Keith Ellison
Published: Sunday 23 September 2012
“The American public provided hundreds of billions to bailout Wall Street during the global fiscal crisis yet bore the brunt of the crisis with lost jobs and reduced household wealth.”

Tax Wall Street to Restore Main Street

Article image

Almost 30 nations have some form of a financial transaction tax and the U.S. had a similar tax from 1914 until 1966. The United Kingdom has had a tax on stock trades for decades – the same rate proposed in HR 6411 – and their volume of trading has grown robustly. Supporters of a form of financial transactions tax include business leaders such as Microsoft founder Bill Gates, Dallas Mavericks’ owner Mark Cuban, and Berkshire Hathaway chairman and CEO Warren Buffet.

The American public provided hundreds of billions to bailout Wall Street during the global fiscal crisis yet bore the brunt of the crisis with lost jobs and reduced household wealth. This is a phenomenally wealthy nation, yet our tax and regulatory system allowed the financial titans to amass great riches while impoverishing the systems that enable inclusive prosperity. A financial transaction tax protects our financial markets from speculation and provides the revenue needed to invest in the education, health and communities of the American people.

These funds could be used to strengthen America’s families, communities and economy by supporting state and federal investments that improve our health, rebuild our crumbling physical infrastructure, and create good jobs.

Because stock and bond markets are computerized adding a tax would be easy to track and enforce and tough to evade. The tax also would make high frequency trading unprofitable, which could reduce the excess speculation on commodities like food and gasoline that has caused their prices to escalate.



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange

Top Stories

7 comments on "Tax Wall Street to Restore Main Street"

McullenNE

September 25, 2012 8:20pm

Great idea Keith and I am proud I voted for you.

Factkneader

September 23, 2012 10:43pm

How about a $500K head tax for industrial lobbyists. This might reduce the profit incentive to mob the congress. They could wear a license tag on a collar around their necks so we could easily identify those who wish to write the laws redistributing wealth upward.

larronm

September 23, 2012 11:48am

The idea of a financial transaction tax is a reasonable and proven concept. It would reduce the volume of computer generated trades which roil markets and accomplish nothing. Reducing speculative trading can only help with market stability. If they feel the need to gamble, they can always jump aboard their private jet and head off to Vegas, or Atlantic City, or Monaco.
The US economy is 70% consumer spending. The more wealth is redistributed upward into fewer and fewer hands, the less is available for consumers to spend and power the economy. What is even more disturbing is that when wealth is redistributed downward into the hands of people who will spend it, even the rich do better. Make no mistake, when governments tax they are redistributing wealth. The only question is to whom?

belleville

September 23, 2012 10:05am

I think rewriting the Tax Code would be better. We need 20 Brackets to $20Million with a top marginal rate of 60%. That would certainly hit Norquist in the Head. To appease the Romney statement of 47% don't pay any Federal income tax, start the rates at 3% for income of $0-$20K, 6% for $20K-$40K, 9% for $40K-$60K, 12% for $60K-$80K, 15% for $80K-$100K, 21% for $100K-$150K, 24% for $150K-$200K, 27% for $200K-$$300K, 30% for $300K-$400K, 33% for $400K-$500K, 36% for $500K-$1Mil, 39% for $1Mil-$2Mil, 42% for $2Mil-$3Mil, 45% for $3Mil-$4Mil, 48% for $4Mil-$5Mil, 51% for $5Mil-$8Mil, 54% for $8Mil-$12Mil, 57% for $12Mil-$20Mil, 60% for $20Mil and UP. Now that is "Fair and Balanced".

dville

September 23, 2012 9:52am

Why not? That is an excellent course to pursue....the bite wouldn't even be noticed except for the Republicans/conservatives that do not want any new taxes. With the enormous activity on Wall Street it would sure put a dent in our starving coffers.

mamabashums

September 23, 2012 9:49am

Lets not stop there why not a foreclosure tax double the amount owed to the state in back property taxes. We should never allow the banks and wallstreet
have this happen again. So add an eminent domain law so the State can raffle off the house and make a hugh profit to sustain our way of life NOBODY WANT TO GO BACKWARDS IN QUALITY OF LIFE AS YOU WILL SEE IN THE COMING YEARS MORE STRESS RELATED DEATHS. sO YES A TRANSACTION TAX FORECLOSURE LAW CHANGES AND EMINENT DOMAIN LAWS ENFORCED IS AGOOD START.

Capn Canard

September 23, 2012 7:33am

Good idea but the Banksters will cry and Grover Norquist's head is likely to explode. And that is something I would gladly pay a tax to see.