Thomas Magstadt
NationofChange / Op-Ed
Published: Monday 17 September 2012
“Leading with fists is the way large brawlers with little brains settle disputes. We have tried that approach for the past eight years.”

A Sane Foreign Policy for a New Era

Article image

During his first term in office, President Obama has sent mixed messages and tried to appease his implacable critics on the right while greatly disappointing many of his friends on the left. It's no secret: Obama's indecisiveness and failed attempts to woe the rabid right (in the deficit debate debacle, for example) has disappointed moderates and progressives, as well as his liberal base. So far, Obama has appeared in the guise of a tragic figure, would-be leader who lacks the mettle to lead. Many hoped that the 2008 election would be a turning point, that Obama would abandon an over-reliance on military muscle in favor of a more traditional reliance on diplomacy, one that would restore our badly damaged reputation in the world. Here are six keys to a more sane and sensible - and less self-defeating - foreign policy.

First, give peace a fighting chance before chancing a fight. Leading with fists is the way large brawlers with little brains settle disputes. We have tried that approach for the past eight years. It worked out very well if you happened to be a friend of George Bush or one of Dick Cheney's cronies. If so, chances are you were also a big defense contractor, beltway bandit, or revolving door lobbyist on the most corrupt corridor in America, otherwise known as K-Street. For the rest of us, whether we know it or not, it was an unmitigated disaster.

Second, avoid unilateralism like the plague because that what it is. The United States was plagued by the protracted war in Vietnam as the old Soviet Union was plagued by the war in Afghanistan. As we know, that "plague" killed (or contributed greatly to the demise of) the once-mighty Soviet empire. The perpetrator became the victim of its own misguided use of force. A formidable arsenal of nuclear weapons could not save the patient. And it was the economic, as well as the social and political consequences, of unilateral armed intervention that put paid to a corrupt political system. Sound familiar?

Third, stop selling Europe short. The EU now consists of 27 member-states and boasts a population of 500 million, giving it a far larger demographic than the United States. Moreover, the EU's single economy is now the largest economy in the world, bigger than America's and much, much bigger than Japan's (ranked number three) or China's (now ranked number four).

Fourth, insist on fair trade. Our biggest trade deficits by far are with China, not Europe. Our biggest two-way trade partner is Europe, not China. Europe actually imports American goods and services. China sells (exports) a great deal to the United States, but buys (imports) very little from us. Meanwhile, China finances America's deficits while refusing to revalue its currency. Obviously, something's gotta give and the time to face this issue head-on is long overdue.

Fifth, do not compromise core principles for the sake of "national security" because acts such as killing civilians (and calling it "collateral damage") or torturing captives (and calling it "enhanced interrogation techniques") or detention without habeas corpus or due process of any kind (and calling it "extraordinary rendition") destroy the very foundations of a constitutional democracy based on respect for human dignity, human rights, and human life. Euphemisms do not change facts or reality. And they only fool the fools in our midst. The rest of humanity - the world's people - are not fooled.

Sixth, use force when necessary, but only as a last resort and after consulting fully with all important international actors, exhausting all avenues for peaceful resolution, and gaining UN approval. The exception, of course, is a massive direct attack that threatens our national survival in an immediate way - in other words, self-defense. It is hard to imagine whence such an attack would come or what form it would take. Canada and Mexico are partners in NAFTA and obviously pose no military threat. Iran? North Korea? Not a chance. Both are possible nuisance factors, neither is a credible threat to the United States.

The Obama in the White House has failed to follow these six rules and forsaken the other Obama, the one who ran successfully for the office he now holds. Climbing out of the crater left in the wake of the disastrous presidency of George W. Bush was not going to be easy under any circumstances. Doing so with rabid Republicans led by a cynically opportunistic once-moderate-turned-reactionary named Mitt Romney making scurrilous attacks accusing him of everything from apologizing to terrorists to something bordering on treason makes the challenges that lie ahead all the more daunting. Let's hope that when Obama defeats the self-described "severe conservative" who was born with a tin ear (and a silver spoon in his mouth), we will finally get the president we elected four years ago.



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange
Author pic
ABOUT Thomas Magstadt

Tom Magstadt earned his Ph.D. at The Johns Hopkins University School of International Studies. He is the author of "An Empire If You Can Keep It: Power and Principle in American Foreign Policy," "Understanding Politics: Ideas, Institutions and Issues," and "Nations and Governments: Comparative Politics in Regional Perspective." He was a regular contributor to the Prague Post in 1998-99 and has published widely in newspapers, magazines and journals in the United States. He was a Fulbright Scholar in the Czech Republic in the mid-1990s and a visiting professor at the Air War College in 1990-92. He has taught at several universities, chaired two political science departments, and also did a stint as an intelligence analyst at the CIA. He is a member of the board of the International Relations Council of Kansas City. Now working mainly as a free-lance writer, he lives in Westwood Hills, Kansas.

Top Stories

9 comments on "A Sane Foreign Policy for a New Era"

wildthang

September 17, 2012 6:06pm

Starting with Carter we funded covert oeprations with the intention of lureing the Soviets to occupy Afghanistan. Thereby weaponizing ac ountry that can't be deweaponized as easily. All to get a toe hold int the region to replace bases in Iran and to combat the oil cartelling of our economy. So too we began assisting Iraq in war agasint Iran and also sold arms to both sides . Currently we are seeing the business ethics with regard to our own society is no better.

