Solar Power Much Cheaper to Produce Than Most Analysts Realize, Study Finds
The public is being kept in the dark about the viability of solar photovoltaic energy, according to a study conducted at Queen’s University.
“Many analysts project a higher cost for solar photovoltaic energy because they don’t consider recent technological advancements and price reductions,” says [co-author] Joshua Pearce, Adjunct Professor, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering. “Older models for determining solar photovoltaic energy costs are too conservative.”
Dr. Pearce believes solar photovoltaic systems are near the “tipping point” where they can produce energy for about the same price other traditional sources of energy.
That’s the news release for a new journal article, “A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity” (subs. req’d). The analysis concludes:
Given the state of the art in the technology and favourable financing terms it is clear that PV has already obtained grid parity in specific locations and as installed costs continue to decline, grid electricity prices continue to escalate, and industry experience increases, PV will become an increasingly economically advantageous source of electricity over expanding geographical regions.
That argument is one Climate Progress and others have been making for a while (see ‘Ferocious Cost Reductions’ Make Solar PV Competitive and Utility CEO on Solar: In “3 to 5 Years You’ll Be Able to Get Power Cheaper from the Roof of Your House Than From the Grid”.)
Here’s more for the news release (plus some more must-have CP charts):
Analysts look at many variables to determine the cost of solar photovoltaic systems for consumers, including installation and maintenance costs, finance charges, the system’s life expectancy, and the amount of electricity it generates.
Dr. Pearce says some studies don’t consider the 70 per cent reduction in the cost of solar panels since 2009 . Furthermore, he says research now shows the productivity of top-of-the-line solar panels only drops between 0.1 and 0.2 percent annually, which is much less than the one per cent used in many cost analyses.
Equipment costs are determined based on dollars per watt of electricity produced. One 2010 study estimated this cost at $7.61, while a 2003 study set the amount at $4.16. According to Dr. Pearce, the real cost in 2011 is under $1 per watt for solar panels purchased in bulk on the global market, though he says system and installation costs vary widely.

Solar is ready for its close up now.
For more, see Anatomy of a Solar PV System: How to Continue “Ferocious Cost Reductions” for Solar Electricity:

(Chart from Emanuel Sachs of MIT. Note: Even this data is already two years old.)
CONNECT
















11 comments on "Solar Power Much Cheaper to Produce Than Most Analysts Realize, Study Finds"
caegwrzg
January 02, 2012 11:16pm
I still wonder how solar will replace our current energy supply....wind and solar are at best less than 40% reliable because first of all the sun just doesn't shine 24-7 and the wind doesn't always blow within the requirements of windmills, sometimes it blows too hard sometimes it doesn't blow hard enough. Oh and what about that battery back up that some are using to supplement solar?? That thing is loaded with toxins! We are making progress and it's good to see information like this but I wish the media wouldn't try to tell you its the answer when it isn't yet. We need to think about the big picture and decide am I willing to live without electricity? If the answer is yes then believe everything you read about how solar and wind are the solutions, but in the mean time I am going to reduce my dependency on electricity so those coal, natural gas and nuke plants don't have to run quite so much.
December 19, 2011 11:52am
By the way, there is some trouble with the font you are using. Seem like the explorer browser is not supporting the text font. Second time I succeeded, but now again not. Advertisements and comments are shown OK.
December 19, 2011 11:50am
Thanks, solar is great, but you may also want to check E-cat http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3284823.eceFuture looks great. Just a little bit of effort still. And good attitude.
December 13, 2011 7:13pm
Hi Joe this is such a great graph and provides much need viewpoint. At a personal level, I've been calling my electric company and suggesting that they give SENIORS who live independently solar panels at cost, allowing others to donate as they do already for "green" energy. Then the "cost" is spread out over xx years at a reasonable rate considering the actual individual's income. The electric company then has the residence equipped with solar. They get to service it and charge any future residents, because it is THEIR equipment.
This plan above would made it turn over a LOT faster. WISH I had it NOW! living on social security 630. month, and electric bill of $200. If I did not raise half my food all these years I would be seriously hard up.
Would you please contact me? I'd like to have another conversation at least the beginning, in private. Peace n planting stellajane at gardener dot com
December 13, 2011 10:43am
You guys badly need an editor. The story is difficult to read due to all the grammatical errors.
December 12, 2011 6:19pm
Does the tipping point of solar energy costs include the huge savings when we no longer rely on fossil fuels, thereby reducing their prices. Also, there will be less air pollution thus less medical cost for everyone.
December 12, 2011 11:55am
still cost more someday it might not
December 12, 2011 5:56pm
Reply to OldHat:
Wrong! It actually costs less. It hasn't happened yet due to lobbyists with pockets full of cash. No other reason than that.
December 11, 2011 5:29pm
What is the hold up? Would that be Congress?
December 12, 2011 5:55pm
Reply to Rufus-Jenny Triplett:
It's all that oil and coal money being thrown at Congress.