You are viewing the NationofChange archives. For the latest news and actions, visit the new
Get Email Updates | Log In | Register

From Short-Term Ceasefire to Long-Term Peace, How to Resolve the Israel-Gaza Crisis?

Amy Goodman
Democracy Now! / Video Interview
Published: Saturday 24 November 2012
“You’re seeing an ongoing conflict, a war Hamas is waging against Israel that has been going on for very long time.”

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has just arrived in Egypt where she will hold talks with Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi about a possible truce between Hamas and Israel to end the Gaza conflict. Clinton has already met with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. As efforts to secure a ceasefire continue, we host a debate on the Israeli assault on the Gaza Strip with two guests: James Colbert, policy director for the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs; and Yousef Munayyer, Executive Director of The Jerusalem Fund and its educational program, The Palestine Center.


AMY GOODMAN: As efforts to secure a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas continue, we host a debate on what’s happening in the Middle East. James Colbert is joining us from Washington D.C., policy director for JINSA, the Jewish Institute for National Security affairs. And Yousef Munayyer is here in New York. He is executive director of The Jerusalem Fund and its educational program, the Palestine Center. James Colbert, we now have figures in, of course they’re changing every moment, more than 139 Palestinians have been killed, five Israelis have been killed, the cease-fire has not been achieved at this point. The Israeli military is continuing to bombard Gaza and in Tel Aviv, we have a bomb exploding on a bus, injuring, we believe, about 21 people. Talk about what is happening right now.

JAMES COLBERT: You’re seeing an ongoing conflict, a war Hamas is waging against Israel that has been going on for very long time. It cycles up as Hamas has felt more emboldened by changes in Egypt, by changes in support from Iran and other changes related to the Palestinian Authority. It has rapidly increased the amount of rocket fire into Israel and then took the not unprecedented, but further step a week and a half ago of targeting Israelis in Israel not through indirect fire rockets and mortars, but by direct fire, anti-tank missile onto an Israeli position and a buried bomb that was tunneled under sovereign Israeli territory, both of which resulted in casualties to the Israeli military. This was viewed in Israel definitely as an escalation in conjunction with the massively increased rocket fire, paralyzing the south of Israel. The Israeli authorities believe that they could no longer sit by and not respond to this latest round of fighting that Hamas initiated.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: Yousef Munayyer, can you respond to what James Colbert said and also talk specifically about what you do in your most recent article, "The Assassination of Ahmed al Jabari," and its role in this?

YOUSEF MUNAYYER: I think one of the biggest mistakes that we make is that we totally remove the situation from the context in which it is in. And to describe this as a war is incorrect. If it is a war at all, it is a war on the people of Gaza. To describe it as a war between — to create the impression that there is two equal sides or parity in any way is really misleading.

This is not an international conflict between two states. This is a domestic issue within the Israeli state that it is using massive force to repress a Palestinian population. If you look at the Gaza Strip on the map, it is this tiny strip of land in the corner of what was Palestine. Eighty percent of the people there are not from the Gaza strip. They’re from outside the Gaza strip. They were made refugees during the depopulation of Palestine in 1948.

So, what you have here is literally the backing of thousands of people — millions of people — into a corner. If you let the underlying causes of this fester for year after year, it is only natural to see people acting out in frustration and aggression against this type of policy. So, until we look at the underlying causes here, this type of really horrific scenes that we’re seeing is going to perpetuate.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: James Colbert, can you respond to that? What do you see as the underlying causes of this conflict?

JAMES COLBERT: Well the underlying cause of this, the approximate underlying cause of this, is Hamas’ absolute rejection of the existence of the Israeli state, their entire — the Hamas manifesto, if you will, explicitly calls for the elimination of Jews and Israelis, the elimination of the Israeli state and its replacement with a theocratic Islamist fundamentalist state to be ruled by Sharia law. There is no place for Israelis or Jews in the Middle East. It actually expands a little bit larger, possibly the world.

