Robert S. Becker
NationofChange / Op-Ed
Published: Sunday 22 July 2012
“Let the world behold: a new teaching from the Angel Moroni and thus a new Mormon Doctrine: Self-Absolution Long After the Fact.”

‘Retro’ Romney’s ‘Immaculate Resignation’

Article image

If one can magically "resign" from any morass after the fact (truly, long after), Mitt Romney shouldn’t only run for president but extraterrestrial, time-shifting Miracle Man. This notorious policy shape-shifter graduates now to time-shifter, as Mitt’s expanding Etch-a-Sketch, with demonic force, dares distort history. Who but a flimflamming devil plays on simultaneous, dual personalities – one, the hard-driving taskmaster who approved Bain’s outsourcing factory (all election documents to the contrary); second, the latter-day, heroic invention: the public-spirited, Olympic overseer who'd never outsource a fly – and who, per one Romney shill, “retroactively resigned” before the mitt hit the fan.    

Romney’s transparent evasion “resigns” from something, though not early enough from Bain. How about “reality for the rest of us” and that’s what now slapping this stonewaller upside the head. So, let’s hear the thundering call, “where’s that retroactive resignation,” far more appropriate than yahoos demanding infinite proof of Obama’s Hawaiian birth. 

Think of the possibilities, if not imponderables. Wouldn’t everyone love instant free passes from mortifying blunders we need no longer shoulder, especially because most consequences are unknowable in advance? The Romney “resignation” farce is a classic logical fallacy, formally post hoc ergo propter hoc for "after this, therefore because of this." I prefer apt religious jargon, served up as a blameless, self-righteous “immaculate resignation.” 

Let the world behold: a new teaching from the Angel Moroni and thus a new Mormon Doctrine: Self-Absolution Long After the Fact. Does this not mimic GOPThink today – invent preposterous nonsense that gets fed to the idiot base, then repeat interminably? On point, Romney’s fabrication evokes the most presumptuous of Mormon arrogance – the self-anointed mandate to baptize non-believers into their faith way, way after the fact. How else can “latter day” saints explain heavenly residents before that visionary ruffian, Joseph Smith, 160 years ago found golden tablets and divine messages from “Moroni"? Note, for scholars, this is not about plural morons, as exegesis suggests Smith filched this romantic-sounding name oddity from an obscure capital city of a remote island nation. 

Political Infallibility

Romney’s clumsy immaculate resignation stretches the political and philosophic envelope. What’s next – proclamations of latter day infallibility (and Romney’s a Mormon bishop), akin to the Pope on matters of dogma? Shameless dissembling from Romney is hardly news, as this blustery tycoon competes for the gold in the Flip-flopping Olympics. I certainly hope only saintly Mormon top-brass can refashion history. Otherwise, expect a mass epidemic of memory deletion by hordes of ordinary evil-doing politicians obscuring miscues.   

For months, media portraits set forth a stylishly “retro” Romney, evoking whitened and brightened, rapacious, Madison Avenue Fifties’ hustlers. True to form, Mitt’s ever the unctuously smiling front man, channeling pitches for “fortified” Wonder Bread (packed with white flour) – or promotions for that foundational revolution in toothpaste technology from Colgate. You all remember famed magical Gardol that shields enamel from decay like plastic slipcovers. Okay, Revolution came cheap in the placid ‘50’s. 

No doubt, this smugly presumptive nominee is praying for campaign Gardol against endlessly piercing jabs over offshore holdings and massive spoils preserved like every devious capitalist does (read: avoid taxation). Romney doppelgängers also sold lavish lots in Florida swampland while broadcasting, like Babbitt, the limitless American Way, whether corporate, military, imperial, nutritional or religious. Did not the ‘50’s ordain American exceptionalism forever, plastering that memorable (if astronomically obscure) phrase, “under God,” to the pledge of allegiance? Retro Mormons know all about tribal allegiance and obedience to rigid symbols. 

Too bad Romney’s allegiance to “truth, justice and the American way” in fact resigned after he accumulated riches. If fallen humans can suddenly, “retroactively retire” from scandal, not only is born a new vocabulary for sleaze but let's declare history by evidence kaput, if not dead. Why limit retroactivity to mere business concerns, where one stays “in the dirty outsourcing trenches” when “on leave”? Wouldn’t a smarter politician find cleaner ways to “update” his grossly misleading election documents?If not strictly a felony, such false disclosure (then and now) qualify as political and intellectual malpractice – and there's no end to the nasty ripples.

