Published: Tuesday 20 November 2012
The plea agreement came unexpectedly on the second week of a trial that was expected to last for months.

 

In a trial closely watched by the insurance industry, Rhode Island attorney Joseph Caramadre and his former employee Raymour Radhakrishnan pleaded guilty today to charges that they conspired to steal the identities of the terminally ill.

ProPublica wrote about Caramadre's scheme last August in “Death Takes a Policy.” He recruited the terminally ill to sign up for products such as variable annuities and bonds that, upon the death of participants, could pay out handsome benefits to Caramadre, his family members and outside investors. Acting on Caramadre's behalf, Radhakrishnan signed up the people whose deaths would trigger the benefits.

Published: Monday 17 September 2012
“Occupy didn’t seem remarkable on September 17, 2011, and not a lot of people were looking at it when it was mostly young people heading for Manhattan’s Zuccotti Park.”

 

Occupy is now a year old.  A year is an almost ridiculous measure of time for much of what matters: at one year old, Georgia O’Keeffe was not a great painter, and Bessie Smith wasn’t much of a singer. One year into the Civil Rights Movement, the Montgomery Bus Boycott was still in progress, catalyzed by the unknown secretary of the local NAACP chapter and a preacher from Atlanta -- by, that is, Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr. Occupy, our bouncing baby, was born with such struggle and joy a year ago, and here we are, 12 long months later.

Occupy didn’t seem remarkable on September 17, 2011, and not a lot of people were looking at it when it was mostly young people heading for Manhattan’s Zuccotti Park. But its most remarkable aspect turned out to be its staying power: it didn’t declare victory or defeat and go home. It decided it was home and settled in for two catalytic months.

Tents and general assemblies and the acts, tools, and ideas of Occupy exploded across the nation and the western world from Alaska to New Zealand, and some parts of the eastern world -- Occupy Hong Kong was going strong until last week. For a while, it was easy to see that this baby was something big, but then most, though not all, of the urban encampments were busted, and the movement became something subtler. But don’t let them tell you it went away.

The most startling question anyone asked me last year was, “What is Occupy’s 10-year plan?”

Who takes the long view? Americans have a tendency to think of activism like a slot machine, and if it doesn’t come up three jailed bankers or three clear ...

Published: Saturday 25 August 2012
“Caramadre portrays himself as a modern-day Robin Hood.”

 

Joseph Caramadre has spent a lifetime scouring the fine print. He's hardwired to seek the angle, an overlooked clause in a contract that allows him to transform a company's carelessness into a personal windfall. He calls these insights his "creations," and he numbers them. There have been about 19 in his lifetime, he says. For example, there was number four, which involved an office superstore coupon he parlayed into enough nearly free office furniture to fill a three-car garage. Number three consisted of a sure-fire but short-lived system for winning money at the local dog track. But the one that landed him on the evening news as a suspect in a criminal conspiracy was number 18, which promised investors a unique arrangement: You can keep your winnings and have someone else cover your losses.

Caramadre portrays himself as a modern-day Robin Hood. He's an Italian kid from Providence, R.I., who grew up modestly, became a certified public accountant and then put himself through night school to get a law degree. He has given millions to charities and the Catholic Church. As he tells his life story, his native ability helps him outsmart a phalanx of high-priced lawyers, actuaries and corporate suits. Number 18 came to fruition, he says, when a sizable segment of the life insurance industry ignored centuries of experience and commonsense in a heated competition for market share.

Federal prosecutors in Rhode Island and insurance companies paint a very different picture of Caramadre: They say he's an unscrupulous con artist who engaged in identity theft, conspiracy and two different kinds of fraud. Prosecutors contend he deceived the terminally ill to make millions for himself and his clients. For them, Caramadre's can't-miss investment strategy was an illusion ...

Published: Thursday 28 June 2012
“This year there is a great deal of chaos and confusion regarding what is happening with the unprecedented wave of restrictive voting laws that has swept the nation since 2010.”

With the 2012 election just a few months away, organizers and voters are working in earnest to support ballot issues, community concerns, and political campaigns. 

This year there is a great deal of chaos and confusion regarding what is happening with the unprecedented wave of restrictive voting laws that has swept the nation since 2010. Understanding which laws are in effect and what it will mean for the November 2012 election is crucial.

One category of restrictive voting law that is especially important to navigate is voter ID requirements.