The organization’s goals are well known. They do not shy from announcing them and repeating them. This is the approximate cause, the underlying cause is an ongoing struggle by many organizations and groups to delegitimize Israel, to remove Israel from the region because they consider it to be an illegitimate state that does not deserve to belong there.

AMY GOODMAN: And James Colbert, what do you see as the reason for the latest Israeli assault on Gaza? What was the cause of this?

JAMES COLBERT: The most recent cause I have already discussed, the ratcheting up of violence perpetuated by Hamas against Israel. It had not gone away. If you look at the number of rocket and mortar attacks, it has been ongoing for the last several years. Since, in fact, the last operation the Israelis used to try and suppress that. What Israel is simply trying to do is deter Hamas from launching any more rockets and mortars into Israel.

AMY GOODMAN: Let’s have Yousef Munayyer respond, from the Palestine Center. What do you see as the timeline of what has taken place there? Then respond to the broader issue.

YOUSEF MUNAYYER: I certainly disagree with the timeline. If you only want to look at the actions of Palestinians, then you will only notice the time line that is convenient for your narrative. But, if you look at all of the facts, you see there is persistent violations of Gaza’s territory, there are persistent violations of Palestinian human rights inside Gaza through the firing on fisherman through the firing of people inside Gaza from the outside, through periodic bombardment through air strikes.

This began on the eighth of November when the IDF, the Israeli military, acknowledges it crossed into Gaza and during clashes there killed a 12-year-old boy. This is when the responses began. The responses were fairly limited and the situation began to die down. For a 24 hour period there was a lot of quiet where we thought this was going to end. And it was when — at the end of that 24 hour period, when the Hamas leader Ahmed al Jabari working on a long-term cease fire with the Israelis that they decided to assassinate him.

The other point that I want to respond to is the question about Palestinians denying the Israeli state’s right to exist. If you look up the Universal Declaration of State Rights, you’ll find that one does that exist. There’s a Universal Declaration of Human rights. And the legitimacy of states is based on the extent to which they respect the human rights of people within their borders. The question here is not, does Israel have a right to exist. The question here is, is the way in which Israel exists, as a colonizer as an occupier and as an apartheid state, right? And I think that Palestinians and many people throughout the world are 100% within their rights to say, no, this is not right. And That’s what’s going on here, and has been going on for 64 years.

The genesis of this, sir, is not with the creation of Hamas, which was in 1987. It goes back much, much farther than that to the depopulation of Palestine in 1948. So, I think if we want to start our calendars and dates that are convenient for us, we’re going to have a problem here. We have to look back at what the entire context is here, and that begins with Zionist colonization of Palestine.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: James Colbert, can you respond to what Yousef Munayyer has said?

JAMES COLBERT: Absolutely not. What Yousef Munayyer is saying — using slogans and terms such as apartheid, depopulation — it takes this — this is not a debate. This is simply sloganeering. These terms have no basis in a reality. On one hand I hear claims of genocide, of an attack on the civilian population, and yet what we see after hundreds of Israeli air strikes, all of which, nearly all of which are videoed and put online — you see the secondary explosions — how can Israel drop so much tonnage of precision weaponry over and over and over for days, destroying Hamas rocket arsenals and yet the reports from Gaza is, 130 plus people have been killed? Unprecedented in warfare.

AMY GOODMAN: I don’t understand. I’m not unsure I understand. Are you saying that is a lot or a little? I think I’m missing your point here.

JAMES COLBERT: I think it’s unbelievably little. I think it shows that the Israeli people are target —

AMY GOODMAN: 139 people and hundreds wounded?

JAMES COLBERT: When you’re talking about the amount of tonnage of precision weaponry dropped on Hamas arsenals, which are intentionally put in civilian structures, basements of hospitals and apartments buildings...

AMY GOODMAN: But, James Colbert, you’re talking about 139 people killed, many children, and over 1000 people wounded. This is not a large number of people?

JAMES COLBERT: Is this not a large number of people? It is unfortunate when any person dies?

