Romney Family Investment Group Partnered with Alleged Perpetrators of $8 Billion Ponzi Scheme

Lee Fang
Think Progress / News Analysis
Published: Tuesday 1 November 2011
“Tagg Romney confirmed their business relationship, but falsely claimed that the men were cleared of any wrongdoing associated with the Ponzi scheme.”
Article image

Mitt Romney, his son Tagg, and Romney’s chief fundraiser, Spencer Zwick, have extensive financial and political ties to three men who allegedly participated in an $8.5 billion Ponzi scheme. A few months after the Ponzi scheme collapsed, a firm financed by Mitt Romney and run by his son and chief fundraiser partnered with the three men and created a new “wealth management business” as a subsidiary.

In an exclusive interview with ThinkProgress, Tagg Romney confirmed their business relationship, but falsely claimed that the men were cleared of any wrongdoing associated with the Ponzi scheme. Tagg Romney told ThinkProgress that his three partners collected about $15,000 from their involvement in the Ponzi scheme. Court documents obtained by ThinkProgress show that the legal proceedings are ongoing and the men made over $1.6 million selling fraudulent CDs to investors.

The Ponzi Scheme

In 2009, prosecutors announced charges against the Stanford Financial Group, which managed a portfolio of $8.5 billion, for running a “massive, ongoing fraud” against its investors. The Ponzi scheme bust was one of the largest in recent history, second only to Bernie Madoff, who perpetrated a fraud estimated to be around $17 billion. The Stanford Ponzi scheme wiped out the savings of thousands, including many American retirees across the country. In Texas, 1290 people lost their retirement savings because of the Stanford Ponzi scheme; in Louisiana, several hundred reportedly suffered the same fate.

The Romney Business Connection

Launched in 2008 by Romney’s son Tagg and a few others, including Mitt Romney’s chief fundraiser Spencer Zwick, Solamere Capital is a “fund of funds,” meaning that it primarily invests in other investment companies, like private equity groups.

Mitt Romney himself made a $10 million initial seed investment in Solamere Capital and his personal financial disclosure forms reveal that he has received between $100,000 and $1 million in returns from his stake in Solamere. Romney has come under fire for refusing to release his tax returns, which would likely reveal additional details about his financial relationship with Solamere Capital.

After news of the Ponzi scheme precipitated the collapse of Stanford in 2009, Tagg partnered with several of Stanford’s North Carolina executives to start a firm called Solamere Advisors. At least three prominent brokers who had worked for Stanford — Tim Bambauer, Deems May, and Brandon Phillips — joined Tagg to help run Solamere Advisors, a wealth management business located in Charlotte, North Carolina. “We are excited to be associated with such a highly capable group of financial advisors with a proven track record of meeting the needs of their clients throughout the Southeast,” said Tagg in a press release announcing Solamere Advisors, which borrows its the name from its parent company, Solamere Capital.

The Romney Campaign Connection

The Romney campaign and the Romney family investment company are deeply entwined. A recent Boston Globe investigation found that top donors to the Romney campaign have invested into Tagg’s firm, and that Romney’s star campaign fundraiser, Spencer Zwick, doubles as a managing partner for Solamere Capital. The Romney campaign has paid Zwick’s firm, SJZ LLC, over $2 million in fees this year alone. Mitt Romney’s brother Scott Romney is listed as a senior advisor to Solamere Capital.

Tagg Defends Partners, Falsely Claims They Were Cleared Of Wrongdoing

In an interview with ThinkProgress after the CNN debate in Las Vegas, Tagg said he was proud of his investment with Solamere Advisors, the wealth management firm now run by Stanford’s former executives. “They’re friends of ours, they use the [Solamere] name, we own a piece of them,” he said. “We helped them get started.” Romney’s son said he owns a minority stake in Solamere Advisors, but noted that they operate with some level of independence. “We don’t control them at all, we just own them,” he explained.

The Solamere Advisors website lists Bambauer, May, and Tagg Romney among the directors of the firm (Eric Scheuermann, a managing partner for Solamere Capital, is also a director of Solamere Advisors). The Solamere name comes from “a private community in Deer Valley, Utah, where [Mitt] Romney owned a ski mansion,” reports Globe writers Michael Kranish and Donovan Slack.

