Romney Benefits From Post-Citizens United Spending

Rachael Marcus
Published: Thursday 11 October 2012
American Crossroads top spender since Labor Day.
Article image

Since Labor Day, the once-unofficial start of the election season, 70 percent of outside spending on the presidential race made possible by the Citizens United Supreme Court decision has benefited Mitt Romney, according to a Center for Public Integrity analysis.

More than $106 million of the $117 million spent on the Obama-Romney matchup since Sept. 3 has been on negative ads, with President Barack Obama absorbing more than $80 million in attacks, according to the analysis of Federal Election Commission data.

By way of comparison, the Obama campaign has spent $346 million over the entire election and Romney has spent $288 million, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

American Crossroads, a conservative super PAC co-founded by Republican strategist Karl Rove, is the top anti-Obama spender as well as the top overall spender among outside groups in the presidential election. Priorities USA Action, a pro-Obama super PAC, is the second-biggest outside spender in the race and the primary source of anti-Romney ads.

Overall, since Labor Day, super PACs, nonprofits and other Citizens United spenders have spent $217 million on “independent expenditures,” ads and campaign activities that urge voters to support or oppose a candidate and are reported to the FEC. The total does not include regulated political action committees and party spending.

Super PACs, which can receive and spend unlimited amounts from individuals, corporations and unions, are responsible for 55 percent of the spending. Nonprofits, which can act in the same way as super PACs but need not publicly disclose their donors, make up 44 percent of the total.

The rest comes from union treasuries, 527 committees not organized as PACs or super PACs, individuals and corporations.

U.S. Senate races attracting the most attention are in the battleground states of Virginia, Ohio and Wisconsin. Republicans are hoping for a strong enough showing to take control of the upper chamber this election.

In Virginia, tops among Senate races in outside spending, former Gov. Tim Kaine, a Democrat, and former Sen. George Allen, a Republican, are aiming to replace retiring Democratic Sen. Jim Webb in a race that has drawn $12.8 million since Labor Day.

In Ohio, Republicans are desperate to unseat Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown, and in Wisconsin, Democratic Rep. Tammy Baldwin and former Republican Gov. Tommy Thompson are vying to replace Democratic Sen. Herb Kohl. Both races have attracted $11.1 million.

The top U.S. House race in terms of outside spending is California’s 7th District, which pits physician Ami Bera, a Democrat, against Republican Rep. Dan Lungren. The race has attracted $5.3 million.

Ohio’s rejiggered 16th District, where Democratic Rep. Betty Sutton squares off with Republican Rep. Jim Renacci, has been the second-most expensive House race for outside spenders since Labor Day, bringing in $4.6 million. And Pennsylvania’s 12th District race — Democratic Rep. Mark Critz versus attorney Keith Rothfus, a Republican — comes in a close third with $4.5 million.

Total Citizens United-related spending since Labor Day: $217.3 million       

Super PACs — $119.9 million

Nonprofits — $95.9 million

Unions — $1.3 million

Other — $160,000

Total spent on the presidential race since Labor Day: $118.7 million*

Pro-Romney and anti-Obama ads: $85 million

Pro-Obama and anti-Romney ads: $32.2 million

Most expensive House races since Labor Day:

California’s 7th District, $5.3 million

Ohio’s 16th District, $4.6 million

Pennsylvania’s 12th District, $4.5 million

Most expensive Senate races since Labor Day:

Virginia, $12.8 million

Ohio, $11.1 million

Wisconsin, $11.1 million

*Third-party candidates make up the remainder.



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange

Top Stories

4 comments on "Romney Benefits From Post-Citizens United Spending"

yellowdogdemo

October 11, 2012 9:54pm

Troll Simon-Corporations consist of management and employees. They have different outlooks and goals. Why don't these superpacks tell us who is contributing? Because decent people would be shocked to find out. For instance, how much of RMoney's superpack contributions come from overseas, from China? I would like to know. I'm sure it's a lot, considering RMoney's large holdings in China. What you say about unions in fact is an outright lie. You Repugnicans have been trying to blame the unions and the schools for years. Here you are, attacking "government employee unions", (teachers' unions). What about your bias against the middle class working people? Do shareholders actually have a say about corporate campaign spending? No-it's the CEO and his gang.

Atlas Simon

October 11, 2012 9:51am

Corporations represent a group of people with similar financial interests- exactly like Unions - right? So explain why a group of people l, shareholders, should not have the right to contribute to political parties or candidates when unions have used their accumulated wealth to represent their best interests? Unions in many cases are in fact bribing and helping to elect their own bosses in the case of government employee unions which has caused the financial disaster across this country in government entities.

You no doubt don't want to ban union political contributions but only those of corporations - typical liberal baloney and delusional bias.

Larry Kachimba

October 12, 2012 6:43am

Corporations exist to make money, which they do in the corrupt US political system by buying policies that will make them money at the expense of everyone else - including their employees and customers.
Unions exist to serve the interests of their members, which requires preserving the right to bargain collectively which is under attack from corporations, like most of Americans' civil rights and liberties. Unions do not conduct business operations that profit by buying public policies from corrupt politians.
As long as money in politics is legal, unions and all of us but the 1% will be losers.
moneyouttapolitics.com

William Bednarz

October 11, 2012 10:31am

All I'm asking is that you list your name...WHY DO YOU INSIST ON HIDING IT ?? STAND UP AND SAY I "NAME" AM DOING THIS....
. . . . . . .
..PEOPLE ARE HIDING??? WHY?? IF YOU GO INTO A STORE AND SPEND YOUR MONEY IT'S O.K. ...BUY A CAR..... IDENTIFY YOURSELF ?? REGISTER IT ?? INSURE IT ??
IF......IF YOU BELIEVE WHAT YOU ARE SAYING - - WHY ARE YOU HIDING......
MY NAME IS WILLIAM BEDNARZ.....NOT MADE UP ....ALFRED E. NEUMAN......CHARLIE ...F*T.... A*S.....
ATLAS ?? IS THAT REALLY A NAME ?? FIRST TIME I'VE EVER HEARD IT
FINANCIAL RECORDS OF CONTRIBUTION FROM UNIONS ARE PUBLIC - THEIR MEMBERS CAN ASK AND RECEIVE THAT INFORMATION.....
.STOCK-HOLDERS DO NOT HAVE THAT RIGHT????
WHAT... AND.... WHY ...ARE... YOU.... HIDING ?.?.?