AMY GOODMAN: At least 139 is the last count and over 1000 people when it.

JAMES COLBERT: When any person loses their life in this conflict, it is a terrible tragedy. However, Israel is trying to destroy the Hamas weaponry that is intentionally in place amidst the civilian population of Gaza. And I think it shows the character which Israel tries to avoid civilian casualties that so few, relatively, have been killed considering where these missions are stored, where they are intentionally stored, where they are fired from. Video evidence by the hundreds shows that Hamas chooses to launch rockets from the courtyards of mosques, from the courtyards of hospitals and schools, from the roofs of apartment buildings. This is a military force that cloaks itself in its civilian population and dares its enemy to attack it. Meanwhile, showing no compulsion about attacking Israeli civilians directly and announcing that their target is indeed Israeli civilians. You can’t possibly compare the two.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: James, I want to turn to the role of the U.S. in the present situation in Gaza. I’m turning to a clip now of President Obama responding to a question about Israel during the third presidential debate last month in Boca Raton, Florida. Moderator Bob Schieffer asked if the candidates would be "Willing to declare an attack on Israel as an attack on the United States." This is part of President Obama’s response.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: First of all, Israel is a true friend, it is our greatest ally in the region. and if Israel is attacked, America will stand with Israel. I have made that clear throughout my presidency.

BOB SCHIEFFER: So you’re saying we have already made that declaration.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: I will stand with Israel if they are attacked. And this is the reason why, working with Israel, we have created the strongest military and intelligence cooperation between our two countries in history. In fact, this week we will be carrying out the largest military exercise with Israel in history. This very week.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: That was President Obama speaking — responding to a question by Bob Schieffer at the third presidential debates last month. Yousef Munayyer, could you respond to what President Obama said?

YOUSEF MUNAYYER: Well, I think the President is describing his policy. He stood 100% by the Israelis as this has continued. I think the problem with that is it shows a complete lack of strategic thinking about how to move this situation forward; a lack of strategic thinking that is echoed, by the way, in the Israeli government.

They’re refer to what they’re doing now in Gaza as mowing the lawn. The bombardment of a largely civilian population, most of whom are refugees, they refer to with the callous idiom of mowing the lawn. A periodic bombardment that they have to do to set back the capacity of the factions there. That’s not strategic thinking. What morality is there an a war whose repetition is planned? There is none. And there is no strategic thinking in Israel about how to move the situation forward. The answer from them has always been to respond to Palestinians with force. You simply cannot think mowing the lawn is going to succeed if you sow seed of hate.

And finally, just a note to our interlocutor on the language, if he has a problem with the term Zionist colonization or describing the Palestinians as native or indigenous, I suggest he take it that up with the Zionists writers and philosophers who coined those terms in their writing to support the Zionist movement in the early 20th century.

AMY GOODMAN: Let’s go back to President Obama on Sunday.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: There’s no country on earth that would tolerate missiles raining down on its citizens from outside its borders. So, we are fully supportive of Israel’s right to defend itself from missiles landing on people’s homes and workplaces and potentially killing civilians.

AMY GOODMAN: Yousef Munayyer and then James Colbert respond to this.

YOUSEF MUNAYYER: I think that the problem again here is the lack of context. What nation would accept being depopulated from their homes, being colonized, being besieged, being trapped, being bombarded? What nation would accept that and also accept that they have no right to self-defense? There is no security for anybody when the idea of security is a zero sum game. Unfortunately, that is the thinking that we have seen out of Israel, is that as long as the Palestinians are more insecure, the Israelis will be more secure. But that simply is not the case.

AMY GOODMAN: James Colbert of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, what do you see as the solution?

JAMES COLBERT: This solution to which specific issue are you referring? Very important to know which solution.

AMY GOODMAN: First, what’s happening right now, the bombardment of Gaza by the Israeli military and also the broader solution to how this conflict will end, which clearly, endangers the security of Palestinians as well as Israelis.

