, 2012 10:22am

Conservatives, Republicans and Tea-Party members moved legislation forward aimed at preventing any reductions in military spending, while they are willing to cut every program that was established to help the individuals and families that are suffering the most.

Why??? Simply the Fact that the Conservatives, Republicans and Tea-Party members are GREEDY and CORRUPT and do what the "Rich and Powerful" who make contributions to them and thier Political Parties, want done.