We've all heard of reverse mortgages, reverse osmosis, reverse stock splits, reverse engineering, even reverse vasectomies (ouch!)? But never in the history of mankind has anyone, not even our philosophic giants (except in science fiction), succeeded in reversing the fixed nature of the past. Done is done, or did Romney miss the W. memo that outlawed “do-overs,” especially during public scrutiny. 

Reactionary Rejiggering 

Behold new vistas for action (and academic study) called “Retroactive Reversals." Why can’t today’s Romney retroactively NOT abuse his pet dog, when the mitt mutt truly hit the fan on that infamous vacation? Why not retroactively annul the pain to that (now deceased) high schooler young Mitt spitefully victimized? Why not retroactively rescind his state’s successful health reform because rightwing cranks indict all government as demonically socialistic? Retro is one thing; reversing time, an impossibility whose quest embarrasses the fool trying it. 

Looking forward, I expect new and happy surprises from Life with Mitt. After getting nominated, if he survives that long, journalistic scrutiny will turn over every rock hunting for front page scandals. Romney the time-shifter faces a long, bitter, itchy trek before November. Or simply an itch to be someone else. Too bad Saint Romney doesn’t share Moroni’s gift for prophecy: what top politician who now pitches job creation at home wouldn’t have better scrubbed away such overt contradictions on his own resume?  

Business reports already chastise Romney for playing fast and loose with partners, even reneging on his word, but only part time. This morning we hear rumors from “Bain sources” that Romney would have declined running if that meant disclosing tax returns. Despite our degraded times, we don’t lack for revelations (no, not the religious fictions) but because many are the instruments and agencies that get truth out. Keeping humiliating moments (or dazzling debacles) secret is a full-time occupation, one that Romney is flubbing. The very dimension of time Romney wants so badly to suppress eventually elevates dead fish to the surface.    

Disclosures in politics about financial details are really about character revelations – especially as a growing mass of blunders are impossible to “resign from” – without serious costs. Mitt could chat up the Mormon God, pleading for post-hoc blanket immunity from hypocrisy and deception. But that might require confession, opposite Romney’s epic stonewalling that his past contains no sins of commission (but many millions from commissions). 

Of course, if one adheres to curious miracles of the church “of Latter Day Saints” – like baptizing retroactively – why not try retroactive, immaculate resignations? Being a “latter day” saint presumes an in-house set of latter day miracles. And if bad goes to worse, only a miracle saves Romney from crashing. Mitt may not “believe” in the same universe (and fixed past) that rational adults confirm, but the future inevitably promises its own marvelous, “latter day” revelations.  And you heard it here first: they come before November. 



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange

Top Stories

15 comments on "‘Retro’ Romney’s ‘Immaculate Resignation’"

Robert S. Becker

July 23, 2012 11:07am

"Romney is indeed ethically vulnerable, but ridiculing his religious beliefs is both distasteful and unnecessary."

Firstly, I brought up only one big issue, the retro baptism silliness, because it fit perfectly with my political satire, as it were. I didn't especially take on Mormonism, nor "Romney's beliefs, since no one knows what they are, or whether he digresses from the LDS dogma.

Retro is retro, and the absurdity of resignations way after the fact parallel baptisms way after the fact, especially when done to folks, like Jews killed by the Nazis, who vigorously would object (and their relatives do).

CHForbesSr

July 23, 2012 4:05am

Romney is indeed ethically vulnerable, but ridiculing his religious beliefs is both distasteful and unnecessary. The poll results are confounding and depressing if we accept them as valid. If accurate they imply confirmation of H.L. Mencken's opinion of the American public as the "boob-ocracy." Fortunately other polls indicate that the President's policies, record, and platform hold a decisive lead. The really scary reality is that voter blocking, as of now, could well swing the election in favor of "Republican" candidates. Note my quotation marks: I cannot bear to call the present far right extremist party "Republican." They certainly do not resemble the Republican Party we have known in recent generations, which was sometimes capable of negotiation, compromise, and even on occasion public spirited initiatives (admittedly not very often ). The hard, painful truth is that we face the worst coalition of anti-democratic factions in our history as a nation. They are close to achieving what no foreign fascist, socialist, or communist ideologues have ever been able to accomplish. That is, to take over control of the federal and state, in some cases such as Michigan, the local institutions of government on a frighteningly fascist model. Very sadly, this is an entirely rational statement. People who believe in our system of government, and our proclaimed values, are today severely challenged to reject this "Republican" coalition at the polls.

greghilbert

July 22, 2012 6:06pm

I agree with one aspect of the article -- that Romney warrants repudiation -- but feel compelled to condemn the pervasive ridicule of his religion.