JAMES COLBERT: Well, the immediate hostilities could be brought to a conclusion if the Hamas is willing to abide by a cease-fire, which has structural elements that show it will last, not simply a status quo ante which we have seen in the past, where the rocket fire will start to increase over time to a point where the sovereign government of Israel — which is responsible to its citizens, being a democracy — cannot sit idly by while its citizens are attacked from a territory outside the borders of its state.

I am curious to understand the description of Gaza as occupied, considering the Israelis withdrew from it. And have in many ways, and many critics have said, by their withdrawal have paid a security price because had they still been there, these rockets wouldn’t be flying. But Israelis chose to do that because they were seeking peace and they have paid a price for that, but they have shown no compulsion or compuncture to go back in and reoccupy. I think no one in Israel wants to reoccupy Gaza. However, they pay a security price for not being there.

AMY GOODMAN: And that issue of occupied Gaza?

YOUSEF MUNAYYER: Yeah, occupation is defined in international law as effective control over territory. And just because Israelis remove the colonists who were there in 2005, who should never have been there in the first place, to begin with because it is illegal under international law, does mean that they no longer exercise effective control over Gaza. To think that they don’t effectively control Gaza is to say that you don’t effectively control the life of a fish living in a fishbowl in your house just because you don’t swim with it.

JAMES COLBERT: That is a ridiculous analogy.

YOUSEF MUNAYYER: The reality is the Israelis control what is going in and out of Gaza. They control the air space over Gaza. They control imports and they control exports, OK. They control who gets to go from Gaza to the West Bank, which is a violation of the Oslo Accords that they agreed to. So, the idea that there is no effective control over the lives of people in Gaza is just absolutely preposterous and doesn’t square with the facts.

JAMES COLBERT: On that point alone, Hamas, which took over the Gaza Strip, had an election, won it, then made sure that there would never be another election. Threw out Fatah in a brutal but short civil war in Gaza in which Fatah activists were thrown from the roofs of buildings rather than be repatriated somewhere else.

To this day, Gaza’s occupation is nonexistent. It is not occupied. These terms — international law — we could discuss the territories, if you will, as the remaining 10% of the old Palestine mandate. This is a history that can certainly be opened up and looked at. But to continue to call all of the people of Gaza refugees and the Israelis colonists, these slogans and terms really take this discussion and put it right back into a gutter of which there will be no progress. None at all. Israel as a sovereign, independent, democratic, liberal and tolerant state exists. To pretend that it isn’t or cannot or is illegitimate really sets the stage for no progress at all. The hope of course of the Israelis has been focused on the Palestinian Authority which unfortunately has taken a backseat to Hamas and its violence and it’s expected support from Egypt and it’s certainly the support it’s receiving from Iran.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: Yousef Munayyer you’ve made a comparison, as have some others, of the most recent Israeli military strikes on Gaza and what happened four years ago during Operation Cast Lead. And you say that the cause has something to do with the forthcoming elections in Israel. Can you talk about that?

YOUSEF MUNAYYER: Yeah, absolutely. I think when you look at the dynamics of fire over the past several years and you look at when the rockets — when projectiles have been fired from Gaza, they have occurred, the vast majority have occurred, probably over 90%, have happened after Israeli extrajudicial assassinations in the Gaza strip. It is the Israelis can control the escalation here with their ability to inflict high casualties in the Gaza strip.

And so, it is very clear from a point of view of security that the way to solve this problem is through dealing with the parties on the ground. And every time that they have done that, through third parties with the Egyptians, they have been able to largely limit this rocket fire while at the same time continuing to have their way with the people in the Gaza Strip through periodic violations and incursions.

The question here is, why now? You look at the situation now and you look at the fact that this did not have to happen. And the Israelis knew that by attacking in the Gaza Strip and murdering Ahmed Jabari that they would only provoke a significant amount of rockets, so why do it? And I think the only answer is that they are domestic, political calculations here on the part of the Israeli government. We saw the same things par to Cast Lead. We saw the same thing prior to the Israeli operation in Lebanon 2006. There’s a very, very strange but significant correlation between vast military operations and Israeli elections happening shortly thereafter.

