From Street Protests to Electioneering, Frustrated Liberals Rising

Tony Pugh
McClatchy / News Analysis
Published: Tuesday 4 October 2011
“Despite low attendance so far, organizers hope the protests will touch a nerve, much like the Wisconsin labor protests that followed the state's move to strip state workers of their collective bargaining rights last year.”
Article image

Demoralized liberals are trying to get their mojo back. Frustrated with Congress, outmaneuvered by the tea party and all but silent as the GOP swept the 2010 elections, liberals say they’ve had enough.

On Monday, 2,000 progressive activists who represented more than 200 groups came to Washington to chart a new course for recapturing the 2008 electoral magic that put Barack Obama in office and gave Democrats control of both houses of Congress.

Monday’s opening of the three-day “Take Back the American Dream” conference took place as small but vocal bands of protesters demonstrated in various cities nationwide to support the ongoing “Occupy Wall Street” protests in New York.

The American Dream conference, which includes a jobs rally Wednesday on Capitol Hill, is sponsored by the liberal Campaign for America’s Future and by Rebuild the Dream, an organization founded by Van Jones, former green jobs adviser for the Obama White House.

The event will try to stir a passionate grass-roots movement of disenchanted liberals who will organize and hit the streets to protest what they see as a hard right turn in American politics after the Great Recession and the 2010 elections.

After fielding nearly 26,000 online ideas from more than 131,000 Americans, the fledgling movement has drafted a “Contract for the American Dream,” which calls for more investment in infrastructure and public education, more green jobs, saving Social Security and Medicare, higher taxes for the wealthy, a financial transaction fee for Wall Street and an end to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Jones, who resigned his White House job in 2009 after several political squabbles with Republicans, said the nascent movement would build on the protests that liberals mounted against the Iraq War during the George W. Bush years, which helped turn public opinion against the war.

“After the Iraq War, before Obama, it was the people who protested in the streets,” Jones told the crowd at the Capitol Hilton Hotel. “This is your movement that you built with your own hands.”

Jones chided liberal leaders for falling asleep at the wheel after Obama became president, arguing, “We went from ‘Yes, we can,’ to ‘Yes, he can.’ “

Hoping to strike a strong activist tone, Monday’s conference began with a live video feed of protesters at New York’s Occupy Wall Street demonstration. After nearly 30 days and the arrest of 700 protesters Sunday, the Wall Street protest is garnering national media attention and is spawning similar demonstrations nationwide.

Late Monday afternoon, the websites of The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times and The Boston Globe featured stories about similar homegrown protests.

Occupy Charlotte, one of the loosely organized groups that support the Wall Street protests, criticizes a range of conservative interests: from banks for the subprime mortgage meltdown to health insurers for denying claims to oil and nuclear companies for what the group calls environmental neglect.

On Saturday, the group will host a “general assembly” to plan more demonstrations in the North Carolina city, which has become an international banking center. Charlotte resident Grey Revell, 37, plans to attend.

“I want to show my solidarity with the people in New York,” said Revell, a musician who lived in New York for six years.

“I think what’s happening is very important,” Revell said. “You have a lot of unarticulated anger, and an overall feeling among citizenry that they’re not being heard, they’re not being appreciated.”

In Chicago, Monday marked Day 11 of a round-the-clock demonstration outside the city’s Federal Reserve Bank. As a few protesters drummed on buckets, others held signs and cheered when cars and taxis honked in support. The protesters, who by midday numbered a few dozen, cited various grievances, most commonly corporate influence on Washington but also joblessness, homelessness, and the costs of education and health care.

Taking a break from his drumming, lifelong Chicago resident Darell Willis said it saddened him to see so many homeless people in a city with many foreclosed homes and abandoned properties.

“If I have to stay out here 24/7 for the next few months, it doesn’t matter,” he said. “We want to be heard.”

Despite low attendance so far, organizers hope the protests will touch a nerve, much like the Wisconsin labor protests that followed the state’s move to strip state workers of their collective bargaining rights last year.

“The Wisconsin struggle was contagious,” said Christine Neumann-Ortiz, founder and executive director of Voces de la Frontera, an immigrant workers’ rights group in Milwaukee that was active in the Wisconsin protests.

Rep. Donna Edwards, D-Md., told attendees at the Washington conference that they must work together and avoid “food fights” with each other and Obama if they hope to have electoral success in 2012. She promised that progressive concerns would be heard in all election contests next year.

“There’s not a single congressional district that will go untouched,” Edwards said, charging that Republicans care more about the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans than the 98 percent of working-class citizens.

“We aren’t going to go silently while the top 2 percent walk away with the American dream,” Edwards said.



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange

Top Stories

12 comments on "From Street Protests to Electioneering, Frustrated Liberals Rising"

hfqpxuye

dwcdxy , [url=http://dbnotgbnhnuf.com/]dbnotgbnhnuf[/url], [link=http://nilbobyhtexh.com/]nilbobyhtexh[/link], http://uzipfkpqxrkq.com/

94IeGK ictuxolxvgzc

I suppose that suonds and smells just about right.

Will Murray

October 08, 2011 3:17pm

It's interesting that this article mentions homeless people in it, since there seem to be less people in this "Occupy" movement so far than there are homeless people in the cities where these demonstrations are happening right now. People walk by the homeless every, single day, and really no large group of people seems to care much about the homeless. Unless this movement gets much, much larger, it will go the way of the homeless...unnoticed & uncared for.

