Right-Wing Media Ignore Fed Report Showing Increase in Wealth Gap
A recent Federal Reserve study found that the wealth gap increased during the recent recession with the median net worth of the wealthiest Americans increasing between 2007 and 2010, while the median net worth for all Americans decreased. But right-wing media have ignored or misrepresented this aspect of the report in order to attack President Obama.
Fed: Net Worth Increased For The Wealthiest Americans, While Decreasing For Everybody
Federal Reserve: Median Net Worth For The Top Ten Percent Increased By 1.9 Percent Between 2007 And 2010. The Federal Reserve found that median net worth increased for top 10 percent families. In 2007 these families had a median net worth of $1,172,300 and in 2010 their median net worth increased to $1,194,300. By contrast, median net worth for all Americans decreased.
[Federal Reserve, June 2012]
Washington Post: The Recession Caused An "Upheaval Among The Middle Class" While "The Wealthiest Families' Median Net Worth Rose Slightly." The Washington Post reported in a June 11 article:
The recession caused the greatest upheaval among the middle class. Only roughly half of middle-class Americans remained on the same economic rung during the downturn, the Fed found. Their median net worth -- the value of assets such as homes, automobiles and stocks minus any debt -- suffered the biggest drops. By contrast, the wealthiest families' median net worth rose slightly. [The Washington Post, 6/11/12]
NYT: "Wealthier Families...Were Cushioned Against The Recession." The New York Timesreported on June 11:
[M]iddle-income families also lost a larger share of their income. The earnings of the median family in the bottom 20 percent of the income distribution actually increased from 2007 to 2010, in part because of the expansion of government aid programs during the recession. Wealthier families, which derive more income from investments, were also cushioned against the recession.
The data does provide the latest indication, however, that the recession reduced income inequality in the United States, at least temporarily. The average income of the wealthiest families fell much more sharply than the median, indicating that some of those at the very top of the ladder slipped down at least a few rungs.
Ranking American families by income, the top 10 percent of households still earned an average of $349,000 in 2010.
The average net worth of the same families was $2.9 million. [The New York Times, 6/11/12]
But Right Wing Media Ignored The Success Of The Wealthiest Americans During The Recession And Attacked Obama
Limbaugh: Buried in Stories On The Fed Bulletin: "Declines In Average Income Were Greatest In The Wealthiest 10 Percent Of Families." On his radio show, Rush Limbaugh ignored the increase in net worth for the richest Americans to claim that "declines in average income were greatest in the wealthiest 10% of families" and that this claim was buried. From the broadcast:
By the way that story on the decline in personal wealth -- let me tell you something buried in that story. Declines in average income were greatest in the wealthiest 10 percent families, and for higher education or wealth groups, according to the survey. Now that story is out there that 40 percent wealth -- the net worth was destroyed during the recession, but declines in average income were greatest in the wealthiest 10 percent. Now it's in there, it's in the story, but it's buried. They want you to conclude something else. They want you to conclude that the gap between the rich and poor is getting wider, the rich are getting richer, the poor are getting poorer, because the rich are stealing from the poor. And yet, they had to include it, because the polling data is what it is. Ten percent - the wealthiest 10 percent of families saw the largest decline in average income during the recession. [Premier Radio Network, The Rush Limbaugh Show, 6/11/12]
- Fed: In fact the median income for the wealthiest Americans remained almost flat between 2007 and 2010: The June 2012 Federal Reserve bulletin also found that while the median income for the average American fell dramatically between 2007 and 2010, the median income for the wealthiest Americans stayed essentially level. [Federal Reserve, June 2012]
Breitbart.com: "American Family Net Worth Nosedives 40%, Obama Approval Still At 50%." In a June 12 Big Government piece, editor-at-large, Ben Shapiro, commented on the Federal Reserve's findings, claiming, "much of that decline must be laid at the feet of the Obama administration, and wondering "how many even hope to build net wealth rather than living off government largess in coming decades," never commenting on the wealthiest Americans. [Breitbart.com, 6/12/12]
For more examples of right-wing media ignoring the increasing wealth gap to attack Obama over the Fed study, see here and here.