Anacortesrealtor

September 17, 2012 10:10am

A "corrupt political system is correct". Here is the way I see it:

My life has changed because what happened after 9/11 forced me to come out of denial. Denial that I didn’t even know I had. It forced me to recognize the fact that during the Bush-Cheney administration our great United States of America willingly sacrificed American blood for Mid East countries’ oil. It forced me to recognize that we do not in practice have two governing parties in our U.S. Congress. Instead of the Republican Party and the Democratic Party in actual practice we only have one party. That one party is the U.S. Corporations Party. And that one party, especially since 9/11, has been in absolute control of our U.S. Congress. Government of the people by the Lobbyists for the rich and powerful U.S. Corporations made it easy for our great nation to sacrifice blood for oil. In addition to the controlling influence our U.S. Big Oil corporations have, we also have experienced the controlling influence of our Big U.S. banks and Investment firms. Specifically evidenced by the way many billions of dollars worth of fraudulent Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS’) were created by Wall Street and sold to “unsuspecting” and naïve pension fund managers and investors. The result of all of the above actions caused our financial crash in 2008. When adding the unpaid cost of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars to the fraudulent Wall Street MBS investment packages the sum equals the Multi Trillion Dollar Debt which we are now experiencing. We cannot permit our gridlocked Congress to continue in its present condition. There is only one way to heal our Congress and that is by taking the money out of politics. And the only way to do that is with a simple Amendment to our Constitution. To see how and why that is done click on, or copy and paste into your browser this link: http://signon.org/sign/take-money-out-of-politics

Ron in NM

September 17, 2012 1:27pm

Aw, come on, you keep posting the same message, word-for-word, in comments on all the articles. Do you really think there's anyone who comes here who hasn't seen this redundant paragraph?

No matter how sincere the intent may be, endless repetition of your message is just downright annoying. It's like a never-ending spam.

RobertMStahl

September 17, 2012 10:49am

Frege's truth theorem, as much as it is pure mathematics, and implies the ability for juror's prudence to keep all this in line, is only a small part of the overall unified mathematics of biology (Varela, Principles of Biological Autonomy) and the universe (Mills, The Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics), not to mention Principia Mathematica by Bertrand Russel and Alfred Lord Whitehead. Although the temptation for a linear analogy has never been greater, and cannot be divorced in the end, seriously (meaning, I agree, but only to begin with), systems operate in a category above any 'Star of David' analogy, and exhibit paired behavior indicating non-linearity. How far the slime of our day mistakes itself for the actual moss of a genuine slumber (Saul Bellow, More Die of Heartbreak), containing a message in the hope of salvation must consider the genetic pool that, collectively, is self-sacrificial, masochistic almost, with little more than a whimper to save those among us that are the step in time so far flung, unfortunately, or seems to be rather uncanny in its lack of musical awareness, if you get my drift.

McKenna Rowe

September 17, 2012 2:34pm

this comment seems gratuitously verbose, full of forced "hyper-academia"...an exhaustive and inefficient monologue on the concept of pure logic. Are you essentially saying politicians are "full of it"? :-) Agreed!

RobertMStahl

September 18, 2012 11:59am

I think there is a leap involved, a paradigm that plays out on the cultural landscape. I am only trying to keep alive the issues, perhaps the interest, but not the classroom. The notion that civilization has entered into a formal issue of a bifurcation catastrophe, a basin of attraction that is harmful across the board where the 1% are taking advantage of it makes it necessary, in my mind, to try and act on the notion that evolution is substitution. The medium makes any kind of miracle, however small, inadequate. Finally, politics, even for the worst of us, cannot be divorced from our living bodies, and some could argue well enough for our dead ones. This issue comes down to knowing politics, which is learning in some psychological awareness (sense) from crime, which I am all for. My experience has been to be on the wrong side of WWIII and my heroin is Indira Singh.

Norman Allen

September 17, 2012 10:06am

The US must pursue social justice issues at home and abroad and lead by example to become credible and a true leader in the world political structure and processes. A cosmic cowboy mentality bent on destruction with huge force behind it threatening the world has not worked for US. The whole system is skewed in favor of the .0005% supported by about 2% immediate circle at the expense of about 90% of the population. We have no moral argument for anyone to be their leader except the thieves and abusers. Time to change but HOW? How can you change a system so ingrained in force and skewed in favor of such a tiny minority? Experience has shown that a strong leader will be able to bring about rational changes to save a system. Usually, the systems implode before it could be fixed. The US has imploded in 1933, in the 80s (S&L crisis), in the 90s (dotcom bust) and recently (mortage bust and war busted) from which we are still trying to recover. I wonder if the elites learned anything or are they the Bourbons of the 21st century who never learns or forgets anything? We shall see!

RobertMStahl

September 17, 2012 10:06am

Hope springs eternal. I think I agree with Banksy, the graffiti artist, not so open to ignorance on a whim, or hope when it is quite simply damage control we have inherited from the cavitation of political intelligence on an ecological scale, or of collectivism in any formal understanding of evolution in learning or politics, and the Nation-State dissolves into something extremely queer. Ever hear of Wayne Madsen's reporting on B Obama? Why did BO drop his testicles on the sidewalk as he took the first step to the White House from Capital Hill or before, condoning torture? What does it matter? I hate Romney worse, but I know that this fake politic is the cybernetic game that historical 'politics' maintains ignorance with, or for. Even Bateson, who proved we were born geniuses as part of our species understood the system was corrupt, and cited the epistemology that our collective imitates, but does NOT invoke, and he couldn't understand trying to help it (just spiral down). Varela and Margulis begin to get at a very basic political fiber totally missing, maybe Randell L Mills, also, but the aforementioned are missing now. So, too, is Indira Singh and something incredibly fundamental (about parallel processing in AI). And the words go on. By the way, it was, "In the beginning all was mush and without form." Only a fool would take it, "In the beginning was the word." Pairs gone crazy.

RobertMStahl

September 17, 2012 10:03am

---