As for demonstrations ending wars (like Iraq or even Vietnam), people need to check their history. Saying that the demonstrations against the Iraq War before it began in 2003 led to the USA getting out of Iraq in 2010-11 is like saying that the demonstrations against the Vietnam War in the late 1960s ended U.S. involvement in that War by 1975, when the side that we were backing finally lost to the North...that's not the way those cookies crumbled. The Iraq War became unpopular because it was carried out recklessly & without merit in the end, and those things that happened *after* the War was started are what really turned the nation's opinion against that needless War. One can pat one's self on the back for being right about the Iraq War in the first place in 2002-03, but one can't rightfully say that one ended the Iraq War some 7+ years later after protesting it in the first place. It just doesn't work that way.

Protesting is mostly an over-rated enterprise that seems more to satisfy the personal, emotional needs of protesters than anything else.

Kathy Gardner Hayes

October 06, 2011 6:50am

Yes Sandro...I agree.

BILL VOM WEG

October 05, 2011 10:32pm

PRODUCTION IS IN THE SYSTEM. WE HAVE A MANAGEMENT PROBLEM AT THE TOP. NO REAL CHOICE IS PRESENTED UNDER THE CURRENT 2 PARTY SYSTEM BOTH OF WHICH ARE CONTROLLED BY THE POWERS THAT BE. ADDING A 3 RD PARTY WILL ONLY MAKE THE SITUATION WORSE.

THE MOST EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE WAY WE CAN EVOLVE OUR SOCIETAL INSTITUTIONS TO GOVERNMENT OF, BY AND FOR THE PEOPLE IS BY ONE 6 YEAR TERM LIMITS FOR ALL OUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES/MANAGERS. EVEN THE POWERS THAT BE WOULD BE BETTER OFF BECAUSE FREE PEOPLE PRODUCE MORE, KEEP MORE AND SHARE MORE.

george r

October 04, 2011 9:35pm

Face it. The endless wars are immoral. They divert tax dollars from Americas needs. Jobs, infrastructure etc. The unemployment is criminal. Years ago Joseph McCarthy had a communist witchhunt. Maybe its time we had a witchunt for people going against the interest of the American citizen. Tea Partiers have infiltrated our government. I suggest we have an unamerican activities committee and investigate who finances them and run them out of office and back to wherever they came from.

Angel J. Perea

October 04, 2011 1:04pm

Keeping it honest: Remember the Movie: “Wall Street?” Isn’t Greed supposed to be NOT good?
So many news articles stating that American protesters have “no clear “agenda? It seems crystal clear to the middle class America that they are frustrated by the lack of concern that exists for the people in this country who need jobs and hope to support themselves and families.
Millions of unemployed people looking for work in this country are being ignored and slowly erased by mega-corporations whose only concern is for their obscene profits far exceed anyone’s understanding!
The beauty and treasured tradition of America allows people the freedom to unite and speak out to draw attention to these huge social injustices. It’s about time that Americans did and said, “we are mad as hell and we are not going take it any longer!”
For the record, “Greed is Not good”; it’s ugly, selfish, obscene and destructive for our society. After all, We are a still a democracy, not aristocracy! Just look around this great county!

" It's no surprise that the Romney campaign and his republicans buddies in the Congress are raising money from Wall Street by saying they want to repeal consumer protections sand allow Wall Street to write its own rules," KEEPING IT HONEST: Wall Street, a key contributor to Obama in 2008, seems to be switching allegiances.
" Hum.. I wonder why? Maybe the gang on Wall Street does not wish to alienate “their” representatives? Mr. Boehner, Cantor, McCarthy and Ryan and Senator McConnell and his 43 obstructionists in the senate that are provided their campaign funds! After all, this same Wall Street Gang were the direct recipients of trillion dollar tax payer bailout with no conditions and used it some of it for bonuses! According to Senator Bernie Sanders, it is now clear that the Republicans /hypocrites made pledges that they are for their “only” plan of continuing its Class War against the middle Class to protect their rich Millionaires on Wall street and Billions like the Gover Norquest, Russ Limbaugh, Rupert Murdock and others like the Koch Brothers that provide them their campaign funds! Their plan was never about creating American jobs for the unemployed middle class! LET'S PUBLICLY LIST THE NAME OF EVERY POLITICIAN AND WALL STREET GIVER SO AMERICAN CAN KNOW WHO IS ON "TAKE" AND SELLING MIDDLE AMERICA OUT!

Smallbear

October 05, 2011 7:37pm

Reply to Angel Perea:

The two most devastating lines to come out of Hollywood movies in the recent past:

"Greed is good." The evil in this one is pretty obvious.

"Build it and they will come."

This is the heart and soul of supply-side economics. Because of it, we now have thousands of empty houses and retail shops that no one can afford to buy or use, and millions of Americans out of work and up to their eyeballs in debt.

RobertMStahl

October 04, 2011 11:44am

Also, there needs to be a PAPER TRAIL with any electronic VOTING apparatus.

Sandro Camarao
Lake Mary, FL
October 04, 2011 10:13am

Here we go again. It becomes another game of us vs. them. Can we come to the realization that the campaign system is structured and capitalized to put in candidates that will serve special interest, corporate objectives. ITs not about Republicans and Democrats. Its about corporate politicians vs. people politicians. Until we change the campaigning and lobbying policies in Washington this "liberal" effort is useless. I'm a Liberal ready to vote for Ron Paul.

Obama is clearly a corporate politician talking to the people's cause and acting for the corporate cause