AMY GOODMAN: I’m curious, do you see a one-state or a two-state solution being solution the solution, ultimately, James Colbert?

JAMES COLBERT: The ultimately, the United States government is committed to a two-state solution. The Israeli government has accepted a two-state solution. The problem has been finding a partner willing to work toward that goal. As far as what was recently said, I’m sorry, but the assassination of the Hamas leader, is a targeted killing of an known terrorist who had blood on his hands. This is the same as saying that the U.S. should not have taken at Osama bin Laden because by doing so you would inflame Al Qaeda worldwide and invite more attacks on the United States. For a democracy to show justice and to show its people that it takes care of them, it must follow through on its laws. Hamas is considered a terrorist organization by the United States, by Europe, by Israel by other countries. This is not some kind of benign entity whose leaders are not active in fomenting violence and the carrying out of suicide bombings and a promotion of violence through their educational system.

AMY GOODMAN: Very quickly, Yousef Munayyer, your final response?

YOUSEF MUNAYYER: The reality is, between river and sea, there are close to 10 million people, almost half of them are Palestinian Arabs. The vast majority of which have no right to vote for the state that controls them. That is the reality on the ground. If our friend here wants to call that democracy, I think he should probably be engaged in a profession of rewriting dictionaries, because that is not with that is. That is de facto apartheid. The U.S., unfortunately, has only helped perpetuate the situation by telling the Israelis that there are no costs to occupation and have made perpetual occupation a viable policy option for the Israeli government.

AMY GOODMAN: I want to thank you both for being with us, Yousef Munayyer is executive director of the Jerusalem Fund, its educational program the Palestine Center. And James Colbert, Policy Director for the JINSA, the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs.

The latest news, as of this moment at least nine Palestinians have been killed in air strikes so far today, bringing the Palestinian death toll to 146, up to 21 people were injured in a bus bombing in the Israeli city of Tel Aviv. The Jerusalem Post reports none of the injuries to those wounded in the Tel Aviv bus bombing are life-threatening. Two Israelis, a soldier and child, have also been killed, bringing the death toll for Israel to five. U.S. Secretary State Hillary Clinton is meeting with Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi as we broadcast to discuss a possible truce in Gaza.

Author pic
ABOUT Amy Goodman

Amy Goodman is the host of "Democracy Now!," a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on more than 900 stations in North America. She is the author of "Breaking the Sound Barrier," recently released in paperback and now a New York Times best-seller.

One thing that is clear in

One thing that is clear in all of this is the fact that israel would not presently exist if not for Jesus Christ. For if not for the so called 'christians' in the united states, who pervert his teachings and delude themselves in the zionist supremist myth of the jews being God's holy cow, incessantly covering the israeli's butts and giving them guns and ammo, there would be no israel. Jesus, therefore has been their Messiah. Maybe by the intelligent design of a few wise guys who were good at exploiting religiopolitical propoganda.

Interesting how only the

Interesting how only the Jewish perspective is quoted under the headline. Always, even here... I cannot fathom how a people, so oppressed and persecuted for so long, can be engaging in inflicting such terror and death upon a captive population. And the lopsided forces involved make it like shooting fish in a barrel.

I also wonder, if I were in the Palestinian shoes, how long it would take me to pick up a rock, make a crude rocket, or do whatever else I could to protect myself.

Imagine waiting at the Midtown Tunnel for days in the hot sun, perhaps you have a relative who is sick and needs care in Manhattan. You wait for days, while watching as another group not only breezes through the tunnel, but has a military escort. Meanwhile, your relative dies for the waiting.

How long would it take you to pick up a rock?

And I also see a resistance to looking squarely at the history that generated this conflict by the Israelis. The guest was unwilling to acknowledge the facts that gave rise to this situation. History and the words of the Zionists. They are real.