“Did you know that some of those guys were in with, there were allegations that some of those guys were involved with the Allen Stanford Ponzi scheme?” ThinkProgress asked. “Before we invested in them, they were in that. But they were cleared of that before we made our investment,” replied Tagg, who spoke to ThinkProgress for a few minutes while walking around the Venetian hotel after the debate.

ThinkProgress also asked about the allegedly fraudulent profits made by his partners in helping orchestrate the Stanford Ponzi scheme and the current effort by Stanford’s victims to retrieve their money. In response, Tagg claimed that his colleagues are also victims: “They probably made, their pay there was like $15,000 total. Those guys got totally screwed by the whole thing. It almost ended their whole careers because they moved all their clients over [to the Stanford Financial Group], and then the place was shut down two months after they moved their clients over. They hadn’t made any money yet. They had bonuses and everything promised to them, but they didn’t make any of their money. So they made no money.”

Tagg’s assertions, that his Solamere Advisors partners who were employed in the Stanford Ponzi scheme didn’t make “any money,” and that they their involvement in the Ponzi scheme has been “cleared,” contrasts with court documents obtained by ThinkProgress. According to documents reviewed by ThinkProgess using the Pacer search engine, charges against Tim Bambauer, Deems May, and Brandon Phillips have not been dropped. A recent court filing shows May requesting the court for arbitration instead of going to trial. ThinkProgress also spoke to the deputy clerk for the federal District Court in Dallas, and confirmed that the three men are still defendants in the lawsuit to recover the Ponzi scheme money.

Moreover, a court-appointed audit of the Stanford Financial Group found that several of the former Stanford brokers made far more than what Tagg claimed:

– Solamere Advisors managing partner Tim Bambauer made $1,143,392 in incentive pay selling fraudulent CDs to investors.– Solamere Advisors partner Deems May made $465,000 in incentive pay selling fraudulent CDs to investors.– Solamere Advisors operations manager made Brandon Phillips $70,000 in incentive pay selling fraudulent CDs to investors.

The lawsuit filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission claims the Stanford Financial Group built its Ponzi scheme by incentivizing brokers to sell fraudulent CDs with an array of bonuses. A document filed in the District Court of North Texas says that Stanford “used an elaborate and sophisticated incentive program” to encourage brokers, like Bambauer and others, to lure investors into the Ponzi scheme. A suit to recover money for Stanford’s victims declares that Stanford’s former brokers are not entitled to their performance pay because those funds were made in “furtherance of the Ponzi scheme.”

Despite Tagg’s assertion that his partners were innocent and had no idea what was going on, representatives for Stanford’s victims differ. San Antonio attorney Edward C. Snyder, an attorney representing Stanford’s investor victims, scoffed at the notion that Stanford’s brokers did not know what they were getting into. They were “making outrageous fees and commissions from selling and promoting CDs,” said Snyder in an interview with ThinkProgress, adding, “no one makes that kind of money doing that.” As the litigation continues, Synder said he is confident that all of Stanford’s brokers that received performance pay selling CDs “are going to give the money back.” Snyder told us that many of Stanford’s brokers have made the argument that they had no idea what was going on, but he isn’t buying it. “Anyone that was selling a related-company offshore bank CD to his clients, and making such a large percent of commission, should have their license revoked,” wrote Snyder in an e-mail.

Bambauer, hired by Tagg in July 2009 as the managing partner for Solamere Advisors, left the firm two months ago, according to Deems May, who spoke to ThinkProgress last week. Bambauer was a higher level executive at the Stanford Financial Group. The Solamere Advisors website still lists Bambauer as a director of the firm along with Tagg. A message left with the Bambauer household has not been returned.

Asked about the current effort by the court-appointed receiver to retrieve the commissions received in selling Stanford Ponzi scheme CDs, May said he “can’t comment on anything like that.” Tagg told ThinkProgress that he now only owns a 5 percent stake in Solamere Advisors, but May said to check with Eric Scheuermann, Tagg’s business partner, about the extent of Solamere Capital’s ownership holding in Solamere Advisors. Mays also referred ThinkProgress’ other questions to Solamere Capital, but the firm has not responded to ThinkProgress’ request for comment.