Since 2010, 10 states passed voter ID laws (Alabama, Kansas, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wisconsin). Although each law is restrictive they are each unique. They have varying enactment dates, some are waiting for pre-clearance under  READ FULL POST 5 COMMENTS

Published: Thursday 21 June 2012
Published: Monday 27 February 2012
“As the housing crisis lingers on with little sign of relief from the Feds, innovative state and local solutions like these are gaining adherents in other states.”
Published: Saturday 25 February 2012
Democrats are convinced that not only is the issue good policy, but that it it’s a message that appeals to middle-class voters and will help yield important victories in the November elections.

Roll Call reports that billionaire Warren Buffett has given his approval of the “Buffett Rule,” a bill introduced in Congress that would set at least a 30% tax rate for people  making more than $1 million a year. The bill was introduced by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI). Read Buffett’s words and Whitehouse’s response in the article below:

Billionaire Warren Buffett wrote to Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse  (D-R.I.) on Wednesday in support of the lawmaker’s bill to charge millionaires a 30 percent minimum tax rate, as Democrats look to spark a debate on taxes and inequality.

“I’m delighted to be identified as a supporter” of the bill, Buffett said in a letter to Whitehouse, according to a release from the Congressman’s office.

“I have no problem endorsing any large step in the direction of greater fairness in the tax code,” Buffett continued.

The idea, which is typically referred to as the Buffett Rule, was put forth by President Barack Obama in the State of the Union address last month when he called for legislation that would require individuals making more than $1 million a year to pay at least a 30 percent tax rate to put them on par with the percentage paid by most middle-class taxpayers.

Democrats are convinced that not only is the issue good policy, but that it it’s a message that appeals to middle-class voters and will help yield important victories in the November elections.

Whitehouse introduced his proposal earlier this month and a House version of the bill was introduced by Rep. 

Published: Monday 23 January 2012
“According to the data, only 10 ‘blue states’ were net recipients of federal subsidies, as opposed to 22 ‘red states.’”

We’ve all heard it: “Dress for the job you want, not the one you have.” I often wonder if the same logic applies to electoral politics. Though conflating “the political” with “the sartorial” isn’t at all my intention, I cannot help but believe that we vote for the lives we want, not the ones we have. Politics, broadly understood, helps to bridge the chasm between the immediate and the aspirational, to negotiate the oscillation of our material needs and our magical desires. To this end, I think there is sufficient evidence to argue that politics is what we do when metaphysics fails, what we do when transhistorical categories of supposed universality become unlaced.

So what exactly constitutes the ground for our political calculus? And what happens when voting for our future aspirations negates our current needs?

Traditional scholars in the field of political science often suggest that our unobstructed self interest (premised on rational choice theory) tends to produce policy preferences and electoral outcomes largely reflective of our material interests. Regrettably, however, according to a 2007 report published by the Tax Foundation entitled “Federal Spending Received Per Dollar Paid by State,” U.S. states that rely most heavily on federal subsidies for public programs routinely elect politicians who are determined to excoriate such funding sources. The articulation of policy preferences and, indeed, the creation and maintenance of a deeply democratic society are co-premised on free and equal access to reliable information, but even a cursory exegesis of the Tax Foundation data compels one to conclude that the particular states most dependent on aid from the federal government are the very same states whose residents voted overwhelmingly for John McCain in 2008. How could this be?

According to the data, only 10 ...

Syndicate content
Make your voice heard.
Write for NationofChange
The National Security Agency Part I - Shifting Historical Context Context One: It is 1971 and the...
Blog Two: Deadly Arguments--The Role of Guns There are few issues in U.S. society that are as...
So far, the biggest revelation of the NSA spying story is…that anyone actually thinks this story is...
Concluding Remarks This blog has introduced the major tool that underlies all of the arguments we...
The records of our phone calls being entered into computers at the NSA is a typical Patriot Act...
Last month, I argued why "America Must Intervene In Syria, Despite Lack of National Security...
In the wake of the Skagit River bridge collapse, which thankfully did not result in any deaths,...
Blog One: TAF--The Toulmin Argumentation Framework In 1958, the distinguished historian and...
At a recent DNC fundraiser 56- year old LGBTQ advocate Ellen Sturt heckled Michelle Obama  to ask...
Neal Boortz Part I - Some Background Information My wife and I have family in Barcelona, Spain,...
We information renegades have been fighting for free information and an open net free of censorship...
Breaking the Tyranny of “Either/Or Thinking” While I certainly do not believe that all...
What our presidents tell our young people In this season of college graduations, let us pause to...
A Native American boy asked his grandfather, “What do you think about the world today?...
As a linguist studying politics, I usually refrain from sharing any of my politic views in my...