Top Defense Oversight Staffer Received $1.6 Million Payout From Lockheed Martin
A former executive for the Pentagon’s top defense contractor collected $1.66 million in salary, consulting fees and retirement pay from two top defense contractors last year before becoming the Republican chief of staff for the Senate Armed Services Committee in February.
The appointment is the second by a Republican member of either the House or Senate Armed Services committee to provoke criticism from independent groups that consider it a conflict of interest.
Ann Elise Sauer, who was appointed to her present job by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., worked for more than a decade as a vice president and lobbyist for Lockheed Martin before leaving in Jan. 2011, according to a financial disclosure she made to the Secretary of the Senate in April.
In 2011, she was paid a salary and bonus totaling $660,390, deferred compensation of $769,574, and $232,872 labeled as “retired pay” on the financial disclosure form. Lockheed is the Defense Department’s largest corporate contractor, earning $28.3 billion, or 61 percent, of its sales from the department in 2011, according to the company’s annual report.
Sauer then worked as a consultant and analyst for BAE Systems, earning $55,000 from the firm, according to her financial disclosure form. BAE is the Pentagon’s ninth largest contractor.
The Project on Government Oversight’s Ben Freeman said Thursday that Sauer’s appointment to the principal Senate committee tasked with overseeing all military spending and contracting creates a huge conflict of interest.
“$1.6 million — that gives a lot of reasons to remember your former employer,” said Freeman, who specializes in defense contracting issues for POGO. “When you’ve been working for a company for 10 years and then just last year you got $1.6 million, I have to think that affects your decision making.”
Sauer’s LinkedIn page shows she served on various McCain political campaigns from 1998 through 2008. This won’t be her first turn on the Armed Services Committee; she worked there as a professional staff member in the late 1970s. She then worked as a legislative assistant and legislative director on McCain’s staff in the 1990s.
In an emailed statement, McCain spokesman Brian Rogers said Sauer’s appointment as Republican staff director on the Armed Services Committee is on a “stop-gap, temporary, one-year basis.” He also noted that, although she received $1.6 million in compensation last year, Sauer holds no stock in Lockheed Martin.
Her former employer has repeatedly drawn the ire of government watchdogs, most recently for its work on the problem-plagued F-35 and F-22 jet fighters. The Center wrote in June about the latest of those troubles, including $1 billion in cost overruns on four early production contracts for the F-35; it is the single most costly military program in U.S. history. A spokesperson for Lockheed Martin did not return request for comment on Sauer’s appointment.
Sauer is not alone in taking a key job — and a major pay cut — to work on Capitol Hill helping oversee federal contracts with a former employer. Last year, when Northrop Grumman lobbyist Thomas MacKenzie joined the House Armed Services Committee, he held between $100,000 and $250,000 of stock in his former company, according to his own financial disclosure to the House Clerk.
Claude Chasin, the committee spokesman, did not immediately respond to questions about the appointment. But Robert Lee Simmons II, staff director of the House Armed Services Committee, told a reporter for Hearst newspapers in June that MacKenzie, who runs the staff for the subcommittee on seapower and projection forces, is "the kind of person we would want to have in his job. We are lucky to have Tom.
Craig Holman, a lobbyist at the nonprofit watchdog group Public Citizen, had a different view. He told both POGO and the Center that “it’s not uncommon for a senior K Street lobbyist to have a quarter of a million dollars tucked away in stock. But it is uncommon for someone who is a congressional staffer. This poses a very serious conflict of interest.”

Reprinted by permission from iWatch News
CONNECT













5 comments on "Top Defense Oversight Staffer Received $1.6 Million Payout From Lockheed Martin"
July 31, 2012 1:33pm
Even within the confines of military logic (if that's not an oxymoron), the F-35 is a black hole for taxpayer's money and unnecessary and far too complex. The sad truth is that the future of offensive fighters is about drones (and we have yet to really address the moral implications of that). Take the pilot out of the airplane, and the price per unit drops significantly. The performance of the airplane improves by a quantum leap and it's ability against manned fighters is trump that cannot be matched. Sadly, we will still be saddled with companies like Lockheed/Martin that will find new and creative ways to keep the American taxpayers strapped to the rack while we gird for new and better enemies in nations full of "those" people.
WA
July 30, 2012 7:04pm
you like money? Do you like BIG money? These petty-cake million dollar appointments are just the tip of the iceberg, the really big money AND political influence is with The Evil Entertainment Empire. Here we have the basic issue again, a few large entities (such as Senators or the President, or oil or coal or car companies) who compete at the top, shoving aside the population, which People can't seem to get their say in. Fine for television, see, there's limited air time for commercials, so if a few large companies or a few politicians are competing, bidding up the publicity war, and thereby bidding up the price of the commercial time, it means mega-bucks roll into L.A. every day, from every side! What happens if large energy companies are REPLACED by such as roof-top Solar? The big companies deflate, people have power over their own electricity, and the big advertising money evaporates! So do it! Install your home with Solar and Turn Off the TV but good!
July 30, 2012 5:51pm
We all know that this is common practice not just among Repubs but among the elite of both parties, who take care of corporate America and their own, as well as themselves. The corruption is so pervasive that it has ceased to be news that the Obama administration is heavy with Wall Streeters, and that they donated heavily to his campaign in 2008. We now return to that part of the Dem-Repub election cycle that focuses on one of the corrupt appointments of a current senator and past Repub candidate for Pres. Do you think this staffer gets minimum wage, and any benefits? I wonder who are the sleep-walkers paying for this. Do you think it possible that not just Repubs but Dems in high office, and their appointees, are actually part of the 1%! Impossible, ours is a democracy OF, BY and FOR the people. Surely the case example of this article is the exception and not the rule! Surely progressive who claim it is the rule are exaggerating!
July 30, 2012 12:06pm
24% of the USAmerican war budget...
That's what it would cost to implement a Global Plan-B -- to provide for every human's basic needs and clean up the damage caused to our environment by the latest 200 year fossil fueled experiment in "industrial growth"...
http://www.earth-policy.org/images/uploads/book_files/pb4book.pdf
For example, by cancelling this turkey now, the full projected cost of the F35 boondoggle over the next 20 years would by itself pay for 3 years of a GLOBAL Plan B...
July 30, 2012 11:15am
Now, that's the entrepreneurial spirit we need to get out of politics and government and put a lid on in the marketplace.