Despite Ponzi Business Connection, Romney Promises To Repeal New Investor Protection Laws

The revelation about Romney’s ties to the Stanford ponzi scheme unmask the risks associated with removing new investor protections. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform law, a reform Romney says he will repeal if he wins the presidency, attempts to address future Ponzi schemes by enacting new protections for whistleblowers to alert authorities when they find evidence of fraud. The law also creates a new Investor Advocate and Investor Advisory Committee within the Securities and Exchange Commission to detect and investigate future Ponzi schemes.

Mike Hudson, a reporter with iWatch News and author of a new book about how predatory Wall Street practices created the financial crisis, told ThinkProgress that Dodd-Frank “could be a game changer that helps the SEC identify and shut down Ponzis and Ponzi-like schemes.” But on the campaign trail, Romney, a fierce critic of efforts to reign in Wall Street practices, has called new investor protections like Dodd-Frank “extraordinarily burdensome.”

When ThinkProgress spoke to Tagg in Las Vegas, the last question about the Stanford Ponzi scheme was this: “How do you prevent a Ponzi scheme like that?” “Hey guys, we’re done,” Tagg said before taking off.

Get Email Alerts from NationofChange
Author pic
ABOUT Lee Fang

Lee Fang is an investigative researcher and contributing author for NationofChange. A resident of Sacramento, CA, Lee has written for the Boston Globe, The Nation, and ThinkProgress.org.

FEATURE A

Connect with your friends

Find new content you might like and see what your friends are sharing!

Top Stories

13 comments on "Romney Family Investment Group Partnered with Alleged Perpetrators of $8 Billion Ponzi Scheme"

iywptxb

VICTIMTOO

November 10, 2011 12:58pm

As a former Stanford employee and can tell you the numbers shown above are complete Bullsh%

Gatorray11

November 02, 2011 9:38am

Will the corporate press investigate this? Please e-mail story to as many people as possible and also post it on your social media sites. Make it hard for the corporate press to ignore this story. Remember in 2000 the corporate press neglected to tell us George W. the Schlemiel Bush a d four oil companies and ran each into the ground. Through hook and crook he became president with a GOP majority on the US Supreme Court crowing him president. Look what that cost the country. Now these people want to go back and implement the policies of the failed oilman/president. Mitt Romney as CEO specialized in making companies money by shipping their jobs overseas. As governor of Massachusetts his state ranked 47th -- third from the bottom -- in job creation. We need to make sure Romney is made to account what his relationship is to these Ponzi schemers. Ray A. Cohn, retired journalist.

Matthew Jacobs

November 02, 2011 7:50pm

See this is an obvious problem with the Electronic media. You're asking others to repost this less then steller, less than factual and unsubstanshated story as true.
Your Brave New World will be informed by Rumor and Innuendo. Which in itself is bad enough but the cherry on the Sunday is you don't seem to care.

evdebs

November 02, 2011 7:45am

Like hands, idle money is the devil's workshop. Super-tax the super-rich to grow the economy.

Republicans like George Will smugly state that even when the US taxed the super rich in the past at 70% and 90% in the highest brackets, no one actually paid those rates. But they fail to mention just how they managed to overcome that liability. The very wealthy did successfully and legally avoid those taxes. Rather than pay those confiscatory rates on their excess income, they opted instead to grow their businesses.

They devoted more funds to research and development, built new plants, updated old ones and hired new employees. They invested in insurance, profit sharing and pension plans for the mutual benefit of themselves and their employees. They did all of this to the benefit of our entire society primarily to avoid that higher tax bracket while continuing to build their individual wealth. .

The prevailing arguments for tax relief for the super rich, those alleged “job creators”, are exactly wrong. If you want to expand the economy you first need to tax the high end of those multi-million dollar incomes at a substantially higher rate to give them the incentive to invest that excess capital back into the economy rather than hoard it or worse, use it to further corrupt “our” political process or earmark it to some hedge fund manager to manipulate the markets to the extreme detriment of all but a very few of us.

“The subjects of every state ought to contribute toward the support of the government in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state." Adam Smith. Wealth of Nations 1776

Matthew Jacobs

November 02, 2011 7:43pm

It is not Rocket Science- They are called Tax Shelters.
Look Back to the Wind Power Industry that got started being the subject of Tax Shelters.
Oh one last thing I'm Glad you're not my Accountant

Matthew Jacobs

November 02, 2011 7:38pm

So your Idea is to Super Tax the Super Rich ...just one question: What happens when we have spent all their money. I've heard if all the Money is taken from the "Rich" it would float the Fed. Government for 4 mo.
THEN WHAT?

evdebs

November 03, 2011 7:48am

In the late 1970's I went to work for a young man that had been bequeathed a struggling business. By virtue of a perfect storm, through better management and it being a recession enhanced business model, it made more money than he had ever anticipated. On the advise of his accountant he expanded the business, established a pension and profit sharing plans, and raises were pretty easy to come by as well..

