You are viewing the NationofChange archives. For the latest news and actions, visit the new
Get Email Updates | Log In | Register

Terrance Heath
Published: Wednesday 18 September 2013
Enough. Food stamps are not a “moral hazard.” Hunger is not a game.

Stop Playing Games with Food Stamps

Article image

Some Republicans now think it’s a “moral hazard” to feed the poor. It’s bad enough that Republicans are proposing $40 billion in cuts to food stamps, but portray it as a moral act beggars belief.

Earlier this summer, Rep. Steve Fincher (R-Tenn.) quoted the Bible to justify cutting food stamps during a hearing on the farm bill, even though he’s one of the biggest recipients of farm subsidies. Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas), at a town meeting in June, supported the House GOP’s cuts to food stamps, telling the audience “It’s a moral hazard for able-bodied adults with no dependents to work.”

The truth is that sometimes those who work still can’t eat, because they’re not paid a living wage. Rep. Conaway recently took it up a notch during a sugar lobby retreat at a Napa resort. He inveighed against “certain moral hazards we’ve built into the safety net” — like food stamps.

Conaway has recently voted to make permanent sugar subsidies that even conservative columnist George Will and the CATO Institute oppose. The government currently guarantees 85 percent of the U.S. market for U.S.-produced sugar. That means the government buys the sugar, and then sells the surplus at a loss.

The program cost to taxpayers — who cover the government’s losses on this one — was about $80 million this year alone. About 75 percent of total farm subsidies go to biggest 10 percent of farming companies, and another $4 to $5 billion per year in direct payments goes to owners of farmland that has traditionally grown crops, even if the “farmers” in question are not growing anything at the moment. So, some direct payments go to wealthy absentee farmers, including $400,000 to a Rockefeller heir.

It ought to be enough to turn the stomach of anyone who calls themselves a “free market” or a  “fiscal” conservative. The funny part is that quite a few members of Congress are themselves farm subsidy recipients. Republicans were among the biggest recipients, raking in 10 times as much as Democratic representatives.

The absolutely hilarious part is that some of the biggest recipients of farm subsidies voted to cut food stamps and voted to keep giving subsidies to rich farmers — like themselves. Fourteen Republicans — with a total net worth of $124.5 million, including $7.2 million in farm subsidies — voted take food from the mouths of millions of the poor while continuing to  put money in their own pockets.

Scott Faber, of the Environmental Working Group, put it best: “Only an evil genius could have dreamed this up.” And these people want to preach to the rest of us about morality? Republicans believe that closing billions of dollars in tax loopholes is wrong, and killing jobs by slashing government spending is right. Republicans believe that raising taxes on the wealthy is immoral, but slashing food assistance is moral.

Enough. Food stamps are not a “moral hazard.” Hunger is not a game.

Jeezuz says, "Don't Tax the

Jeezuz says, "Don't Tax the Rich, and Don't Feed the Poor."

GOD rewards his loyal servants with wealth and power and punishes sinners with poverty. (Ultraconservative televangelist Joel Osteen's self-serving, false prophecy called "Prosperity Theology").

It's all in the New & Improved, Rewritten, Ultraconservative Bible.

Comment with your Facebook account

Comment with your Disqus account

Top Stories

comments powered by Disqus

NationofChange works to educate, inform, and fight power with people, corruption with community.

If you would like to stay up to date with the best in independent, filter-free journalism, updates on upcoming events to attend, and more, enter your email below:

7 Compelling Reasons Why You Should Support NationofChange

Our readers often tell us why they’ve decided to step up and become supporters. Here are some of the top reasons people are giving.

1. You’re keeping independent journalism alive
The corporate owned media has proven that it can’t be trusted. In a media landscape wrought with spin and corruption, NationofChange stands in very scarce company.

2. You’re sticking it to the rich, powerful, and corrupt
When you have money in this country you can get away with damn near anything, and they do. NationofChange isn’t afraid to expose these criminals no matter how powerful they are.

3. Your donation is 100% tax-deductible
NationofChange is a 501(c)3 charity. People tend to assume that many other organizations are (most nonprofits are NOT) but it’s that 501(c)3 status is a bit more rare than you think.

Read the rest...