The Right-Wing Media Have A Pattern Of Dismissing The Growing Wealth Gap
Limbaugh: Increasing Income Inequality "A Myth." During the January 3 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show, host Rush Limbaugh claimed that "there are so many myths - the income gap getting wider, it isn't real." [Media Matters, 1/3/12]
O'Reilly: "Income Inequality Is Bull." During the May 14 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor, host Bill O'Reilly claimed that "income inequality is bull. Nobody gives you anything, you earn it." [Media Matters, 5/14/12]
CONNECT













9 comments on "Right-Wing Media Ignore Fed Report Showing Increase in Wealth Gap"
June 19, 2012 7:52am
The super-rich had rigged the rules of the money game to butter their own bread. Rush Limbouth is a big fat idiot, as current US Senator Al Franken said long time ago. However, the American society is non-sstainable on all levels. If people went off the grid and harvested solar, wind and geothermal energy and water on their houses, they would not have to pay utility bills and live much more cheaply and not shop till they drop.
June 14, 2012 7:54pm
Hey, Flush Lameballs, I hope you bring back something nice from your next trip to the Dominican Republic with a sack full of Viagra. The Clap! The antibiotic resistant kind.
June 14, 2012 7:38pm
We need to scream bloody murder until the public sees the reality of the wealth transfer going to the already-wealthy at the expense of the many. A majority already favor repeal of tax cuts for the wealthy and job-exporting corporations, even if many are oblivious to the extent of the transfer.
BLOODY MURDER! BLOODY MURDER!!
Repeal tax cuts for the wealthy and job-exporting corporations!
June 14, 2012 4:42pm
The current economic paradigm is "unsustainable." Unless, of course, the United States essentially becomes a banana republic. Which is, I believe, "exactly" what the neo-liberalists have in mind. And they belong to BOTH parties. Clinton's signing of Glass-Stegall banking deregulation's and free trade agreements have proved no less damning than Bush's tax cuts or Obama's extension of them. "Shock Doctrine 101" on tap and flowing. Ask a former "drinker," perhaps in Chile, Argentina or Russia. It simply goes down like thumbtacks.
June 14, 2012 2:59pm
"THE RICH GET RICHER and the POOR get POOR." It is the Conservative Republican and Tea-Party way.
June 14, 2012 1:59pm
Didn't the bulk of the losses come during the bush regime?
June 14, 2012 11:45am
We can always rely on Limbaugh to misinform his listeners.
June 14, 2012 11:23am
Private Banking vs Public Banking
Private money-supply and banking is the chief--maybe the only--cause of the present and severe wealth and income gap In the USA and world-wide.
In fact, none of the country's social, educational, infrastructural, health or housing problems will ever be solved until the following situation transpires-----
The government prints and owns certificates of legal tender (of exchange) for use in the people's commerce. The central government lends to state government banks at a given interest rate. Those banks lend to branches at that interest plus an additional percent amount. They in turn lend to people and businesses at that same interest rate plus an additional percent amount. The income then generated by this interest for the two governments, precludes the need for any taxes. All branches have the same variety of accounts that now exist. The interest rates are adjusted, based on the needs of the governments for the public welfare--minimum safety and security nets, education, health and infrastructure. Interest rates at all levels are determined and coordinated by board members of each bank that are selected through a transparent political/electoral process with term limits.
The central bank prints money (not the present Fed) as is needed for the economy as decided by a board, which members are selected through a transparent political/electoral process with term limits.
The constitution permits money-printing and banking by the federal government. "......... even though paper money is not expressly permitted by the Constitution, it is also not expressly forbidden, and in spite of the extra-constitutional opinions of some of the Framers, the ability to print paper money is a necessary and proper power of the federal government." Source: http://www.usconstitution.net/constfaq_q154.html
The present, private banking system? No need to nationalize it or stop its existence. Let the private and business customer decide which tender he or she wants to use---the "certificate of exchange" that is printed by the private bank system or the US Government-backed "certificate of exchange."
June 14, 2012 11:18am
Wealth of the 99% are sinking while the 1% are basking on a 38% income increase and Romney wants to reward them with more tax cuts: In spite of the $300 million anti-Obama hogwash, this is what they offer: A smiley vendor’s taking you to the cleaners to pay for his deeper tax cuts for the rich and corporations. Romney pays 14% rate on his earnings against over 30% for American workers and middle class. He’d like the 1% to pay two percent or even zero taxes. Math doesn’t add up. When is he going to pay Bush’s ten trillion red account? If you believe his recipe for prosperity go buy a used car from Mr Romney.