Then came Reagan and the S Corporation, which allowed him to take all the profits as income at a greatly reduced personal tax rate. His zeal for expansion and sharing were gone. He has since sold the business and they're still in operation, but they're a mere shadow of what they were.

So you can see how excessive tax breaks to those alleged "job creators" can, and often does have a negative effect on growth in an economy. The corporate raiding , paper scuffling, casino gambling by the financial industry that today passes for the bulk of the American economy is not sustainable.

janmb

November 01, 2011 4:55pm

I don't know who will be the flavor of November of the GOP candidates but the FOUX NEWS people are looking at Gingrich again. Think they believe the public has forgotten his first gaffe.....saying his passion for the USA made him CHEAT on his bedridden cancer stricken wife and having an affair.
Mr. Family Values was a pot smoking, draft-dodging adulterer from a poor Southern family .

Gatorray11

November 02, 2011 10:12am

Newt Gingrich's problems go far beyond this one incident and his draft dodging. He was cheating with what would become wife number three on wife number two while trying to impeach Bill Clinton for Monica's Lewinsky's BJ and lying about it. He put Henry J. Hyde in charge of that investigation. The same married Henry Hyde who as an Illinois state legislator had a five and a half year affair with a married woman and the prolonged tryst ended up breaking up her family. Hyde claimed "it was a youthful indiscretion." He was over 40 at the time of the affair. Yes, a real teenager making a mistake. Hyde -- who lectured us nightly on family values also kept talking about "the rule of law." The trouble is -- just like Newt -- these Republicans never apply their BS to themselves. Hyde was a member of the Board of Directors of a failed savings and loan. There was a successful lawsuit against the directors. Some had to file bankruptcy. Not Mr. Hyde. He used his congressional status to get himself exempt from the vedrict. That is the "rule of law" Gingrich style. Remember he was one of those Republicans who called Bill Clinton "a draft dodger." Certainly a guy like World War II hero Bob Dole and George H. W. Bush could easily do. But for somebody who spent the war teaching poplitical science that is a bit much. But then thrice divorced, four times married drug junkie Rush Limbaugh did that for nine years against Clinton. The same Limbaugh who dodged the Vietnam War because of a cyst above his fat ass. Then he lied and said he did nothing to get the exemption when there is a letter to his Draft Board requesting the exemption. Also Rush falsely told his audience that he got an exemption because he had "a high school football injury." Of course, George W. Bush, unlike his war hero father, dodged the Vietnam War by getting his father's friends to get him into the Texas National Guard. His tenure there was filled with special preferential treatment. He transferred to Alabama so he could work in the US Senate campaign for a family friend. He showed up one time for a free dental appointment at the Alabama National Guard. Then he went AWOL for over a year, but still got an "honorable discharge." Newt's record is much like George's. So he is not going anywhere either.

Matthew Jacobs

November 01, 2011 1:28pm

So We... Well You Found 2 Degrees of Separation from the Events and Romney his Son and others as the focal point of your Story. Just think if you went 1 more Degree you could have included Henry 8th. WOW What a Story That Would have Made.

janmb

November 01, 2011 4:59pm

MORE disturbing facts is who in the world would tie a dog to the top of a car .....well Romney did !!!
ROMNEY's public stance on abortion may have changed at least twice or more times in the past 25 years, but his obtuse view of how to treat women's rights has stayed the same. More than 20 years ago, according to a news report published over the weekend, Romney rushed to a Boston hospital and tried to use his position as a lay Mormon leader to intimidate a pregnant woman experiencing complications into rejecting abortion. She chose the procedure anyway. "He was blind to me as a human being," she says now.

Oh the GOP can sure pick lousy candidates or maybe these are the BEST they have .

Matthew Jacobs

November 02, 2011 7:33pm

I think the Aborted Proto-Human Killed that day might see Romney differently then You.