Three Ways the Obama Administration Could Help the Housing Market
It is hardly a secret that the Obama administration’s programs to bolster the housing market and help struggling homeowners have failed to meet expectations — Obama admitted so himself last year, when he said his administration was “going back to the drawing board” to expand those programs. The slow progress in housing, as the New York Times detailed today, has “remained a millstone” around the economy’s neck, even though the programs have helped millions of homeowners: the Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP) and Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) have helped more than 3.6 million people refinance or modifyexisting loans.
More homeowners have received assistance through reforms and changes made to the private modification and refinancing process, and even more are sure to benefit from the $25-billion mortgage settlement between large banks and the federal government and state attorneys generals reached this year. But even as the housing market has begun to show signs of life in recent months, there are ways in which Congress and the administration could help boost the housing market right now:
Pay for principal reductions: Edward DeMarco, the acting director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, recently turned down an offer from the Obama administration to help pay for principal reductions on loans backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. DeMarco’s primary concern is price; his agency has approved principal reductions in the past when someone other than Fannie and Freddie fronted the whole bill. So the Treasury Department can bypass this hangup by offering to pay for certain principal reductions in full, as the Center for American Progress’ John Griffith has written. This could help hundreds of thousands of underwater homeowners avoid foreclosure and would not require any new funding, thanks to unspent funds from HAMP and the Treasury’s Hardest Hit Fund.
Streamline existing refinancing programs: Streamlining and better utilizing two programs already in existence — the Home Affordable Refinancing Program and the Federal Housing Administration’s Short Refinance program — could further aid the housing market. Small changes that, again, would not cost taxpayers more money could be made to HARP and the Short Refi program tomake refinancings available to more homeowners, helping some of the millions of underwater homeowners that are locked in at above-market rates by reducing their mortgage payments by an average of $2,600 a year.
Seek new ways to increase refinancings: Roughly 3.2 million underwater homeowners are current on their monthly payments but cannot refinance to today’s historically low rates, simply because their loans are ineligible for current government programs. Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Jeff Merkley(D-OR) have each proposed new programs that seek to help these borrowers refinance, and the Obama administration has indicated that it would consider both proposals. President Obama proposed a program similar to Feinstein’s in his three-pronged refinancing plan earlier this year, while Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said that he’d like to work with Merkley to test the proposalthrough a pilot program, assuming they have the legal authority to do so.
While Obama’s programs haven’t succeeded the way he hoped, he hasn’t received much help from congressional Republicans, who have consistently and repeatedly blocked efforts to address the housing crisis. Obama, at least, has attempted to help the housing market, something House Republicans can’t say: their budget, in fact, would derail the recent progressthe housing market has made. The nation’s biggest banks haven’t helped either, usingpredatory and often illegal practices to foreclose on a countless number of homeowners, prolonging the pain the housing crisis has caused.
CONNECT














5 comments on "Three Ways the Obama Administration Could Help the Housing Market"
August 22, 2012 6:14pm
TAX THE RICH
August 21, 2012 2:37pm
SOLUTION TO THE HOUSING CRISIS
In late 2006 I had advocated a simple solution for the housing crises, but that would have required the banks and their investors to face reality. That solution was to adjust the mortgages to current appraised value.
If that had been done, there would have been an initial shock to the bank's assets but the banks would have been far better off in the long run, eliminating most foreclosures and short sales that seem to have no end today, as prices continue to decline.
Here is an example:
A person bought a home for 200K with a mortgage of 180K. The appraised value became 100K. Without a reduction in the mortgage, that person walked. As a foreclosed property, the bank can only sell for 90K. The value of the home is now under the former appraisal.
It gets worse. The next comparable home is for sale for 90K but can only sell for 80K. The bank gets it back and sells it for even less. A downward spiral. That is what has happened in this market.
(This is an actual true example here. Not speculation.)
If my plan had been adopted, the owner would have stayed in his home. No foreclosures and the prices would once again have begun to rise because the market would have stabilized.
PS: I have since added an incentive for the banks: After reducing the mortgage to current market value, re-appraise the home every 2 years
(up to a 3x - 6 years - maximum). 50% of any increase in value can be added to the mortgage.
August 21, 2012 2:03pm
I have to wonder what planet these figures come from. I especially love the claim that " even more are sure to benefit from the $25-billion mortgage settlement between large banks and the federal government". What nonsense. There have not been 3.5 million helpful modifications and refinances for the victims of the crash. The certainly may have been millions of re-finances for houses which took advantage of the drops in interest rates but underwater mortgages - phooey. It continues to this day that Modifications are based on the ability of the homeowner to pay the existing mortgage as is. THEN the Bank will "Maybe" alter the interest rate (adding in any fees and delinquent amounts) so that the fix is "Maybe" a couple of hundred dollars. More often the fix is to have a trial period for 5 months or so and then re-do the interest rate again or deny the fix altogether. The figures for ACTUAL help via all the programs is 300,000 out of 3.5 million underwater and/or delinquent. And the $25 Billion settlement - the maximum for displaced homeowners ILLEGALLY evicted is $2,500. Several State have raided the funds for their State Budgets.
3 things Obama COULD do that would FIX the economy - 1- Stop all foreclosures. 2- force all the lenders to write down the values of the houses and re-mortgage at actual rates and lowest interest, or lose the contract entirely. 3- Break up the Biggest 12 banks and separate uninsured Investments from insured savings (ie. Glass Steagall)
August 21, 2012 12:30pm
Force the banks to renogiate all outstanding mortgages based on realistic values of homes. The banks could have done this from day ONE. Instead they stood firm and witnessed the huge decline in home values.
No common sense there except the banks believed they were all powerful.
Look at the mess the BANKS created by being stubborn. They should hire people who will understand the people willing to pay within their means.
Banks are replete with $$$$
August 21, 2012 7:25am
It is WAR Get our every voter Survival
VOTE FOR PEACE AND SUCCESS-SAVE OUR MIDDLE CLASS
1945 to 1980 were Great growth years of the Middle Class
Affordable Housing via local Savings and Loan
Affordable Health Care via company insurance coverage
Affordable education via GI Bill
THEN 1980-2009—What a Change!!!
Three Republican presidents for 20 years
Initiated our involvement in 10 foreign conflicts in which hundreds of thousands of
innocents lost their lives.
Had 5 stock market crashes in 20 years
Took Carter record 218,000 jobs created per month down to 99,000
Took a 600B Budget to 3500B (less wjc itsy bitsy)
Took a 1000B Debt to 10,000B
Took a surplus to 1400B Deficit
Destroyed the great Savings and Loan Industry that had financed millions of affordable homes for the middle class.
Destroyed the local owned banking system by Repeal of Glass Steagall whereby today 10 Too Big To Fail hold 80% of all deposits in about 7000 banks. Monopoly?
Destroyed our great housing industry by allowing predator toxic loans labeled Triple A to be created and sold world wide by profiteering banks. One of all time great disasters.
Created a Modernization of Commodities Bill that freed Wall Street to become Casino Derivative of America or a bigger gambling Casino than Las Vegas.
How do We get back to 1945-1980 success for the Middle Class? Today top 10% own 73% of Net Wealth—83% Financial Wealth and get 50% of Individual Income.
It can be done via the tax code, get money out of elections, elect those who promise to be Fair protecting programs that aid the Middle Class, invest in growth and jobs in America not around the world. Clarence swinney