And the US is not an honest broker in this conflict. Simply look at the arms trade between the US and Israel to see the reason why. War is quite profitable. Endless war is even more profitable. And the US wonders why they are hated in the Arab world. When Israel is using US jets and tanks, and bulldozers to destroy any chance of a viable life in the occupied territories.

Finally, I agree that no people would sit idly by while being bombed from outside. And so the Gazans have not sat idly by while being bombed from the air by Israel. What about the rights of Gazans to defend themselves?

Israel, please awaken from your delusion of persecution. We gave you a state, you promptly made war to make it bigger. You give your word in international treaties, and then promptly break it by continuing settlements, building walls, and killing Palestinians. There is no trust. It is with Israel to take responsibility for a real effort to allow the Palestinians a place to be. The Allies rescued the Jews from the Holocaust at the end of the war. Who will rescue the Palestinians from this, their own, Holocaust?

Perhaps Jews have focused too much on their Holocaust, and kept alive a fear-based mentality that has given rise to paranoia. I cannot fathom how else they can be doing this to others.

The solution: The

The solution: The jews/israelis accepting the fact that they are not the only human beings on this planet.

It's easy to bring all the

It's easy to bring all the narrow minds out of the crevices, simply suggest that a someone who is jewish killing another human being is no different than someone who is not jewish killing another human being. "All men(human beings) are created equal." That means the jews are no more or less human than anybody else. And above all that means that "WE are all God's children." None 'chosen' above another. If you don't like that, then get the fucking hell out of the United States, you don't belong here!

I agree with ISSYCO 100%. I

I agree with ISSYCO 100%. I am a good catholic boy & my undergraduate degree is in: Middle Eastern & Islamic Studies. I even studied Farsi for a year. We had a Persian roommate for 2 years and a Libyan roommate for 1 year (Abubakar Omar) while in college. We would discuss this issue back then (1976 to 1981) - and the fact is: No other Arab nation wants to have the Palestinians in their backyard. Hell, Egypt could easily give them a large part of the Sinai peninsula; the Saudi's have huge tracts of land; Syria, Iraq, Libya, Sudan etc., etc. None of these Islamic states has ever wanted their "Moslem Brethren" to live with them. Why?

They behave like animals. The entire world has watched as they insist on eradicating Israel, and we do not agree. "WE" IS THE REST OF THE NON ARAB, NON JEWISH PART OF THE WORLD. Just regular citizens of the planet earth. We see the missiles launched into Israel and the videos of Muslims killing Muslims. Just Google the term: "Muslim on Muslim video YouTube" - and you will see many, many videos of right wing Muslim zealots attacking and killing innocent men, women and children that are Muslims. I have no dog in this hunt - just my opinion. Please, no ad hominem attacks if anyone chooses to respond. I am not a Zionist. I am not a troll. Just a 54 year old guy that has watched and studied this problem.

The Palestinians have no

The Palestinians have no country because the Arab nations don't want them to have one. Otherwise, why don't they just give them one of their own? Simple answer: then who would stir up trouble and keep Israel on her toes for them?

Comment with your Facebook account

Comment with your Disqus account

Top Stories

comments powered by Disqus

NationofChange works to educate, inform, and fight power with people, corruption with community.

If you would like to stay up to date with the best in independent, filter-free journalism, updates on upcoming events to attend, and more, enter your email below:

7 Compelling Reasons Why You Should Support NationofChange

Our readers often tell us why they’ve decided to step up and become supporters. Here are some of the top reasons people are giving.

1. You’re keeping independent journalism alive
The corporate owned media has proven that it can’t be trusted. In a media landscape wrought with spin and corruption, NationofChange stands in very scarce company.

2. You’re sticking it to the rich, powerful, and corrupt
When you have money in this country you can get away with damn near anything, and they do. NationofChange isn’t afraid to expose these criminals no matter how powerful they are.

3. Your donation is 100% tax-deductible
NationofChange is a 501(c)3 charity. People tend to assume that many other organizations are (most nonprofits are NOT) but it’s that 501(c)3 status is a bit more rare than you think.

Read the rest...