Three Ways Big Oil Spends Its Profits to Defend Oil Subsidies and Defeat Clean Energy

Rebecca Leber
Climate Progress / News Report
Published: Thursday 25 October 2012
The House of Representatives is the most anti-environment in Congressional history, averaging at least one anti-environment vote per day to eliminate or undermine pollution protections, many benefiting Big Oil.
Article image

Starting tomorrow, the world’s largest oil companies — ExxonMobil, Shell, Chevron, BP, and ConocoPhillips — will begin to announce their third-quarter profits for 2012. In the first half of 2012, these companies — all ranked in the top 10 of Fortune 500 Global — earned over $60 billion.

The oil industry reinvests tens of millions of these dollars for political purposes, including nearly all political contributions to Republicans, lobbying, and campaign ads. Through its enormous spending, these five and other Big Oil companies have fought to maintain $4 billion of their annual subsidies, while seeking to undermine clean energy investments:

$105 Million On Lobbying Since 2011, 90 Percent Of Campaign Contributions To GOP:  The big five companies have spent over $105 million on lobbying Congress since 2011, according to lobbying disclosures through the third quarter. The biggest spenders were Shell ($25.7 million), Exxon ($25.4 million), and ConocoPhillips ($22.9 million). The five companies’ oil PACs have donated over $2.16 million to mostly Republican candidates this election cycle. Koch Industries also spends big money to pressure Congress, with $16.2 million on lobbying and more than $1.3 million from its PAC (the top oil and gas spender). In total, the oil and gas industry sends 90 percent of its near $50 million in contributions to Republicans, far eclipsing their record spending in 2008.

Misinformation Campaigns, Including Over $150 Million In Election Ads:
Over $150 million has been spent on TV ads promoting fossil fuel interests, particularly oil and coal, reports the New York Times. In addition to traditional campaign donations, the oil industry has turned to outside groups running attack ads. Earlier this year, Americans For Prosperity — founded and funded by the Koch brothers — launched a bogus ad claiming that clean energy stimulus dollars went overseas. And the oil lobby American Petroleum Institute has its own campaign promoting myths about oil production and gas prices. For example, API chief Jack Gerard, rumored to be on Mitt Romney’s shortlist for a White House or agency appointment, claimed that oil production on federal land is down. This is simply not true, since oil production is up 240 million barrels on federal lands and waters under President Obama compared to the Bush administration. And oil companies hold 20 million acres of federal oil, gas leases in Gulf of Mexico that remain unexplored or undeveloped. This is just one of the many myths Big Oil has pushed this campaign cycle.

Behind-The-Scenes Campaign To Defeat Clean Energy: Koch Industries and fossil fuel groups are mobilizing to defeat the extension of modest tax incentives for wind energy, even though oil tax breaks are permanent. The American Energy Alliance, which has Koch ties, aims to make the credit “so toxic” for Republicans it would be “impossible for John Boehner to sit at a table with Harry Reid.” The Koch-funded Americans For Prosperity is also campaigning against wind energy. Meanwhile, the industry has argued its own century-old tax breaks are necessary to maintain, despite years of record-breaking profits.

Overall, these efforts to keep their tax breaks while weakening public health safeguards from pollution have paid off in Congress and for Republican candidates. The House of Representatives is the most anti-environment in Congressional history, averaging at least one anti-environment vote per day to eliminate or undermine pollution protections, many benefiting Big Oil. And the Romney/Ryan budget plan would give the big five oil companies another $2.3 billion annual tax cut beyond existing loopholes.

After the big five companies’ second quarter profits, ThinkProgress calculated what a typical 24 hours looks like for the oil industry:



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange

Top Stories

5 comments on "Three Ways Big Oil Spends Its Profits to Defend Oil Subsidies and Defeat Clean Energy"

jackwenayscott's picture
jackwenayscott
WA
October 25, 2012 6:24pm

When I was born, the environment of the world was in pretty good shape, and by 1971 Earth Day was declared because it was obvious that the world's environment was rapidly deteriorating. But, now Evil has taken over. You think it's lobbyist money or that television show-business does what they do as whores, this is not true. By 1980 all of the entertainment-television industry had gone Satanic, as they still are today. Now, looking at the political landscape, it looks like the human will put paid to Earth, killing it almost for sure. Get a grip, not only does the 150 million go to television, the 105 million given to congress also goes to the entertainment-news empire for political TV ads! Check out who's finally getting the money to determine who really has all the power!