Factkneader

July 22, 2012 11:08pm

On the contrary, Romoney embraces not one but two layers of transparent mythology -- christianity and mormonism -- which indicates that he is incapable of assessing fact and dealing with reality. One only need examine the disasters wrought by our last faith-based president following his beliefs in divine guidance to understand the dangers of illogical convictions. Of course one must appear to accept these absurdities in order be elected in a nation which clings tenaciously to beliefs it never rationally examines.

MoniqueDC

July 22, 2012 5:44pm

So, guys, since we all see Romney as unethical bordering upon evil, why is he doing so well in the polls? He is running even with Obama in almost all the polls. Why would people support someone who would exploit them and kick all of us 99% folks to the curb?

oldhat

July 24, 2012 3:05pm

because bho is a disaster

jon02794

July 24, 2012 12:19pm

He does well in the polls because of the Republican Right-Wing Nut-Job Propaganda Bubble. NASA should use this for heat shields during re-entry from Low Earth Orbit.

jeltez42

July 22, 2012 5:28pm

Four years of Mitt in the White House could be fun from a humorist's standpoint. The contortions, the re-writing of HizStory, and the legalized-criminality.

Instead, can we just retroactively say that Romney was president and create our own history on our etch-a-sketch of how those 4 years went? Fiction is always better than reality.

David Ewing

July 22, 2012 3:07pm

Come to think of it, what Romney is really saying is that the company came to the conclusion, after the Olympics, that he had failed to carry out his duties for a couple of years but kept on drawing a paycheck. Doesn't that make him a sort of corporate welfare cheat?

David Ewing

July 22, 2012 3:01pm

That Romney, he really things outside the box!

Obama could respond by retroactively postponing his inauguration so that unemployment stopped rising the day he took office.

But then W would probably retroactively leave office before the economy tanked and we'd be retroactively stuck with Cheney as president ---- oh, that's right, in hindsight he was.

Robert S. Becker

July 22, 2012 12:56pm

P.D. -- I like "opportunistic innocence," though it softens the blow since he's more oblivious, even ignorant, than innocent. I get your irony. That he could profess all the formal rigidities of Mormonism -- without a moment's hesitation before abusing (non-Mormon) gentiles with lying, fudging and deceptions is a shocker. I assume there will be more scandals for I see Romney as the greatest phony running for the GOP since Nixon (who had better political savvy). Yes, Obama has many weaknesses, and washes over complexity with his own deceptiveness, but compare Romney even with W., a genuine fake, and he seem truly a fake fake. Thanks for the kind words.

RB

Patricia Dixon

July 22, 2012 12:34pm

Great article and to the point. The contradictions in Romney's life are too broad to ignore. He suffers from an opportunistic innocence to justify his actions, and in doing so, he exposes his multiple strategies to avoid the truth.

anono

July 22, 2012 12:07pm

There's one distinct advantages that always goes with being one of 'Gods chosen people'. You're absolved of adhearing to any common sense of morality. You get to make your own rules and bludgeon others into to following your rules. Rongney is just doing his supreme being thing.

Scott Ashley

July 22, 2012 11:11am

I just want to know how he can justify stealing $ millions from workers retirement funds and know he explains that to his kids..

jeltez42

July 22, 2012 5:19pm

What did Romney steal? Nothing that was not bought and paid for in some small capacity. Bain bought these companies for a song and a wooden nickel. To Mittens, that means he owned all and could raid the cookie jar any time he wanted. Retirement accounts? These people were not retired yet so the money was not theirs, it was still the company's, which was owned by Bain, which as sole shareholder, was really owned by Mitt.

As for explaining to his kids, that is very easy too. Kids, your grandfather, great grandfather, and great-great grandfather were profits (intentional) of god and as such, we are entitled to all god has to offer. god (intentional) provided me with company X and all the riches that are contained within. Those poor people left jobless and no retirement, well that is god's punishment for not being a believer. Use this as a lesson boys, don't anger the profit lest you be kicked out and cut off from god's blessings.