Grandma in WA

October 25, 2012 1:13pm

I am 78 years old and from when I was only four years old I remember my father saying "Money talks"! Of course that was only a colloquialism of the time that meant exclusively “You can get what you want if you paid enough money for it!” However, now that I am a mature, well educated and experienced adult, I know the difference between speech and money. However, our current Supreme Court Justice Scalia (who naively took the old colloquial expression literally) has ruled that "money is speech". This gross distortion coupled with another of his gross distortions; i.e., "Corporations are people" has encouraged and made legal an infinite amount of money (that could total billions of dollars or more) that U.S. Corporations can contribute to U.S. elected members of our U.S. Congress to assure adoption of their preferred policies and legislation. Our Supreme Court voted that their action is protected by our Constitutional freedom of speech proviso. As a result, the Corporations' massive amounts of money funneled through an inordinately large number of lobbyists to our members of Congress "speaks" so loudly that the voices of ordinary U.S. citizens are not heard or ignored by our elected Representatives and Senators. This is not Democracy (government by the people). It is a form of Plutocracy (government by the wealthy). This is the insidious compelling and all powerful force that is the real problem causing the gridlock we have been experiencing in our U.S. Congress. I respectfully submit that nothing is going to improve in Washington D.C. until this crippling situation is changed. And, the ONLY way it can be changed is to take the money out of American politics. To make this change, because our Supreme Court approved what Justice Scalia maintains, we must amend our U.S. Constitution. The basic Amendment is set forth in http://signon.org/sign/take-money-out-of-politics - so click on this link or paste it into your browser and see if you would like to sign the petition. Enough signatures are needed to get a two thirds vote in both our House of Representatives and Senate. Again - http://signon.org/sign/take-money-out-of-politics.

clefman

October 25, 2012 1:00pm

We have paid subsidies to small farmers to help them reach parity with the larger producers. I can see no further justification for oil subsidies to producers already making obscene amounts of money by artificially manipulating gas prices.....For that matter I see no defense of the entire lobbyist system.

We constantly hear of our congressmen falling prey to unscrupulous monied interests. Why do we allow these moneymen to haunt the halls of congress? We constantly bemoan this practice, but we refuse to do anything about it. We appear to enjoy the incessant scandals of our "representatives" caught with their hands in the cookie jar. We seem to enjoy electing, not people who want to do things for us, but a new set of hands for the big cookie jar. It will go on as long as we choose to look the other way.

We were once famously admonished to "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain". Apparently, we've taken that to heart, especially if he's wearing a $1000 suit!

Sunflowerbio

October 25, 2012 10:31am

I, for one, would like to see a carbon tax, the proceeds to be used to subsidize renewable energy production and research on and the creation of an infrastructure to transition to a hydrogen economy. This would be a real energy policy.

Grandma in WA

October 25, 2012 1:09pm

E85 Ethanol and Biodiesel would be necessary to transition to Hydrogen Fuel Cells. The complete transition would take 20 or 30 years to complete the entire change. In other words, E85 and Biodiesel would be decreasingly consumed as Hydrogen Fuel Cells would be increasingly implemented. This transition would be the only economically and physically viable way to completely eliminate fossil fuels for private and commercial ground transportation. As to aircraft propelled by jet engines, algae is already a proven alternative to fossil jet fuel. All of this has been presented to our Congress for years but of course our Plutocracy has chosen to favor fossil fuels (especially oil) and will continue to do so until the supply is not sufficient to provide the enormous profits enjoyed by the plutocrats currently in command of our Congress. If you would like to pursue further the much needed elimination of fossil fuels, please click on or copy and paste into your browser - http://signon.org/sign/take-money-out-of-politics